1932

Abstract

Beginning with efforts in the late 1940s to ensure that clinical psychologists were adequately trained to meet the mental health needs of the veterans of World War II, the accreditation of clinical psychologists has largely been the province of the Commission on Accreditation of the American Psychological Association. However, in 2008 the Psychological Clinical Science Accreditation System began accrediting doctoral programs that adhere to the clinical science training model. This review discusses the goals of accreditation and the history of the accreditation of graduate programs in clinical psychology, and provides an overview of the evaluation procedures used by these two systems. Accreditation is viewed against the backdrop of the slow rate of progress in reducing the burden of mental illness and the changes in clinical psychology training that might help improve this situation. The review concludes with a set of five recommendations for improving accreditation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093559
2017-05-08
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/clinpsy/13/1/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093559.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093559&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Am. Psychiatr. Assoc. 1952. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Washington, DC: Am. Psychiatr. Publ, 1st ed..
  2. Am. Psychiatr. Assoc. 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: Am. Psychiatr. Publ, 4th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  3. Am. Psychiatr. Assoc. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Arlington, VA: Am. Psychiatr. Publ, 5th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  4. APA (Am. Psychol. Assoc.). 2006. Guidelines and Principles for Accreditation of Programs in Professional Psychology Washington, DC: APA
  5. APA (Am. Psychol. Assoc.). 2015. Standards of Accreditation for Health Service Psychology Washington, DC: APA
  6. Baker DB, Benjamin LT Jr. 2000. The affirmation of the scientist–practitioner: a look back at Boulder. Am. Psychol. 55:241–47 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baker TB, McFall RM, Shoham V. 2008. Current status and future prospects of clinical psychology: toward a scientifically principled approach to mental and behavioral health care. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 9:67–103 [Google Scholar]
  8. Benjamin LT Jr. 2005. A history of clinical psychology as a profession in America (and a glimpse at its future). Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 1:1–30 [Google Scholar]
  9. Berenbaum H, Shoham V. 2011. Broad and cutting-edge training in applied psychology: a clinical science perspective. Train. Educ. Prof. Psychol. 5:22–29 [Google Scholar]
  10. Berman JS, Norton NC. 1985. Does professional training make a therapist more effective. Psychol. Bull. 98:401–7 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bootzin RR. 2007. Psychological clinical science: why and how we got to where we are. Psychological Clinical Science: Papers in Honor of Richard M. McFall TA Treat, RR Bootzin, TB Baker 3–28 New York: Psychology Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Cautin RL. 2008. David Shakow and schizophrenia research at Worcester State Hospital: the roots of the scientist–practitioner model. J. Hist. Behav. Sci. 44:219–37 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cent. Dis. Control Prev. 2001. HIV and AIDS—United States, 1981–2000 Atlanta, GA: Cent. Dis. Control Prev.
  14. Chambless DL, Ollendick TH. 2001. Empirically supported psychological interventions: controversies and evidence. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52:685–716 [Google Scholar]
  15. Christensen A, Jacobson NS. 1994. Who (or what) can do psychotherapy: the status and challenge of nonprofessional therapies. Psychol. Sci. 5:8–14 [Google Scholar]
  16. Comm. Accredit. 2015. Section C: IRs related to the Standards of Accreditation. Implementing Regulations1–141 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  17. Comm. Train. Clin. Psychol. 1947. Recommended graduate training program in clinical psychology. Am. Psychol 2:539–58 [Google Scholar]
  18. Curtin S, Warner M, Hedegaard H. 2016. Increase in suicide in the United States 1999–2014 NCHS data brief, no. 241 Hyattsville, MD: Natl. Cent. Health Stat.
  19. Cuthbert BN, Insel TR. 2010a. The data of diagnosis: new approaches to psychiatric classification. Psychiatry 73:311–14 [Google Scholar]
  20. Cuthbert BN, Insel TR. 2010b. Toward new approaches to psychotic disorders: the NIMH Research Domain Criteria project. Schizophr. Bull. 36:1061–62 [Google Scholar]
  21. Cuthbert BN, Insel TR. 2013. Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC. Biomed Cent. Med. 11:126 [Google Scholar]
  22. Durlak JA. 1979. Comparative effectiveness of paraprofessional and professional helpers. Psychol. Bull. 86:80–92 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ferrari AJ, Charlson FJ, Norman RE, Patten SB, Freedman G. et al. 2013. Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLOS Med 10:e1001547 [Google Scholar]
  24. Grove WM, Zald DH, Lebow BS, Snitz BE, Nelson C. 2000. Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Assess. 12:19–30 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hoffman DH, Carter DJ, Viglucci Lopez CR, Benzmiller HL, Guo AX. et al. 2015. Report to the Special Committee of the Board of Directors of the American Psychological Association: Independent Review Relating to APA Ethics Guidelines, National Security Interrogations, and Torture Chicago: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
  26. Horvath AO, Symonds DB. 1991. Relationship between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. J. Couns. Psychol. 38:139–49 [Google Scholar]
  27. Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, Miller D, Bishop K. et al. 2016. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2013 Bethesda, MD: Natl. Cancer Inst.
  28. Insel TR. 2015. The NIMH experimental medicine initiative. World Psychiatry 14:151–53 [Google Scholar]
  29. Insel TR, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, Heinssen R, Pine DS. et al. 2010. Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 167:748–51 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kazdin AE. 2007. Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 3:1–27 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kelly EL. 1947. Research on the selection of clinical psychologists. J. Clin. Psychol. 3:39–42 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Walters EE. 2005. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey replication. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 62:617–27 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lambert MJ, Barley DE. 2001. Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy 38:357–61 [Google Scholar]
  34. Levenson RW. 2007. The future of the clinical science movement: challenges, issues, and opportunities. Psychological Clinical Science: Papers in Honor of Richard M. McFall TA Treat, RR Bootzin, TB Baker 349–60 New York: Psychology Press [Google Scholar]
  35. Levenson RW. 2014. The future of clinical science training: new challenges and opportunities. Clin. Psychol. Sci 2:35–45 [Google Scholar]
  36. Levenson RW. 2016. Licensure for clinical scientists: a critical issue for psychological scientists. Observer Jan. http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/licensure-for-clinical-scientists-a-critical-issue-for-psychological-scientists
  37. Levenson RW, Cowan CP, Cowan PA. 2010. A specialty clinic model for clinical science training: translating couples research into practice in the Berkeley Couples Clinic. Strengthening Couple Relationships for Optimal Child Development: Lessons from Research and Intervention MS Schulz, MK Pruett, PK Kerig, RD Parke 197–209 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  38. McFall RM. 1991. Manifesto for a science of clinical psychology. Clin. Psychol. 44:75–88 [Google Scholar]
  39. McFall RM. 2006. Doctoral training in clinical psychology. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2:21–49 [Google Scholar]
  40. McHugh RK, Barlow DH. 2010. The dissemination and implementation of evidence-based psychological treatments: a review of current efforts. Am. Psychol. 65:73–84 [Google Scholar]
  41. Meehl PE. 1954. Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence Minneapolis, MN: Univ. Minnesota Press
  42. Meehl PE. 1973. Why I do not attend case conferences. Psychodiagnosis: Selected Papers PE Meehl 225–302 Minneapolis, MN: Univ. Minnesota Press [Google Scholar]
  43. Miller JG. 1946. Clinical psychology in the Veterans Administration. Am. Psychol. 1:181–89 [Google Scholar]
  44. Open Sci. Collab. 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349:aac4716 [Google Scholar]
  45. Peterson DR. 1968. The doctor of psychology program at the University of Illinois. Am. Psychol. 23:511–16 [Google Scholar]
  46. Psychol. Clin. Sci. Accredit. Syst. 2016a. Accreditation Review Standards and Criteria Washington, DC: Psychol. Clin. Sci. Accredit. Syst.
  47. Psychol. Clin. Sci. Accredit. Syst. 2016b. Welcome Psychol. Clin. Sci. Accredit. Syst. Washington, DC: http://www.pcsas.org/
  48. Reeves WC, Strine TW, Pratt LA, Thompson W, Ahluwalia I. et al. 2011. Mental illness surveillance among adults in the United States. MMWR Suppl 60:1–29 [Google Scholar]
  49. Rogers CR. 1957. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. J. Consult. Psychol. 21:95–103 [Google Scholar]
  50. Smith ML, Glass GV. 1977. Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. Am. Psychol. 32:752–60 [Google Scholar]
  51. Univ. Calif. Berkeley. 2016. Clinical Science: Accreditation Berkeley, CA: Univ. Calif. Berkeley, Dep. Psychol http://psychology.berkeley.edu/students/graduate-program/clinical-science-accreditation
  52. Wang PS, Berglund PA, Olfson M, Pincus HA, Wells KB, Kessler RC. 2005. Failure and delay in initial treatment contact after first onset of mental disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey replication. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 62:603–13 [Google Scholar]
  53. Zlotlow SF, Nelson PD, Peterson RL. 2011. The history of broad and general education in scientific psychology: the foundation for professional psychology education and training. Train. Educ. Prof. Psychol. 5:1–8 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093559
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093559
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error