1932

Abstract

This commentary describes the concept of evidence-based public health, including the limitations of evidence. Increased attention to evidence may have numerous benefits for public health practice, including access to higher-quality information on what works, a higher likelihood of successful programs and policies being implemented, greater workforce productivity, and more efficient use of resources. To broaden thinking on the sources and scope of evidence, the three reviews in this symposium seek to () compare and contrast several evaluation designs that are alternatives to the randomized controlled trial; () describe two research approaches that are useful in addressing complex, multilevel public health issues (i.e., mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews); and () provide an overview of the value and approaches for generating practice-based evidence. These reviews highlight the complexity and interrelatedness of public health challenges, limitations of researcher-driven, quantitative approaches, and the need to broaden our current concepts of evidence.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-112613-011646
2014-03-18
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/publhealth/35/1/annurev-publhealth-112613-011646.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-112613-011646&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ammerman A, Smith T, Calancie L. 1.  2014. Practice-based evidence in public health: improving reach, relevance, and results. Annu. Rev. Public Health 3547–63
  2. Anderson LM, Brownson RC, Fullilove MT, Teutsch SM, Novick LF. 2.  et al. 2005. Evidence-based public health policy and practice: promises and limits. Am. J. Prev. Med. 28:226–30 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brownson RC, Baker EA, Leet TL, Gillespie KN, True WR. 3.  2011. Evidence-Based Public Health New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  4. Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Maylahn CM. 4.  2009. Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. Annu. Rev. Public Health 30:175–201 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cargo M, Mercer SL. 5.  2008. The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. Annu. Rev. Public Health 29:325–50 [Google Scholar]
  6. Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, Clegg Smith KC. 6.  2011. Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences Bethesda, MD: Off. Behav. Soc. Sci. Res., Natl. Inst. Health
  7. Diez-Roux AV. 7.  2000. Multilevel analysis in public health research. Annu. Rev. Public Health 21:171–92 [Google Scholar]
  8. Glasgow RE, Chambers D. 8.  2012. Developing robust, sustainable, implementation systems using rigorous, rapid and relevant science. Clin. Transl. Sci. 5:48–55 [Google Scholar]
  9. Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. 9.  2007. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu. Rev. Public Health 28:413–33 [Google Scholar]
  10. Glass TA, Goodman SN, Hernán MA, Samet JM. 10.  2013. Causal inference in public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 34:61–75 [Google Scholar]
  11. Glasziou P, Longbottom H. 11.  1999. Evidence-based public health practice. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 23:436–40 [Google Scholar]
  12. Green LW, Nasser M. 12.  2012. Furthering dissemination and implementation research: the need for more attention to external validity. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice RC Brownson, GA Colditz, EK Proctor 305–26 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  13. Green LW, Glasgow RE. 13.  2006. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval. Health Prof. 29:126–53 [Google Scholar]
  14. Green LW, Ottoson JM, Garcia C, Hiatt RA. 14.  2009. Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 30:151–74 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hausman AJ. 15.  2002. Implications of evidence-based practice for community health. Am. J. Community Psychol. 30:453–67 [Google Scholar]
  16. Higgins JW, Strange K, Scarr J, Pennock M, Barr V. 16.  et al. 2011. “It's a feel. That's what a lot of our evidence would consist of”: public health practitioners' perspectives on evidence. Eval. Health Prof. 34:278–96 [Google Scholar]
  17. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. 17.  1998. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 19:173–202 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kerner JF. 18.  2008. Integrating research, practice, and policy: what we see depends on where we stand. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 14:193–98 [Google Scholar]
  19. Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Glasgow RE. 19.  2008. Review of external validity reporting in childhood obesity prevention research. Am. J. Prev. Med. 34:216–23 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kohatsu ND, Melton RJ. 20.  2000. A health department perspective on the Guide to Community Preventive Services. Am. J. Prev. Med. 18:3–4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kohatsu ND, Robinson JG, Torner JC. 21.  2004. Evidence-based public health: an evolving concept. Am. J. Prev. Med. 27:417–21 [Google Scholar]
  22. Luke DA, Harris JK. 22.  2007. Network analysis in public health: history, methods, and applications. Annu. Rev. Public Health 28:69–93 [Google Scholar]
  23. Luke DA, Stamatakis KA. 23.  2012. Systems science methods in public health: dynamics, networks, and agents. Annu. Rev. Public Health 33:357–76 [Google Scholar]
  24. McQueen DV. 24.  2001. Strengthening the evidence base for health promotion. Health Promot. Int. 16:261–68 [Google Scholar]
  25. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D. 25.  2001. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 285:1987–91 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pluye P, Hong QN. 26. 2014 Combining the power of stories and the power of numbers: mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews. Annu. Rev. Public Health 3529–45
  27. Rimer BK, Glanz DK, Rasband G. 27.  2001. Searching for evidence about health education and health behavior interventions. Health Educ. Behav. 28:231–48 [Google Scholar]
  28. Rychetnik L, Frommer M, Hawe P, Shiell A. 28.  2002. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 56:119–27 [Google Scholar]
  29. Sanson-Fisher R, D'Este C, Carey M, Noble N, Paul C. 29.  2014. Evaluation of system-oriented public health interventions: alternative research designs. Annu. Rev. Public Health 359–27
  30. Sanson-Fisher RW, Bonevski B, Green LW, D'Este C. 30.  2007. Limitations of the randomized controlled trial in evaluating population-based health interventions. Am. J. Prev. Med. 33:155–61 [Google Scholar]
  31. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. 31.  CONSORT Group 2010. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med. 7:e1000251 [Google Scholar]
  32. Weiss N, Koepsell T, Psaty BM. 32.  2008. Generalizability of the results of randomized trials. Arch. Int. Med. 168:133–35 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-112613-011646
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-112613-011646
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error