1932

Abstract

In 1963–71, a group of people, myself included, formulated and perfected a new approach to physics problems, which eventually came to be known under the names of scaling, universality, and renormalization. This work formed the basis of a wide variety of theories ranging from a starting point in critical phenomena, moving out to particle physics and relativity, and then into economics and biology. This work was of transcendental beauty and of considerable intellectual importance.

This left me with a personal problem. What next? Constructing the answer to that question would dominate the next 45 years of my professional life. I would

  • ■  Try to help in finding and constructing new fields of science.
  • ■  Do research and give talks on the science-society borderline.
  • ■  Provide constructive criticism of scientific and technical work.
  • ■  Help students and younger scientists.
  • ■  Demonstrate scientific leadership.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014646
2015-03-10
2025-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/conmatphys/6/1/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014646.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014646&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Domb C. 1996. The Critical Point New York: Taylor and Francis [Google Scholar]
  2. Kadanoff LP. 2009. J. Stat. Phys. 137:777–97 [Google Scholar]
  3. Kadanoff LP. 2013. In The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Physics, ed. R Batterman, pp. 143–85. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  4. Kadanoff LP. 2013. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part B 44:122–39 [Google Scholar]
  5. Onsager L. 1944. Phys. Rev. 65:117–49 [Google Scholar]
  6. Patashinskii AZ, Pokrovskii VL. 1964. Soviet Phys. JETP 19:667 [Google Scholar]
  7. Patashinskii AZ, Pokrovskii VL. 1979. Fluctuation Theory of Phase Transitions Oxford: Pergamon Press [Google Scholar]
  8. Widom B. 1965. J. Chem. Phys. 43:3892–96 [Google Scholar]
  9. Wilson KG, Fisher ME. 1972. Phys. Rev. Lett. 28:240–43 [Google Scholar]
  10. Wilson KG. 1971. Phys. Rev. B 4:3174–83 [Google Scholar]
  11. Wilson KG. 1971. Phys. Rev. B 4:3184–205 [Google Scholar]
  12. Wilson KG. 1983. Rev. Mod. Phys. 55:583–600 [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang CN, Lee TD. 1952. Phys. Rev. 87:410–19 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gell-Mann M, Low FE. 1954. Phys. Rev. 95:1300–12 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuhn TS. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Chicago, IL: Univ. Chic. Press [Google Scholar]
  16. Paulsen JD, Burton JC, Nagel SR, Appathurai S, Harris MT, Basaran OA. 2012. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:6857–61 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kadanoff LP. 1999. Rev. Mod. Phys. 71:1435–44 [Google Scholar]
  18. Miskin MZ, Jaeger HM. 2012. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:4389–94 [Google Scholar]
  19. Paley W. 1802. Natural Theology or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity New York: Sheldon [Google Scholar]
  20. Behe M. 2004. In Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA, ed. WA Dembski, M Ruse, pp. 352–70. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  21. Lang K. 2006. Parting the Cosmic Veil New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  22. Kadanoff LP. 2014. J. Stat. Phys. 156:1–9 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kadanoff LP. 2013. J. Stat. Phys. 152:805–23 [Google Scholar]
  24. Forrester J. 1969. Urban Dynamics Waltham, MA: Pegasus Commun [Google Scholar]
  25. Kadanoff LP. 2004. Comput. Sci. Eng. 6:57–67 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kadanoff LP. 1986. Phys. Today 39:7 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014646
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014646
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error