1932

Abstract

As the world's economies become more integrated and the global economy subsequently grows, there is increasing concern regarding how such trends will affect the environment. In fact, the relationship between globalization and the environment has become quite contentious in policy circles. In part in response to these controversies, a burgeoning amount of academic attention has emerged that examines the globalization/environment nexus. Although there have been advances in the thinking about these relationships, significant challenges remain. This article provides a critical taxonomy that will help scholars better understand the overwhelming literature on the subject and also outlines the key challenges that scholars and policy makers will face for a second wave of thinking on the subject.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.021407.092325
2009-11-21
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/energy/34/1/annurev.environ.33.021407.092325.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.021407.092325&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Nye JS, Donahue JD. 1.  2000. Governance in a Globalizing World Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
  2. 2.  World Bank 2008. World Development Indicators Washington, DC: World Bank
  3. 3. UN Environ. Program (UNEP) 2007. Global Environment Outlook GEO4 Environment for Development: Summary for Decision Makers Valletta, Malta: Progress4
  4. 4. Millenn. Ecosyst. Assess 2005. Living beyond our means: natural assets and human well-being (statement of the MA board). Millenn. Ecosyst. Assess. Rep. Island Press Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  5. 5. Intergov. Panel Clim. Change (IPCC) 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers Geneva, Switz.: IPCC
  6. 6. World Bank 1992. World Development Report Washington, DC: World Bank
  7. Ricardo D. 7.  1817. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: Murray [Google Scholar]
  8. Krugman P, Obstfeld M. 8.  2006. International Economics: Theory and Policy Boston: Addison Wesley
  9. Grossman G, Krueger A. 9.  1993. Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. The US-Mexico Free Trade Agreement P Garber 313–56 Cambridge: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  10. Kuznets S. 10.  1957. Economic growth and income inequality. Am. Econ. Rev. 45:1–28 [Google Scholar]
  11. Stern D. 11.  2004. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev. 32:1419–39 [Google Scholar]
  12. Rock MT, Angel DP. 12.  2006. Industrial Transformation in the Developing World Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  13. Penner JE, Lister DH, Griggs DJ, Dokken DJ, McFarland M. 13.  1999. IPCC special report: aviation and the global atmosphere: summary for policymakers. Intergov. Panel Clim. Change. Geneva, Switz.: [Google Scholar]
  14. Corbett JJ, Fishbeck PS. 14.  1997. Emissions from ships. Science 278:823–24 [Google Scholar]
  15. Corbett JJ, Fishbeck PS. 15.  2000. Emissions from waterborne commerce vessels in United States continental and inland waterways. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34:3254–60 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gallagher K. 16.  2005. International trade and air pollution: estimating the economic costs of air emissions from waterborne commerce vessels in the United States. J. Environ. Manag. 7:99–103 [Google Scholar]
  17. McAusland C, Costello C. 17.  2004. Avoiding invasives: trade-related policies for controlling unintentional exotic species introductions. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 48:954–77 [Google Scholar]
  18. 18. ICF Consult 2001. North American trade and transportation corridors: environmental impacts and mitigation strategies. Prepared for the North Am. Comm. Environ. Coop. http://www.cec.org/files/PDF/POLLUTANTS/corridors-e_EN.pdf
  19. Bhagwati J, Daly HE. 19.  1993. Debate: Does free trade harm the environment?. Sci. Am. Nov.:41–57 [Google Scholar]
  20. Copeland BR, Taylor MS. 20.  2003. Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press
  21. Cole MA. 21.  2004. Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecol. Econ. 48:71–81 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kahn ME, Yoshino Y. 22.  2004. Testing for pollution havens inside and outside of regional trading blocs. Adv. Econ. Anal. Policy 4:1288 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gallagher K. 23.  2004. Free Trade and the Environment: Mexico, NAFTA, and Beyond Palo Alto: Stanford Univ. Press
  24. Barbier EB. 24.  2005. Natural Resources and Economic Development Cambridge, UK: Camb. Univ. Press
  25. Zarsky L. 25.  2004. International Investment Rules for Sustainable Development: Balancing Rights with Rewards London: Earthscan
  26. Gallagher K. 26.  2006. China Shifts Gears: Automakers, Oil, Pollution, and Development Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  27. Gallagher K. 27.  2007. Toward a theory of innovation and industrial pollution: evidence from Mexican manufacturing. Industrial Innovation and Environmental Regulation: Developing Workable Solutions S Parto, B Herbert-Copley 138–56 Tokyo/New York/Paris: UN Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  28. Jaffe A, Peterson S, Portney P, Stavins R. 28.  1995. Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us?. J. Econ. Lit. 33:132–63 [Google Scholar]
  29. Porter ME, van der Linde C. 29.  1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 9:97–118 [Google Scholar]
  30. Palmer K, Oates WE, Portney PR. 30.  1995. Tightening environmental standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm?. J. Econ. Perspect. 9:119–32 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jenkins R, Barton J, Bartzokas A, Hesselberg J, Knutsen H. 31.  2002. Environmental Regulation in the New Global Economy: The Impact on Industry and Competitiveness Northampton, MA: Elgar
  32. Charnovitz S. 32.  2007. The WTO's environmental progress. J. Int. Econ. Law685–706
  33. Newcombe A. 33.  2007. Sustainable development and international treaty law. J. World Invest. Trade 8:4–17 [Google Scholar]
  34. 34. UN Environ. Program./Int. Inst. Sustain. Dev. (IISD) 2000. Trade and Environment: A Handbook Winnipeg, Can.: IISD
  35. Barrett S. 35.  1994. Self-enforcing international environmental agreements. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 46:878–94 [Google Scholar]
  36. Neumeyer E. 36.  2001. Greening Trade and Investment London: Earthscan
  37. Krueger J. 37.  1999. International Trade and the Basel Convention London: Earthscan
  38. Sampson G. 38.  2000. Trade, Environment, and the WTO: The Post-Seattle Agenda Washington, DC: Overseas Dev. Counc.
  39. Charnovitz S. 39.  2005. The WTO, trade and the environment. The WTO, Trade and the Environment G Sampson, J Whalley 413–31 Cheltenham, UK: Elgar [Google Scholar]
  40. Esty D. 40.  1997. Greening the GATT Washington, DC: Inst. Int. Econ.
  41. Ruggerio R. 41.  1999. Opening remarks to the high level symposium on trade and the environment. Proc. World Trade Organ. Mar. 15. Proc. High-Level Symp. Trade Environ., Geneva http://intranet.corpei.ec/carpetas/cic/OMC/WTOCD/WTO%20Website/SnapshotOfWTOWebsiteInEnglish/english/tratop_e/envir_e/dgenv.htm
  42. Najam A. 42.  2003. The case against a new international environmental organization. Glob. Gov. 9:367–84 [Google Scholar]
  43. Anderson S, Cavanagh J. 43.  2004. Lessons of European Integration for the Americas Washington, DC: Inst. Policy Stud.
  44. Edsall R. 44.  2007. Indirect expropriation under NAFTA and DR-CAFTA. Boston Univ. Law Rev. 86:931–62 [Google Scholar]
  45. Conroy M. 45.  2002. Can advocacy-led certification systems transform global corporate practices? Evidence, and some theory Work. Pap. 21 Polit. Econ. Res. Inst., Univ. Mass.: Amherst
  46. DeSombre ER. 46.  2006. Flagging Standards: Globalization and Environmental, Safety and Labor Regulations at Sea Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  47. Clapp J. 47.  2005. Global environmental governance for corporate responsibility and accountability. Glob. Environ. Polit. 5:23–34 [Google Scholar]
  48. Putnam RD. 48.  1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. Int. Organ. 42:427–60 [Google Scholar]
  49. Vogel D. 49.  1997. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy Cambridge: Harvard
  50. Steinberg R. 50.  1997. Trade-environment negotiations in the EU, NAFTA, and WTO: regional trajectories of rule development. Am. J. Int. Law 91:231–67 [Google Scholar]
  51. DeSombre ER. 51.  2000. Domestic Sources of International Environmental Policy: Industry, Environmentalists, and U.S. Power Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  52. Mayer FW. 52.  1998. Interpreting NAFTA: The Science and Art of Political Analysis New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  53. Newell P. 53.  2007. Trade and environmental justice in Latin America. New Polit. Econ. 12:237–59 [Google Scholar]
  54. Najam A. 54.  2007. Envisioning a Sustainable Development Agenda for Trade and Environment New York: Palgrave MacMillian
  55. Pulver S. 55.  2007. Developing country firms as agents of environmental sustainability?. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 42:191–208 [Google Scholar]
  56. Cosbey A. 56.  2008. Trade and Climate Change: Issues in Perspective Winnipeg: Int. Inst. Sustain. Dev.
  57. Ackerman F, Gallagher KP. 57.  2004. Computable abstraction: environmental reviews of trade agreements. Flawed Foundations of General Equilibrium Theory F Ackerman, A Nadal 168–81 London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  58. Shafik N, Bandyopadhyay S. 58.  1992. Economic growth and environmental quality, time series and cross-country evidence Work. Pap. WPS 904 World Bank Washington, DC:
  59. Hettige H, Lucas REB, Wheeler D. 59.  1992. The toxic intensity of industrial production: global patterns, trends, and trade policy. Am. Econ. Rev. 82:478–81 [Google Scholar]
  60. Panayotou T.60.  1993. Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development Work. Pap. WP238 Technol. Employ Program., Int. Labor Off. Geneva:
  61. Grossman G, Krueger A. 61.  1993. Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. The U.S. Mexico Free Trade Agreement Work. Pap. 3914 P Garber Natl. Bur. Econ. Res.: Cambridge, MA [Google Scholar]
  62. Shafik N.62.  1994. Economic development and the environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 46:757–73 [Google Scholar]
  63. Selden TM, Song D. 63.  1994. Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions?. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 27:147–62 [Google Scholar]
  64. Cropper M, Griffiths C. 64.  1994. The interaction of population growth and environmental quality. Popul. Econ. 84:250–54 [Google Scholar]
  65. Antle JM, Heidebrink G. 65.  1995. Environment and development: theory and international evidence. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 43:603–25 [Google Scholar]
  66. Grossman G, Krueger A. 66.  1995. Economic growth and the environment. Q. J. Econ. 110:353–77 [Google Scholar]
  67. Panayotou T. 67.  1997. Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2:465–84 [Google Scholar]
  68. Roberts JT, Grimes PE. 68.  1997. Carbon intensity and economic development 1962–91: a brief exploration of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev. 25:191–98 [Google Scholar]
  69. Schmalensee R, Stoker TM, Judson RA. 69.  1997. World carbon dioxide emissions: 1950-2050. Rev. Econ. Stat. 80:15–27 [Google Scholar]
  70. Cole MA, Rayner AJ, Bates JM. 70.  1997. The environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical analysis. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2:401–16 [Google Scholar]
  71. Vincent JR, Ali RBM. 71.  1997. Environment and Development in a Resource-Rich Economy: Malaysia Under the New Economic Policy Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  72. Hettige H, Mani M, Wheeler D. 72.  1997. Industrial pollution in economic development: Kuznets revisited Work. Pap. WPS1876 World Bank: Washington, DC
  73. Carson RT, Jeon Y, McCubbin DR. 73.  1997. The relationship between air pollution emissions and income: US data. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2:433–50 [Google Scholar]
  74. Moomaw WR, Unruh GC. 74.  1997. Are environmental Kuznets curves misleading us? The case of CO2 emissions. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2:451–63 [Google Scholar]
  75. Ravallion M, Heil M, Jalan J. 75.  1997. A less poor world, but a hotter one? Carbon emissions, economic growth and income inequality Work. Pap. WPS13 World Bank: Washington, DC
  76. Torras M, Boyce J. 76.  1998. Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol. Econ. 25:147–60 [Google Scholar]
  77. Unruh GC, Moomaw WR. 77.  1998. An alternative analysis of apparent EKC-type transitions. Ecol. Econ. 25:221–29 [Google Scholar]
  78. Suri V, Chapman D. 78.  1998. Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol. Econ. 25:195–208 [Google Scholar]
  79. de Bruyn SM, van den Bergh JCJM, Opschoor JB. 79.  1998. Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves. Ecol. Econ. 25:161–75 [Google Scholar]
  80. Kaufman R, Davidsdottir B, Garnham S, Pauly P. 80.  1998. The determinants of atmospheric SO2 concentration: reconsidering the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol. Econ. 25:209–20 [Google Scholar]
  81. Chaudhuri S, Pfaff A. 81.  1998. Household income, fuel choice, and indoor air quality: microfoundations of an environmental Kuznets curve Work. Pap., Econ. Dep., Columbia Univ.
  82. Kahn ME. 82.  1998. A household level environmental Kuznets curve. Econ. Lett. 59:269–73 [Google Scholar]
  83. Islam N, Vincent J, Panayotou T. 83.  1999. Unveiling the income-environment relationship: an exploration into the determinants of environmental quality Work. Pap. Dep. Econ., Harvard Inst. Int. Dev.
  84. Panayotou T, Sachs J, Peterson A. 84.  1999. Developing countries and the control of climate change: a theoretical perspective and policy implications CAER II Discuss. Pap. 45 Cent. Int. Dev. Harvard Univ.
  85. Galeotti M, Lanza A. 85.  1999. Desperately seeking (environmental) Kuznets Work. Pap. 1999.2 Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Milan, Italy:
  86. Tuan NA.86.  1999. Evidences of the environmental Kuznet's curve from CO2 emissions in six-country analysis Inst. Econ. Polit. Energie (IEPE) Grenoble, Fr: http://www.upmf-grenoble.fr/iepe/textes/Tuan_Kuznetscurve99.pdf
  87. Bhattarai M, Hammig M. 87.  2001. Institutions and the environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: a crosscountry analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia. World Dev. 29:995–1010 [Google Scholar]
  88. Galeotti M, Lanza A, Pauli F. 88.  2001. Desperately seeking (environmental Kuznets): a new look at the evidence Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Note di Lavoro Work. Pap. 67.2001.
  89. Stern DI, Common MS. 89.  2001. Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur?. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 41:62–78 [Google Scholar]
  90. Canas A, Ferrão P, Conceição P. 90.  2003. A new environmental Kuznets curve? Relationship between direct material input and income per capita: evidence from industrialized countries. Ecol. Econ. 46:217–29 [Google Scholar]
  91. Cole MA. 91.  2003. Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecol. Econ. 48:71–81 [Google Scholar]
  92. Richmond AK, Kaufmann RK. 92.  2004. Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and energy use and/or carbon emissions?. Ecol. Econ. 56:176–89 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.021407.092325
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.021407.092325
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error