Defense Priming: An Adaptive Part of Induced Resistance

Literature Cited

1. Agorio A, Vera P. 1.  2007. ARGONAUTE4 is required for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae. Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 193778–90 [Google Scholar]
2. Agrios GN.2.  2005. How plants defend themselves against pathogens. Plant Pathology207–48 San Diego, CA: Academic. , 5th ed.. [Google Scholar]
3. Ahn IP, Lee SW, Suh SC. 3.  2007. Rhizobacteria-induced priming in Arabidopsis is dependent on ethylene, jasmonic acid, and NPR1. Mol. . Plant-Microbe Interact. 20759–68 [Google Scholar]
4. Alborn HT, Hansen TV, Jones TH, Bennett DC, Tumlinson JH. 4.  et al. 2007. Disulfooxy fatty acids from the American bird grasshopper Schistocerca americana, elicitors of plant volatiles. PNAS 10412976–81 [Google Scholar]
5. Alborn HT, Turlings TCJ, Jones TH, Stenhagen G, Loughrin JH, Tumlinson JH. 5.  1997. An elicitor of plant volatiles from beet armyworm oral secretion. Science 276945–49 [Google Scholar]
6. Alvarez ME, Pennell RI, Meijer PJ, Ishikawa A, Dixon RA, Lamb C. 6.  1998. Reactive oxygen intermediates mediate a systemic signal network in the establishment of plant immunity. Cell 92773–84 [Google Scholar]
7. Alvarez-Venegas R, Al Abdallat A, Guo M, Alfano JR, Avramova Z. 7.  2007. Epigenetic control of a transcription factor at the cross section of two antagonistic pathways. Epigenetics 2106–13 [Google Scholar]
8. Baccelli I, Mauch-Mani B. 8.  2016. Beta-aminobutyric acid priming of plant defense: the role of ABA and other hormones. Plant Mol. Biol. 91703–11 [Google Scholar]
9. Bago B, Zipfel W, Williams RM, Jun J, Arreola R. 9.  et al. 2002. Translocation and utilization of fungal storage lipid in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Physiol 128108–24 [Google Scholar]
10. Balmer A, Pastor V, Gamir J, Flors V, Mauch-Mani B. 10.  2015. The ‘prime-ome’: towards a holistic approach to priming. Trends Plant Sci 20443–52Presents the latest results in the field of priming based on -omics research. [Google Scholar]
11. Bandoly M, Hilker M, Steppuhn A. 11.  2015. Oviposition by Spodoptera exigua on Nicotiana attenuata primes induced plant defence against larval herbivory. Plant J. 83661–72 [Google Scholar]
12. Beckers GJ, Conrath U. 12.  2007. Priming for stress resistance: from the lab to the field. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10425–31 [Google Scholar]
13. Beckers GJ, Jaskiewicz M, Liu Y, Underwood WR, He SY. 13.  et al. 2009. Mitogen-activated protein kinases 3 and 6 are required for full priming of stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 21944–53 [Google Scholar]
14. Beneloujaephajri E, Costa A, L'Haridon F, Metraux JP, Binda M. 14.  2013. Production of reactive oxygen species and wound-induced resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana against Botrytis cinerea are preceded and depend on a burst of calcium. BMC Plant Biol. 13160 [Google Scholar]
15. Benikhlef L, L'Haridon F, Abou-Mansour E, Serrano M, Binda M. 15.  et al. 2013. Perception of soft mechanical stress in Arabidopsis leaves activates disease resistance. BMC Plant Biol 13133 [Google Scholar]
16. Boller T, Felix G. 16.  2009. A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 60379–406 [Google Scholar]
17. Boughton AJ, Hoover K, Felton GW. 17.  2005. Methyl jasmonate application induces increased densities of glandular trichomes on tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. J. Chem. Ecol. 312211–16 [Google Scholar]
18. Boyko A, Kathiria P, Zemp FJ, Yao Y, Pogribny I, Kovalchuk I. 18.  2007. Transgenerational changes in the genome stability and methylation in pathogen-infected plants. Nucleic Acids Res 351714–25 [Google Scholar]
19. Brotman Y, Lisec J, Meret M, Chet I, Willmitzer L, Viterbo A. 19.  2012. Transcript and metabolite analysis of the Trichoderma-induced systemic resistance response to Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis thaliana. Microbiology 158139–46 [Google Scholar]
20. Bruce TJA, Matthes MC, Napier JA, Pickett JA. 20.  2007. Stressful “memories” of plants: evidence and possible mechanisms. Plant Sci 173603–8 [Google Scholar]
21. Bruessow F, Gouhier-Darimont C, Buchala A, Metraux JP, Reymond P. 21.  2010. Insect eggs suppress plant defence against chewing herbivores. Plant J 62876–85 [Google Scholar]
22. Camañes G, Pastor V, Cerezo M, García-Andrade J, Vicedo B. 22.  et al. 2012. A deletion in NRT2.1 attenuates. Pseudomonas syringae -induced hormonal perturbation, resulting in primed plant defenses. Plant Physiol 1581054–66 [Google Scholar]
23. Cameron DD, Neal AL, van Wees SC, Ton J. 23.  2013. Mycorrhiza-induced resistance: more than the sum of its parts?. Trends Plant Sci 18539–45 [Google Scholar]
24. Campos-Soriano L, Garcia-Martinez J, San Segundo B. 24.  2012. The arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis promotes the systemic induction of regulatory defence-related genes in rice leaves and confers resistance to pathogen infection. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13579–92 [Google Scholar]
25. Campos-Soriano L, Gomez-Ariza J, Bonfante P, San Segundo B. 25.  2011. A rice calcium-dependent protein kinase is expressed in cortical root cells during the presymbiotic phase of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. BMC Plant Biol 1190 [Google Scholar]
26. Cecchini NM, Jung HW, Engle NL, Tschaplinski TJ, Greenberg JT. 26.  2015. ALD1 regulates basal immune components and early inducible defense responses in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 28455–66 [Google Scholar]
27. Cervantes-Gámez RG, Bueno-Ibarra MA, Cruz-Mendívil A, Calderón-Vázquez CL, Ramírez-Douriet CM. 27.  et al. 2016. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis-induced expression changes in Solanum lycopersicum leaves revealed by RNA-seq analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 3489–102 [Google Scholar]
28. Chassot C, Buchala A, Schoonbeek HJ, Metraux JP, Lamotte O. 28.  2008. Wounding of Arabidopsis leaves causes a powerful but transient protection against Botrytis infection. Plant J 55555–67 [Google Scholar]
29. Chinchilla D, Zipfel C, Robatzek S, Kemmerling B, Nurnberger T. 29.  et al. 2007. A flagellin-induced complex of the receptor FLS2 and BAK1 initiates plant defence. Nature 448497–500 [Google Scholar]
30. Conrath U, Beckers GJM, Flors V, García-Agustín P, Jakab J. 30.  et al. (Prime-A-Plant Group) 2006. Priming: getting ready for battle. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 191062–71 [Google Scholar]
31. Conrath U, Beckers GJM, Langenbach CJG, Jaskiewicz MR. 31.  2015. Priming for enhanced defense. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 5397–119 [Google Scholar]
32. Conrath U, Pieterse CM, Mauch-Mani B. 32.  2002. Priming in plant-pathogen interactions. Trends Plant Sci 7210–16 [Google Scholar]
33. Crisp PA, Ganguly D, Eichten SR, Borevitz JO, Pogson BJ. 33.  2016. Reconsidering plant memory: intersections between stress recovery, RNA turnover, and epigenetics. Sci. Adv. 2e1501340 [Google Scholar]
34. De Vleesschauwer D, Höfte M. 34.  2009. Rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance. Advances in Botanical Research, Vol. 51: Plant Innate Immunity LC Van Loon 223–81 San Diego, CA: Academic [Google Scholar]
35. Delaux PM, Sejalon-Delmas N, Becard G, Ane JM. 35.  2013. Evolution of the plant-microbe symbiotic ‘toolkit. .’ Trends Plant Sci. 18298–304
36. Dempsey DA, Klessig DF. 36.  2012. SOS—too many signals for systemic acquired resistance?. Trends Plant Sci 17538–45 [Google Scholar]
37. Dodds PN, Rathjen JP. 37.  2010. Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant-pathogen interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11539–48 [Google Scholar]
38. Dowen RH, Pelizzola M, Schmitz RJ, Lister R, Dowen JM. 38.  et al. 2012. Widespread dynamic DNA methylation in response to biotic stress. PNAS 109E2183–91 [Google Scholar]
39. Dubreuil-Maurizi C, Trouvelot S, Frettinger P, Pugin A, Wendehenne D, Poinssot B. 39.  2010. β-Aminobutyric acid primes an NADPH oxidase–dependent reactive oxygen species production during grapevine-triggered immunity. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 231012–21 [Google Scholar]
40. Engelberth J, Alborn HT, Schmelz EA, Tumlinson JH. 40.  2004. Airborne signals prime plants against insect herbivore attack. PNAS 1011781–85 [Google Scholar]
41. Erb M, Veyrat N, Robert CA, Xu H, Frey M. 41.  et al. 2015. Indole is an essential herbivore-induced volatile priming signal in maize. Nat. Commun. 66273 [Google Scholar]
42. Farag MA, Ryu CM, Sumner LW, Pare PW. 42.  2006. GC-MS SPME profiling of rhizobacterial volatiles reveals prospective inducers of growth promotion and induced systemic resistance in plants. Phytochemistry 672262–68 [Google Scholar]
43. Fester T, Hause G. 43.  2005. Accumulation of reactive oxygen species in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots. Mycorrhiza 15373–79 [Google Scholar]
44. Flors V, Ton J, van Doorn R, Jakab G, Garcia-Agustin P, Mauch-Mani B. 44.  2008. Interplay between JA, SA and ABA signalling during basal and induced resistance against Pseudomonas syringae and. Alternaria brassicicola. Plant J. 5481–92 [Google Scholar]
45. Flury P, Klauser D, Schulze B, Boller T, Bartels S. 45.  2013. The anticipation of danger: Microbe-associated molecular pattern perception enhances AtPep-triggered oxidative burst. Plant Physiol 1612023–35 [Google Scholar]
46. Frost CJ, Mescher MC, Carlson JE, De Moraes CM. 46.  2008. Plant defense priming against herbivores: getting ready for a different battle. Plant Physiol 146818–24 [Google Scholar]
47. Frye CA, Tang D, Innes RW. 47.  2001. Negative regulation of defense responses in plants by a conserved MAPKK kinase. PNAS 98373–78 [Google Scholar]
48. Gamir J, Pastor V, Cerezo M, Flors V. 48.  2012. Identification of indole-3-carboxylic acid as mediator of priming against Plectosphaerella cucumerina. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 61169–79 [Google Scholar]
49. Gamir J, Sanchez-Bel P, Flors V. 49.  2014. Molecular and physiological stages of priming: how plants prepare for environmental challenges. Plant Cell Rep 331935–49 [Google Scholar]
50. Garcia-Andrade J, Ramirez V, Flors V, Vera P. 50.  2011. Arabidopsis ocp3 mutant reveals a mechanism linking ABA and JA to pathogen-induced callose deposition. Plant J 67783–94 [Google Scholar]
51. Gauthier A, Trouvelot S, Kelloniemi J, Frettinger P, Wendehenne D. 51.  et al. 2014. The sulfated laminarin triggers a stress transcriptome before priming the SA- and ROS-dependent defenses during grapevine's induced resistance against Plasmopara viticola. PLOS ONE 9e88145 [Google Scholar]
52. Gehring M, Henikoff S. 52.  2007. DNA methylation dynamics in plant genomes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1769276–86 [Google Scholar]
53. Gerlach N, Schmitz J, Polatajko A, Schluter U, Fahnenstich H. 53.  et al. 2015. An integrated functional approach to dissect systemic responses in maize to arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Cell Environ 381591–612 [Google Scholar]
54. Gutjahr C.54.  2014. Phytohormone signaling in arbuscular mycorhiza development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2026–34 [Google Scholar]
55. Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M. 55.  2004. Trichoderma species—opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 243–56 [Google Scholar]
56. Hilker M, Fatouros NE. 56.  2015. Plant responses to insect egg deposition. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 60493–515 [Google Scholar]
57. Hilker M, Meiners T. 57.  2006. Early herbivore alert: insect eggs induce plant defense. J. Chem. Ecol. 321379–97 [Google Scholar]
58. Hilker M, Meiners T. 58.  2010. How do plants “notice” attack by herbivorous arthropods? Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 85267–80 [Google Scholar]
59. Hoffmann D, Vierheilig H, Schausberger P. 59.  2011. Mycorrhiza-induced trophic cascade enhances fitness and population growth of an acarine predator. Oecologia 166141–49 [Google Scholar]
60. Holeski LM, Jander G, Agrawal AA. 60.  2012. Transgenerational defense induction and epigenetic inheritance in plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27618–26 [Google Scholar]
61. Howe GA, Jander G. 61.  2008. Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 5941–66 [Google Scholar]
62. Hsu FC, Chou MY, Chou SJ, Li YR, Peng HP, Shih MC. 62.  2013. Submergence confers immunity mediated by the WRKY22 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 252699–713 [Google Scholar]
63. Huang PY, Yeh YH, Liu AC, Cheng CP, Zimmerli L. 63  2014. The Arabidopsis LecRK-VI.2 associates with the pattern-recognition receptor FLS2 and primes Nicotiana benthamiana pattern-triggered immunity. Plant J 79243–55 [Google Scholar]
64. Jaskiewicz M, Conrath U, Peterhansel C. 64.  2011. Chromatin modification acts as a memory for systemic acquired resistance in the plant stress response. EMBO Rep 1250–55Shows that certain stimuli can change the epigenetic status of a plant. [Google Scholar]
65. Jeworutzki E, Roelfsema MR, Anschutz U, Krol E, Elzenga JT. 65.  et al. 2010. Early signaling through the Arabidopsis pattern recognition receptors FLS2 and EFR involves Ca-associated opening of plasma membrane anion channels. Plant J 62367–78 [Google Scholar]
66. Jin H.66.  2008. Endogenous small RNAs and antibacterial immunity in plants. FEBS Lett 5822679–84 [Google Scholar]
67. Jung HW, Tschaplinski TJ, Wang L, Glazebrook J, Greenberg JT. 67.  2009. Priming in systemic plant immunity. Science 32489–91 [Google Scholar]
68. Jung SC, Martinez-Medina A, Lopez-Raez JA, Pozo MJ. 68.  2012. Mycorrhiza-induced resistance and priming of plant defenses. J. Chem. Ecol. 38651–64Demonstrates that mycorrhization can induce a priming state in a plant. [Google Scholar]
69. Kathiria P, Sidler C, Golubov A, Kalischuk M, Kawchuk LM, Kovalchuk I. 69.  2010. Tobacco mosaic virus infection results in an increase in recombination frequency and resistance to viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens in the progeny of infected tobacco plants. Plant Physiol 1531859–70 [Google Scholar]
70. Katz VA, Thulke OU, Conrath U. 70.  1998. A benzothiadiazole primes parsley cells for augmented elicitation of defense responses. Plant Physiol 1171333–39 [Google Scholar]
71. Kim J, Felton GW. 71.  2013. Priming of antiherbivore defensive responses in plants. Insect Sci 20273–85 [Google Scholar]
72. Kim J, Tooker JF, Luthe DS, De Moraes CM, Felton GW. 72.  2012. Insect eggs can enhance wound response in plants: a study system of tomato Solanum lycopersicum L. and Helicoverpa zea Boddie. PLOS ONE 7e37420 [Google Scholar]
73. Kloepper JW, Ryu CM, Zhang S. 73.  2004. Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 941259–66 [Google Scholar]
74. Lee CS, Lee YJ, Jeun YC. 74.  2005. Observations of infection structures on the leaves of cucumber plants pre-treated with arbuscular mycorrhiza Glomus intraradices after challenge inoculation with Colletotrichum orbiculare. Plant Pathol. J. 21237–43 [Google Scholar]
75. Leitner M, Kaiser R, Hause B, Boland W, Mithofer A. 75.  2010. Does mycorrhization influence herbivore-induced volatile emission in Medicago truncatula?. Mycorrhiza 2089–101 [Google Scholar]
76. Liu J, Maldonado-Mendoza I, Lopez-Meyer M, Cheung F, Town CD, Harrison MJ. 76.  2007. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis is accompanied by local and systemic alterations in gene expression and an increase in disease resistance in the shoots. Plant J 50529–44 [Google Scholar]
77. López A, Ramírez V, García-Andrade J, Flors V, Vera P. 77.  2011. The RNA silencing enzyme RNA polymerase V is required for plant immunity. PLOS Genet 7e1002434 [Google Scholar]
78. López Sánchez A, Stassen JHM, Furci L, Smith LM, Ton J. 78.  2016. The role of DNA (de)methylation in immune responsiveness of Arabidopsis. Plant J 88361–74 [Google Scholar]
79. Luna E, Bruce TJ, Roberts MR, Flors V, Ton J. 79.  2012. Next-generation systemic acquired resistance. Plant Physiol 158844–53 [Google Scholar]
80. Luna E, Lopez A, Kooiman J, Ton J. 80.  2014. Role of NPR1 and KYP in long-lasting induced resistance by β-aminobutyric acid. Front. Plant Sci. 5184 [Google Scholar]
81. Luna E, Pastor V, Robert J, Flors V, Mauch-Mani B, Ton J. 81.  2011. Callose deposition: a multifaceted plant defense response. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 24183–93 [Google Scholar]
82. Luna E, Ton J. 82.  2012. The epigenetic machinery controlling transgenerational systemic acquired resistance. Plant Signaling Behav 7615–18 [Google Scholar]
83. Luna E, van Hulten M, Zhang Y, Berkowitz O, Lopez A. 83.  et al. 2014. Plant perception of β-aminobutyric acid is mediated by an aspartyl-tRNA synthetase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10450–56 [Google Scholar]
84. Maekawa S, Sato T, Asada Y, Yasuda S, Yoshida M. 84.  et al. 2012. The Arabidopsis ubiquitin ligases ATL31 and ATL6 control the defense response as well as the carbon/nitrogen response. Plant Mol. Biol. 79217–27 [Google Scholar]
85. Maillet F, Poinsot V, Andre O, Puech-Pages V, Haouy A. 85.  et al. 2011. Fungal lipochitooligosaccharide symbiotic signals in arbuscular mycorrhiza. Nature 46958–63 [Google Scholar]
86. March-Diaz R, Garcia-Dominguez M, Lozano-Juste J, Leon J, Florencio FJ, Reyes JC. 86.  2008. Histone H2A.Z and homologues of components of the SWR1 complex are required to control immunity in Arabidopsis. Plant J 53475–87 [Google Scholar]
87. Martinez-Aguilar K, Ramirez-Carrasco G, Hernandez-Chavez JL, Barraza A, Alvarez-Venegas R. 87.  2016. Use of BABA and INA as activators of a primed state in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Front. Plant Sci. 7653 [Google Scholar]
88. Martinez-Medina A, Fernandez I, Sanchez-Guzman MJ, Jung SC, Pascual JA, Pozo MJ. 88.  2013. Deciphering the hormonal signalling network behind the systemic resistance induced by Trichoderma harzianum in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 4206 [Google Scholar]
89. Martinez-Medina A, Flors V, Heil M, Mauch-Mani B, Pieterse CMJ. 89.  et al. 2016. Recognizing plant defense priming. Trends Plant Sci 21818–22 [Google Scholar]
90. Martinez-Medina A, Pascual JA, Perez-Alfocea F, Albacete A, Roldan A. 90.  2010. Trichoderma harzianum and Glomus intraradices modify the hormone disruption induced by Fusarium oxysporum infection in melon plants. Phytopathology 100682–88 [Google Scholar]
91. Mishina TE, Zeier J. 91.  2007. Pathogen-associated molecular pattern recognition rather than development of tissue necrosis contributes to bacterial induction of systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant J 50500–13 [Google Scholar]
92. Molinier J, Ries G, Zipfel C, Hohn B. 92.  2006. Transgeneration memory of stress in plants. Nature 4421046–49Shows that exposure to UV or flg22 results in greater homologous recombination frequency in subsequent generations. [Google Scholar]
93. Mosher RA, Durrant WE, Wang D, Song J, Dong X. 93.  2006. A comprehensive structure–function analysis of Arabidopsis SNI1 defines essential regions and transcriptional repressor activity. Plant Cell 181750–65 [Google Scholar]
94. Mousavi SA, Chauvin A, Pascaud F, Kellenberger S, Farmer EE. 94.  2013. GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR-LIKE genes mediate leaf-to-leaf wound signalling. Nature 500422–26 [Google Scholar]
95. Navarova H, Bernsdorff F, Doring AC, Zeier J. 95.  2012. Pipecolic acid, an endogenous mediator of defense amplification and priming, is a critical regulator of inducible plant immunity. Plant Cell 245123–41 [Google Scholar]
96. Newman MA, von Roepenack-Lahaye E, Parr A, Daniels MJ, Dow JM. 96.  2002. Prior exposure to lipopolysaccharide potentiates expression of plant defenses in response to bacteria. Plant J 29487–95 [Google Scholar]
97. Oldroyd GE, Harrison MJ, Paszkowski U. 97.  2009. Reprogramming plant cells for endosymbiosis. Science 324753–54 [Google Scholar]
98. Oostendorp M, Kunz W, Dietrich B, Staub T. 98.  2001. Induced disease resistance in plants by chemicals. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 10719–28 [Google Scholar]
99. Pasini D, Hansen KH, Christensen J, Agger K, Cloos PA, Helin K. 99.  2008. Coordinated regulation of transcriptional repression by the RBP2 H3K4 demethylase and Polycomb-Repressive Complex 2. Genes Dev 221345–55 [Google Scholar]
100. Pastor V, Balmer A, Gamir J, Flors V, Mauch-Mani B. 100.  2014. Preparing to fight back: generation and storage of priming compounds. Front. Plant Sci. 5295 [Google Scholar]
101. Pastor V, Luna E, Mauch-Mani B, Ton J, Flors V. 101.  2012. Primed plants do not forget. Environ. Exp. Bot. 9446–56 [Google Scholar]
102. Pastor V, Luna E, Ton J, Cerezo M, García-Agustín P, Flors V. 102.  2013. Fine tuning of reactive oxygen species homeostasis regulates primed immune responses in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 261334–44 [Google Scholar]
103. Peiffer M, Tooker JF, Luthe DS, Felton GW. 103.  2009. Plants on early alert: glandular trichomes as sensors for insect herbivores. New Phytol 184644–56 [Google Scholar]
104. Pérez-Hedo M, Bouagga S, Jaques JA, Flors V, Urbaneja A. 104.  2015. Tomato plant responses to feeding behavior of three zoophytophagous predators (Hemiptera: Miridae). Biol. Control 8646–51 [Google Scholar]
105. Pieterse CM, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL, Weller DM, Van Wees SC, Bakker PA. 105.  2014. Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 52347–75 [Google Scholar]
106. Po-Wen C, Singh P, Zimmerli L. 106.  2013. Priming of the Arabidopsis pattern-triggered immunity response upon infection by necrotrophic Pectobacterium carotovorum bacteria. Mol. Plant Pathol. 1458–70 [Google Scholar]
107. Pozo MJ, Lopez-Raez JA, Azcon-Aguilar C, Garcia-Garrido JM. 107.  2015. Phytohormones as integrators of environmental signals in the regulation of mycorrhizal symbioses. New Phytol 2051431–36 [Google Scholar]
108. Rasmann S, De Vos M, Casteel CL, Tian D, Halitschke R. 108.  et al. 2012. Herbivory in the previous generation primes plants for enhanced insect resistance. Plant Physiol 158854–63Demonstrates that transgenerational resistance to herbivory attack can be achieved in model and crop plants. [Google Scholar]
109. Rivero J, Gamir J, Aroca R, Pozo MJ, Flors V. 109.  2015. Metabolic transition in mycorrhizal tomato roots. Front. Microbiol. 6598 [Google Scholar]
110. Roberts DA.110.  1983. Acquired resistance to tobacco mosaic virus transmitted to the progeny of hypersensitive tobacco. Virology 124161–63 [Google Scholar]
111. Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH, Reddy MS, Kloepper JW, Pare PW. 111.  2004. Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 1341017–26 [Google Scholar]
112. Schenk ST, Hernandez-Reyes C, Samans B, Stein E, Neumann C. 112.  et al. 2014. N-acyl-homoserine lactone primes plants for cell wall reinforcement and induces resistance to bacterial pathogens via the salicylic acid/oxylipin pathway. Plant Cell 262708–23 [Google Scholar]
113. Schweiger R, Muller C. 113.  2015. Leaf metabolome in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 26120–26 [Google Scholar]
114. Singh P, Roberts MR. 114.  2015. Keeping it in the family: transgenerational memories of plant defence. CAB Rev 1026 [Google Scholar]
115. Singh P, Yekondi S, Chen PW, Tsai CH, Yu CW. 115.  et al. 2014. Environmental history modulates Arabidopsis pattern-triggered immunity in a HISTONE ACETYLTRANSFERASE1-dependent manner. Plant Cell 262676–88 [Google Scholar]
116. Slaughter A, Daniel X, Flors V, Luna E, Hohn B, Mauch-Mani B. 116.  2012. Descendants of primed Arabidopsis plants exhibit resistance to biotic stress. Plant Physiol 158835–43 [Google Scholar]
117. Smart LE, Martin JL, Limpalaer M, Bruce TJ, Pickett JA. 117.  2013. Responses of herbivore and predatory mites to tomato plants exposed to jasmonic acid seed treatment. J. Chem. Ecol. 391297–300 [Google Scholar]
118. Smith FA, Grace EJ, Smith SE. 118.  2009. More than a carbon economy: nutrient trade and ecological sustainability in facultative arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses. New Phytol 182347–58 [Google Scholar]
119. Smith SE, Smith FA. 119.  2011. Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant nutrition and growth: new paradigms from cellular to ecosystem scales. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 62227–50 [Google Scholar]
120. Song YY, Chen D, Lu K, Sun Z, Zeng R. 120.  2015. Enhanced tomato disease resistance primed by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Front. Plant Sci. 6786 [Google Scholar]
121. Song YY, Ye M, Li CY, He X, Zhu-Salzman K. 121.  et al. 2014. Hijacking common mycorrhizal networks for herbivore-induced defence signal transfer between tomato plants. Sci. Rep. 43915 [Google Scholar]
122. Song YY, Ye M, Li CY, Wang RL, Wei XC. 122.  et al. 2013. Priming of anti-herbivore defense in tomato by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and involvement of the jasmonate pathway. J. Chem. Ecol. 391036–44 [Google Scholar]
123. Sun X-G, Tang M. 123.  2013. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation on root traits and root volatile organic compound emissions of Sorghum bicolor. S. Afr. J. Bot. 88373–79 [Google Scholar]
124. Tateda C, Zhang Z, Shrestha J, Jelenska J, Chinchilla D, Greenberg JT. 124.  2014. Salicylic acid regulates Arabidopsis microbial pattern receptor kinase levels and signaling. Plant Cell 264171–87Reports that, in Arabidopsis, microbial pattern receptor kinase levels and signaling are regulated by SA. [Google Scholar]
125. terHorst CP, Lau JA. 125.  2012. Direct and indirect transgenerational effects alter plant-herbivore interactions. Evol. Ecol. 261469–80 [Google Scholar]
126. Theocharis A, Bordiec S, Fernandez O, Paquis S, Dhondt-Cordelier S. 126.  et al. 2012. Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN primes Vitis vinifera L. and confers a better tolerance to low nonfreezing temperatures. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 25241–49 [Google Scholar]
127. Thevenet D, Pastor V, Baccelli I, Balmer A, Vallat A. 126a.  et al. 2017. The priming molecule β-aminobutyric acid is naturally present in plants and is induced by stress. New Phytol. 213552–59 [Google Scholar]
128. Thomma BP, Nurnberger T, Joosten MH. 127.  2011. Of PAMPs and effectors: the blurred PTI-ETI dichotomy. Plant Cell 234–15 [Google Scholar]
129. Ton J, D'Alessandro M, Jourdie V, Jakab G, Karlen D. 128.  et al. 2007. Priming by airborne signals boosts direct and indirect resistance in maize. Plant J 4916–26Shows that, in maize, priming is mediated by airborne signals. [Google Scholar]
130. Ton J, Jakab G, Toquin V, Flors V, Iavicoli A. 129.  et al. 2005. Dissecting the β-aminobutyric acid-induced priming phenomenon in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17987–99 [Google Scholar]
131. Ton J, Mauch-Mani B. 130.  2004. β-Amino-butyric acid-induced resistance against necrotrophic pathogens is based on ABA-dependent priming for callose. Plant J 38119–30 [Google Scholar]
132. Trouvelot S, Varnier AL, Allegre M, Mercier L, Baillieul F. 131.  et al. 2008. A β-1,3 glucan sulfate induces resistance in grapevine against Plasmopara viticola through priming of defense responses, including HR-like cell death. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 21232–43 [Google Scholar]
133. Tsai CH, Singh P, Chen CW, Thomas J, Weber J. 132.  et al. 2011. Priming for enhanced defence responses by specific inhibition of the Arabidopsis response to coronatine. Plant J 65469–79 [Google Scholar]
134. van den Burg HA, Takken FLW. 133.  2009. Does chromatin remodeling mark systemic acquired resistance?. Trends Plant Sci 14286–94 [Google Scholar]
135. Van der Ent S, Van Hulten M, Pozo MJ, Czechowski T, Udvardi MK. 134.  et al. 2009. Priming of plant innate immunity by rhizobacteria and β-aminobutyric acid: differences and similarities in regulation. New Phytol 183419–31 [Google Scholar]
136. van Hulten M, Pelser M, van Loon LC, Pieterse CM, Ton J. 135.  2006. Costs and benefits of priming for defense in Arabidopsis. PNAS 1035602–7Reports that priming is ecologically less costly for a plant than direct defense. [Google Scholar]
137. Walker V, Bertrand C, Bellvert F, Moenne-Loccoz Y, Bally R, Comte G. 136.  2011. Host plant secondary metabolite profiling shows a complex, strain-dependent response of maize to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria of the genus Azospirillum. New Phytol 189494–506 [Google Scholar]
138. Walley JW, Rowe HC, Xiao Y, Chehab EW, Kliebenstein DJ. 137.  et al. 2008. The chromatin remodeler SPLAYED regulates specific stress signaling pathways. PLOS Pathog 4e1000237 [Google Scholar]
139. Walters DR, Ratsep J, Havis ND. 138.  2013. Controlling crop diseases using induced resistance: challenges for the future. J. Exp. Bot. 641263–80 [Google Scholar]
140. Wang W-H, He E-M, Guo Y, Tong Q-X, Zheng H-L. 139.  2016. Chloroplast calcium and ROS signaling networks potentially facilitate the primed state for stomatal closure under multiple stresses. Environ. Exp. Bot. 12285–93 [Google Scholar]
141. Winter TR, Borkowski L, Zeier J, Rostas M. 140.  2012. Heavy metal stress can prime for herbivore-induced plant volatile emission. Plant Cell Environ 351287–98 [Google Scholar]
142. Worrall D, Holroyd GH, Moore JP, Glowacz M, Croft P. 141.  et al. 2012. Treating seeds with activators of plant defence generates long-lasting priming of resistance to pests and pathogens. New Phytol 193770–78 [Google Scholar]
143. Xu J, Xie J, Yan C, Zou X, Ren D, Zhang S. 142.  2014. A chemical genetic approach demonstrates that MPK3/MPK6 activation and NADPH oxidase-mediated oxidative burst are two independent signaling events in plant immunity. Plant J 77222–34 [Google Scholar]
144. Yalpani N, Enyedi AJ, León J, Raskin I. 143.  1994. Ultraviolet light and ozone stimulate accumulation of salicylic acid, pathogenesis-related proteins and virus resistance in tobacco. Planta 193372–76 [Google Scholar]
145. Yamazaki A, Hayashi M. 144.  2015. Building the interaction interfaces: host responses upon infection with microorganisms. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 23132–39 [Google Scholar]
146. Yi SY, Min SR, Kwon SY. 145.  2015. NPR1 is instrumental in priming for the enhanced flg22-induced MPK3 and MPK6 activation. Plant Pathol. J. 31192–94 [Google Scholar]
147. Yu A, Lepere G, Jay F, Wang J, Bapaume L. 146.  et al. 2013. Dynamics and biological relevance of DNA demethylation in Arabidopsis antibacterial defense. PNAS 1102389–94 [Google Scholar]
148. Zhou J, Wang X, He K, Charron JB, Elling AA, Deng XW. 147.  2010. Genome-wide profiling of histone H3 lysine 9 acetylation and dimethylation in Arabidopsis reveals correlation between multiple histone marks and gene expression. Plant Mol. Biol. 72585–95 [Google Scholar]
149. Zilberman D.148.  2008. The evolving functions of DNA methylation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11554–59 [Google Scholar]
150. Zimmerli L, Jakab G, Metraux JP, Mauch-Mani B. 149.  2000. Potentiation of pathogen-specific defense mechanisms in Arabidopsis by β-aminobutyric acid. PNAS 9712920–25 [Google Scholar]
151. Zimmerli L, Metraux JP, Mauch-Mani B. 150.  2001. β-Aminobutyric acid-induced protection of Arabidopsis against the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea. Plant Physiol. 126517–23 [Google Scholar]