This review summarizes and critically examines the changes in how the (DSM) characterizes paraphilias. Attention is paid to the diagnostic options that were included in DSM-5, the decision not to include criterion sets for two additional disorders (paraphilic coercive disorder and hypersexual behavior disorder), and the further decision not to modify the diagnosis of pedophilic to pedohebephilic disorder. The three most significant changes are () the move to distinguish paraphilias from paraphilic disorders (allowing unusual sexual interests to be studied by researchers but only regarded as disorders when they cause distress or dysfunction), () introducing criteria describing paraphilic disorders as being in remission (when they no longer cause distress or dysfunction), and () clarifying the relationship between behavior and paraphilias. Concerns are noted about the forensic use of diagnoses and the lack of funding for field trials in this revision of the DSM. Suggestions are given for future directions in order to further research efficacy and clinical diagnosis.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Abel G, Rouleau J. 1990. The nature and extent of sexual assault. Handbook of Sexual Assault: Issues, Theories and Treatment of the Offender WL Marshall, DR Laws, HE Barbaree 9–12 New York: Plenum [Google Scholar]
  2. Aggrawal A. 2008. Forensic and Medico-Legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices. Boca Raton, FL: CRC PressCovers aspects of sexual practices in a cross-cultural medico-legal context and provides geographical prevalence rates. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexander M. 1999. Sexual offender treatment efficacy revisited. Sex. Abuse 11:101–16 [Google Scholar]
  4. Am. Psychiatr. Assoc 1952. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: Am. Psychiatr. Assoc., 1st ed.. [Google Scholar]
  5. Am. Psychiatr. Assoc 1968. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: Am. Psychiatr. Assoc, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  6. Am. Psychiatr. Assoc 1980. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: Am. Psychiatr. Assoc, 3rd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  7. Am. Psychiatr. Assoc 1987. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: Am. Psychiatr. Assoc, 3rd ed., rev.. [Google Scholar]
  8. Am. Psychiatr. Assoc 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: Am. Psychiatr. Assoc, 4th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  9. Am. Psychiatr. Assoc 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: Am. Psychiatr. Assoc, 4th ed., text rev.. [Google Scholar]
  10. Am. Psychiatr. Assoc 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: Am. Psychiatr. Assoc, 5th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  11. Appelbaum PS. 2014. Commentary: DSM-5 and forensic psychiatry. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 42:136–40Discusses the changes in the criteria for diagnosis of paraphilia and their forensic implications. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bader SM, Schoeneman-Morris SA, Scalora MJ, Casady TK. 2008. Exhibitionism: findings from a Midwestern police contact sample. Int. J. Offender Ther. Comp. Criminol. 52:270–79 [Google Scholar]
  13. Balon R. 2014. Politics of diagnostic criteria: specifiers of pedophilic disorder in DSM-5. Arch. Sex. Behav. 43:1235–36 [Google Scholar]
  14. Beech AR, Harkins L. 2012. DSM-IV paraphilia: descriptions, demographics and treatment interventions. Aggress. Violent Behav. 17:527–39 [Google Scholar]
  15. Beech AR, Oliver C, Fisher D, Beckett RC. 2005. STEP 4: The Sex Offender Treatment Programme in Prison: Addressing the Needs of Rapists and Sexual Murderers Birmingham, UK: Univ. Birmingham http://www.researchgate.net/publication/260293579_STEP_4_The_Sex_Offender_Treatment_Programme_in_prison_Addressing_the_needs_of_rapists_and_sexual_murderers [Google Scholar]
  16. Blanchard R. 2010a. The DSM diagnostic criteria for transvestic fetishism. Arch. Sex. Behav. 239:363–72 [Google Scholar]
  17. Blanchard R. 2010b. The specificity of victim count as a diagnostic indicator of pedohebephilia. Arch. Sex. Behav. 39:1245–52 [Google Scholar]
  18. Blanchard R. 2011. A brief history of field trials of the DSM diagnostic criteria for paraphilias. Arch. Sex. Behav. 40:861–62 [Google Scholar]
  19. Blanchard R, Lykins AD, Wherrett D, Kuban ME, Cantor JM. et al. 2009. Pedophilia, hebephilia, and the DSM-V. Arch. Sex. Behav. 38:335–50Literature review presenting the arguments for expanding the pedophilia diagnosis and including specifiers for prepubescent and early-pubescent sexual interests. [Google Scholar]
  20. Briken P, Federoff JP, Bradford JW. 2014. Why can't pedophilic disorder remit?. Arch. Sex. Behav. 43:1237–39 [Google Scholar]
  21. Cantor JM, Blanchard R, Christensen BK, Dickey R, Klassen PE. et al. 2004. Intelligence, memory, and handedness in pedophilia. Neuropsychology 18:3–14 [Google Scholar]
  22. Cantor JM, Klassen PE, Dickey R, Christensen BK, Kuban ME. et al. 2005. Handedness in pedophilia and hebephilia. Arch. Sex. Behav. 34:447–59 [Google Scholar]
  23. Cantor JM, Kuban ME, Blak T, Klassen PE, Dickey R, Blanchard R. 2006. Grade failure and special education placement in sexual offenders' educational histories. Arch. Sex. Behav. 35:743–51 [Google Scholar]
  24. Caspi A, Houts RM, Belsky DW, Goldman-Mellor SJ, Harrington H. et al. 2014. The p factor: one general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorder. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 2:119–37 [Google Scholar]
  25. Darcangelo S, Hollings A, Paladino G. 2008. Fetishism: assessment and treatment. See Laws & O'Donohue 2008 119–30
  26. Dietz PE, Hazelwood MS, Warren J. 1990. The sexually sadistic criminal and his offenses. Bull. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 16:163–78 [Google Scholar]
  27. Dunsieth NW, Nelson EB, Brusman-Lovins LA, Holcomb JL, Beckman D. et al. 2004. Psychiatric and legal features of 113 men convicted of sexual offenses. J. Clin. Psychiatry 65:293–300 [Google Scholar]
  28. Fedoroff JP, Di Gioacchino L, Murphy L. 2013. Problems with paraphilias in the DSM-5. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 15:363–68 [Google Scholar]
  29. First MB. 2014. DSM-5 and paraphilic disorders. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 42:191–201 [Google Scholar]
  30. First MB, Frances AJ. 2008. Issues for DSM-V: unintended consequences of small changes: the case of paraphilias. Am. J. Psychiatry 165:1240–41 [Google Scholar]
  31. First MB, Halon RL. 2008. Use of DSM paraphilia diagnoses in sexually violent predator commitment cases. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 36:443–54 [Google Scholar]
  32. Frances A, First MB. 2011. Hebephilia is not a mental disorder in DSM-IV-TR and should not become one in DSM-5. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 39:78–85 [Google Scholar]
  33. Freund K. 1988. Courtship disorder: Is this hypothesis valid?. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 528:172–82Describes and defines courtship disorder, an organizing concept for DSM-5 paraphilic disorders. [Google Scholar]
  34. Freund K, Blanchard R. 1986. The concept of courtship disorder. J. Sex Marital Ther. 12:79–92 [Google Scholar]
  35. Freund K, Seto MC. 1998. Preferential rape in the theory of courtship disorder. Arch. Sex. Behav. 27:433–43 [Google Scholar]
  36. Freund K, Seto MC, Kuban M. 1997. Frotteurism: the theory of courtship disorder. Sexual Deviance: Theory, Assessment, and Treatment DR Laws, W O'Donohue 111–30 London: Guilford [Google Scholar]
  37. Giles J. 2006. No such thing as excessive sexual behavior. Arch. Sex. Behav. 35:641–42 [Google Scholar]
  38. Hanson RK, Gordon A, Harris AJR, Marques JK, Murphy W. et al. 2002. First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sex. Abuse 14:169–94 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hanson RK, Harris AJ, Helmus L, Thornton D. 2014. High-risk sex offenders may not be high risk forever. J. Interpers. Violence 29:2792–813 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hanson RK, Steffy RA, Gauthier R. 1993. Long-term recidivism of child molesters. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 51:646–52 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hinderliter AC. 2011. Defining paraphilia in DSM-5: Do not disregard grammar. J. Sex Marital Ther. 37:17–31 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hucker SJ. 2008. Sexual masochism: assessment and treatment. See Laws & O'Donohue 2008 264–71
  43. Hughes JR. 2007. Review of medical reports on pedophilia. Clin. Pediatr. 46:667–82 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hurlbert DF. 1992. Voyeurism in an adult female with schizoid personality: a case report. J. Sex. Educ. Ther. 18:17–21 [Google Scholar]
  45. James EL. 2011. Fifty Shades of Grey Hornsby, New South Wales: Writers Coffee Shop [Google Scholar]
  46. Jetha MK, Segalowitz SJ. 2012. Adolescent Brain Development: Implications for Behavior San Diego, CA: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  47. Joyal CC. 2014. How anomalous are paraphilic interests?. Arch. Sex. Behav. 43:1241–43 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kafka MP. 2010a. The DSM diagnostic criteria for fetishism. Arch. Sex. Behav. 39:357–62 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kafka MP. 2010b. Hypersexual disorder: a proposed diagnosis for DSM-V. Arch. Sex. Behav. 39:377–400Literature review presenting the arguments for inclusion of hypersexual disorder in the DSM-5 as a sexual disorder. [Google Scholar]
  50. Karpman B. 1951. The sexual psychopath. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 42:184–98 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kilmann PR, Sabalis RF, Gearing ML, Bukstel LH, Scovern AW. 1982. The treatment of sexual paraphilias: a review of the outcome research. J. Sex. Res. 18:193–252 [Google Scholar]
  52. Kingston DA, Yates PM. 2008. Sexual sadism: assessment and treatment. See Laws & O'Donohue 2008 231–49
  53. Knight RA. 2010. Is a diagnostic category for paraphilic coercive disorder defensible?. Arch. Sex. Behav. 39:419–26 [Google Scholar]
  54. Knight RA, Sims-Knight J, Guay J. 2013. Is a separate diagnostic category defensible for paraphilic coercion?. J. Crim. Justice 41:90–99Provides statistical evidence that paraphilic coercion falls on a continuum with sexual sadism. [Google Scholar]
  55. Krueger RB, Kaplan MS. 2008. Frotteurism: assessment and treatment. See Laws & O'Donohue 2008 150–63
  56. Krueger RF, Watson D, Barlow DH. 2005. Introduction to the special section: toward a dimensionally based taxonomy of psychopathology. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 114:491–93 [Google Scholar]
  57. Långström N. 2010. The DSM diagnostic criteria for exhibitionism, voyeurism, and frotteurism. Arch. Sex. Behav. 39:317–24 [Google Scholar]
  58. Långström N, Seto MC. 2006. Exhibitionistic and voyeuristic behavior in a Swedish national population survey. Arch. Sex. Behav. 5:427–35 [Google Scholar]
  59. Lavin M. 2008. Voyeurism: psychopathology and theory. See Laws & O'Donohue 2008 305–19
  60. Laws DR, O'Donohue W. 2008. Sexual Deviance: Theory, Assessment, and Treatment New York: Guilford, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  61. Levenson JS. 2004. Reliability of sexually violent predator civil commitment criteria in Florida. Law Hum. Behav. 28:357–68 [Google Scholar]
  62. Ley D, Prause N, Finn P. 2014. The emperor has no clothes: a review of the pornography addiction model. Curr. Sex. Health Rep. 6:94–105 [Google Scholar]
  63. Lösel F, Schmucker M. 2005. The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: a comprehensive meta-analysis. J. Exp. Criminol. 1:117–46 [Google Scholar]
  64. Maletzky BM, Steinhauser C. 2002. A 25-year follow-up of cognitive/behavioral therapy with 7,275 sexual offenders. Behav. Modif. 26:123–47 [Google Scholar]
  65. Mann RE, Ainsworth F, Al-Attar Z, Davies M. 2008. Voyeurism: assessment and treatment.. See Laws & O'Donohue 2008 305–19
  66. Mann RE, Hanson RK, Thornton D. 2010. Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sex. Abuse 22:191–217 [Google Scholar]
  67. Marks IM, Gelder MG, Bancroft JHJ. 1970. Sexual deviants two years after electric aversion. Br. J. Psychiatry 117:173–85 [Google Scholar]
  68. Marks IM, Rachman S, Gelder MG. 1965. Methods for assessment of aversion treatment in fetishism with masochism. Behav. Res. Ther. 3:253–58 [Google Scholar]
  69. Marshall WL, Kennedy P, Yates P, Serran G. 2002. Diagnosing sexual sadism in sexual offenders: reliability across diagnosticians. Int. J. Offender Ther. Comp. Criminol. 46:668–77 [Google Scholar]
  70. McManus MA, Hargreaves P, Rainbow L, Alison LJ. 2013. Paraphilias: definition, diagnosis and treatment. F1000Prime Rep. 5:36 [Google Scholar]
  71. Money J. 1986. Lovemaps: Clinical Concepts of Sexual/Erotic Health and Pathology, Paraphilia, and Gender Transposition in Childhood, Adolescence, and Maturity New York: Irvington [Google Scholar]
  72. Moser C. 2009. When is an unusual sexual interest a mental disorder?. Arch. Sex. Behav. 38:323–25 [Google Scholar]
  73. Moser C. 2011. Hypersexual disorder: just more muddled thinking. Arch. Sex. Behav. 40:227–29 [Google Scholar]
  74. Moser C, Levitt EE. 1987. An exploratory-descriptive study of sadomasochistically oriented sample. J. Sex Res. 23:322–37 [Google Scholar]
  75. Nitschke J, Osterheider M, Mokros A. 2009. A cumulative scale of severe sexual sadism. Sex. Abuse 21:262–78 [Google Scholar]
  76. Pinard G, Lamontagne Y. 1967. Electrical aversion, aversion relief, and sexual retraining in treatment of fetishism and masochism. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 7:71–74 [Google Scholar]
  77. Prause N, Pfaus J. 2015. Viewing sexual stimuli associated with greater sexual responsiveness, not erectile dysfunction. Sex. Med. 3:90–98 [Google Scholar]
  78. Prause N, Staley C, Fong TW. 2013. No evidence of emotion dysregulation in “hypersexuals” reporting their emotions to a sexual film. Sex. Addict. Compuls. 20:106–26 [Google Scholar]
  79. Rabinowitz Greenberg SR, Firestone P, Bradford JM, Greenberg DM. 2002. Prediction of recidivism in exhibitionists: psychological, phallometric, and offense factors. Sex. Abuse 14:329–47 [Google Scholar]
  80. Rahman Q, Symeonides DJ. 2008. Neurodevelopmental correlates of paraphilic sexual interests in men. Arch. Sex. Behav. 37:166–72 [Google Scholar]
  81. Reid RC, Kafka MP. 2014. Controversies about hypersexual disorder and the DSM-5. Curr. Sex. Health Rep. 6:259–64 [Google Scholar]
  82. Richters JL, de Visser RO, Rissel CE, Grulich AE, Smith AM. 2008. Demographic and psychosocial features of participants in bondage and discipline, “sadomasochism” or dominance and submission (BDSM): data from a national survey. J. Sex. Med. 5:1660–68 [Google Scholar]
  83. Robinson WJ. 1913. Masturbation—injurious or harmless?. Am. J. Urol. [Google Scholar]
  84. Sandnabba K, Santilla P, Nordling N. 1999. Sexual behavior and social adaptation among sadomasochistically-oriented males. J. Sex. Res. 36:273–82 [Google Scholar]
  85. Schlesinger LB, Revitch E. 1999. Sexual burglaries and sexual homicide: clinical, forensic, and investigative considerations. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry 27:227–38 [Google Scholar]
  86. Schober JM, Kuhm PJ, Kovacs PG, Earle JH, Byrne PM, Fries M. 2005. Leuprolide acetate suppresses pedophilic urges and arousability. Arch. Sex. Behav. 34:691–705 [Google Scholar]
  87. Seto MC. 2008. Pedophilia: psychopathology and theory. See Laws & O'Donohue 2008 164–82
  88. Seto MC, Lalumière ML. 2001. A brief screening scale to identify pedophilic interests among child molesters. Sex. Abuse 13:15–25 [Google Scholar]
  89. Spitzer RL. 1981. The diagnostic status of homosexuality in DSM-III: a reformulation of the issues. Am. J. Psychiatry 138:210–15 [Google Scholar]
  90. Steele VR, Staley C, Fong T, Prause N. 2013. Sexual desire, not hypersexuality, is related to neurophysiological responses elicited by sexual images. Socioaffect. Neurosci. Psychol. 3:20770 [Google Scholar]
  91. Sugarman P, Dumughn C, Saad K, Hinder S, Bluglass R. 1994. Dangerousness in exhibitionists. J. Forensic Psychiatry 5:287–96 [Google Scholar]
  92. Sun SS, Schubert CM, Chumlea WC, Roche AF, Kulin HE. et al. 2002. National estimates of the timing of sexual maturation and racial differences among US children. Pediatrics 110:911–19Provides mean and median ages of entering Tanner stages for a large nationally representative sample of US children. [Google Scholar]
  93. Templeman TL, Stinnett RD. 1991. Patterns of sexual arousal and history in a “normal” sample of young men. Arch. Sex. Behav. 20:137–50 [Google Scholar]
  94. Thornton D. 2010. Evidence regarding the need for a diagnostic category for a coercive paraphilia. Arch. Sex. Behav. 39:411–18Reviews research evidence for an abnormal sexual arousal pattern associated with rape. [Google Scholar]
  95. Thornton D, Palmer S, Ramsay RK. 2011. Pedohebephilia, PCD, and sadism diagnoses: reliability in Wisconsin. Presented at 30th Annu. Res. Treat. Conf. Assoc. Treat. Sex. Abus., Toronto, Ontario
  96. Voros F. 2009. The invention of addiction to pornography. Sexologies 18:243–46 [Google Scholar]
  97. Wakefield JC. 2012. The DSM-5's proposed new categories of sexual disorder: the problem of false positives in sexual diagnosis. Clin. Soc. Work J. 40:213–23 [Google Scholar]
  98. Weeks J. 2015. Beyond the categories. Arch. Sex. Behav. 44:1091–97 [Google Scholar]
  99. Wiederman MW. 2003. Paraphilia and fetishism. Sex. Ther. 11:315–21 [Google Scholar]
  100. Wilcox D, Sosnoski D, Warberg B, Beech AR. 2005. Sexual history disclosure using the polygraph in a sample of British sex offenders in treatment. Polygraph 34:171–83 [Google Scholar]
  101. Wilson RJ, Abracen J, Picheca JE, Malcolm PB, Prinzo M. 2003. Pedophilia: an evaluation of the diagnostic and risk management methods. Presented at 23rd Annu. Res. Treat. Conf. Assoc. Treat. Sex. Abus., St. Louis, MO
  102. Wilson RJ, Pake DR, Duffee S. 2011. DSM-5 pedohebephilia, paraphilic coercive disorder and sadism diagnoses: reliability in Florida. Presented at 30th Annu. Res. Treat. Conf. Assoc. Treat. Sex. Abus., Toronto, Ontario
  103. Witt PH, Conroy MA. 2013. Evaluation of sex offenders. Forensic Assessments in Civil and Criminal Law: A Handbook for Lawyers P Roesch, PA Zapf 60–73 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error