Genetically engineered crops were first commercialized in 1994 and since then have been rapidly adopted, enabling growers to more effectively manage pests and increase crop productivity while ensuring food, feed, and environmental safety. The development of these crops is complex and based on rigorous science that must be well coordinated to create a plant with desired beneficial phenotypes. This article describes the general process by which a genetically engineered crop is developed from an initial concept to a commercialized product.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Altpeter F, Niranjan B, Beachy R, Bock R, Capell T. 1.  et al. 2005. Particle bombardment and the genetic enhancement of crops: myths and realities. Mol. Breed. 15:305–27 [Google Scholar]
  2. Astwood JD, Leach JN, Fuchs RL. 2.  1996. Stability of food allergens to digestion in vitro. Nat. Biotechnol. 14:1269–73 [Google Scholar]
  3. 3. Aust. Gov. Dep. Health Ageing Off. Gene Technol. Regul 2009. Risk analysis framework April 2009 Commonw. Aust., Canberra
  4. Barton KA, Binns AN, Matzke AJM, Chilton M-D. 4.  1983. Regeneration of intact tobacco plants containing full length copies of genetically engineered T-DNA, and transmission of T-DNA to R1 progeny. Cell 32:1033–43 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bendiek J, Buhk H-J. 5.  2010. Risk assessment and economic application of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: GMO approval and import on a world-wide scale. Genetic Modification of Plants: Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry F Kempken, C Jung 631–48 Berlin: Springer-Verlag [Google Scholar]
  6. Bravo A, Gómez I, Porta H, García-Gómez BI, Rodriguez-Almazan C. 6.  et al. 2013. Evolution of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins insecticidal activity. Microb. Biotechnol. 6:17–26 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brookes G, Barfoot P. 7.  2013. The global income and production effects of genetically modified (GM) crops 1996–2011. GM Crops Food 4:74–83 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brookes G, Barfoot P. 8.  2013. Key environmental impacts of global genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996–2011. GM Crops Food 4:109–19 [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. Can. Food Insp. Agency 2012. Assessment criteria for determining environmental safety of plants with novel traits. Dir. 94–08, Can. Food Insp. Agency, Ottawa, Can.
  10. Cerdeira AL, Duke SO. 10.  2006. The current status and environmental impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops: a review. J. Environ. Q. 35:1633–58 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cerdeira AL, Duke SO. 11.  2007. Environmental impacts of transgenic herbicide-resistant crops. CAB Rev. 2:14 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cerny RE, Bookout JT, CaJacob CA, Groat JR, Hart JL. 12.  et al. 2010. Development and characterization of a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) event with enhanced reproductive resistance to glyphosate. Crop Sci. 50:1375–84 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chappell J. 13.  1996. Plant biotechnology comes of age—again. Mol. Breed. 2:1–6 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chassy B, Hlywka JJ, Kleter GA, Kok EJ, Kuiper HA. 14.  et al. 2004. Nutritional and safety assessments of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 3:38–104 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chesson A. 15.  2001. Assessing the safety of GM food crops. Food Safety and Food Quality RE Hester, RM Harrison 1–24 Cambridge, UK: R. Soc. Chem. [Google Scholar]
  16. 16. Codex Alimentarius 2001. Codex Alimentarius Commission: Procedural Manual Rome: World Health Organ. and Food Agric. Organ. UN, 12th ed..
  17. 17. Codex Alimentarius 2003. Guideline for the conduct of food safety assessment of foods produced using recombinant-DNA plants. Doc. CAC/GL 45-2003, World Health Organ. and Food Agric. Organ. UN, Rome
  18. 18. Codex Alimentarius 2003. Principles for the risk analysis of foods derived from modern biotechnology Doc. CAC/GL 44–2003, World Health Organ. and Food Agric. Organ. UN, Rome
  19. 19. Codex Alimentarius 2009. Foods Derived from Modern Biotechnology Rome: World Health Organ. and Food Agric. Organ. UN, 2nd ed..
  20. Constable A, Jonas D, Cockburn A, Davi A, Edwards G. 20.  et al. 2007. History of safe use as applied to the safety assessment of novel foods and foods derived from genetically modified organisms. Food Chem. Toxicol. 45:2513–25 [Google Scholar]
  21. Craig W, Tepfer M, Degrassi G, Ripandelli D. 21.  2008. An overview of general features of risk assessments of genetically modified crops. Euphytica 164:853–80 [Google Scholar]
  22. Davies HM. 22.  2010. Review article: commercialization of whole-plant systems for biomanufacturing of protein products: evolution and prospects. Plant Biotechnol. J. 8:845–61 [Google Scholar]
  23. Donovan WP, Rupar MJ, Slaney AC, Malvar T, Gawron-Burke MC, Johnson TB. 23.  1992. Characterization of two genes encoding Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal proteins toxic to Coleoptera species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:3921–27 [Google Scholar]
  24. 24. Environ. Prot. Agency 1998. Guidance for the reregistration of pesticide products containing Bacillus thuringiensis as the active ingredient. Publ. 540/RS-89-023, Environ. Prot. Agency, Washington, DC
  25. 25. Eur. Comm 2000. First report on the harmonisation of risk assessment procedures Part 1 Report of the Scientific Steering Committee's Working Group on Harmonisation of Risk Assessment Procedures in the Scientific Committees advising the European Commission in the area of human and environmental health 26–27 October 2000. Rep., Eur. Comm., Brussels
  26. 26. Eur. Comm 2013. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2013 of 3 April 2013 on applications for authorisation of genetically modified food and feed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Regulations (EC) No 641/2004 and (EC) No 1981/2006 Off. J. Eur. Union 8.6.2013, No. L 157/1, Eur. Comm., Brussels [Google Scholar]
  27. 27. Eur. Food Saf. Auth 2006. Guidance document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed. EFSA J. 99:1–100 [Google Scholar]
  28. 28. Eur. Food Saf. Auth 2008. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. Food Chem. Toxicol. 46:Suppl. 1S2–70 [Google Scholar]
  29. 29. Eur. Food Saf. Auth 2010. Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA J. 8:1879 [Google Scholar]
  30. 30. Eur. Food Saf. Auth 2011. Guidance for risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified plants. EFSA J. 9:2150 [Google Scholar]
  31. 31. Eur. Food Saf. Auth 2011. Guidance on selection of comparators for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed. EFSA J. 9:2149 [Google Scholar]
  32. 32. Excell. Through Steward 2009. Guide for stewardship of biotechnology-derived plant products Guide, Excell. Through Steward., Washington, DC
  33. Faustman EM, Omenn GS. 33.  2008. Risk assessment. Toxicology CD Klaassen 107–28 New York: McGraw-Hill Medical [Google Scholar]
  34. Fernandez-Cornejo J, Hallahan C, Nehring R, Wechsler S, Grube A. 34.  2012. Conservation tillage, herbicide use, and genetically engineered crops in the United States: the case of soybeans. AgBioForum 15:231–41 [Google Scholar]
  35. Finger R, El Benni N, Kaphengst T, Evans C, Herbert S. 35.  et al. 2011. A meta analysis on farm-level costs and benefits of GM crops. Sustainability 3:743–62 [Google Scholar]
  36. Flachowsky G, Schafft H, Meyer U. 36.  2012. Animal feeding studies for nutritional and safety assessments of feeds from genetically modified plants: a review. J. Verbrauch. Lebensm. 7:179–94 [Google Scholar]
  37. 37. Food Agric. Organ. UN, World Health Organ 1996. Biotechnology and food safety: report of a joint FAO/WHO consultation, Rome, Italy, 30 September–4 October 1996. Rep., Food Agric. Organ. UN, Rome
  38. 38. Food Agric. Organ. UN, World Health Organ 2000. Safety aspects of genetically modified foods of plant origin: report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on foods derived from biotechnology Rep., World Health Organ., Geneva
  39. 39. Food Agric. Organ. UN, World Health Organ 2001. Evaluation of allergenicity of genetically modified foods derived from biotechnology Rep., Food Agric. Organ. UN, Rome
  40. Fromm M, Taylor LP, Walbot V. 40.  1985. Expression of genes transferred into monocot and dicot plant cells by electroporation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:5824–28 [Google Scholar]
  41. Gatehouse JA. 41.  2008. Biotechnological prospects for engineering insect-resistant plants. Plant Physiol. 146:881–87 [Google Scholar]
  42. Gianessi LP. 42.  2008. Economic impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops. Pest Manag. Sci. 64:346–52 [Google Scholar]
  43. Gordon-Kamm WJ, Spencer TM, Mangano ML, Adams TR, Daines RJ. 43.  et al. 1990. Transformation of maize cells and regeneration of fertile transgenic plants. Plant Cell 2:603–18 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hammond BG, Jez JM. 44.  2011. Impact of food processing on the safety assessment for proteins introduced into biotechnology-derived soybean and corn crops. Food Chem. Toxicol. 49:711–21 [Google Scholar]
  45. Heck GR, Armstrong CL, Astwood JD, Behr CF, Bookout JT. 45.  et al. 2005. Development and characterization of a CP4 EPSPS-based, glyphosate-tolerant corn event. Crop Sci. 45:329–39 [Google Scholar]
  46. Herrera-Estrella L, Depicker A, Van Montagu M, Schell J. 46.  1983. Expression of chimaeric genes transferred into plant cells using a Ti-plasmid-derived vector. Nature 303:209–13 [Google Scholar]
  47. Horsch RB, Fry JE, Hoffmann NL, Eichholtz D, Rogers SG, Fraley RT. 47.  1985. A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science 227:1229–31 [Google Scholar]
  48. James C. 48.  2012. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2012 Brief 44, Int. Serv. Acquis. Agri-Biotech Appl., Ithaca, NY
  49. Jefferson T. 49.  2005 (1800). Summary of public service [after 2 September 1800]. The Papers of Thomas Jefferson 32 1 June 1800–16 February 1801 BB Oberg 122–25 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press http://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-32-02-0080 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kishore GM, Padgette SR, Fraley RT. 50.  1992. History of herbicide-tolerant crops, methods of development and current state of the art—emphasis on glyphosate tolerance. Weed Technol. 6:626–34 [Google Scholar]
  51. Klee H, Horsch R, Rogers S. 51.  1987. Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation and its further applications to plant biology. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 38:467–86 [Google Scholar]
  52. Knauf VC. 52.  1987. The application of genetic engineering to oilseed crops. Trends Biotechnol. 5:40–47 [Google Scholar]
  53. Kok EJ, Keijer J, Kleter GA, Kuiper HA. 53.  2008. Comparative safety assessment of plant-derived foods. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 50:98–113 [Google Scholar]
  54. Kuiper HA, Kleter GA, Noteborn HPJM, Kok EJ. 54.  2001. Assessment of the food safety issues related to genetically modified foods. Plant J. 27:503–28 [Google Scholar]
  55. Kuiper HA, Kok EJ, Davies HV. 55.  2013. New EU legislation for risk assessment of GM food: no scientific justification for mandatory animal feeding trials. Plant Biotechnol. J. 11:781–84 [Google Scholar]
  56. Li XY, Li SY, Lang ZH, Zhang J, Zhu L, Huang DF. 56.  2013. Chloroplast-targeted expression of the codon-optimized truncated cry1Ah gene in transgenic tobacco confers a high level of protection against insects. Plant Cell Rep. 32:1299–308 [Google Scholar]
  57. Lucca P, Poletti S, Sautter C. 57.  2006. Genetic engineering approaches to enrich rice with iron and vitamin A. Physiol. Plant. 126:291–303 [Google Scholar]
  58. Marra MC, Piggott NE, Carlson GA. 58.  2004. The net benefits, including convenience, of Roundup Ready soybeans: results from a national survey Tech. Bull. 2004-3, NSF Cent. Integr. Pest Manag., Raleigh, NC
  59. McCabe DE, Swain WF, Martinell BJ, Christou P. 59.  1988. Stable transformation of soybean (Glycine max) by particle acceleration. Nat. Biotechnol. 6:923–26 [Google Scholar]
  60. McDougall P. 60.  2011. The cost and time involved in the discovery, development and authorisation of a new plant biotechnology derived trait Consultancy Study for Crop Life International by P McDougall, Midlothian, UK
  61. McHughen A. 61.  2012. Introduction to the GM crops special issue on biosafety, food and GM regulation. GM Crops Food 3:6–8 [Google Scholar]
  62. Nickson TE. 62.  2008. Planning environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops: problem formulation for stress-tolerant crops. Plant Physiol. 147:494–502 [Google Scholar]
  63. Nicolia A, Manzo A, Veronesi F, Rosellini D. 63.  2014. An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 3477–88
  64. 64. Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev 1993. Safety considerations for biotechnology: scale-up of crop plants. Rep., Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev., Paris
  65. 65. Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev 1993. Safety evaluation of foods derived by modern biotechnology—concepts and principles Rep., Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev., Paris
  66. 66. Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev 1998. Repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rodents. Guidel. Test. Chem., Sec. 4, Test 408, Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev., Paris
  67. 67. Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev 2001. Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of soybean: key food and feed nutrients and anti-nutrients Doc. ENV/JM/MONO(2001)15, Ser. Saf. Nov. Foods Feeds 2, Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev., Paris
  68. 68. Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev 2002. Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of maize (Zea mays): key food and feed nutrients, anti-nutrients and secondary plant metabolites. Doc. ENV/JM/MONO(2002)25, Ser. Saf. Nov. Foods Feeds 6, Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev., Paris [Google Scholar]
  69. 69. Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev 2004. Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium barbadense): key food and feed nutrients and anti-nutrients. Doc. ENV/JM/MONO(2004)16, Ser. Saf. Nov. Foods Feeds 11, Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev., Paris
  70. Padgette S, Re D, Barry G, Eichholtz D, Delannay X. 70.  et al. 1996. New weed control opportunities: development of soybeans with a Roundup Ready gene. Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Agricultural, Environmental, Economic, Regulatory, and Technical Aspects SO Duke 53–84 Boca Raton, FL: CRC [Google Scholar]
  71. Paoletti C, Flamm E, Yan W, Meek S, Renckens S. 71.  et al. 2008. GMO risk assessment around the world: some examples. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 19:Suppl. 1S70–78 [Google Scholar]
  72. Peng T, Sun X, Mumm R. 72.  2014. Optimized breeding strategies for multiple trait integration: II. Process efficiency in event pyramiding and trait fixation. Mol. Breed. 33:105–15 [Google Scholar]
  73. Perlak FJ, Fuchs RL, Dean DA, McPherson SL, Fischhoff DA. 73.  1991. Modification of the coding sequence enhances plant expression of insect control protein genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:3324–28 [Google Scholar]
  74. Pilacinski W, Crawford A, Downey R, Harvey B, Huber S. 74.  et al. 2011. Plants with genetically modified events combined by conventional breeding: an assessment of the need for additional regulatory data. Food Chem. Toxicol. 49:1–7 [Google Scholar]
  75. Poirier Y, Nawrath C, Somerville C. 75.  1995. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates, a family of biodegradable plastics and elastomers, in bacteria and plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 13:142–50 [Google Scholar]
  76. Privalle L, Bannon G, Herman R, Ladics G, McClain S. 76.  et al. 2011. Heat stability, its measurement, and its lack of utility in the assessment of the potential allergenicity of novel proteins. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 61:292–95 [Google Scholar]
  77. Qaim M. 77.  2005. Agricultural biotechnology adoption in developing countries. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 87:1317–24 [Google Scholar]
  78. Qaim M. 78.  2010. Benefits of genetically modified crops for the poor: household income, nutrition, and health. New Biotechnol. 27:552–57 [Google Scholar]
  79. Raven PH. 79.  2010. Does the use of transgenic plants diminish or promote biodiversity?. New Biotechnol. 27:528–33 [Google Scholar]
  80. Raybould A. 80.  2006. Problem formulation and hypothesis testing for environmental risk assessments of genetically modified crops. Environ. Biosaf. Res. 5:119–25 [Google Scholar]
  81. Raybould A. 81.  2007. Ecological versus ecotoxicological methods for assessing the environmental risks of transgenic crops. Plant Sci. 173:589–602 [Google Scholar]
  82. Ricroch AE. 82.  2013. Assessment of GE food safety using “-omics” techniques and long-term animal feeding studies. New Biotechnol. 30:349–54 [Google Scholar]
  83. Romeis J, Meissle M. 83.  2011. Non-target risk assessment of Bt crops—Cry protein uptake by aphids. J. Appl. Entomol. 135:1–6 [Google Scholar]
  84. Romeis J, Meissle M, Bigler F. 84.  2006. Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and biological control. Nat. Biotechnol. 24:63–71 [Google Scholar]
  85. Romeis J, Raybould A, Bigler F, Candolfi MP, Hellmich RL. 85.  et al. 2013. Deriving criteria to select arthropod species for laboratory tests to assess the ecological risks from cultivating arthropod-resistant genetically engineered crops. Chemosphere 90:901–9 [Google Scholar]
  86. Rupar MJ, Donovan WP, Groat RG, Slaney AC, Mattison JW. 86.  et al. 1991. Two novel strains of Bacillus thuringiensis toxic to coleopterans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:3337–44 [Google Scholar]
  87. Sanford JC, Klein TM, Wolf ED, Allen N. 87.  1987. Delivery of substances into cells and tissues using a particle bombardment process. Part. Sci. Technol. 5:27–37 [Google Scholar]
  88. Sansinenea E. 88.  2012. Bacillus thuringiensis. Biotechnology Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer [Google Scholar]
  89. Sanvido O, Romeis J, Gathmann A, Gielkens M, Raybould A, Bigler F. 89.  2012. Evaluating environmental risks of genetically modified crops: ecological harm criteria for regulatory decision-making. Environ. Sci. Policy 15:82–91 [Google Scholar]
  90. Scheffe L. 90.  2008. Benefits of conservation tillage. Integrated Cropping Systems and Water Management Handbook (AGRO-76) Sec. 10a Washington, DC: US Dep. Agric. Nat. Resour. Conserv. Serv. [Google Scholar]
  91. Schnepf E, Crickmore N, Van Rie J, Lereclus D, Baum J. 91.  et al. 1998. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:775–806 [Google Scholar]
  92. Shah DM, Horsch RB, Klee HJ, Kishore GM, Winter JA. 92.  et al. 1986. Engineering herbicide tolerance in transgenic plants. Science 233:478–81 [Google Scholar]
  93. Snell C, Bernheim A, Berge JB, Kuntz M, Pascal G. 93.  et al. 2012. Assessment of the health impact of GM plant diets in long-term and multigenerational animal feeding trials: a literature review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 50:1134–48 [Google Scholar]
  94. Somerville C, Meyerowitz E. 94.  2007. Arabidopsis. Cold Spring Harb. Monogr. 27. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harb. Lab. Press [Google Scholar]
  95. Streatfield SJ. 95.  2007. Approaches to achieve high-level heterologous protein production in plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 5:2–15 [Google Scholar]
  96. Thomas K, Aalbers M, Bannon GA, Bartels M, Dearman RJ. 96.  et al. 2004. A multi-laboratory evaluation of a common in vitro pepsin digestion assay protocol used in assessing the safety of novel proteins. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 39:87–98 [Google Scholar]
  97. Tzfira T, Citovsky V. 97.  2006. Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of plants: biology and biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17:147–54 [Google Scholar]
  98. Umbeck P, Johnson G, Barton K, Swain W. 98.  1987. Genetically transformed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 5:263–66 [Google Scholar]
  99. Vaughn T, Cavato T, Brar G, Coombe T, DeGooyer T. 99.  et al. 2005. A method of controlling corn rootworm feeding using a Bacillus thuringiensis protein expressed in transgenic maize. Crop Sci. 45:931–38 [Google Scholar]
  100. Wang W, Vinocur B, Altman A. 100.  2003. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 218:1–14 [Google Scholar]
  101. Wolt JD, Keese P, Raybould A, Fitzpatrick JW, Burachik M. 101.  et al. 2010. Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants. Transgenic Res. 19:425–36 [Google Scholar]
  102. Ye W, Zhu L, Liu Y, Crickmore N, Peng D. 102.  et al. 2012. Mining new crystal protein genes from Bacillus thuringiensis on the basis of mixed plasmid-enriched genome sequencing and a computational pipeline. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78:4795–801 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error