A Conversation with Angus Deaton

Literature Cited

1. Attanasio OP, Weber G. 2010. Consumption and saving: models of intertemporal allocation and their implications for public policy. J. Econ. Lit. 48:3693–751
   [Google Scholar]
2. Besley T. 2016. The contributions of Angus Deaton. Scand. J. Econ. 118:3375–96
   [Google Scholar]
3. Br. Acad 1993. John Richard Nicholas Stone 1913–1991. Proc. Br. Acad. 82:475–92
   [Google Scholar]
4. Browning M, Deaton A, Irish M 1985. A profitable approach to labor supply and commodity demands over the life-cycle. Econometrica 53:3503–44
   [Google Scholar]
5. Case A, Deaton A. 2015. Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st century. PNAS 112:4915078–83
   [Google Scholar]
6. Case A, Deaton A. 2020. Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
7. Coffey D. 2015. Prepregnancy body mass and weight gain during pregnancy in India and sub-Saharan Africa. PNAS 112:113302–7
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cohen AJ, Harcourt GC. 2003. Retrospectives: Whatever happened to the Cambridge capital theory controversies. J. Econ. Persp. 17:1199–214
   [Google Scholar]
9. Deaton A. 1977. Involuntary saving through unanticipated inflation. Am. Econ. Rev. 67:5899–910
   [Google Scholar]
10. Deaton A. 1985. Panel data from time series of cross-sections. J. Econom. 30:109–26
    [Google Scholar]
11. Deaton A. 1987. Life-cycle models of consumption: Is the evidence consistent with the theory?. Advances in Econometrics: Fifth World Congress Vol 2 T Bewley 1221–48 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
12. Deaton A. 1991. Saving and liquidity constraints. Econometrica 59:1221–48
    [Google Scholar]
13. Deaton A. 2003. Health, inequality, and economic development. J. Econ. Lit. 41:1113–58
    [Google Scholar]
14. Deaton A. 2010a. Instruments, randomization, and learning about development. J. Econ. Lit. 48:2424–55
    [Google Scholar]
15. Deaton A. 2010b. Price indexes, inequality, and the measurement of world poverty. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:15–34
    [Google Scholar]
16. Deaton A. 2013. The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
17. Deaton A. 2016. Measuring and understanding behavior, welfare, and poverty. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:61221–43
    [Google Scholar]
18. Deaton A, Drèze J. 2009. Food and nutrition in India: facts and interpretations. Econ. Political Wkly. 44:742–65
    [Google Scholar]
19. Deaton A, Heston A. 2010. Understanding PPPs and PPP-based national accounts. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 2:41–35
    [Google Scholar]
20. Deaton A, Muellbauer J. 1980a. An almost ideal demand system. Am. Econ. Rev. 70:3312–26
    [Google Scholar]
21. Deaton A, Muellbauer J. 1980b. Economics and Consumer Behavior Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
22. Deaton A, Paxson C. 1994. Intertemporal choice and inequality. J. Political Econ. 102:3437–67
    [Google Scholar]
23. Deaton AS. 1974. The analysis of consumer demand in the United Kingdom, 1900–1970. Econometrica 42:2341–67
    [Google Scholar]
24. Deaton AS, Muellbauer J. 1986. On measuring child costs: with applications to poor countries. J. Political Econ. 94:4720–44
    [Google Scholar]
25. Fields GS. 1977. Who benefits from economic development? A reexamination of Brazilian growth in the 1960s. Am. Econ. Rev. 67:4570–82
    [Google Scholar]
26. Fukuyama F. 1989. The end of history. Natl. Interest 16:3–18
    [Google Scholar]
27. Gorman WM. 1953. Community preference fields. Econometrica 21:163–80
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gorman WM. 1959. Separable utility and aggregation. Econometrica 27:3469–81
    [Google Scholar]
29. Gorman WM. 1968. The structure of utility functions. Rev. Econ. Stud. 35:4367–90
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lewis WA. 1954. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor. Manch. Sch. 22:2139–91
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lewis WA. 1955. The Theory of Economic Growth London/New York: Routledge
32. Lowrey A. 2017. Is it better to be poor in Bangladesh or the Mississippi Delta. The Atlantic March 8. https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/03/angus-deaton-qa/518880/
    [Google Scholar]
33. Modigliani F, Brumberg R. 1954. Utility analysis and the consumption function: an interpretation of cross-section data. Post-Keynesian Econ 1:338–436
    [Google Scholar]
34. Muellbauer J. 1975. Aggregation, income distribution and consumer demand. Rev. Econ. Stud. 42:4525–43
    [Google Scholar]
35. Nobel Media AB. 2015. Angus Deaton: biographical Nobel Media AB, Stockholm. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2015/deaton/biographical/
36. Popper K. 2005. The Logic of Scientific Discovery London: Routledge
37. Samuelson PA. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
38. Stone R. 1954a. Linear expenditure systems and demand analysis: an application to the pattern of British demand. Econ. J. 64:255511–27
    [Google Scholar]
39. Stone R. 1954b. The Measurement of Consumers’ Expenditure and Behaviour in the United Kingdom, 1920–1938 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
40. Subramanian S, Deaton A. 1996. The demand for food and calories. J. Political Econ. 104:1133–62
    [Google Scholar]
41. Taylor L, Bacha EL. 1976. The unequalizing spiral: a first growth model for Belindia. Q. J. Econ. 90:2197–218
    [Google Scholar]
42. Tucker M. 2019. Appiah, Case, Deaton, Maldacena among many Princetonians chosen for list of top 50 thinkers. Princeton University News July 17. https://www.princeton.edu/news/2019/07/17/case-deaton-chosen-prospect-magazines-2019-list-worlds-top-50-thinkers
    [Google Scholar]