Cognacy Databases and Phylogenetic Research on Indo-European

Literature Cited

1. Anthony DW. 2007. The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
2. Beaumont MA. 2010. Approximate Bayesian computation in evolution and ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 41:379–406
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bellwood P. 2005. First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies Oxford, UK: Blackwell
4. Bouckaert R, Lemey P, Dunn M, Greenhill SJ, Alekseyenko AV et al. 2012. Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 337:6097957–60 http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219669
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
5. Bouckaert R, Lemey P, Dunn M, Greenhill SJ, Alekseyenko AV et al. 2013. Correction to: Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 342:61651446 http://doi.org/10.1126/science.342.6165.1446-a
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
6. Campbell L. 2013. Historical Linguistics: An Introduction Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
7. Chang W, Cathcart C, Hall D, Garrett A 2015. Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European steppe hypothesis. Language 91:1194–244 http://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0005
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
8. Clackson J. 2016. Latin as a source for the Romance languages. The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages A Ledgeway, M Maiden 3–13 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
9. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A 2012. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29:81969–73 http://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss075
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
10. Dyen I, Kruskal JB, Black P 1992. An Indoeuropean classification: a lexicostatistical experiment. Trans. Am. Philos. Soc. 82:51–132 http://doi.org/10.2307/1006517 (data set available at https://thevore.com/comparative-indoeuropean-database-collected-by-isidore-dyen/ )
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
11. Embleton SM. 1995. Review of An Indoeuropean Classification: A Lexicostatistical Experiment, by Isidore Dyen, Joseph B. Kruskal, and Paul Black. Diachronica 12:2263–68 http://doi.org/10.1075/dia.12.2.10emb
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
12. Finegan E. 2009. English. The World's Major Languages B Comrie 59–85 London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gamkrelidze TV, Ivanov VV. 1984. Indoevropjskij jazyk i indoevropejcy: rekonstrukcija i istoriko-tipologieskij analiz prajazyka i protokultury [The Indo-European Language and the Indo-Europeans: A Reconstruction and Historical-Typological Analysis of a Proto-Language and a Proto-Culture] Tblisi, Ga: Tbilisi Univ. Press
14. Gamkrelidze TV, Ivanov VV. 1995. Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans: A Reconstruction and Historical Analysis of a Proto-Language and a Proto-Culture Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
15. Gimbutas M. 1970. Proto-Indo-European culture: the Kurgan culture during the 5th to the 3rd millennia B.C. Indo-European and Indo-Europeans G Cardona, HM Koenigswald, A Senn 155–98 Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gray RD, Atkinson QD. 2003. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426:435–39 http://doi.org/10.1038/nature02029
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
17. Greenhill SJ, Gray RD. 2009. Austronesian language phylogenies: myths and misconceptions about Bayesian computational methods. Austronesian Historical Linguistics and Culture History: A Festschrift for Robert Blust KA Adelaar, A Pawley 375–97 Canberra, Aust: Pac. Linguist.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Greenhill SJ, Heggarty P, Gray RD 2020. Bayesian phylolinguistics. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics RD Janda, BD Joseph, BS Vance 226–53 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
19. Heggarty P. 2014. Prehistory by Bayesian phylogenetics? The state of the art on Indo-European origins. Antiquity 88:340566–77 http://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00101188
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
20. Heggarty P. 2015. Prehistory through language and archaeology. The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics C Bowern, B Evans 598–626 London: Routledge https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315794013.ch28
    [Google Scholar]
21. Heggarty P. 2018a. Indo-European and the ancient DNA revolution. Talking Neolithic: Proceedings of the Workshop on Indo-European Origins Held at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, December 2–3, 2013 G Kroonen, JP Mallory, B Comrie 120–73 Washington, DC: Inst. Study Man
    [Google Scholar]
22. Heggarty P. 2018b. Why Indo-European? Clarifying cross-disciplinary misconceptions on farming versus pastoralism. Talking Neolithic: Proceedings of the Workshop on Indo-European Origins Held at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, December 2–3, 2013 G Kroonen, JP Mallory, B Comrie 69–119 Washington, DC: Inst. Study Man
    [Google Scholar]
23. Heggarty P, Anderson C, Scarborough M, Greenhill SJ, Kühnert D, Gray RD 2021. Language trees with sampled ancestors support an early origin of the Indo-European language family Work. Pap., Max Planck Inst. Evol. Anthropol Leipzig, Ger:.
24. Holm HJ. 2011. “Swadesh lists” of Albanian revisited and consequences for its position in the Indo-European languages. J. Indo-Eur. Stud. 39:1–245–99
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lazzeroni R. 1998. Sanskrit. The Indo-European Languages AG Ramat, P Ramat 98–124 London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mallory JP. 1989. In Search of the Indo-Europeans London: Thames & Hudson
27. Masica CP. 1991. The Indo-Aryan Languages Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
28. McMahon AMS, Heggarty P, McMahon R, Slaska N 2005. Swadesh sublists and the benefits of borrowing: an Andean case study. Trans. Philol. Soc. 103:2147–70 http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2005.00148.x
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
29. McMahon AMS, McMahon R. 2005. Language Classification by Numbers Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
30. Nakhleh L, Ringe D, Warnow T 2005. Perfect phylogenetic networks: a new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. Language 81:2382–420 www.jstor.org/stable/4489897
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pereltsvaig A, Lewis MW. 2015. The Indo-European Controversy: Facts and Fallacies in Historical Linguistics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
32. Rama T. 2018. Three tree priors and five datasets: a study of Indo-European phylogenetics. Lang. Dyn. Change 8:2182–218 http://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00802005
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
33. Renfrew C. 1987. Archaeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins London: Jonathan Cape
34. Ringe DA, Warnow T, Taylor A 2002. Indo-European and computational cladistics. Trans. Philol. Soc. 100:159–129 http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00091
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
35. Ritchie AM, Ho SYW. 2019. Influence of the tree prior and sampling scale on Bayesian phylogenetic estimates of the origin times of language families. J. Lang. Evol. 4:2108–23 https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzz005
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
36. Rix H, Kümmel MJ, Zehnder T, Lipp R, Schirmer B 2001. Lexikon der Indogermanischen Verben (LIV²) Wiesbaden, Ger: Reichert, 2nd. ed.
37. Whitfield J. 2003. Language tree rooted in Turkey. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/news031124-6
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
38. Wodtko DS, Irslinger B, Schneider C 2008. Nomina im indogermanischen Lexikon (NIL) Heidelberg, Ger: Winter
39. Yang Z. 2006. Computational Molecular Evolution Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press