1932

Abstract

Fruit has evolved myriad forms that facilitate seed dispersal in varied environmental and ecological contexts. Because fleshy fruits become attractive and nutritious to seed-dispersing animals, the transition from unripe to ripe fruit represents a dramatic shift in survival strategy—from protecting unripe fruit against damaging animals to making it appealing to those same animals once ripened. For optimal fitness, ripening therefore must be tightly controlled and coordinated with seed development. Fruits, like many vegetative tissues of plants that contribute to human diets, are also subject to decay, which is enhanced as a consequence of the ripening transition. As such, ripening control has enormous relevance for both plant biology and food security. Here, we review the complex interactions of hormones and transcription factors during fleshy-fruit ripening, with an emphasis on the recent discovery that epigenome dynamics are a critical and early regulator of the cascade of molecular events that ultimately contribute to fruit maturation and ripening.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-040906
2017-04-28
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/arplant/68/1/annurev-arplant-042916-040906.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-040906&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adams-Phillips L, Barry C, Kannan P, Leclercq J, Bouzayen M, Giovannoni J. 1.  2004. Evidence that CTR1-mediated ethylene signal transduction in tomato is encoded by a multigene family whose members display distinct regulatory features. Plant Mol. Biol. 54:387–404 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alba R, Payton P, Fei Z, McQuinn R, Debbie P. 2.  et al. 2005. Transcriptome and selected metabolite analyses reveal multiple points of ethylene control during tomato fruit development. Plant Cell 17:2954–65 [Google Scholar]
  3. Allis D, Jenuwein T. 3.  2016. The hallmarks of epigenetic control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17:487–500 [Google Scholar]
  4. Aquea F, Timmermann T, Arce-Johnson P. 4.  2010. Analysis of histone acetyltransferase and deacetylase families of Vitis vinifera. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 48:194–99 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayub R, Guis M, Ben Amor M, Gillot L, Roustan JP. 5.  et al. 1996. Expression of ACC oxidase antisense gene inhibits ripening of cantaloupe melon fruits. Nat. Biotechnol. 14:862–66 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baubec T, Ivanek R, Lienert F, Schubeler D. 6.  2013. Methylation-dependent and -independent genomic targeting principles of the MBD protein family. Cell 153:480–92 [Google Scholar]
  7. Becker C, Hagmann J, Muller J, Koenig D, Stegle O. 7.  et al. 2011. Spontaneous epigenetic variation in the Arabidopsis thaliana methylome. Nature 480:245–49 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bemer M, Karlova R, Ballester AR, Tikunov YM, Bovy AG. 8.  et al. 2012. The tomato FRUITFULL homologs TDR4/FUL1 and MBP7/FUL2 regulate ethylene-independent aspects of fruit ripening. Plant Cell 24:4437–51 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bi F, Meng X, Ma C, Yi G. 9.  2015. Identification of miRNAs involved in fruit ripening of Cavendish bananas by deep sequencing. BMC Genom 16:776 [Google Scholar]
  10. Boureau L, How-Kit A, Teyssier E, Drevensek S, Rainieri M. 10.  et al. 2016. A CURLY LEAF homologue controls both vegetative and reproductive development of tomato plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 90:485–501 [Google Scholar]
  11. Breitel DA, Chappell-Maor L, Meir S, Panizel I, Puig CP. 11.  et al. 2016. AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 2 intersects hormonal signals in the regulation of tomato fruit ripening. PLOS Genet 12:e1005903 [Google Scholar]
  12. Burg SP, Burg EA. 12.  1965. Ethylene action and ripening of fruits: Ethylene influences growth and development of plants and is the hormone which initiates fruit ripening. Science 148:1190–96 [Google Scholar]
  13. Burkhardt PK, Beyer P, Wunn J, Kloti A, Armstrong GA. 13.  et al. 1997. Transgenic rice (Oryza sativa) endosperm expressing daffodil (. Narcissus pseudonarcissus ) phytoene synthase accumulates phytoene, a key intermediate of provitamin A biosynthesis. Plant J 11:1071–78 [Google Scholar]
  14. Candaele J, Demuynck K, Mosoti D, Beemster GTS, Inzé D, Nelissen H. 14.  2014. Differential methylation during maize leaf growth targets developmentally regulated genes. Plant Physiol 164:1350–64 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chahrour M, Jung SY, Shaw C, Zhou X, Wong ST. 15.  et al. 2008. MeCP2, a key contributor to neurological disease, activates and represses transcription. Science 320:1224–29 [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen H, Shen Y, Tang X, Yu L, Wang J. 16.  et al. 2006. Arabidopsis CULLIN4 forms an E3 ubiquitin ligase with RBX1 and the CDD complex in mediating light control of development. Plant Cell 18:1991–2004 [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen W, Kong J, Qin C, Yu S, Tan J. 17.  et al. 2015. Requirement of CHROMOMETHYLASE3 for somatic inheritance of the spontaneous tomato epimutation colourless non-ripening. Sci. Rep. 5:9192 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cherian S, Figueroa CR, Nair H. 18.  2014. ‘Movers and shakers’ in the regulation of fruit ripening: a cross-dissection of climacteric versus non-climacteric fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 65:4705–22 [Google Scholar]
  19. Christou P, Ford T, Kofron M. 19.  1991. Production of transgenic rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants from agronomically important Indica and Japonica varieties via electric discharge particle acceleration of exogenous DNA into immature zygotic embryos. Nat. Biotechnol. 9:957–62 [Google Scholar]
  20. Chung MY, Vrebalov J, Alba R, Lee J, McQuinn R. 20.  et al. 2010. A tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) APETALA2/ERF gene, SlAP2a, is a negative regulator of fruit ripening. Plant J 64:936–47 [Google Scholar]
  21. Cigliano RA, Sanseverino W, Cremona G, Ercolano MR, Conicella C, Consiglio FM. 21.  2013. Genome-wide analysis of histone modifiers in tomato: gaining an insight into their developmental roles. BMC Genom 14:57 [Google Scholar]
  22. Daminato M, Guzzo F, Casadoro G. 22.  2013. A SHATTERPROOF-like gene controls ripening in non-climacteric strawberries, and auxin and abscisic acid antagonistically affects its expression. J. Exp. Bot. 64:3775–86 [Google Scholar]
  23. Dandekar AM, Teo G, Defilippi BG, Uratsu SL, Passey AJ. 23.  et al. 2004. Effect of down-regulation of ethylene biosynthesis on fruit flavor complex in apple fruit. Transgenic Res 13:373–84 [Google Scholar]
  24. DellaPenna D, Alexander DC, Bennett AB. 24.  1986. Molecular cloning of tomato fruit polygalacturonase: analysis of polygalacturonase mRNA levels during ripening. PNAS 83:6420–24 [Google Scholar]
  25. D'Hont A, Denoeud F, Aury J-M, Baurens F-C, Carreel F. 25.  et al. 2012. The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants. Nature 488:213–17 [Google Scholar]
  26. Dong T, Hu Z, Deng L, Wang Y, Zhu M. 26.  et al. 2013. A tomato MADS-box transcription factor, SlMADS1, acts as a negative regulator of fruit ripening. Plant Physiol 163:1026–36 [Google Scholar]
  27. Dowen RH, Pelizzola M, Schmitz RJ, Lister R, Dowen JM. 27.  et al. 2012. Widespread dynamic DNA methylation in response to biotic stress. PNAS 109:E2183–91 [Google Scholar]
  28. Elitzur T, Yakir E, Quansah L, Fei Z, Vrebalov J. 28.  et al. 2016. Banana MaMADS transcription factors are necessary for fruit ripening and molecular tools to promote shelf-life and food security. Plant Physiol 171:380–91 [Google Scholar]
  29. Fich EA, Segerson NA, Rose JKC. 29.  2016. The plant polyester cutin: biosynthesis, structure, and biological roles. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 67:207–33 [Google Scholar]
  30. Fisher AJ, Franklin KA. 30.  2011. Chromatin remodeling in plant light signaling. Physiol. Plant. 142:305–13 [Google Scholar]
  31. Fujisawa M, Nakano T, Ito Y. 31.  2011. Identification of potential target genes for the tomato fruit-ripening regulator RIN by chromatin immunoprecipitation. BMC Plant Biol 11:26 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fujisawa M, Nakano T, Shima Y, Ito Y. 32.  2013. A large-scale identification of direct targets of the tomato MADS box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR reveals the regulation of fruit ripening. Plant Cell 25:371–86 [Google Scholar]
  33. Fujisawa M, Shima K, Nakagawa H, Kitagawa M, Kimbara J. 33.  et al. 2014. Transcriptional regulation of fruit ripening by tomato FRUITFULL homologs and associated MADS box proteins. Plant Cell 26:89–101 [Google Scholar]
  34. Gallusci P, Hodgman C, Teyssier E, Seymour GB. 34.  2016. DNA methylation and chromatin regulation during fleshy fruit development and ripening. Front. Plant Sci. 7:807 [Google Scholar]
  35. García-Aguilar M, Gillmor CS. 35.  2015. Zygotic genome activation and imprinting: parent-of-origin gene regulation in plant embryogenesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 27:29–35 [Google Scholar]
  36. Garcia-Mas J, Benjak A, Sanseverino W, Bourgeois M, Mir G. 36.  et al. 2012. The genome of melon (Cucumis melo L.). PNAS 109:11872–77 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gimenez E, Castañeda L, Pineda P, Pan IL, Moreno V. 37.  et al. 2016. TOMATO AGAMOUS1 and ARLEQUIN/TOMATOAGAMOUS-LIKE1 MADS-box genes have redundant and divergent functions required for tomato reproductive development. Plant Mol. Biol. 91:513–31 [Google Scholar]
  38. Giovannoni J, Tanksley S, Vrebalov J, Noensie E. 38.  2004. NOR gene for use in manipulation of fruit quality and ethylene response. US Patent No6762347 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gouil Q, Novák O, Baulcombe D. 39.  2016. SLTAB2 is the paramutated SULFUREA locus in tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 67:2655–64 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hadfield KA, Dandekar AM, Romani RJ. 40.  1993. Demethylation of ripening specific genes in tomato fruit. Plant Sci 92:13–18 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hamilton AJ, Lycett GW, Grierson D. 41.  1990. Antisense gene that inhibits synthesis of the hormone ethylene in transgenic plants. Nature 346:284–87 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hao Y, Hu G, Breitel D, Liu M, Mila I. 42.  et al. 2015. Auxin response factor SlARF2 is an essential component of the regulatory mechanism controlling fruit ripening in tomato. PLOS Genet 11:1–23 [Google Scholar]
  43. Harjes CE, Rocheford TR, Bai L, Brutnell TP, Kandianis CB. 43.  et al. 2008. Natural genetic variation in lycopene epsilon cyclase tapped for maize biofortification. Science 319:330–33 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hen-Avivi S, Lashbrooke J, Costa F, Aharoni A. 44.  2014. Scratching the surface: genetic regulation of cuticle assembly in fleshy fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 65:4653–64 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hirakawa H, Shirasawa K, Miyatake K, Nunome T, Negoro S. 45.  et al. 2014. Draft genome sequence of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.): the representative Solanum species indigenous to the old world. DNA Res. 21:649–60 [Google Scholar]
  46. How Kit AH, Boureau L, Stammitti-Bert L, Rolin D, Teyssier E, Gallusci P. 46.  2010. Functional analysis of SlEZ1 a tomato. Enhancer of zeste (E(z)) gene demonstrates a role in flower development. Plant Mol. Biol. 74:201–13 [Google Scholar]
  47. Hsieh TF, Shin J, Uzawa R, Silva P, Cohen S. 47.  et al. 2011. Regulation of imprinted gene expression in Arabidopsis endosperm. PNAS 108:1755–62 [Google Scholar]
  48. Itkin M, Seybold H, Breitel D, Rogachev I, Meir S, Aharoni A. 48.  2009. Tomato AGAMOUS-LIKE 1 is a component of the fruit ripening regulatory network. Plant J 60:1081–95 [Google Scholar]
  49. Jackson JP, Lindroth AM, Cao X, Jacobsen SE. 49.  2002. Control of CpNpG DNA methylation by the KRYPTONITE histone H3 methyltransferase. Nature 416:556–60 [Google Scholar]
  50. Ji K, Kai W, Zhao B, Sun Y, Yuan B. 50.  et al. 2014. SlNCED1 and. SlCYP707A2 : key genes involved in ABA metabolism during tomato fruit ripening. J. Exp. Bot. 65:5243–55 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kadomura-Ishikawa Y, Miyawaki K, Takahashi A, Masuda T, Noji S. 51.  2015. Light and abscisic acid independently regulate FaMYB10 in Fragaria × ananassa fruit. Planta 241:953–65 [Google Scholar]
  52. Karlova R, Chapman N, David K, Angenent GC, Seymour GB, de Maagd RA. 52.  2014. Transcriptional control of fleshy fruit development and ripening. J. Exp. Bot. 65:4527–41 [Google Scholar]
  53. Karlova R, Rosin FM, Busscher-Lange J, Parapunova V, Do PT. 53.  et al. 2011. Transcriptome and metabolite profiling show that APETALA2a is a major regulator of tomato fruit ripening. Plant Cell 23:923–41 [Google Scholar]
  54. Kim S, Park M, Yeom S-I, Kim Y-M, Lee JM. 54.  et al. 2014. Genome sequence of the hot pepper provides insights into the pungency in Capsicum species. Nat. Genet. 46:270–78 [Google Scholar]
  55. King G.55.  2015. Crop epigenetics and the molecular hardware of genotype × environment interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 6:968 [Google Scholar]
  56. Klee HJ, Giovannoni JJ. 56.  2011. Genetics and control of tomato fruit ripening and quality attributes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45:41–59 [Google Scholar]
  57. Kou X, Liu C, Han L, Wang S, Xue Z. 57.  2016. NAC transcription factors play an important role in ethylene biosynthesis, reception and signaling of tomato fruit ripening. Mol. Genet. Genom. 291:1205–17 [Google Scholar]
  58. Kuhn N, Guan L, Dai ZW, Wu BH, Lauvergeat V. 58.  et al. 2014. Berry ripening: recently heard through the grapevine. J. Exp. Bot. 65:4543–59 [Google Scholar]
  59. Kullan JB, Pinto DLP, Bertolini E, Fasoli M, Zenoni S. 59.  et al. 2015. miRVine: a microRNA expression atlas of grapevine based on small RNA sequencing. BMC Genom 16:393 [Google Scholar]
  60. Law JA, Jacobsen SE. 60.  2010. Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11:204–20 [Google Scholar]
  61. Lee J, Joung J, McQuinn R, Chung M, Fei Z. 61.  et al. 2012. Combined transcriptome, genetic diversity and metabolite profiling in tomato fruit reveals the ethylene response factor SlERF6 to play an important role in ripening and carotenoid accumulation. Plant J 70:191–204 [Google Scholar]
  62. Li Y, Deng H, Miao M, Li H, Huang S. 62.  et al. 2015. Tomato MBD5, a methyl CpG binding domain protein, physically interacting with UV-damaged DNA binding protein-1 functions in multiple processes. New Phytol 210:208–26 [Google Scholar]
  63. Liljegren S, Ditta G, Eshed Y, Savidge B, Bowman J, Yanofsky M. 63.  2000. SHATTERPROOF MADS-box genes control seed dispersal in Arabidopsis. Nature 404:766–70 [Google Scholar]
  64. Lin Z, Hong Y, Yin M, Li C, Zhang K, Grierson D. 64.  2008. A tomato HD-Zip homeobox protein, LeHB-1, plays an important role in floral organogenesis and ripening. Plant J 55:301–10 [Google Scholar]
  65. Lincoln JE, Cordes S, Read E, Fischer RL. 65.  1987. Regulation of gene expression by ethylene during Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato) fruit development. PNAS 84:2793–97 [Google Scholar]
  66. Lippman ZB, Semel Y, Zamir D. 66.  2007. An integrated view of quantitative trait variation using tomato interspecific introgression lines. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17:545–52 [Google Scholar]
  67. Liu DD, Zhou LJ, Fang MJ, Dong QL, An XH. 67.  et al. 2016. Polycomb-group protein SlMSI1 represses the expression of fruit-ripening genes to prolong shelf life in tomato. Sci. Rep. 6:31806 [Google Scholar]
  68. Liu R, How-Kit A, Stammitti L, Teyssier E, Rolin D. 68.  et al. 2015. A DEMETER-like DNA demethylase governs tomato fruit ripening. PNAS 112:10804–9Identifies a demethylase gene that contributes to ripening-related epigenome dynamics. [Google Scholar]
  69. Liu Y, Roof S, Ye Z, Barry C, van Tuinen A. 69.  et al. 2004. Manipulation of light signal transduction as a means of modifying fruit nutritional quality in tomato. PNAS 101:9897–902 [Google Scholar]
  70. Lopez AB, Van Eck J, Conlin BJ, Paolillo DJ, O'Neill J, Li L. 70.  2008. Effect of the cauliflower Or transgene on carotenoids accumulation and chromoplast formation in transgenic potato tubers. J. Exp. Bot. 59:213–23 [Google Scholar]
  71. Manning K, Tor M, Poole M, Hong Y, Thompson A. 71.  et al. 2006. A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SPB-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat. Genet. 38:949–52Characterizes a novel epiallele of the CNR-SPL locus that is necessary for tomato fruit ripening. [Google Scholar]
  72. Martel C, Vrebalov J, Tafelmeyer P, Giovannoni J. 72.  2011. The tomato MADS-box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR interacts with promoters involved in numerous ripening processes in a COLORLESS NONRIPENING-dependent manner. Plant Physiol. 157:1568–79Demonstrates that RIN-MADS DNA binding requires the presence of the CNR-SPL protein. [Google Scholar]
  73. Martin LB, Rose JKC. 73.  2014. There's more than one way to skin a fruit: formation and functions of fruit cuticles. J. Exp. Bot. 65:4639–51 [Google Scholar]
  74. Matzke MA, Kanno T, Matzke AJM. 74.  2015. RNA-directed DNA methylation: the evolution of a complex epigenetic pathway in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 66:243–67 [Google Scholar]
  75. McMurchie EJ, McGlasson WB, Eaks IL. 75.  1972. Treatment of fruit with propylene gives information about the biogenesis of ethylene. Nature 237:235–36Physiological characterizes system 1 and system 2 ethylene responses, in which ethylene promotes and inhibits ripening, respectively. [Google Scholar]
  76. Messeguer R, Ganal M, Steffens J, Tanksley SD. 76.  1991. Characterization of the level, target sites and inheritance of cytosine methylation in tomato nuclear DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 16:753–70 [Google Scholar]
  77. Mustilli AC, Fenzi F, Ciliento R, Alfano F, Bowler C. 77.  1999. Phenotype of the tomato high pigment-2 mutant is caused by a mutation in the tomato homolog of DEETIOLATED1. Plant Cell 11:145–57 [Google Scholar]
  78. Nguyen C, Vrebalov J, Gapper N, Zheng Y, Zhong S. 78.  et al. 2014. Tomato Golden 2-like (GLK) transcription factors reveal molecular gradients functioning during fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell 26:585–601Assesses the ripening gradient in the context of gene expression profiles of ripening regulators. [Google Scholar]
  79. Oeller PW, Min Wong L, Taylor LP, Pike DA, Theologis A. 79.  1991. Reversible inhibition of tomato fruit senescence by antisense RNA. Science 254:437–39 [Google Scholar]
  80. Palumbo MC, Zenoni S, Fasoli M, Massonnet M, Farina L. 80.  et al. 2014. Integrated network analysis identifies fight-club nodes and a class of hubs encompassing key putative switch genes that induce major transcriptome reprogramming during grapevine development. Plant Cell 26:4617–35 [Google Scholar]
  81. Pnueli L, Hareven D, Rounsley SD, Yanofsky MF, Lifschitz E. 81.  1994. Isolation of the tomato AGAMOUS gene TAG1 and analysis of its homeotic role in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 6:163–73 [Google Scholar]
  82. Powell A, Nguyen C, Hill T, Cheng K, Figueroa-Balderas R. 82.  et al. 2012. Uniform ripening encodes a Golden 2-like transcription factor regulating tomato fruit chloroplast development. Science 336:1711–15 [Google Scholar]
  83. Quadrana L, Almeida J, Asis R, Duffy T, Dominguez PG. 83.  et al. 2014. Natural occurring epialleles determine vitamin E accumulation in tomato fruits. Nat. Commun. 5:4027 [Google Scholar]
  84. Rodrigues J, Zilberman D. 84.  2015. Evolution and function of genomic imprinting in plants. Genes Dev 29:2517–31 [Google Scholar]
  85. Schmidz RJ, Schultz MD, Lewsey MG, O'Malley RC, Urich MA. 85.  et al. 2011. Transgenerational epigenetic instability is a source of novel methylation variants. Science 334:369–73 [Google Scholar]
  86. Schnable PS, Springer NM. 86.  2013. Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64:71–88 [Google Scholar]
  87. Seymour GB, Østergaard L, Chapman NH, Knapp S, Martin C. 87.  2013. Fruit development and ripening. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64:219–41 [Google Scholar]
  88. Seymour GB, Ryder C, Cevik V, Hammond J, Popovich A. 88.  et al. 2011. A SEPALLATA gene is involved in the development and ripening of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) fruit, a non-climacteric tissue. J. Exp. Bot. 62:1179–88 [Google Scholar]
  89. Shivaprasad PV, Dunn RM, Santos BACM, Bassett A, Baulcombe DC. 89.  2012. Extraordinary transgressive phenotypes of hybrid tomatoes are influenced by epigenetics and small silencing RNAs. EMBO J 31:257–66 [Google Scholar]
  90. Tadiello A, Pavanello A, Zanin D, Caporali E, Colombo L. 90.  et al. 2009. A PLENA-like gene of peach is involved in carpel formation and subsequent transformation into a fleshy fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 60:651–61 [Google Scholar]
  91. Tang X, Miao M, Niu X, Zhang D, Cao X. 91.  et al. 2015. Ubiquitin-conjugated degradation of golden 2-like transcription factor is mediated by CUL4-DDB1-based E3 ligase complex in tomato. New Phytol 209:1028–39 [Google Scholar]
  92. Taylor IB, Linforth RST, Al-Naieb RJ, Bowman WR, Marples BA. 92.  1988. The wilty tomato mutants flacca and sitiens are impaired in the oxidation of ABA-aldehyde to ABA. Plant Cell Environ. 11:739–45 [Google Scholar]
  93. Tieman DM, Ciardi JA, Taylor MG, Klee HJ. 93.  2001. Members of the tomato LeEIL (EIN3-like) gene family are functionally redundant and regulate ethylene responses throughout plant development. Plant J 26:47–58 [Google Scholar]
  94. Tieman DM, Taylor MG, Ciardi JA, Klee HJ. 94.  2000. The tomato ethylene receptors NR and LeETR4 are negative regulators of ethylene response and exhibit functional compensation within a multigene family. PNAS 97:5663–68 [Google Scholar]
  95. Tomato Genom. Consort. 95.  2012. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485:635–41 [Google Scholar]
  96. Uluisik S, Chapman NH, Smith R, Poole M, Adams G. 96.  et al. 2016. Genetic improvement of tomato by targeted control of fruit softening. Nat. Biotechnol. 34:950–52 [Google Scholar]
  97. Velasco R, Zharkikh A, Affourtit J, Dhingra A, Cestaro A. 97.  et al. 2010. The genome of the domesticated apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Nat. Genet. 42:833–39 [Google Scholar]
  98. Vrebalov J, Pan I, Matas A, McQuinn R, Chung M. 98.  et al. 2009. Fleshy fruit expansion and ripening are regulated by the tomato SHATTERPROOF gene, TAGL1. Plant Cell 21:3041–62 [Google Scholar]
  99. Vrebalov J, Ruezinsky D, Padmanabhan V, White R, Medrano D. 99.  et al. 2002. A MADS-box gene necessary for fruit ripening at the tomato ripening-inhibitor (rin) locus. Science 296:343–46Characterizes the RIN-MADS ripening gene underlying the rin mutation. [Google Scholar]
  100. Woo HR, Dittmer TA, Richards EJ. 100.  2008. Three SRA-domain methylcytosine-binding proteins cooperate to maintain global CpG methylation and epigenetic silencing in Arabidopsis. PLOS Genet. 4:e1000156 [Google Scholar]
  101. Wu W, Yang YL, He WM, Rouard M, Li WM. 101.  et al. 2016. Whole genome sequencing of a banana wild relative Musa itinerans provides insights into lineage-specific diversification of the Musa genus. Sci. Rep. 6:31586 [Google Scholar]
  102. Ye X, Al-Babili S, Kloti A, Zhang J, Lucca P. 102.  et al. 2000. Engineering the provitamin A (β-carotene) biosynthetic pathway into (carotenoids-free) rice endosperm. Science 287:303–5 [Google Scholar]
  103. Zemach A, Kim MY, Silva P, Rodrigues JA, Dotson B. 103.  et al. 2010. Local DNA hypomethylation activates genes in rice endosperm. PNAS 107:18729–34 [Google Scholar]
  104. Zhao L, Lu J, Zhang J, Wu PY, Yang S, Wu K. 104.  2014. Identification and characterization of histone deacetylases in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Front. Plant Sci. 5:760 [Google Scholar]
  105. Zhong S, Fei Z, Chen Y, Zheng Y, Huang M. 105.  et al. 2013. Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nat. Biotechnol. 31:154–59Demonstrates the tomato fruit methylation dynamics that operate during fruit development and in concert with the RIN-MADS transcription factor to regulate ripening. [Google Scholar]
  106. Zhu M, Chen G, Zhou S, Tu Y, Wang Y. 106.  et al. 2014. A new tomato NAC (NAM/ATAF1/2/CUC2) transcription factor, SlNAC4, functions as a positive regulator of fruit ripening and carotenoid accumulation. Plant Cell Physiol 55:119–35 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-040906
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-040906
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error