1932

Abstract

Many theoretically based interventions have been developed over the past two decades to improve educational outcomes in higher education. Based in social-psychological and motivation theories, well-crafted interventions have proven remarkably effective because they target specific educational problems and the processes that underlie them. In this review, we evaluate the current state of the literature on targeted interventions in higher education with an eye to emerging theoretical and conceptual questions about intervention science. We review three types of interventions, which focus on the value students perceive in academic tasks, their framing of academic challenges, and their personal values, respectively. We consider interventions that () target academic outcomes (e.g., grades, major or career plans, course taking, retention) in higher education, as well as the pipeline to college, and () have been evaluated in at least two studies. Finally, we discuss implications for intervention science moving forward.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011725
2018-01-04
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/69/1/annurev-psych-122216-011725.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011725&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Acee TW, Weinstein CE. 2010. Effects of a value-reappraisal intervention on statistics students’ motivation and performance. J. Exp. Educ. 78:487–512 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aronson E. 1999. The power of self-persuasion. Am. Psychol. 54:875–84 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aronson J, Fried CB, Good C. 2002. Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38:113–25 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beigman Klebanov B, Burstein J, Harackiewicz JM, Priniski SJ, Mulholland M. 2017. Reflective writing about the utility value of science as a tool for increasing STEM motivation and retention—can AI help scale up. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. In press
  5. Blackwell LS, Trzesniewski KH, Dweck CS. 2007. Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Dev 78:246–63 [Google Scholar]
  6. Borman GD, Grigg J, Hanselman P. 2016. An effort to close achievement gaps at scale through self-affirmation. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 38:21–42 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowen NK, Wegmann KM, Webber KC. 2013. Enhancing a brief writing intervention to combat stereotype threat among middle-school students. J. Educ. Psychol. 105:427–35 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brady ST, Reeves SL, Garcia J, Purdie-Vaughns V, Cook JE. et al. 2016. The psychology of the affirmed learner: spontaneous self-affirmation in the face of stress. J. Educ. Psychol. 108:353–73 [Google Scholar]
  9. Browman AS, Destin M. 2016. The effects of a warm or chilly climate toward socioeconomic diversity on academic motivation and self-concept. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 42:172–87 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown E, Smith J, Thoman D, Allen J, Muragishi G. 2015. From bench to bedside: a communal utility value intervention to enhance students’ biomedical science motivation. J. Educ. Psychol. 107:1116–35 [Google Scholar]
  11. Canning EA, Harackiewicz JM. 2015. Teach it, don't preach it: the differential effects of directly-communicated and self-generated utility-value information. Motiv. Sci. 1:47–71 [Google Scholar]
  12. Canning EA, Harackiewicz JM, Priniski SP, Hecht CA, Tibbetts Y, Hyde JS. 2018. Improving performance and retention in introductory biology with a utility-value intervention. J. Educ. Psychol. In press
  13. Cohen GL, Garcia J, Apfel N, Master A. 2006. Reducing the racial achievement gap: a social-psychological intervention. Science 313:1307–10 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cohen GL, Garcia J, Purdie-Vaughns V, Apfel N, Brzustoski P. 2009. Recursive processes in self-affirmation: intervening to close the minority achievement gap. Science 324:400–3 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cohen GL, Sherman DK. 2014. The psychology of change: self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 65:333–71 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cole ER. 2009. Intersectionality and research in psychology. Am. Psychol. 64:170–80 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cook JE, Purdie-Vaughns V, Garcia J, Cohen GL. 2012. Chronic threat and contingent belonging: protective benefits of values affirmation on identity development. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 102:479–96 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dee TS. 2015. Social identity and achievement gaps: evidence from an affirmation intervention. J. Res. Educ. Eff. 8:149–68 [Google Scholar]
  19. Durik AM, Hulleman CS, Harackiewicz JM. 2015. One size fits some: Instructional enhancements to promote interest don't work the same for everyone. Interest in Mathematics and Science Learning KA Renninger, M Nieswandt, S Hidi 49–62 Washington, DC: Am. Educ. Res. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dweck CS. 1999. Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Philadelphia: Psychol. Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Eccles J, Adler T, Futterman R, Goff S, Kaczala C, Meece J. 1983. Expectations, values and academic behaviors. Perspective on Achievement and Achievement Motivation JT Spence 75–146 San Francisco: W. H. Freeman [Google Scholar]
  22. Eccles JS, Wigfield A. 2002. Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53:109–32 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gaspard H, Dicke A-L, Flunger B, Brisson BM, Häfner I. et al. 2015. Fostering adolescents’ value beliefs for mathematics with a relevance intervention in the classroom. Dev. Psychol. 51:1226–40 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hall NC, Perry RP, Goetz T, Ruthig JC, Stupnisky RH, Newall NE. 2007. Attributional retraining and elaborative learning: improving academic development through writing-based interventions. Learn. Individ. Differ. 17:280–90 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hanselman P, Bruch SK, Gamoran A, Borman GD. 2014. Threat in context: school moderation of the impact of social identity threat on racial/ethnic achievement gaps. Sociol. Educ. 87:106–24 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hanselman P, Rozek CS, Grigg J, Borman GD. 2017. New evidence on self-affirmation effects and theorized sources of heterogeneity from large-scale replications. J. Educ. Psychol. 109:405–24 [Google Scholar]
  27. Harackiewicz JM, Canning EA, Tibbetts Y, Giffen CJ, Blair SS. et al. 2014a. Closing the social class achievement gap for first-generation students in undergraduate biology. J. Educ. Psychol. 106:375–89 [Google Scholar]
  28. Harackiewicz JM, Canning EA, Tibbetts Y, Priniski SJ, Hyde JS. 2016a. Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: disentangling race and social class. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 111:745–65 [Google Scholar]
  29. Harackiewicz JM, Hulleman CS. 2010. The importance of interest: the role of achievement goals and task values in promoting the development of interest. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 4:42–52 [Google Scholar]
  30. Harackiewicz JM, Rozek CS, Hulleman CS, Hyde JS. 2012. Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: an experimental test of a utility-value intervention. Psychol. Sci. 23:899–906 [Google Scholar]
  31. Harackiewicz JM, Smith JL, Priniski SJ. 2016b. Interest matters: the importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 3:220–27 [Google Scholar]
  32. Harackiewicz JM, Tibbetts Y, Canning EA, Hyde JS. 2014b. Harnessing values to promote motivation in education. Advances in Motivation and Achievement SA Karabenick, TC Urden 71–105 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publ. Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  33. Haynes TL, Ruthig JC, Perry RP, Stupnisky RH, Hall NC. 2006. Reducing the academic risks of over-optimism: the longitudinal effects of attributional retraining on cognition and achievement. Res. High. Educ. 47:755–79 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hulleman CS, Cordray DS. 2009. Moving from the lab to the field: the role of fidelity and achieved intervention strength. J. Res. Educ. Eff. 2:88–110 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hulleman CS, Godes O, Hendricks BL, Harackiewicz JM. 2010. Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. J. Educ. Psychol. 102:880–95 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hulleman CS, Harackiewicz JM. 2009. Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science 326:1410–12 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hulleman CS, Kosovich JJ, Barron KE, Daniel DB. 2017. Making connections: replicating and extending the utility value intervention in the classroom. J. Educ. Psychol. 109:387–404 [Google Scholar]
  38. Jamieson JP, Peters BJ, Greenwood EJ, Altose AJ. 2016. Reappraising stress arousal improves performance and reduces evaluation anxiety in classroom exam situations. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 7:579–87 [Google Scholar]
  39. Johnson ML, Sinatra GM. 2013. Use of task-value instructional inductions for facilitating engagement and conceptual change. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 38:51–63 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kizilcec RF, Saltarelli AJ, Reich J, Cohen GL. 2017. Closing global achievement gaps in MOOCs: Brief interventions address social identity threat at scale. Science 355:251–52 [Google Scholar]
  41. Landau MJ, Oyserman D, Keefer LA, Smith GC. 2014. The college journey and academic engagement: how metaphor use enhances identity-based motivation. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 106:679–98 [Google Scholar]
  42. Layous K, Davis EM, Garcia J, Purdie-Vaughns V, Cook JE. et al. 2017. Feeling left out, but affirmed: protecting against the negative effects of low belonging in college. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 69:227–31 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lazowski RA, Hulleman CS. 2016. Motivation interventions in education: a meta-analytic review. Rev. Educ. Res. 86:602–40 [Google Scholar]
  44. Miyake A, Kost-Smith LE, Finkelstein ND, Pollock SJ, Cohen GL. et al. 2010. Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: a classroom study of values affirmation. Science 330:1234–37 [Google Scholar]
  45. O'Donnell CL. 2008. Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Rev. Educ. Res. 78:33–84 [Google Scholar]
  46. Paunesku D, Walton GM, Romero C, Smith EN, Yeager DS, Dweck CS. 2015. Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychol. Sci. 26:784–93 [Google Scholar]
  47. Perry RP, Chipperfield JG, Hladkyj S, Pekrun R, Hamm JM. 2014. Attribution-based treatment interventions in some achievement settings. Adv. Motiv. Achiev. 18:1–35 [Google Scholar]
  48. Perry RP, Hamm JM. 2017. An attribution perspective on competence and motivation: theory and treatment interventions. Handbook of Competence and Motivation: Theory and Application AJ Elliot, CS Dweck, DS Yeager 61–84 New York: Guilford Press, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  49. Perry RP, Stupnisky RH, Hall NC, Chipperfield JG, Weiner B. 2010. Bad starts and better finishes: attributional retraining and initial performance in competitive achievement settings. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 29:668–700 [Google Scholar]
  50. Pennebaker JW, Booth RJ, Francis ME. 2007. Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC. Software http://liwc.wpengine.com/
  51. Protzko J, Aronson J. 2016. Context moderates affirmation effects on the ethnic achievement gap. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 7:500–7 [Google Scholar]
  52. Ross L, Nisbett RE. 2011. The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology London: Pinter & Martin
  53. Rozek CS, Svoboda RC, Harackiewicz JM, Hulleman CS, Hyde JS. 2017. Utility-value intervention with parents increases students’ STEM preparation and career pursuit. PNAS 114:909–14 [Google Scholar]
  54. Schwartz DL, Cheng KM, Salehi S, Wieman C. 2016. The half empty question for socio-cognitive interventions. J. Educ. Psychol. 108:297–404 [Google Scholar]
  55. Sherman DK, Hartson KA, Binning KR, Purdie-Vaughns V, Garcia J. et al. 2013. Deflecting the trajectory and changing the narrative: how self-affirmation affects academic performance and motivation under identity threat. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 104:591–618 [Google Scholar]
  56. Shnabel N, Purdie-Vaughns V, Cook JE, Garcia J, Cohen GL. 2013. Demystifying values-affirmation interventions: Writing about social belonging is a key to buffering against identity threat. Personal. Soc. Psychol. B 39:663–76 [Google Scholar]
  57. Steele CM. 1988. The psychology of self-affirmation: sustaining the integrity of the self. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 21:261–302 [Google Scholar]
  58. Stephens NM, Fryberg SA, Markus HR, Johnson CS, Covarrubias R. 2012. Unseen disadvantage: how American universities' focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 102:1178–97 [Google Scholar]
  59. Stephens NM, Hamedani MG, Destin M. 2014. Closing the social-class achievement gap: A difference-education intervention improves first-generation students’ academic performance and all students’ college transition. Psychol. Sci. 25:943–53 [Google Scholar]
  60. Stephens NM, Townsend SS, Hamedani MG, Destin M, Manzo V. 2015. A difference-education intervention equips first-generation college students to thrive in the face of stressful college situations. Psychol. Sci. 26:1556–66 [Google Scholar]
  61. Thoman DB, Brown ER, Mason AZ, Harmsen AG, Smith JL. 2015. The role of altruistic values in motivating underrepresented minority students for biomedicine. BioScience 65:183–88 [Google Scholar]
  62. Thoman DB, Muragishi GA, Smith JL. 2017. Research microcultures as socialization contexts for underrepresented science students. Psychol. Sci. 28:760–73 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tibbetts Y, Harackiewicz JM, Canning EA, Boston JS, Priniski SJ. et al. 2016a. Affirming independence: exploring mechanisms underlying a values affirmation intervention for first-generation students. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 110:635–59 [Google Scholar]
  64. Tibbetts Y, Harackiewicz JM, Priniski SJ, Canning EA. 2016b. Broadening participation in the life sciences with social-psychological interventions. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 15:es4 [Google Scholar]
  65. Walton GM. 2014. The new science of wise psychological interventions. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23:73–82 [Google Scholar]
  66. Walton GM, Cohen GL. 2007. A question of belonging: race, social fit, and achievement. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 92:82–96 [Google Scholar]
  67. Walton GM, Cohen GL. 2011. A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes among minority students. Science 331:1447–51 [Google Scholar]
  68. Walton GM, Logel C, Peach JM, Spencer SJ, Zanna MP. 2015. Two brief interventions to mitigate a “chilly climate” transform women's experience, relationships, and achievement in engineering. J. Educ. Psychol. 107:468–85 [Google Scholar]
  69. Weiner B. 1974. Achievement Motivation and Attribution Theory Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press
  70. Wilson TD. 2006. The power of social psychological interventions. Science 313:1251–52 [Google Scholar]
  71. Wilson TD. 2011. Redirect: The Surprising New Science of Psychological Change New York: Little, Brown
  72. Wilson TD, Linville PW. 1982. Improving the academic performance of college freshmen: attribution therapy revisited. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 42:367–76 [Google Scholar]
  73. Wilson TD, Linville PW. 1985. Improving the performance of college freshmen with attributional techniques. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 49:287–93 [Google Scholar]
  74. Yeager DS, Henderson MD, Paunesku D, Walton GM, D'Mello S. et al. 2014. Boring but important: A self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 107:559–80 [Google Scholar]
  75. Yeager DS, Walton GM. 2011. Social-psychological interventions in education: They're not magic. Rev. Educ. Res. 81:267–301 [Google Scholar]
  76. Yeager DS, Walton GM, Brady ST, Akcinar EN, Paunesku D. et al. 2016. Teaching a lay theory before college narrows achievement gaps at scale. PNAS 113:E3341–48 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011725
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011725
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error