Household Response to Time-Varying Electricity Prices

Literature Cited

1. Aigner D. 1985. The residential electricity time-of-use pricing experiments: What have we learned?. Social Experimentation JA Hausman, DA Wise 11–54 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
2. Aigner DJ, Ghali K. 1989. Self-selection in the residential electricity time-of-use pricing experiments. J. Appl. Econ. 4:Suppl. 1131–44 [Google Scholar]
3. Aigner DJ, Hausman JA. 1980. Correcting for truncation bias in the analysis of experiments in time-of-day pricing of electricity. Bell J. Econ. 11:1131–42 [Google Scholar]
4. Allcott H. 2011a. Consumers’ perceptions and misperceptions of energy costs. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:398–104 [Google Scholar]
5. Allcott H. 2011b. Rethinking real-time electricity pricing. Resour. Energy Econ. 33:4820–42 [Google Scholar]
6. Bhargava S, Manoli D. 2012. Why are benefits left on the table? Assessing the role of information, complexity, and stigma on take-up with an IRS field experiment. Adv. Consumer Res. 40:298–302 [Google Scholar]
7. Boiteux M. 1960. Peak-load pricing. J. Bus. 33:2157–79 [Google Scholar]
8. Boiteux M. 1964. Marginal cost pricing. Marginal Cost Pricing in Practice JR Nelson 51–58 Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall [Google Scholar]
9. Bollinger B, Hartmann WR. 2016. Welfare effects of home automation technology with dynamic pricing Work. Pap. Fuqua Sch. Bus., Duke Univ. Durham, NC: http://www.bryanbollinger.com/index_files/HomeAutomation.pdf
10. Bollinger B, Leslie P, Sorensen A. 2011. Calorie posting in chain restaurants. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 3:191–128 [Google Scholar]
11. Borenstein S. 2002. The trouble with electricity markets: understanding California's restructuring disaster. J. Econ. Perspect. 16:1191–211 [Google Scholar]
12. Borenstein S. 2005a. The long-run efficiency of real-time electricity pricing. Energy J 26:393–116 [Google Scholar]
13. Borenstein S. 2005b. Time-varying retail electricity prices: theory and practice. Electricity Deregulation: Choices and Challenges J Griffin, SL Puller 317–58 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
14. Borenstein S. 2009. Electricity pricing that reflects its real-time cost. NBER Reporter 1: http://www.nber.org/reporter/2009number1/borenstein.html [Google Scholar]
15. Borenstein S. 2012. The private and public economics of renewable electricity generation. J. Econ. Perspect. 26:167–92 [Google Scholar]
16. Borenstein S, Bushnell J. 2015. The US electricity industry after 20 years of restructuring. Annu. Rev. Econ. 7:437–63 [Google Scholar]
17. Borenstein S, Holland S. 2005. On the efficiency of competitive markets with time-invariant retail prices. RAND J. Econ. 36:3469–93 [Google Scholar]
18. Borenstein S, Jaske M, Rosenfeld A. 2002. Dynamic pricing, advanced metering, and demand response in electricity markets Work. Pap. 105 Cent. Study Energy Mark., Univ. Calif. Berkeley:
19. Braithwait S. 2000. Residential TOU price response in the presence of interactive communication equipment. Pricing in Competitive Electricity Markets A Faruqui, K Eakin 359–73 Berlin: Springer Sci. Bus. Media [Google Scholar]
20. Brown A, Chua ZE, Camerer CF. 2009. Learning and visceral temptation in dynamic savings experiments. Q. J. Econ. 124:1197–231 [Google Scholar]
21. Brown J, Hossain T, Morgan J. 2010. Shrouded attributes and information suppression: evidence from the field. Q. J. Econ. 125:2859–76 [Google Scholar]
22. Busse M, Silva-Risso J, Zettelmeyer F. 2006. $1,000 cash back: the pass-through of auto manufacturer promotions. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:41253–70 [Google Scholar]
23. Cappers P, Fowlie M, Spurlock CA, Todd A, Wolfram C, Baylis P. 2015. Default effects, follow-on behavior and welfare in residential electricity pricing programs Work. Pap. NBER Summer Inst. Cambridge, Mass: http://conference.nber.org/confer/2015/SI2015/EEE/Cappers_Fowlie_Spurlock_Todd_Wolfram_Baylis.pdf
24. Chetty R, Looney A, Kroft K. 2009. Salience and taxation: theory and evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 99:41145–77 [Google Scholar]
25. Chetty R, Saez E. 2005. Dividend taxes and corporate behavior: evidence from the 2003 dividend tax cut. Q. J. Econ. 120:3791–833 [Google Scholar]
26. Cho S, Rust J. 2010. The flat rental puzzle. Rev. Econ. Stud. 77:2534–59 [Google Scholar]
27. Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A. 2004. For better or for worse: default effects and 401(k) savings behavior. Perspectives on the Economics of Aging DA Wise 81–126 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
28. Clark JM. 1911. Rates for public utilities. Am. Econ. Rev. 1:3473–87 [Google Scholar]
29. Cooper A. 2016. Electric company smart meter deployments: foundation for a smart grid Rep., Inst. Elect. Innov., Edison Found. Washington, DC: http://www.edisonfoundation.net/iei/publications/Documents/Final%20Electric%20Company%20Smart%20Meter%20Deployments-%20Foundation%20for%20A%20Smart%20Energy%20Grid.pdf
30. DellaVigna S. 2009. Psychology and economics: evidence from the field. J. Econ. Lit. 47:2315–72 [Google Scholar]
31. DellaVigna S, Pollet JM. 2009. Investor inattention and Friday earnings announcements. J. Finance 64:2709–49 [Google Scholar]
32. Duflo E, Saez E. 2003. The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: evidence from a randomized experiment. Q. J. Econ. 118:3815–42 [Google Scholar]
33. Eisenmenger HE. 1921. Central Station Rates in Theory and Practice Chicago: FJ Drake & Co.
34. Faruqui A, George S. 2005. Quantifying customer response to dynamic pricing. Electr. J. 18:453–63 [Google Scholar]
35. Faruqui A, Hledik R, Tsoukalis J. 2009. The power of dynamic pricing. Electr. J. 22:342–56 [Google Scholar]
36. Faruqui A, Sergici S. 2010. Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments. J. Regul. Econ. 38:2193–225 [Google Scholar]
37. Faruqui A, Sergici S. 2011. Dynamic pricing of electricity in the mid-Atlantic region: econometric results from the Baltimore gas and electric company experiment. J. Regul. Econ. 40:182–109 [Google Scholar]
38. Faruqui A, Sergici S. 2013. Arcturus: international evidence on dynamic pricing. Electr. J. 26:755–65 [Google Scholar]
39. Faruqui A, Sergici S, Akaba L. 2012. Dynamic pricing in a moderate climate: the evidence from Connecticut SSRN Work. Pap. 2028178 Rochester, NY:
40. Faruqui A, Sergici S, Akaba L. 2013. Dynamic pricing of electricity for residential customers: the evidence from Michigan. Energy Effic 6:3571–84 [Google Scholar]
41. Faruqui A, Sergici S, Sharif A. 2010. The impact of informational feedback on energy consumption—a survey of the experimental evidence. Energy 35:41598–608 [Google Scholar]
42. FERC (US Fed. Energy Reg. Comm.). 2011. 2010 assessment of demand response and advanced metering Staff Rep. FERC Washington, DC: http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/2010-dr-report.pdf
43. FERC (US Fed. Energy Reg. Comm.). 2015. 2015 assessment of demand response and advanced metering Staff Rep. FERC Washington, DC: https://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/2015/demand-response.pdf
44. Gallagher KS, Muehlegger E. 2011. Giving green to get green? Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 61:11–15 [Google Scholar]
45. Gilbert B, Graff Zivin JS. 2014. Dynamic salience with intermittent billing: evidence from smart electricity meters. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 107:176–90 [Google Scholar]
46. Grubb MD, Osborne M. 2015. Cellular service demand: biased beliefs, learning, and bill shock. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:1234–71 [Google Scholar]
47. Harding M, Lamarche C. 2016. Empowering consumers through data and smart technology: experimental evidence on the consequences of time‐of‐use electricity pricing policies. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 35:4906–31 [Google Scholar]
48. Hausman WJ, Neufeld JL. 1984. Time-of-day pricing in the U.S. electric power industry at the turn of the century. RAND J. Econ. 15:1116–26 [Google Scholar]
49. Herter K. 2007. Residential implementation of critical-peak pricing of electricity. Energy Policy 35:42121–30 [Google Scholar]
50. Herter K, Wayland S. 2010. Residential response to critical-peak pricing of electricity: California evidence. Energy 35:41561–67 [Google Scholar]
51. Hogan WW. 1999. Getting the prices right in PJM: analysis and summary: April 1998 through March 1999 Work. Pap. Harvard Univ. Cambridge, Mass: https://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/whogan/pjm0399.pdf
52. Hossain T, Morgan J. 2006. Plus shipping and handling. Adv. Econ. Anal. Policy 6:1–27 [Google Scholar]
53. Houser D, Keane M, McCabe K. 2004. Behavior in a dynamic decision problem: an analysis of experimental Bayesian type classification algorithm. Econometrica 72:3781–822 [Google Scholar]
54. Houthakker HS. 1951. Electricity tariffs in theory and practice. Econ. J. 61:2411–25 [Google Scholar]
55. Ito K. 2014. Do consumers respond to marginal or average price? Evidence from nonlinear electricity pricing. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:2537–63 [Google Scholar]
56. Jessoe K, Rapson D. 2014. Knowledge is (less) power: experimental evidence from residential energy use. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:41417–38 [Google Scholar]
57. Johnson EJ, Goldstein D. 2003. Do defaults save lives. Science 302:56491338–39 [Google Scholar]
58. Joskow PL. 2001. California's electricity crisis. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 17:3365–88 [Google Scholar]
59. Joskow PL. 2012. Creating a smarter US electricity grid. J. Econ. Perspect. 26:129–47 [Google Scholar]
60. Kahneman D. 2003. Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 93:51449–75 [Google Scholar]
61. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. 1991. Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econ. Perspect. 5:1193–206 [Google Scholar]
62. Krauss C, Cardwell D. 2015. A Texas utility offers a nighttime special: free electricity. New York Times Nov. 8. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/09/business/energy-environment/a-texas-utility-offers-a-nighttime-special-free-electricity.html
63. Letzler RJ. 2007. Implementing opt-in, residential, dynamic electricity pricing: insights from economics and psychology PhD Thesis Univ. Calif. Berkeley:
64. Madrian BC, Shea DF. 2001. The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Q. J. Econ. 116:41149–87 [Google Scholar]
65. Malik N. 2016. A thunderstorm just drove New York power prices above $1,000. Bloomberg July 5. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-25/a-thunderstorm-just-drove-new-york-power-prices-above-1-000
66. Malik N, Weber H. 2016. One thing California, Texas have in common is negative power. Bloomberg Apr. 5. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-05/one-thing-california-texas-have-in-common-is-negative-power
67. Miedema AK, White SB. 1980. Time-of-use electricity price effects: summary I Rep. DOE/RG/08684-T6 Res. Triangle Inst., Res Triangle Park, NC:
68. Mitchell B, Acton J. 1980. The effect of time-of-use rates in the Los Angeles electricity study Rep. N-1533-DWP/HF RAND Santa Monica, Calif: http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/notes/2007/N1533.pdf
69. PJM Interconnect. 2015. State of the market Rep., Monit. Anal. Eagleville, Pa: http://www.monitoringanalytics.com/reports/PJM_State_of_the_Market/2015.shtml
70. Price MK. 2014. Using field experiments to address environmental externalities and resource scarcity: major lessons learned and new directions for future research. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 30:4621–38 [Google Scholar]
71. Reiss PC, White MW. 2005. Household electricity demand, revisited. Rev. Econ. Stud. 72:3853–83 [Google Scholar]
72. Sexton S. 2015. Automatic bill payment and salience effects: evidence from electricity consumption. Rev. Econ. Stat. 97:2229–41 [Google Scholar]
73. Shin J-S. 1985. Perception of price when price information is costly: evidence from residential electricity demand. Rev. Econ. Stat. 67:4591–98 [Google Scholar]
74. Simon HA. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 69:99–118 [Google Scholar]
75. Steiner PO. 1957. Peak loads and efficient pricing. Q. J. Econ. 71:4585–610 [Google Scholar]
76. Stigler GJ. 1961. The economics of information. J. Polit. Econ. 69:3213–25 [Google Scholar]
77. Taylor TN, Schwarz PM, Cochell JE. 2005. 24/7 hourly response to electricity real-time pricing with up to eight summers of experience. J. Regul. Econ. 27:3235–62 [Google Scholar]
78. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. 2003. Libertarian paternalism. Am. Econ. Rev. 93:2175–79 [Google Scholar]
79. Train K, Mehrez G. 1994. Optional time-of-use prices for electricity: econometric analysis of surplus and Pareto impacts. RAND J. Econ. 25:2263–83 [Google Scholar]
80. Turvey R. 1968. Peak load pricing. J. Polit. Econ. 76:1101–13 [Google Scholar]
81. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:41571124–31 [Google Scholar]
82. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1991. Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Q. J. Econ. 106:41039–61 [Google Scholar]
83. Wald ML. 2014. Power savings of smart meters prove slow to materialize. New York Times Dec. 6. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/06/business/energy-environment/power-savings-of-smart-meters-prove-slow-to-materialize.html?_r=0
84. Watkins GP. 1915. A third factor in the variation of productivity: the load factor. Am. Econ. Rev. 5:4753–86 [Google Scholar]
85. Watkins GP. 1916. The theory of differential rates. Q. J. Econ. 30:4682–703 [Google Scholar]
86. Wattles J. 2016. New York City electricity price spikes 1000%. CNN.com July 25. http://money.cnn.com/2016/07/25/news/companies/new-york-energy-prices-storm/
87. Weightman G. 2011. Children of Light: How Electricity Changed Britain Forever London: Atlantic
88. Wolak FA. 2010. An experimental comparison of critical peak and hourly pricing: the PowerCentsDC Program Work. Pap. Stanford Univ. Stanford, Calif: http://www.stanford.edu/group/fwolak/cgi-bin/sites/default/files/files/An%20Experimental%20Comparison%20of%20Critical%20Peak%20and%20Hourly%20Pricing_March%202010_Wolak.pdf
89. Wolak FA. 2011. Measuring the benefits of greater spatial granularity in short-term pricing in wholesale electricity markets. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:3247–52 [Google Scholar]