1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  4. Volume 20, 2024
  5. Article

Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Volume 20, 2024

The Alternative Model of Personality Disorders: Assessment, Convergent and Discriminant Validity, and a Look to the Future

Abstract

The Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) is a dimensional, empirically based diagnostic system developed to overcome the serious limitations of traditional categories. We review the mounting evidence on its convergent and discriminant validity, with an incursion into the less-studied ICD-11 system. In the literature, the AMPD's Pathological Trait Model (Criterion B) shows excellent convergence with normal personality traits, and it could be useful as an organizing framework for mental disorders. In contrast, Personality Functioning (Criterion A) cannot be distinguished from personality traits, lacks both discriminant and incremental validity, and has a shaky theoretical background. We offer some suggestions with a view to the future. These include removing Criterion A, using the real-life consequences of traits as indicators of severity, delving into the dynamic mechanisms underlying traits, and furthering the integration of currently disengaged psychological paradigms that can shape a sounder clinical science.

Keyword(s): Alternative Model of Personality Disorders, ICD-11 dimensional model, mental disorders, personality psychology, personalized assessment and treatment
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081122-010709
2024-07-12
2024-10-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/clinpsy/20/1/annurev-clinpsy-081122-010709.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081122-010709&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Al-Dajani N, Gralnick TM, Bagby RM. 2016.. A psychometric review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): current status and future directions. . J. Personal. Assess. 98::62–81
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aluja A, Blanch A, García LF, García O, Escorial S. 2012.. Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire as a predictor of MCMI-III personality disorder scales: the role of facets. . Personal. Ment. Health 6::217–27
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aluja A, García LF, Cuevas L, García O. 2007.. The MCMI-III personality disorders scores predicted by the NEO-FFI-R and the ZKPQ-50-CC: a comparative study. . J. Personal. Disord. 21:(1):58–71
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aluja A, García LF, Cuevas L, Lucas I. 2019.. Dimensional pathological personality predicting personality disorders: comparison of the DAPP-BQ and PID-5 shortened versions in a Spanish community sample. . J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 41:(1):160–73
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aluja A, Sayans-Jiménez P, García LF, Gutiérrez F. 2021.. Location of International Classification of Diseases–11th Revision and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, dimensional trait models in the alternative five-factor personality space. . Personal. Disord. 12:(2):127–39
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  6. Aluja A, Sorrel M, García L, García O, Gutiérrez F. 2022.. Factor convergence and predictive analysis of the Five Factor and Alternative Five Factor personality models with the Five-Factor Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (FFICD). . J. Personal. Disord. 36:(3):296–319
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  7. Am. Psychiatr. Assoc. 2013.. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC:: Am. Psychiatr. Assoc. , 5th ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Anglim J, Horwood S, Smillie LD, Marrero RJ, Wood JK. 2020.. Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: a meta-analysis. . Psychol. Bull. 146:(4):279–323
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bach B, Brown TA, Mulder RT, Newton-Howes G, Simonsen E, Sellbom M. 2021.. Development and initial evaluation of the ICD-11 personality disorder severity scale: PDS-ICD-11. . Personal. Ment. Health 15:(3):223–36
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bach B, Hutsebaut J. 2018.. Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2.0: utility in capturing personality problems in psychiatric outpatients and incarcerated addicts. . J. Personal. Assess. 100:(6):660–70
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bach B, Sellbom M, Kongerslev M, Simonsen E, Krueger RF, Mulder R. 2017.. Deriving ICD-11 personality disorder domains from DSM-5 traits: initial attempt to harmonize two diagnostic systems. . Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 136:(1):108–17
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bach B, Sellbom M, Skjernov M, Simonsen E. 2018.. ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: finding a common ground. . Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 52:(5):425–34
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bach B, Tracy M. 2022.. Clinical utility of the alternative model of personality disorders: a 10th year anniversary review. . Personal. Disord. 13:(4):369–79
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Baskin-Sommers A, Brazil IA. 2022.. The importance of an exaggerated attention bottleneck for understanding psychopathy. . Trends Cogn. Sci. 26:(4):325–36
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bastiaansen L, Hopwood CJ, Van den Broeck J, Rossi G, Schotte C, De Fruyt F. 2016.. The twofold diagnosis of personality disorder: How do personality dysfunction and pathological traits increment each other at successive levels of the trait hierarchy?. Personal. Disord. 7:(3):280–92
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bastiaansen L, Rossi G, Schotte C, De Fruyt F. 2011.. The structure of personality disorders: comparing the DSM-IV-TR axis II classification with the Five-Factor Model framework using structural equation modeling. . J. Personal. Disord. 25:(3):378–96
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. Baumert A, Schmitt M, Perugini M. 2019.. Towards an explanatory personality psychology: integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. . Personal. Individ. Differ. 147::18–27
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bender DS, Morey LC, Skodol AE. 2011.. Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5. Part I: A review of theory and methods. . J. Personal. Assess. 93:(4):332–46
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  19. Blanco A, Blanco R, Díaz D. 2016.. Social (dis)order and psychosocial trauma: Look earlier, look outside, and look beyond the persons. . Am. Psychol. 71:(3):187–98
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  20. Boudreaux MJ. 2016.. Personality-related problems and the Five-Factor Model of personality. . Personal. Disord. 7:(4):372–83
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Brandes M, Bienvenu OJ. 2006.. Personality and anxiety disorders. . Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 8:(4):263–69
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bucher MA, Suzuki T, Samuel DB. 2019.. A meta-analytic review of personality traits and their associations with mental health treatment outcomes. . Clin. Psychol. Rev. 70::51–63
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cervone D, Little BR. 2019.. Personality architecture and dynamics: the new agenda and what's new about it. . Personal. Individ. Differ. 136::12–23
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. Christensen MV, Kessing LV. 2006.. Do personality traits predict first onset in depressive and bipolar disorder?. Nord. J. Psychiatry 60:(2):79–88
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  25. Clark LA, Watson D. 2022.. The trait model of the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorder (AMPD): a structural review. . Personal. Disord. 13:(4):328–36
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. Corr PJ, Matthews G. 2020.. The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Crego C, Widiger TA. 2020.. The convergent, discriminant, and structural relationship of the DAPP-BQ and SNAP with the ICD-11, DSM-5, and FFM trait models. . Psychol. Assess. 32:(1):18–28
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  28. Creswell KG, Bachrach RL, Wright AGC, Pinto A, Ansell E. 2016.. Predicting problematic alcohol use with the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Pathology. . Personal. Disord. 7:(1):103–11
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  29. Cruitt PJ, Boudreaux MJ, King HR, Oltmanns JR, Oltmanns TF. 2019.. Examining Criterion A: DSM-5 level of personality functioning as assessed through life story interviews. . Personal. Disord. 10:(3):224–34
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  30. Deary IJ, Peter A, Austin E, Gibson G. 1998.. Personality traits and personality disorders. . Br. J. Psychol. 89:(4):647–61
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  31. Del Giudice M. 2023.. A general motivational architecture for human and animal personality. . Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 144::104967
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  32. DeYoung CG. 2015.. Cybernetic Big Five Theory. . J. Res. Personal. 56::33–58
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  33. DeYoung CG, Krueger RF. 2018.. A cybernetic theory of psychopathology. . Psychol. Inq. 29:(3):117–38
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  34. DiGangi JA, Gomez D, Mendoza L, Jason LA, Keys CB, Koenen KC. 2013.. Pretrauma risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review of the literature. . Clin. Psychol. Rev. 33:(6):728–44
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  35. Farstad SM, McGeown LM, von Ranson KM. 2016.. Eating disorders and personality, 2004–2016: a systematic review and meta-analysis. . Clin. Psychol. Rev. 46::91–105
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  36. Few LR, Miller JD, Rothbaum AO, Meller S, Maples J, et al. 2013.. Examination of the Section III DSM-5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample. . J. Abnorm. Psychol. 122:(4):1057–69
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  37. Fleeson W, Jayawickreme E. 2015.. Whole trait theory. . J. Res. Personal. 56::82–92
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  38. Forbes MK, Kotov R, Ruggero CJ, Watson D, Zimmerman M, Krueger RF. 2017.. Delineating the joint hierarchical structure of clinical and personality disorders in an outpatient psychiatric sample. . Compr. Psychiatry 79::19–30
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  39. Frances A. 2013.. Saving Normal: An Insider's Revolt Against Out-of-Control Psychiatric Diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the Medicalization of Ordinary Life. New York:: Morrow
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Franquillo AC, Guccione C, Angelini G, Carpentieri R, Ducci G, Caretti V. 2021.. The role of personality in schizophrenia and psychosis: a systematic review. . Clin. Neuropsychiatry 18:(1):28–40
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Freilich CD, Krueger RF, Hobbs KA, Hopwood CJ, Zimmermann J. 2023.. The DSM-5 Maladaptive Trait Model for personality disorders. . In Oxford Textbook of Psychopathology, ed. RF Krueger, PH Blaney , pp. 604–27. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press. , 4th ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Funder DC, Ozer DJ. 2019.. Evaluating effect size in psychological research: sense and nonsense. . Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 2:(2):156–68
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gamache D, Savard C, Leclerc P, Côté A. 2019.. Introducing a short self-report for the assessment of DSM-5 level of personality functioning for personality disorders: the Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale. . Personal. Disord. 10:(5):438–47
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  44. García LF, Aluja A, Urieta P, Gutiérrez F. 2022.. High convergent validity among the Five-Factor Model, PID-5-SF, and PiCD. . Personal. Disord. 13:(2):119–32
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  45. García LF, Cuevas L, Lucas I, Aluja A. 2021.. Comparing the prediction of dimensional personality disorders (PID-5) after three personality trait models: Five Factor, Zuckerman, and Cloninger models. . Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 37:(3):167–77
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  46. Gecaite-Stonciene J, Lochner C, Marincowitz C, Fineberg NA, Stein DJ. 2021.. Obsessive-compulsive (anankastic) personality disorder in the ICD-11: a scoping review. . Front. Psychiatry 12::646030
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  47. Gignac GE, Szodorai ET. 2016.. Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. . Personal. Individ. Differ. 102::74–78
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  48. Gomez R, Corr PJ. 2014.. ADHD and personality: a meta-analytic review. . Clin. Psychol. Rev. 34:(5):376–88
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  49. Grove WM, Zald DH, Lebow BS, Snitz BE, Nelson C. 2000.. Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis. . Psychol. Assess. 12:(1):19–30
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  50. Gutiérrez F, Aluja A, Rodríguez C, Gárriz M, Peri JM, et al. 2023a.. Severity in the ICD-11 personality disorder model: evaluation in a Spanish mixed sample. . Front. Psychiatry 13::1015489
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  51. Gutiérrez F, Aluja A, Ruiz J, García LF, Gárriz M, et al. 2021a.. Personality disorders in the ICD-11: Spanish validation of the PiCD and the SASPD in a mixed community and clinical sample. . Assessment 28:(3):759–72
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  52. Gutiérrez F, Peri JM, Aluja A, Baillés E, Sureda B, et al. 2023b.. Differentiating abnormal, normal, and ideal personality profiles in multidimensional spaces. . J. Individ. Differ. 44:(4):215–22
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  53. Gutiérrez F, Peri JM, Gárriz M, Vall G, Arqué E, et al. 2021b.. Integration of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 dimensional systems for personality disorders into a unified taxonomy with non-overlapping traits. . Front. Psychiatry 12::591934
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  54. Gutiérrez F, Ruiz J, Peri JM, Gárriz M, Vall G, Cavero M. 2020.. Toward an integrated model of pathological personality traits: common hierarchical structure of the PID-5 and the DAPP-BQ. . J. Personal. Disord. 34:(Suppl. C):25–39
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Gutiérrez F, Valdesoiro F. 2023.. The evolution of personality disorders: a review of proposals. . Front. Psychiatry 14::1110420
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hanke N, Penzel N, Betz LT, Rohde M, Kambeitz-Ilankovic L, Kambeitz J. 2022.. Personality traits differentiate patients with bipolar disorder and healthy controls—a meta-analytic approach. . J. Affect. Disord. 302::401–11
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  57. Harkness AR, Reynolds SM, Lilienfeld SO. 2014.. A review of systems for psychology and psychiatry: adaptive systems, Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5), and the DSM-5. . J. Personal. Assess. 96:(2):121–39
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  58. Helle AC, Trull TJ, Widiger TA, Mullins-Sweatt SN. 2017.. Utilizing interview and self-report assessment of the Five-Factor Model to examine convergence with the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. . Personal. Disord. 8:(3):247–54
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  59. Herpertz SC, Bertsch K. 2014.. The social-cognitive basis of personality disorders. . Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 27:(1):73–77
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  60. Hopwood CJ. 2022.. The DSM should replace maladaptive traits with the Five-Factor Model: comment on Clark and Watson 2022. . Personal. Disord. 13:(4):343–46
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  61. Hopwood CJ, Donnellan MB. 2010.. How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated?. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 14:(3):332–46
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  62. Hopwood CJ, Kotov R, Krueger RF, Watson D, Widiger TA, et al. 2018.. The time has come for dimensional personality disorder diagnosis. . Personal. Ment. Health 12:(1):82–86
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  63. Hopwood CJ, Malone JC, Ansell EB, Sanislow CA, Grilo CM, et al. 2011.. Personality assessment in DSM-5: empirical support for rating severity, style, and traits. . J. Personal. Disord. 25:(3):305–20
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  64. Hopwood CJ, Morey LC, Edelen MO, Shea MT, Grilo CM, et al. 2008.. A comparison of interview and self-report methods for the assessment of borderline personality disorder criteria. . Psychol. Assess. 20:(1):81–85
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  65. Hornor G. 2017.. Resilience. . J. Pediatr. Health Care 31:(3):384–90
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  66. Huprich SK. 2018.. Moving beyond categories and dimensions in personality pathology assessment and diagnosis. . Br. J. Psychiatry 213:(6):685–89
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. Hutsebaut J, Kamphuis JH, Feenstra DJ, Weekers LC, De Saeger H. 2017.. Assessing DSM-5-oriented level of personality functioning: development and psychometric evaluation of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1). . Personal. Disord. 8:(1):94–101
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  68. Johnston OG, Cruess DG, Burke JD. 2020.. Irritability and behavioral symptom dimensions of oppositional defiant disorder in young adults: associations with DSM-5 pathological personality traits. . J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 42:(3):424–35
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  69. Katakis P, Schlief M, Barnett P, Rains LS, Rowe S, et al. 2023.. Effectiveness of outpatient and community treatments for people with a diagnosis of ‘personality disorder’: systematic review and meta-analysis. . BMC Psychiatry 23::57
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kernberg OF, Caligor E. 2005.. A psychoanalytic theory of personality disorders. . In Major Theories of Personality Disorder, ed. MF Lenzenweger, JF Clarkin , pp. 114–16. New York:: Guilford
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Kotov R, Gamez W, Schmidt F, Watson D. 2010.. Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. . Psychol. Bull. 136:(5):768–821
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  72. Kotov R, Waszczuk MA, Krueger RF, Forbes MK, Watson D, et al. 2017.. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): a dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. . J. Abnorm. Psychol. 126:(4):454–77
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  73. Krueger RF, Derringer J, Markon KE, Watson D, Skodol AE. 2012.. Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. . Psychol. Med. 42:(9):1879–90
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  74. Krueger RF, Markon KE. 2014.. The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. . Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 10::477–501
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lahey BB. 2009.. Public health significance of neuroticism. . Am. Psychol. 64:(4):241–56
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  76. Leising D, Zimmermann J. 2011.. An integrative conceptual framework for assessing personality and personality pathology. . Rev. Gen. Psychol. 15:(4):317–30
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  77. Livesley WJ. 2022.. Progress but no cigar: comment on Bach and Tracy 2022. . Personal. Disord. 13:(4):383–86
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. Livesley WJ, Jang KL. 2000.. Toward an empirically based classification of personality disorders. . J. Personal. Disord. 14:(2):137–51
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  79. Lodi-Smith J, Rodgers JD, Cunningham SA, Lopata C, Thomeer ML. 2019.. Meta-analysis of Big Five personality traits in autism spectrum disorder. . Autism 23:(3):556–65
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  80. Luo X, Hopwood CJ, Good EW, Turchan JE, Thomas KM, Levendosky AA. 2021.. Using interpersonal dimensions of personality and personality pathology to examine momentary and idiographic patterns of alliance rupture. . Front. Psychol. 12::711109
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  81. Maples JL, Carter NT, Few LR, Crego C, Gore WL, et al. 2015.. Testing whether the DSM-5 Personality Disorder Trait Model can be measured with a reduced set of items: an item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. . Psychol. Assess. 27:(4):1195–210
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  82. Markon KE, Chmielewski M, Miller CJ. 2011.. The reliability and validity of discrete and continuous measures of psychopathology: a quantitative review. . Psychol. Bull. 137:(5):856–79
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  83. Montag C, Panksepp J. 2017.. Primary emotional systems and personality: an evolutionary perspective. . Front. Psychol. 8::464
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  84. Morey LC. 2005.. Personality pathology as pathological narcissism. . In Personality Disorders, ed. M Maj, HS Akiskal, JE Mezzich, A Okasha , pp. 328–31. New York:: Wiley
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Morey LC. 2018.. Application of the DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning scale by lay raters. . J. Personal. Disord. 32:(5):709–20
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  86. Morey LC. 2019.. Thoughts on the assessment of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: comment on Sleep et al. 2019. . Psychol. Assess. 31:(10):1192–99
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  87. Morey LC, Bender DS, Skodol AE. 2013.. Validating the proposed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition, severity indicator for personality disorder. . J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 201:(9):729–35
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  88. Morey LC, Berghuis H, Bender DS, Verheul R, Krueger RF, Skodol AE. 2011.. Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5. Part II: Empirical articulation of a core dimension of personality pathology. . J. Personal. Assess. 93:(4):347–53
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  89. Morey LC, McCredie MN, Bender DS, Skodol AE. 2022.. Criterion A: level of personality functioning in the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders. . Personal. Disord. 13:(4):305–15
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  90. Mulay AL, Cain NM, Waugh MH, Hopwood CJ, Adler JM, et al. 2018.. Personality constructs and paradigms in the alternative DSM-5 model of personality disorder. . J. Personal. Assess. 100:(6):593–602
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  91. Mulder RT, Newton-Howes G, Crawford MJ, Tyrer PJ. 2011.. The central domains of personality pathology in psychiatric patients. . J. Personal. Disord. 25:(3):364–77
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  92. Mullins-Sweatt SN, Widiger TA. 2010.. Personality-related problems in living: an empirical approach. . Personal. Disord. 1:(4):230–38
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  93. Muñoz-Champel A, Gutiérrez F, Peri JM, Torrubia R. 2018.. Personality disorders are not as we thought: hierarchical factor structure at the criterion level. . J. Personal. Assess. 100:(1):16–29
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  94. Ohi K, Hashimoto R, Yasuda Y, Fukumoto M, Yamamori H, et al. 2012.. Personality traits and schizophrenia: evidence from a case-control study and meta-analysis. . Psychiatry Res. 198:(1):7–11
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  95. Oltmanns JR, Widiger TA. 2018.. A self-report measure for the ICD-11 dimensional trait model proposal: the Personality Inventory for ICD-11. . Psychol. Assess. 30:(2):154–69
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  96. Oltmanns JR, Widiger TA. 2019.. Evaluating the assessment of the ICD-11 personality disorder diagnostic system. . Psychol. Assess. 31:(5):674–84
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  97. Oltmanns JR, Widiger TA. 2020.. The Five-Factor Personality Inventory for ICD-11: a facet-level assessment of the ICD-11 trait model. . Psychol. Assess. 32:(1):60–71
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  98. Paris J. 2022.. Nature and Nurture in Personality and Psychopathology. New York:: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Peri JM, Muñoz-Champel A, Torrubia R, Gutiérrez F. 2019.. The general criteria for personality disorders assessed by interview: Do they still have a role to play?. J. Personal. Disord. 33:(4):515–32
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  100. Pincus AL, Cain NM, Halberstadt AL. 2020.. Importance of self and other in defining personality pathology. . Psychopathology 53:(3/4):133–40
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  101. Rauthmann JF. 2021.. The Handbook of Personality Dynamics and Processes. Amsterdam:: Elsevier
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Roberts BW. 2018.. A revised sociogenomic model of personality traits. . J. Personal. 86:(1):23–35
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  103. Roberts BW, Kuncel NR, Shiner R, Caspi A, Goldberg LR. 2007.. The power of personality: the comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. . Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2:(4):313–45
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  104. Roche MJ, Jaweed S. 2023.. Comparing measures of Criterion A to better understand incremental validity in the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders. . Assessment 30:(3):689–705
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  105. Rodriguez-Seijas C. 2022.. Sociocultural context and the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorder: comment on Widiger and Hines 2022. . Personal. Disord. 13:(4):356–59
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  106. Rodriguez-Seijas C, Ruggero C, Eaton NR, Krueger RF. 2019.. The DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders and clinical treatment: a review. . Curr. Treat. Opt. Psychiatry 6:(4):284–98
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  107. Samuel DB, Widiger TA. 2008.. A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the Five-Factor Model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. . Clin. Psychol. Rev. 28:(8):1326–42
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  108. Saulsman LM, Page AC. 2004.. The Five-Factor Model and personality disorder empirical literature: a meta-analytic review. . Clin. Psychol. Rev. 23:(8):1055–85
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  109. Sharp C. 2022.. Fulfilling the promise of the LPF: comment on Morey et al. 2022. . Personal. Disord. 13:(4):316–20
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  110. Sharp C, Wall K. 2021.. DSM-5 Level of personality functioning: refocusing personality disorder on what it means to be human. . Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 17::313–37
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  111. Sharp C, Wright AGC, Fowler JC, Frueh BC, Allen JG, et al. 2015.. The structure of personality pathology: both general (‘g’) and specific (‘s’) factors?. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 124:(2):387–98
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  112. Simms LJ, Calabrese WR. 2016.. Incremental validity of the DSM-5 Section III personality disorder traits with respect to psychosocial impairment. . J. Personal. Disord. 30:(1):95–111
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  113. Sleep CE, Hyatt CS, Lamkin J, Maples-Keller JL, Miller JD, et al. 2018.. Examining the relations among the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality, the Five-Factor Model, and externalizing and internalizing behavior. . Personal. Disord. 9:(4):379–84
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  114. Sleep CE, Lynam DR. 2022.. The problems with Criterion A: a comment on Morey et al. 2022. . Personal. Disord. 13:(4):325–27
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  115. Sleep CE, Lynam DR, Widiger TA, Crowe ML, Miller JD. 2019.. An evaluation of DSM-5 Section III personality disorder Criterion A (impairment) in accounting for psychopathology. . Psychol. Assess. 31:(10):1181–91
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  116. Sleep CE, Weiss B, Lynam DR, Miller JD. 2020.. The DSM-5 Section III personality disorder Criterion A in relation to both pathological and general personality traits. . Personal. Disord. 11:(3):202–12
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  117. Somma A, Borroni S, Maffei C, Giarolli LE, Markon KE, et al. 2017.. Reliability, factor structure, and associations with measures of problem relationship and behavior of the personality inventory for DSM-5 in a sample of Italian community-dwelling adolescents. . J. Personal. Disord. 31:(5):624–46
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  118. Somma A, Krueger RF, Markon KE, Fossati A. 2019.. The replicability of the personality inventory for DSM-5 domain scale factor structure in U.S. and non-U.S. samples: a quantitative review of the published literature. . Psychol. Assess. 31:(7):861–77
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  119. Sorrel MA, García LF, Aluja A, Rolland JP, Rossier J, et al. 2021.. Cross-cultural measurement invariance in the personality inventory for DSM-5. . Psychiatry Res. 304::114134
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  120. Soto CJ, Napolitano CM, Roberts BW. 2021.. Taking skills seriously: toward an integrative model and agenda for social, emotional, and behavioral skills. . Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 30:(1):26–33
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  121. Stanton K, Brown MFD, Bucher MA, Balling C, Samuel DB. 2019.. Self-ratings of personality pathology: insights regarding their validity and treatment utility. . Curr. Treat. Opt. Psychiatry 6::299–311
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  122. Stein DJ, Palk AC, Kendler KS. 2021.. What is a mental disorder? An exemplar-focused approach. . Psychol. Med. 51:(6):894–901
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  123. Stoffers-Winterling J, Kongerslev M, Simonsen E, Lieb K, Storebø OJ. 2023.. Clinical trials in personality disorders: recommendations for study design and conduct. . Personal. Disord. 14:(1):127–36
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  124. Suzuki T, Griffin SA, Samuel DB. 2017.. Capturing the DSM-5 Alternative Personality Disorder Model traits in the Five-Factor Model's nomological net. . J. Personal. 85:(2):220–31
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  125. Suzuki T, Samuel DB, Pahlen S, Krueger RF. 2015.. DSM-5 Alternative Personality Disorder Model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the Five-Factor Model: an item-response theory analysis. . J. Abnorm. Psychol. 124:(2):343–54
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  126. Thimm JC, Jordan S, Bach B. 2016.. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF): psychometric properties and association with Big Five traits and pathological beliefs in a Norwegian population. . BMC Psychol. 4::61
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  127. Tyrer P, Mulder R, Kim Y-R, Crawford MJ. 2019.. The development of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders: an amalgam of science, pragmatism, and politics. . Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 15::481–502
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  128. Vall G, Gutiérrez F, Peri JM, Gárriz M, Ferraz L, et al. 2015.. Seven basic dimensions of personality pathology and their clinical consequences: Are all personalities equally harmful?. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 54:(4):450–68
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  129. Vanwoerden S, Chandler J, Cano K, Mehta P, Pilkonis PA, Sharp C. 2023.. Sampling methods in personality pathology research: some data and recommendations. . Personal. Disord. 14:(1):19–28
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  130. Verheul R, van den Brink W. 2000.. The role of personality pathology in the aetiology and treatment of substance use disorders. . Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 13:(2):163–69
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  131. Waszczuk MA, Hopwood CJ, Luft BJ, Morey LC, Perlman G, et al. 2022.. The prognostic utility of personality traits versus past psychiatric diagnoses: predicting future mental health and functioning. . Clin. Psychol. Sci. 10:(4):734–51
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  132. Waszczuk MA, Li K, Ruggero CJ, Clouston SAP, Luft BJ, Kotov R. 2018.. Maladaptive personality traits and 10-year course of psychiatric and medical symptoms and functional impairment following trauma. . Ann. Behav. Med. 52:(8):697–712
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  133. Watson D, Clark LA. 2020.. Personality traits as an organizing framework for personality pathology. . Personal. Ment. Health 14:(1):51–75
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  134. Watters CA, Bagby RM, Sellbom M. 2019.. Meta-analysis to derive an empirically based set of personality facet criteria for the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders. . Personal. Disord. 10:(2):97–104
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  135. WHO (World Health Organ.). 2022.. International Classification of Diseases for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics. Geneva:: WHO. , 11th ed.. https://icd.who.int
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Widiger TA, Bach B, Chmielewski M, Clark LA, DeYoung C, et al. 2019.. Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP. . J. Personal. Assess. 101:(4):345–55
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  137. Widiger TA, Costa PT Jr., eds. 2013.. Personality Disorders and the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Washington, DC:: Am. Psychol. Assoc. , 3rd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Widiger TA, Hines A. 2022.. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition alternative model of personality disorder. . Personal. Disord. 13:(4):347–55
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  139. Widiger TA, McCabe GA. 2020.. The Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) from the perspective of the Five-Factor Model. . Psychopathology 53:(3/4):149–56
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  140. Widiger TA, Simonsen E. 2005.. Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: finding a common ground. . J. Personal. Disord. 19:(2):110–30
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  141. Widiger TA, Trull TJ. 2007.. Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: shifting to a dimensional model. . Am. Psychol. 62:(2):71–83
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  142. Wilt J, Revelle W. 2023.. It's about time: emphasizing temporal dynamics in dynamic personality regulation. . J. Personal. 91:(4):1051–63
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  143. Wright AGC, Woods WC. 2020.. Personalized models of psychopathology. . Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 16::49–74
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  144. Youyou W, Yang Y, Uzzi B. 2023.. A discipline-wide investigation of the replicability of Psychology papers over the past two decades. . PNAS 120:(6):e2208863120
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  145. Zachar P, Kendler KS. 2017.. The philosophy of nosology. . Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 13::49–71
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  146. Zimmerman M. 2022.. Should the demonstration of improved patient outcome be necessary to overhaul diagnostic approaches? Comment on Bach and Tracy 2022. . Personal. Disord. 13:(4):387–91
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  147. Zimmermann J. 2022.. Beyond defending or abolishing Criterion A: comment on Morey et al. 2022. . Personal. Disord. 13:(4):32124
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  148. Zimmermann J, Böhnke JR, Eschstruth R, Mathews A, Wenzel K, Leising D. 2015.. The latent structure of personality functioning: investigating Criterion A from the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders in DSM-5. . J. Abnorm. Psychol. 124:(3):532–48
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  149. Zimmermann J, Hopwood CJ, Krueger RF. 2023.. The DSM-5 level of personality functioning scale. . In Oxford Textbook of Psychopathology, ed. RF Krueger, PH Blaney , pp. 579–603. New York:: Oxford Univ. Press. , 4th ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Zimmermann J, Kerber A, Rek K, Hopwood CJ, Krueger RF. 2019.. A brief but comprehensive review of research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders. . Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 21:(9):92
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  151. Zuckerman M. 1999.. Vulnerability to Psychopathology: A Biosocial Model. Washington, DC:: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081122-010709
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error