1932

Abstract

Latent growth models make up a class of methods to study within-person change—how it progresses, how it differs across individuals, what are its determinants, and what are its consequences. Latent growth methods have been applied in many domains to examine average and differential responses to interventions and treatments. In this review, we introduce the growth modeling approach to studying change by presenting different models of change and interpretations of their model parameters. We then apply these methods to examining sex differences in the development of binge drinking behavior through adolescence and into adulthood. Advances in growth modeling methods are then discussed and include inherently nonlinear growth models, derivative specification of growth models, and latent change score models to study stochastic change processes. We conclude with relevant design issues of longitudinal studies and considerations for the analysis of longitudinal data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084840
2018-05-07
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/clinpsy/14/1/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084840.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084840&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Achenbach T. 1991. Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 Profile Burlington: Univ. Vt. Dep. Psychiatry
  2. Achenbach T. 1992. Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/2-3 and 1992 Profile Burlington: Univ. Vt. Dep. Psychiatry
  3. Aydin B, Leite WL, Algina J. 2014. The consequences of ignoring variability in measurement occasions within data collection waves in latent growth models. Multivar. Behav. Res. 49:149–60 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baltes PB, Nesselroade JR. 1979. History and rationale of longitudinal research. Longitudinal Research in the Study of Behavior and Development JR Nesselroade, PB Baltes 1–39 New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  5. Beal SL, Sheiner LB. 1982. Estimating population kinetics. CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 8:195–222 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bell RQ. 1954. An experimental test of the accelerated longitudinal approach. Child Dev 25:281–86 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bentler PM. 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 107:238–46 [Google Scholar]
  8. Biesanz JC, Deeb-Sossa N, Papadakis AA, Bollen KA, Curran PJ. 2004. The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models. Psychol. Methods 9:30–52 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blozis SA. 2004. Structured latent curve models for the study of change in multivariate repeated measures. Psychol. Methods 9:334–53 [Google Scholar]
  10. Boker SM, McArdle JJ, Neale M. 2002. An algorithm for the hierarchical organization of path diagrams and calculation of components of expected covariance. Struct. Equ. Model. 9:174–94 [Google Scholar]
  11. Boker SM, Nesselroade JR. 2002. A method for modeling the intrinsic dynamics of intraindividual variability: recovering the parameters of simulated oscillators in multi–wave panel data. Multivar. Behav. Res. 37:127–60 [Google Scholar]
  12. Browne MW. 1993. Structured latent curve models. In Multivariate Analysis: Future Directions, Vol. 2 CM Cuadras, CR Rao 171–98 Amsterdam: North-Holland [Google Scholar]
  13. Browne MW, du Toit SHC. 1991. Models for learning data. Best Methods for the Analysis of Change L Collins, JL Horn 47–68 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW. 1987. Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychol. Bull. 101:147–58 [Google Scholar]
  15. Burchinal M, Appelbaum MI. 1991. Estimating individual developmental functions: methods and their assumptions. Child Dev 62:23–43 [Google Scholar]
  16. Chassin L, Barrera M, Bech K, Kossak-Fuller J. 1992. Recruiting a community sample of adolescent children of alcoholics: a comparison of three subject sources. J. Stud. Alcohol 53:316–19 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cudeck R, du Toit SH. 2002. A version of quadratic regression with interpretable parameters. Multivar. Behav. Res. 37:501–19 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cudeck RA, Klebe KJ. 2002. Multiphase mixed-effects models for repeated measures data. Psychol. Methods 7:41–63 [Google Scholar]
  19. Grimm KJ, An Y, McArdle JJ, Zonderman AB, Resnick SM. 2012. Recent changes leading to subsequent changes: extensions of multivariate latent difference score models. Struct. Equ. Model. 19:268–92 [Google Scholar]
  20. Grimm KJ, Castro-Schilo L, Davoudzadeh P. 2013.a Modeling intraindividual change in nonlinear growth models with latent change scores. GeroPsych 26:153–62 [Google Scholar]
  21. Grimm KJ, Marcoulides KM. 2016. Individual change and the timing and onset of important life events: methods, models, and assumptions. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 40:87–96 [Google Scholar]
  22. Grimm KJ, McArdle JJ. 2005. A note on the computer generation of structural expectations. Multi-Level Issues in Strategy and Research Methods F Dansereau, F Yammarino 335–72 Amsterdam: JAI Press/Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  23. Grimm KJ, Ram N. 2009. Nonlinear growth models in Mplus and SAS. Struct. Equ. Model. 16:676–701 [Google Scholar]
  24. Grimm KJ, Ram N, Estabrook R. 2010. Nonlinear structured growth mixture models in Mplus and OpenMx. Multivar. Behav. Res. 45:887–909 [Google Scholar]
  25. Grimm KJ, Ram N, Estabrook R. 2017. Growth Modeling: Structural Equation and Multilevel Modeling Approaches New York: Guilford
  26. Grimm KJ, Ram N, Hamagami F. 2011. Nonlinear growth curves in developmental research. Child Dev 82:1357–71 [Google Scholar]
  27. Grimm KJ, Widaman KF. 2010. Residual structures in latent growth curve analysis. Struct. Equ. Model. 17:424–42 [Google Scholar]
  28. Grimm KJ, Zhang Z, Hamagami F, Mazzocco MM. 2013.b Modeling nonlinear change via latent change and latent acceleration frameworks: examining velocity and acceleration of growth trajectories. Multivar. Behav. Res. 48:117–43 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hamagami F, McArdle JJ. 2007. Dynamic extensions of latent difference score models. Data Analytic Techniques for Dynamical Systems SM Boker, MJ Wenger 47–85 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc [Google Scholar]
  30. Infurna FJ, Luthar SS. 2016. Resilience to major life stressors is not as common as thought. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11:175–94 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. 1996. LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language Chicago: Sci. Softw. Int.
  32. King LA, King DW, McArdle JJ, Saxe GN, Doron-LaMarca S, Orazem RJ. 2006. Latent difference score approach to longitudinal trauma research. J. Trauma. Stress 19:771–85 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kwok OM, West SG, Green SB. 2007. The impact of misspecifying the within-subject covariance structure in multiwave longitudinal multilevel models: a Monte Carlo study. Multivar. Behav. Res. 42:557–92 [Google Scholar]
  34. Marceau K, Ram N, Houts RM, Grimm KJ, Susman EJ. 2011. Individual differences in boys' and girls' timing and tempo of puberty: modeling development with nonlinear growth models. Dev. Psychol. 47:1389–409 [Google Scholar]
  35. McArdle JJ. 1986. Latent variable growth within behavior genetic models. Behav. Genet. 16:163–200 [Google Scholar]
  36. McArdle JJ. 2001. A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic structural analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future R Cudeck, S du Toit, D Sorbom 342–80 Chicago: Sci. Softw. Int. [Google Scholar]
  37. McArdle JJ. 2005. The development of the RAM rules for latent variable structural equation modeling. Contemporary Psychometrics A Maydeu-Olivares, JJ McArdle 224–75 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  38. McArdle JJ, Epstein D. 1987. Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models. Child Dev 58:110–33 [Google Scholar]
  39. McArdle JJ, Grimm KJ, Hamagami F, Bowles RP, Meredith W. 2009. Modeling lifespan growth curves of cognition using longitudinal data with multiple samples and changing scales of measurement. Psychol. Methods 14:126–49 [Google Scholar]
  40. McArdle JJ, Hamagami F. 2001. Linear dynamic analyses of incomplete longitudinal data. New Methods for the Analysis of Change LM Collins, AG Sayer 137–76 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  41. McArdle JJ, McDonald RP. 1984. Some algebraic properties of the reticular action model for moment structures. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 37:234–51 [Google Scholar]
  42. McArdle JJ, Woodcock RW. 1997. Expanding test–retest designs to include developmental time-lag components. Psychol. Methods 2:403–35 [Google Scholar]
  43. Mehta PD, Neale MC. 2005. People are variables too: multilevel structural equations modeling. Psychol. Methods 10:259–84 [Google Scholar]
  44. Meredith W. 1993. Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika 58:525–43 [Google Scholar]
  45. Meredith W, Horn J. 2001. The role of factorial invariance in modeling growth and change. New Methods for the Analysis of Change LM Collins, AG Sayer 203–40 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  46. Meredith W, Tisak J. 1990. Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika 55:107–22 [Google Scholar]
  47. Millsap RE. 2012. Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance New York: Routledge
  48. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. 2017. Mplus User's Guide Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén. , 8th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  49. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. 2000. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-plus New York: Springer
  50. Preacher KJ, Hancock GR. 2015. Parameterizing aspects of change as random coefficients. Psychol. Methods 20:84–101 [Google Scholar]
  51. Preece MA, Baines MJ. 1978. A new family of mathematical models describing the human growth curve. Ann. Hum. Biol. 5:1–24 [Google Scholar]
  52. Ram N, Diehl M. 2015. Multiple time-scale design and analysis: pushing towards real-time modeling of complex developmental processes. Handbook of Intraindividual Variability Across the Lifespan, M Diehl, K Hooker, M Sliwinski 308–23 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  53. Ram N, Gerstorf D, Fauth E, Zarit S, Malmberg B. 2010. Aging, disablement, and dying: using time-as-process and time-as-resources metrics to chart late-life change. Res. Hum. Dev. 7:27–44 [Google Scholar]
  54. Ram N, Grimm KJ. 2007. Using simple and complex growth models to articulate developmental change: matching method to theory. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 31:303–16 [Google Scholar]
  55. Ram N, Grimm K. 2015. Growth curve modeling and longitudinal factor analysis. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, Vol. 1 Theory and Method RM Lerner, WF Overton, PCM Molenaar 758–88 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. , 7th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  56. Singer JD, Willett JB. 2003. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Methods for Studying Change and Event Occurrence Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  57. Sterba SK. 2014. Fitting nonlinear latent growth curve models with individually varying time points. Struct. Equ. Model. 21:630–47 [Google Scholar]
  58. Tucker LR, Lewis C. 1973. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38:1–10 [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang L, McArdle JJ. 2008. A simulation study comparison of Bayesian estimation with conventional methods for estimating unknown change points. Struct. Equ. Model. 15:52–74 [Google Scholar]
  60. Widaman KF, Thompson JS. 2003. On specifying the null model for incremental fit indices in structural equation modeling. Psychol. Methods 8:16–37 [Google Scholar]
  61. Willett JB. 1997. Measuring change: what individual growth modeling buys you. Change and Development: Issues of Theory, Method, and Application E Amsel, KA Renninger 213–43 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wright S. 1921. Correlation and causation. J. Agric. Res. 20:557–85 [Google Scholar]
  63. Wright S. 1934. The method of path coefficients. Ann. Math. Stat. 5:161–215 [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhang Z, Hamagami F, Wang L, Grimm KJ, Nesselroade JR. 2007. Bayesian analysis of longitudinal data using growth curve models. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 31:374–83 [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhang Z, McArdle JJ, Nesselroade JR. 2012. Growth rate models: emphasizing growth rate analysis through growth curve modeling. J. Appl. Stat. 39:1241–62 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084840
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084840
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error