1932

Abstract

We call for incorporating organizations into migration scholarship, and for considering immigrants in organizational research. By centering immigrant organizations (IOs) as a unit of analysis, migration scholars can reconsider whether and how IOs affect well-being, integration, political voice, identities, globalization, and development. Migration scholars must learn from scholars of organizations, but organization scholars must in turn question assumptions of nativity and citizenship in their research. Doing so illuminates the unique challenges—and, at times, opportunities—faced by IOs, especially regarding inequities tied to legal status and stigmatization. We further argue that cross-national and transnational analyses of IOs help unpack organizational embeddedness—that is, the ways in which contexts at the local, national, binational, and geopolitical levels generate opportunities and constraints. Studying IOs raises critical questions of civic inequality and organizational stigma but also highlights IOs’ potential to give voice to and effect positive change for migrant communities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-015613
2022-07-29
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/48/1/annurev-soc-030420-015613.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-015613&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abrego LJ, Negrón-Gonzales G, eds. 2020. We Are Not Dreamers: Undocumented Scholars Theorize Undocumented Life in the United States Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  2. Adamson FB, Demetriou M. 2007. Remapping the boundaries of state and national identity: incorporating diasporas into IR theorizing. Eur. J. Int. Relat. 13:4489–526
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alba R, Nee V 2003. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  4. Ameeriar L. 2017. Downwardly Global: Women, Work, and Citizenship in the Pakistani Diaspora Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  5. Bada X. 2014. Mexican Hometown Associations in Chicagoacán: From Local to Transnational Civic Engagement New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
  6. Bakalian A, Bozorgmehr M. 2009. Backlash 9/11: Middle Eastern and Muslim Americans Respond Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  7. Basch LG. 1989. The politics of Caribbeanization: Vicentians and Grenadians in New York. Cent. Migr. Stud. Spec Issues 7:1147–66
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bloemraad I. 2005. The limits of de Tocqueville: how government facilitates organisational capacity in newcomer communities. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud 31:5865–87
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bloemraad I. 2006. Becoming a citizen in the United States and Canada: structured mobilization and immigrant political incorporation. Soc. Forces 85:667–95
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bloemraad I. 2007. Unity in diversity? Bridging models of multiculturalism and immigrant integration. Du Bois Rev 4:2317–36
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bloemraad I, de Graauw E, Gleeson S 2020. Immigrant organizations: civic voice, civic (in)equality, and civic (in)visibility. The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook WW Powell, P Bromley 292–313 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press. , 3rd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bloemraad I, Voss K. 2020. Movement or moment? Lessons from the pro-immigrant movement in the United States and contemporary challenges. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud 46:4683–704
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Boccagni P, Lafleur JM, Levitt P. 2015. Transnational politics as cultural circulation: toward a conceptual understanding of migrant political participation on the move. Mobilities 11:444–63
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Breton R. 1964. Institutional completeness of ethnic communities and the personal relations of immigrants. Am. J. Sociol. 70:2193–205
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Brinkerhoff JM, Johnson JM, Gudelis D 2019. Are our assumptions about diaspora and immigrant philanthropy generalizable? Exploring the relevance to high-income countries of origin. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 48:51094–109
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Burciaga EM, Martinez LM. 2017. How do political contexts shape undocumented youth movements? Evidence from three immigrant destinations. Mobilization 22:4451–71
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chaudhary AR. 2018a. Organizing transnationalism and belonging among Pakistani immigrants in London and New York. Migr. Stud. 6:3420–47
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chaudhary AR. 2018b. Voting here and there: political integration and transnational political engagement among immigrants in Europe. Glob. Netw. 18:3437–60
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chaudhary AR. 2021. Ascriptive organizational stigma and the constraining of Pakistani immigrant organizations. Int. Migr. Rev. 55:184–107
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Chaudhary AR, Guarnizo LE. 2016. Pakistani immigrant organisational spaces in Toronto and New York City. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 42:61013–35
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Chaudhary AR, Moss DM. 2019. Suppressing transnationalism: bringing constraints into the study of transnational political action. Comp. Migr. Stud. 7:9
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen MH. 2020. Pursuing Citizenship in the Enforcement Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  23. Chen MH, New Z. 2018. Silence and the second wall. South. Calif. Interdiscip. Law J. 28:549
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Chun JJ. 2016. Building political agency and movement leadership: the grassroots organizing model of Asian immigrant women advocates. Citizsh. Stud. 20:3–4379–95
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Coutin SB, Ashar SM, Chacón JM, Lee S. 2017. Deferred action and the discretionary state: migration, precarity and resistance. Citizsh. Stud. 21:8951–68
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Dahl RA. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  27. Darrow JH, Scholl JH. 2020. Chaos and confusion: impacts of the Trump administration executive orders on the US refugee resettlement system. Hum. Serv. Organ. 44:362–80
    [Google Scholar]
  28. de Graauw E. 2016. Making Immigrant Rights Real: Nonprofits and the Politics of Integration in San Francisco Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  29. de Graauw E, Gleeson S 2017. Context, coalitions and organizing: immigrant labor rights advocacy in San Francisco and Houston. The City Is the Factory: New Solidarities and Spatial Strategies in an Urban Age M Greenberg, P Lewis 80–98 Berlin: de Gruyter
    [Google Scholar]
  30. de Graauw E, Gleeson S. 2018. Immigrant rights funding in peril: closing down access routes to the American dream. New Labor Forum 27:358–63
    [Google Scholar]
  31. de Graauw E, Gleeson S, Bloemraad I. 2013. Funding immigrant organizations: suburban free riding and local civic presence. Am. J. Sociol. 119:175–130
    [Google Scholar]
  32. de Haas H. 2010. Migration and development: a theoretical perspective. Int. Migr. Rev. 44:1227–64
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Délano A, Gamlen A. 2014. Comparing and theorizing state-diaspora relations. Political Geogr 41:July43–53
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Eby J, Iverson E, Smyers J, Kekic E. 2011. The faith community's role in refugee resettlement in the United States. J. Refugee Stud. 24:3586–605
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Eckstein SE. 2022. Cuban Privilege: The Making of Immigrant Inequality in America Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  36. Ehrkamp P, Nagel C. 2014.. “ Under the Radar”: undocumented immigrants, Christian faith communities, and the precarious spaces of welcome in the U.S. South. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr 104:2319–28
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Erdal MB, Oeppen C. 2013. Migrant balancing acts: understanding the interactions between integration and transnationalism. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 39:6867–84
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Escudero K. 2020. Organizing While Undocumented: Immigrant Youth's Political Activism Under the Law New York: NYU Press
  39. Espiritu YL. 1992. Asian American Panethnicity: Bridging Institutions and Identities Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
  40. Faist T. 2008. Migrants as transnational development agents: an inquiry into the newest round of the migration-development nexus. Popul. Space Place 14:121–42
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Fantasia R, Voss K. 2004. Hard Work: Remaking the American Labor Movement Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  42. Fox J, Bada X. 2008. Migrant organization and hometown impacts in rural Mexico. J. Agrar. Change 8:2–3435–61
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Gilliom J. 2001. Overseers of the Poor: Surveillance, Resistance, and the Limits of Privacy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  44. Glazer N, Moynihan DP. 1963. Beyond the Melting Pot: The Negroes, Puerto Ricans, Jews, Italians, and Irish of New York City Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  45. Godin M, Herman B, Rea A, Thys R 2015. Moroccan and Congolese migrant organizations in Belgium. The State and the Grassroots: Immigrant Transnational Organizations in Four Continents, eds. A Portes, P Fernandez-Kelly 189–211 New York: Berghahn
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Goldring L. 2002. The Mexican state and transmigrant organizations: negotiating the boundaries of membership and participation. Latin Am. Res. Rev55–99
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Gonzales A. 2013. Reform Without Justice: Latino Migrant Politics and the Homeland Security State Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  48. Gordon MM. 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  49. Guarnizo LE. 2003. The economics of transnational living. Int. Migr. Rev. 37:3666–99
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Guarnizo LE, Portes A, Haller W 2003. Assimilation and transnationalism: determinants of transnational political action among contemporary migrants. Am. J. Sociol. 108:61211–48
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Guevarra AR. 2009. Marketing Dreams, Manufacturing Heroes: The Transnational Labor Brokering of Filipino Workers New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
  52. Hamlin R. 2008. Immigrants at work: labor unions and non-citizen members. Civic Hopes and Political Realities: Immigrants, Community Organizations, and Political Engagement SK Ramakrishnan, I Bloemraad 300–22 New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Hein J. 1997. Ethnic organizations and the welfare state: the impact of social welfare programs on the formation of Indochinese refugee associations. Sociol. Forum 12:2279–95
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Heredia LL. 2008. Faith in Action: The Catholic Church and the Immigrant Rights Movement, 1980–2007 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Hernández-León R. 2013. The migration industry: brokering mobility in the Mexico-U.S. migratory system Work. Pap., Dep. Sociol., Univ. Calif. Los Angeles:
  56. Holman PA. 1996. Refugee resettlement in the United States. Refugees in America in the 1990s: A Reference Handbook DW Haines 3–27 Westport, CT: Praeger
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Horton S. 2004. Different subjects: the health care system's participation in the differential construction of the cultural citizenship of Cuban refugees and Mexican immigrants. Med. Anthropol. Q. 18:4472–89
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Itzigsohn J, Saucedo SG. 2002. Immigrant incorporation and sociocultural transnationalism. Int. Migr. Rev. 36:3766–98
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Jalal A. 2014. The Struggle for Pakistan: A Muslim Homeland and Global Politics Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  60. Johnson M. 2017. Support adult English language education to invest in future. Georgia Budget and Policy Institute Blog May 4. https://gbpi.org/support-adult-english-language-education-invest-future/
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Jones-Correa M. 1998. Different paths: gender, immigration and political participation. Int. Migr. Rev. 32:2326–49
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Kastoryano R, Schader M. 2014. A comparative view of ethnicity and political engagement. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 40:241–60
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Keck ME, Sikkink K 1998. Transnational advocacy networks in the movement society. The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century DS Meyer, S Tarrow 217–38 Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Kibria N. 1997. The construction of “Asian American”: reflections on intermarriage and ethnic identity among second-generation Chinese and Korean Americans. Ethn. Racial Stud. 20:3523–44
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Kibria N. 2000. Race, ethnic options, and ethnic binds: identity negotiations of second-generation Chinese and Korean Americans. Sociol. Perspect. 43:177–95
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Kim JY. 2020a. How other minorities gained access: the War on Poverty and Asian American and Latino community organizing. Political Res. Q. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920983456
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kim JY. 2020b. Racism is not enough: minority coalition building in San Francisco, Seattle, and Vancouver. Stud. Am. Political Dev. 34:2195–215
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Koinova M. 2013. Four types of diaspora mobilization: Albanian diaspora activism for Kosovo independence in the US and the UK. Foreign Policy Anal 9:4433–53
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Koopmans R, Statham P, Giugni M, Passy F 2005. Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  70. Lacomba C. 2016. Mobilising abroad across ethnic lines: home-country politics and immigrant political engagement in comparative perspective. Ethnicities 16:186–110
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Lacroix T. 2009. Transnationalism and development: the example of Moroccan migrant networks. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 35:101665–78
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Lacroix T. 2015. Moroccans in France: their organizations and activities back home. The State and the Grassroots: Immigrant Transnational Organizations in Four Continents A Portes, P Fernandez-Kelly 212–35 New York: Berghahn
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Lafleur JM. 2013. Transnational Politics and the State: The External Voting Rights of Diasporas New York: Routledge
  74. Landolt P. 2008. The transnational geographies of immigrant politics: insights from a comparative study of migrant grassroots organizing. Sociol. Q. 49:153–77
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Lee J, Zhou M. 2015. The Asian American Achievement Paradox New York: Russell Sage Found.
  76. Legal Serv. Corp. 2020. Can LSC grantees represent undocumented immigrants? Rep., Legal Serv. Corp Washington, DC: https://www.lsc.gov/our-impact/publications/other-publications-and-reports/can-lsc-grantees-represent-undocumented
  77. Levitt P. 2001. The Transnational Villagers Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  78. Levitt P, Jaworsky BN. 2007. Transnational migration studies: past developments and future trends. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 33:129–56
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Levitt P, Schiller NG. 2004. Conceptualizing simultaneity: a transnational social field perspective on society. Int. Migr. Rev. 38:31002–39
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Lieberson S. 1980. A Piece of the Pie: Blacks and White Immigrants Since 1880 Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  81. Lieberson S, Waters MC 1988. From Many Strands: Ethnic and Racial Groups in Contemporary America New York: Russell Sage Found.
  82. Light DW. 2012. Categorical inequality, institutional ambivalence, and permanently failing institutions: the case of immigrants and barriers to health care in America. Ethn. Racial Stud. 35:123–39
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Lopez D, Espiritu Y. 1990. Panethnicity in the United States: a theoretical framework. Ethn. Racial Stud. 13:2198–224
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Luthra R, Soehl T, Waldinger R. 2018. Reconceptualizing context: a multilevel model of the context of reception and second-generation educational attainment. Int. Migr. Rev. 52:3898–928
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Marinari M. 2020. Unwanted: Italian and Jewish Mobilization Against Restrictive Immigration Laws, 1882–1965 Chapel Hill: Univ. N. C. Press
  86. Marrow HB. 2009. Immigrant bureaucratic incorporation: the dual roles of government policies and professional missions. Am. Sociol. Rev. 74:5756–76
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Martin PL. 2017. Merchants of Labor: Recruiters and International Labor Migration Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  88. Marwell NP. 2004. Privatizing the welfare state: nonprofit community-based organizations as political actors. Am. Sociol. Rev. 69:2265–91
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Marwell NP, Gullickson A. 2013. Inequality in the spatial allocation of social services: government contracts to nonprofit organizations in New York City. Soc. Serv. Rev. 87:2319–53
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Marwell NP, Morrissey SL. 2020. Organizations and the governance of urban poverty. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 46:233–50
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Massey DS. 1981. Dimensions of the new immigration to the United States and the prospects for assimilation. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 7:57–85
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Menjívar C. 2006. Liminal legality: Salvadoran and Guatemalan immigrants’ lives in the United States. Am. J. Sociol. 111:4999–1037
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Meyer DS, Minkoff DC. 2004. Conceptualizing political opportunity. Social Forces 82:41457–92
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Milkman R. 2020. Immigrant Labor and the New Precariat Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
  95. Milkman R, Terriquez V. 2012.. “ We are the ones who are out in front”: women's leadership in the immigrant rights movement. Fem. Stud 38:3723–52
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Minkoff D. 1995. Organizing for Equality New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
  97. Mora GC. 2014. Making Hispanics: How Activists, Bureaucrats and Media Constructed a New American Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  98. Morales L, Giugni M, eds. 2011. Social Capital, Political Participation and Migration in Europe Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan
  99. Moya JC. 2005. Immigrants and associations: a global and historical perspective. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud 31:5833–64
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Najam A. 2006. Portrait of a Giving Community: Philanthropy by the Pakistani-American Diaspora Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  101. Natl. Acad. Sci. Eng. Med. 2015. The Integration of Immigrants into American Society Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  102. Natl. Immigr. Law Cent. 2020. Update on access to health care for immigrants and their families Rep., Natl. Immigr. Law Cent Los Angeles: https://www.nilc.org/issues/health-care/update-on-access-to-health-care-for-immigrants-and-their-families/
  103. Nawyn SJ. 2006. Faith, ethnicity, and culture in refugee resettlement. Am. Behav. Sci. 49:111509–27
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Nicholls WJ. 2013. The DREAMers: How the Undocumented Youth Movement Transformed the Immigrant Rights Debate Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  105. Nicholls WJ. 2019. The Immigrant Rights Movement: The Battle over National Citizenship Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  106. Novak M. 1972. The Rise of the Unmeltable Ethnics New York: MacMillan
  107. Okamoto D, Mora GC. 2014. Panethnicity. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 40:219–39
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Okamoto DG. 2003. Toward a theory of panethnicity: explaining Asian American collective action. Am. Sociol. Rev. 68:6811–42
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Okamoto DG. 2014. Redefining Race: Asian American Panethnicity and Shifting Ethnic Boundaries New York: Russell Sage Found.
  110. Østergaard-Nielsen E. 2003. The politics of migrants’ transnational political practices. Int. Migr. Rev. 37:3760–86
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Østergaard-Nielsen EK. 2001. Transnational political practices and the receiving state: Turks and Kurds in Germany and the Netherlands. Glob. Netw. 1:3261–82
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Pallares A, Flores-González N. 2010. ¡Marcha! Latino Chicago and the Immigrant Rights Movement Champaign: Univ. Ill. Press
  113. Pedraza S. 2007. Political Disaffection in Cuba's Revolution and Exodus Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  114. Portes A, Bach RL. 1985. Latin Journey Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  115. Portes A, Escobar C, Arana R. 2008. Bridging the gap: transnational and ethnic organizations in the political incorporation of immigrants in the United States. Ethn. Racial Stud. 31:61056–90
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Portes A, Escobar C, Radford AW. 2007. Immigrant transnational organizations and development: a comparative study. Int. Migr. Rev. 41:1242–81
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Portes A, Fernandez-Kelly P. 2015. The State and the Grassroots: Immigrant Transnational Organizations in Four Continents New York: Berghahn
  118. Portes A, Guarnizo LE, Landolt P. 2017. Commentary on the study of transnationalism: pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethn. Racial Stud. 40:91486–91
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Portes A, Rumbaut RG. 2001. Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  120. Portes A, Zhou M. 1993. The new second generation: segmented assimilation and its variants. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 530:174–96
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Ramakrishnan SK, Bloemraad I 2008. Introduction: civic and political inequalities. Civic Hopes and Political Realities: Immigrants, Community Organizations, and Political Engagement SK Ramakrishnan, I Bloemraad 1–42 New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Robertson CB, Manta ID. 2020. Litigating citizenship. Vanderbilt Law Rev 73:3757
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Rogers R. 2009. Political institutions and rainbow coalitions: immigrant-minority relations in New York and Hartford. Bringing Outsiders In: Transatlantic Perspectives on Immigrant Political Incorporation JL Hochschild, JH Mollenkopf 93–110 Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Roth BJ, Gonzales RG, Lesniewski J 2015. Building a stronger safety net: local organizations and the challenges of serving immigrants in the suburbs. Hum. Serv. Organ. 39:4348–61
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Schmitter BE. 1980. Immigrants and associations: their role in the socio-political process of immigrant worker integration in West Germany and Switzerland. Int. Migr. Rev. 14:2179–92
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Schneider D. 2001. Naturalization and United States citizenship in two periods of mass migration: 1894–1930, 1965–2000. J. Am. Ethn. Hist. 21:150–82
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Schrover DM, Vermeulen F. 2005. Immigrant organisations. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 31:5823–32
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Soss J, Fording R, Schram SF. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  129. Soysal YN. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  130. Strolovitch DZ. 2008. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  131. Sullivan R, Lee K 2008. Organizing immigrant women in America's sweatshops: lessons from the Los Angeles Garment Worker Center. Signs 33:3527–32
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Terriquez V. 2011. Schools for democracy: labor union participation and Latino immigrant parents’ school-based civic engagement. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76:4581–601
    [Google Scholar]
  133. Terriquez V. 2015. Intersectional mobilization, social movement spillover, and queer youth leadership in the immigrant rights movement. Soc. Probl. 62:3343–62
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Terriquez V, Villegas R, Villalobos R, Xu J. 2020. The political socialization of Latinx youth in a conservative political context. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 70:101188
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Thomas WI, Znaniecki F. 1984. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press
  136. Trouille D. 2021. Fútbol in the Park: Immigrants, Soccer, and the Creation of Social Ties Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  137. Tsutsui K. 2017. Human rights and minority activism in Japan: transformation of movement actorhood and local-global feedback loop. Am. J. Sociol. 122:41050–103
    [Google Scholar]
  138. Verduzco Reyes D 2018. Learning to Be Latino: How Colleges Shape Identity Politics New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
  139. Vermeulen F. 2013. Mutualism, resource competition and opposing movements among Turkish organizations in Amsterdam and Berlin, 1965–2000. Br. J. Sociol. 64:3453–77
    [Google Scholar]
  140. Vermeulen F, Minkoff DC, Meer T. 2016. The local embedding of community-based organizations. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 45:123–44
    [Google Scholar]
  141. Vermeulen F, Tillie J, Walle R 2012. Different effects of ethnic diversity on social capital: density of foundations and leisure associations in Amsterdam neighbourhoods. Urban Stud 49:2337–52
    [Google Scholar]
  142. Vonderlack-Navarro R. 2014. Immigrant Political Incorporation: The Role of Hometown Associations El Paso, TX: LFB Sch. Publ.
  143. Voss K, Bloemraad I, eds. 2011. Rallying for Immigrant Rights: The Fight for Inclusion In 21st Century America Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  144. Waldinger R. 2015. The Cross-Border Connection: Immigrants, Emigrants, and Their Homelands Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  145. Watkins-Hayes C. 2009. The New Welfare Bureaucrats: Entanglements of Race, Class, and Policy Reform Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  146. Williams HP. 1912. The road to citizenship. Political Sci. Q. 27:3399–427
    [Google Scholar]
  147. Wise RD, Ramírez HR. 2001. The emergence of collective migrants and their role in Mexico's local and regional development. Can. J. Dev. Stud./Rev. Can. Études Dév. 22:3747–64
    [Google Scholar]
  148. Wong JS, Ramakrishnan SK, Lee T, Junn J, Wong J. 2011. Asian American Political Participation: Emerging Constituents and Their Political Identities New York: Russell Sage Found.
  149. Wong K, Munoz CB. 2004. Don't miss the bus: the immigrant workers freedom ride. New Labor Forum 13:261–66
    [Google Scholar]
  150. Woods RA, Kennedy AJ, eds. 1911. Handbook of Settlements New York: Charities Publ. Comm.
  151. Zepeda-Millán C. 2017. Latino Mass Mobilization: Immigration, Racialization, and Activism Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  152. Zhou M, Lee R 2015. Traversing ancestral and new homelands: Chinese immigrant transnational organizations in the United States. The State and the Grassroots: Immigrant Transnational Organizations in Four Continents, A Portes, P Fernandez-Kelly 27–59 New York: Berghahn
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030420-015613
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error