1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Sociology
  4. Volume 44, 2018
  5. Article

Annual Review of Sociology

Volume 44, 2018

Boundary-Spanning in Social Movements: Antecedents and Outcomes

Abstract

Social movement scholarship has increasingly sought to understand the relational dynamics of internal movement activity, from investigating the factors that enable movement coalitions to analyzing the trade-offs of organizational hybridity. We bring these and other related phenomena together under the label of boundary-spanning processes. Specifically, we organize research on boundary-spanning in social movements by identifying three types of boundaries that have symbolic significance as categorical demarcations: () issue and identity boundaries, () organizational boundaries, and () tactical boundaries. We then elucidate the tension in work that has examined how each form of boundary-spanning either promotes or hinders the realization of three important movement outcomes: () mobilization, () internal movement solidarity and scope, and () external social and political change. We relate our three types of boundary-spanning to these three types of outcomes in an organizing framework to locate future opportunities for research on boundary-spanning in social movements.

Keyword(s): boundaries, coalitions, hybridity, identity, organizations, protest tactics, social movements
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041258
2018-07-30
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/44/1/annurev-soc-073117-041258.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041258&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Almeida PD 2010. Social movement partyism: collective action and political parties. See Van Dyke & McCammon 2010 170–96
  2. Armstrong EA 2002. Forging Gay Identities: Organizing Sexuality in San Francisco, 1950–1994 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  3. Bandy J, Smith J 2005. Coalitions across Borders: Transnational Protest and the Neoliberal Order Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
  4. Barkan SE 1986. Interorganizational conflict in the Southern civil rights movement. Soc. Inq. 56:2190–209
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Beamish TD, Luebbers AJ 2009. Alliance building across social movements: bridging difference in a peace and justice coalition. Soc. Probl. 56:4647–76
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett LW, Segerberg A 2014. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  7. Bernstein M 1997. Celebration and suppression: the strategic uses of identity by the lesbian and gay movement. Am. J. Sociol. 103:3531–65
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Blee KM 2002. Inside Organized Racism: Women in the Hate Movement Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  9. Borland E 2008. Social movement organizations and coalitions: comparisons from the women's movement in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change PG Coy 83–112 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bystydzienski JM, Schacht SP 2001. Forging Radical Alliances Across Difference: Coalition Politics for the New Millennium Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
  11. Carroll W, Ratner RS 1996. Master framing and cross-movement networking in contemporary social movements. Sociol. Q. 37:4601–25
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 35:1128–52
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Coleman JS 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94:95–120
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Crenshaw K 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a Black feminist critique of antidiscrimi-nation doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Univ. Chicago Legal Forum 140:139–67
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Cress DM, Snow DA 2000. The outcomes of homeless mobilization: the influence of organization, disruption, political mediation, and framing. Am. J. Sociol. 105:41063–1104
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Croteau D, Hicks L 2003. Coalition framing and the challenge of a consonant frame pyramid: the case of a collaborative response to homelessness. Soc. Probl. 50:2251–72
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Curtis RL, Zurcher LA 1973. Stable resources of protest movements: the multi-organizational field. Soc. Forces 52:153–61
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Dailey K 2012. Kony2012: the rise of online campaigning. BBC News Mar. 12. http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-17306118
  19. Democracy in America blog. 2011. Social media and the Wall Street protests: #Occupytheweb. The Economist/Democracy in America Blog Oct. 11. https://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2011/10/social-media-and-wall-street-protests
  20. Diani M 2009. The structural bases of protest events: multiple memberships and civil society networks in the 15 February 2003 anti-war demonstrations. Acta Sociol 52:163–83
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Dixon M, Danaher W, Kail B 2013. Allies, targets, and the effectiveness of coalition protest: a comparative analysis of labor unrest in the U. S. South. Mobilization 18:3331–50
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Dobusch L, Schoeneborn D 2015. Fluidity, identity, and organizationality: the communicative constitution of Anonymous. J. Manag. Stud. 52:81005–35
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Durkheim E, Mauss M 1963. Primitive Classification Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  24. Earl J 2006. Pursuing social change online: the use of four protest tactics on the Internet. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 24:3362–77
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Earl J, Kimport K 2008. The targets of online protest: state and private targets of four online protest tactics. Inf. Commun. Soc. 11:4449–72
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Ellingson S, Woodley VA, Paik A 2012. The structure of religious environmentalism: movement organizations, interorganizational networks, and collective action. J. Sci. Study Relig. 51:2266–85
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Epstein SG 1987. Gay politics, ethnic identity: the limits of social constructionism. Social. Rev. 17:93/949–54
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Evans R, Kay T 2008. How environmentalists ‘greened’ trade policy: strategic action and the architecture of field overlap. Am. Sociol. Rev. 73:6970–91
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Fantasia R 1988. Cultures of Solidarity: Consciousness, Action, and Contemporary American Workers Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  30. Fassiotto MA, Soule SA 2017. Loud and clear: the effect of protest signals on congressional attention. Mobilization 22:117–38
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Ferguson J-P, Dudley T, Soule SA 2017. Osmotic mobilization and union support during the long protest wave,. 1960–1995 Adm. Sci. Q. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217715618
    [Crossref]
  32. Fisher DR, Dow DM, Ray R 2017. Intersectionality takes it to the streets: mobilizing across diverse interests for the Women's March. Sci. Adv. 3:9eaao1390
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Fligstein N, McAdam D 2012. A Theory of Fields Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  34. Gamson J, Moon D 2004. The sociology of sexualities: queer and beyond. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30:147–64
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Gamson WA 1975. The Strategy of Social Protest Homewood, IL: Dorsey
  36. Gerbaudo P 2012. Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism London, UK: Pluto Press
  37. Gerhards J, Rucht D 1992. Mesomobilization: organizing and framing in two protest campaigns in West Germany. Am. J. Sociol. 98:3555–96
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Ghaziani A 2008. The Dividends of Dissent: How Conflict and Culture Work in Lesbian and Gay Marches on Washington Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  39. Glynn MA, Navis C 2013. Categories, identities, and cultural classification: moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. J. Manag. Stud. 50:1124–37
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Goss KA, Heaney MT 2010. Organizing women as women: hybridity and grassroots collective action in the 21st century. Perspect. Politics 8:127–52
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Gould RV 1995. Insurgent Identities: Class, Community, and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  42. Gusfield JR 1955. Social structure and moral reform: a study of the Woman's Christian Temperance Union. Am. J. Sociol. 61:3221–32
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Gusfield JR 1963. Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement Urbana-Champaign: Univ. Ill. Press
  44. Hara N, Huang B-Y 2011. Online social movements. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 45:1489–522
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Heaney MT, Rojas F 2014. Hybrid activism: social movement mobilization in a multi-movement environment. Am. J. Sociol. 119:41047–103
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Heery E, Williams S, Abbott B 2012. Civil society organizations and trade unions: cooperation, conflict, indifference. Work Employ. Soc. 26:1145–60
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Hilgartner S, Bosk CL 1988. The rise and fall of social problems: a public arenas model. Am. J. Sociol. 94:153–78
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Hsu G, Hannan MT 2005. Identities, genres, and organizational forms. Organ. Sci. 16:5474–90
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Hunt SA, Benford RA 2007. Collective identity, solidarity, and commitment. The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements DA Snow, SA Soule, H Kriesi 433–57 Oxford, UK: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Ince J, Rojas F, Davis CA 2017. The social media response to Black Lives Matter: how Twitter users interact with Black Lives Matter through hashtag use. Ethnic Racial Stud 40:111814–30
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Isaac L, Christiansen L 2002. How the civil rights movement revitalized labor militancy. Am. Sociol. Rev. 67:5722–46
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Isaac L, McDonald S, Lukasik G 2006. Takin’ it from the streets: how the sixties mass movement revitalized unionization. Am. J. Sociol. 112:146–96
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Jones AW, Hutchinson RN, Van Dyke N, Gates L, Companion M 2001. Coalition form and mobilization effectiveness in local social movements. Sociol. Spectrum 21:2207–31
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Jung W, King BG, Soule SA 2014. Issue bricolage: explaining the configuration of the social movement sector, 1960–1995. Am. J. Sociol. 120:1187–225
     [Google Scholar]
  55. King BG, Cornwall M 2005. Specialists and generalists: learning strategies in the woman suffrage movement, 1866–1918. Res. Soc. Mov. Confl. Change 26:3–34
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Lamont M, Molnár V 2002. The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 28:1167–95
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Lee J-E 2011. Insularity or solidarity? The impacts of political opportunity structure and social movement sector on alliance formation. Mobilization 16:3303–324
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Levi M, Murphy GH 2006. Coalitions of contention: the case of the WTO protests in Seattle. Political Stud 54:4651–70
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Levi M, Olson D 2000. The battles in Seattle. Politics Soc 28:3309–29
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Lewis K, Gray K, Meierhenrich J 2014. The structure of online activism. Sociol. Sci. 1:1–19
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Lichterman P 1995. Piecing together multicultural community: cultural differences in community building among grass-roots environmentalists. Soc. Probl. 42:4513–34
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Luo XR, Zhang J, Marquis C 2016. Mobilization in the Internet age: Internet activism and corporate response. Acad. Manag. J. 59:2045–68
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Lynch M 2011. After Egypt: the limits and promise of online challenges to the authoritarian Arab state. Perspect. Politics 9:2301–10
     [Google Scholar]
  64. March JG 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2:171–87
     [Google Scholar]
  65. McAdam D 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  66. McAdam D 1983. Tactical innovation and the pace of insurgency. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:6735–54
     [Google Scholar]
  67. McAdam D, Tarrow S, Tilly C 2001. Dynamics of Contention Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  68. McCammon HJ 2003. ‘Out of the parlors and into the streets’: the changing tactical repertoire of the U.S. women's movements. Soc. Forces 81:3787–818
     [Google Scholar]
  69. McCammon HJ, Campbell KE 2002. Allies on the road to victory: coalition formation between the suffragists and the Woman's Christian Temperance Union. Mobilization 7:3231–51
     [Google Scholar]
  70. McCammon HJ, Moon M 2015. Social movement coalitions. The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements D Della Porta, M Diani 326–39 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  71. McCarthy JD, Zald MN 1977. Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory. Am. J. Sociol. 82:61212–41
     [Google Scholar]
  72. McCaughey M, Ayers MD 2003. Cyberactivism: Online Activism in Theory and Practice Abingdon, UK: Routledge
  73. McVeigh R, Myers DJ, Sikkink D 2004. Corn, Klansmen, and Coolidge: structure and framing in social movements. Soc. Forces 83:2653–90
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Meyer DS, Corrigall-Brown C 2005. Coalitions and political context: U.S. movements against wars in Iraq. Mobilization 10:3327–46
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Meyer DS, Whittier N 1994. Social movement spillover. Soc. Probl. 41:277–98
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Minkoff DC 1997. The sequencing of social movements. Am. Sociol. Rev. 62:5779
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Morris AD 1993. Birmingham confrontation reconsidered: an analysis of the dynamics and tactics of mobilization. Am. Sociol. Rev. 58:5621–36
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Negro G, Koçak O, Hsu G 2010. Research on categories in the sociology of organizations. Categories in Markets: Origins and Evolution G Hsu, G Negro, Ö Koçak 3–35 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Obach BK 2004. Labor and the Environmental Movement: The Quest for Common Ground Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  80. Okamoto DG 2010. Organizing across ethnic boundaries in the post-civil rights era: Asian American panethnic coalitions. See Van Dyke & McCammon 2010 143–69
  81. Okamoto DG, Ebert K 2010. Beyond the ballot: immigrant collective action in gateways and new destinations in the United States. Soc. Probl. 57:4529–58
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Olzak S 2016. The effect of category spanning on lethality and longevity of terrorist organizations. Soc. Forces 95:2559–84
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Olzak S, Ryo E 2007. Organizational diversity, vitality and outcomes in the civil rights movement. Soc. Forces 85:41561–91
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Olzak S, Uhrig NS 2001. The ecology of tactical overlap. Am. Sociol. Rev. 66:5694–717
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Padgett JF, Ansell CK 1993. Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. Am. J. Sociol. 98:61259–319
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Padgett JF, McLean PD 2006. Organizational invention and elite transformation: the birth of partnership systems in Renaissance Florence. Am. J. Sociol. 111:51463–568
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Podolny JM, Stuart TE, Hannan MT 1996. Networks, knowledge, and niches: competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. Am. J. Sociol. 102:3659–89
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Polletta F 1999. ‘Free spaces’ in collective action. Theory Soc 28:11–38
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Polletta F, Jasper JM 2001. Collective identity and social movements. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27:283–305
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Powell WW, Horvath A, Brandtner C 2016. Click and mortar: organizations on the Web. Res. Organ. Behav. 36:101–20
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Adm. Sci. Q. 41:1116–45
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Reich AD 2017. The organizational trace of an insurgent moment: Occupy Wall Street and New York City's social movement field, 2004 to 2015. Socius 3:1–21
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Rosa JA, Porac JF, Runser-Spanjol J, Saxon MS 1999. Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. J. Mark. 63:64–77
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Rose F 2000. Coalitions Across the Class Divide: Lessons from the Labor, Peace, and Environmental Movements Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  95. Saguy AC, Ward A 2011. Coming out as fat. Soc. Psychol. Q. 74:153–75
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Scott C 2013. Anonymous Agencies, Backstreet Businesses, and Covert Collectives: Rethinking Organizations in the 21st Century Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  97. Snow DA, Rochford EB, Worden SK, Benford RD 1986. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 51:4464–81
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Soule SA 1997. The student divestment movement in the United States and tactical diffusion: the Shantytown protest. Soc. Forces 75:3855–82
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Soule SA, King BG 2008. Competition and resource partitioning in three social movement industries. Am. J. Sociol. 113:61568–1610
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Staggenborg S 1986. Coalition work in the pro-choice movement: organizational and environmental opportunities and obstacles. Soc. Probl. 33:5374–90
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Staggenborg S 2015. Event coalitions in the Pittsburgh G20 protests. Sociol. Q. 56:2386–411
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Strang D, Soule SA 1998. Diffusion in organizations and social movements: from hybrid corn to poison pills. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24:265–90
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Tarrow S 2011. Power in Movement: Collective Action, Social Movements and Politics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  104. Taylor P, Jordan T 2004. Hacktivism and Cyberwars: Rebels with a Cause Abingdon, UK: Routledge
  105. Taylor VA, Van Dyke N 2004. ‘Get up, stand up’: tactical repertoires of social movements. The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements DA Snow, SA Soule, H Kriesi 262–93 Oxford, UK: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Taylor VA, Whittier N 1992. Collective identity in social movement communities: lesbian feminist mobilization. Frontiers in Social Movement Theory AD Morris, M Mueller 104–29 New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Terriquez V 2015. Intersectional mobilization, social movement spillover, and queer youth leadership in the immigrant rights movement. Soc. Probl. 62:3343–362
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Tilly C 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution Boston: Addison-Wesley
  109. Tilly C 1995. Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  110. Tilly C, Tarrow S 2006. Contentious Politics Boulder, CO: Paradigm
  111. Tilly C, Wood LJ 2013. Social Movements 1768–2012 Abingdon, UK: Routledge
  112. Tufekci Z 2017. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  113. Tufekci Z, Wilson C 2012. Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: observations from Tahrir Square. J. Commun. 62:2363–79
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Van Dyke N 2003. Crossing movement boundaries: factors that facilitate coalition protest by American college students, 1930–1990. Soc. Probl. 50:2226–50
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Van Dyke N, Amos B 2017. Social movement coalitions: formation, longevity, and success. Sociol. Compass 11:7e12489
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Van Dyke N, McCammon HJ 2010. Strategic Alliances: Coalition Building and Social Movements Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  117. Vasi IB 2006. The new anti-war protests and miscible mobilizations. Soc. Mov. Stud. 5:2137–53
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Walder AG 2009. Political sociology and social movements. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 35:393–412
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Wang DJ, Piazza A 2016. The use of disruptive tactics in protest as a trade-off: the role of social movement claims. Soc. Forces 94:41675–710
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Wang DJ, Soule SA 2012. Social movement organizational collaboration: networks of learning and the diffusion of protest tactics, 1960–1995. Am. J. Sociol. 117:61674–722
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Wang DJ, Soule SA 2016. Tactical innovation in social movements: the effects of peripheral and multi-issue protest. Am. Sociol. Rev. 81:3517–48
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Wood LJ 2012. Direct Action, Deliberation, and Diffusion: Collective Action After the WTO Protests in Seattle Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  123. Zald MN, McCarthy JD 1980. Social movement industries: competition and cooperation among social movement organizations. Res. Soc. Mov. Confl. Change 3:1–20
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Zuckerman EW 1999. The categorical imperative: securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Am. J. Sociol. 104:51398–438
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041258
Loading
Boundary-Spanning in Social Movements: Antecedents and Outcomes
Annual Review of Sociology 44, 167 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041258
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041258
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041258
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error