1932

Abstract

For a large class of nonequilibrium systems, thermodynamic notions like work, heat, and, in particular, entropy production can be identified on the level of fluctuating dynamical trajectories. Within stochastic thermodynamics various fluctuation theorems relating these quantities have been proven. Their application to experimental systems requires that all relevant mesostates are accessible. Recent advances address the typical situation that only partial, or coarse-grained, information about a system is available. Thermodynamic inference as a general strategy uses consistency constraints derived from stochastic thermodynamics to infer otherwise hidden properties of nonequilibrium systems. An important class in this respect are active particles, for which we resolve the conflicting strategies that have been proposed to identify entropy production. As a paradigm for thermodynamic inference, the thermodynamic uncertainty relation provides a lower bound on the entropy production through measurements of the dispersion of any current in the system. Likewise, it quantifies the cost of precision for biomolecular processes. Generalizations and ramifications allow the inference of, inter alia, model-free upper bounds on the efficiency of molecular motors and of the minimal number of intermediate states in enzymatic networks.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013554
2019-03-10
2024-10-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/conmatphys/10/1/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013554.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013554&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1.  Seifert U 2012. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75:126001
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.  Pekola JP 2015. Nat. Phys. 11:118
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 3.  Jarzynski C 1997. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78:2690
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.  Crooks GE 1999. Phys. Rev. E 60:2721
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.  Crooks GE 2000. Phys. Rev. E 61:2361
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.  Jarzynski C 2011. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2:329
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 7.  Sekimoto K 1997. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66:1234
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 8.  Sekimoto K 1998. Prog. Theor. Phys. Supp. 130:17
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 9.  Seifert U 2005. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95:040602
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 10.  Evans DJ, Cohen EGD, Morriss GP 1993. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71:2401
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 11.  Evans DJ, Searles DJ 1994. Phys. Rev. E 50:1645
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 12.  Gallavotti G, Cohen EGD 1995. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74:2694
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 13.  Kurchan J 1998. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31:3719
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 14.  Lebowitz JL, Spohn H 1999. J. Stat. Phys. 95:333
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 15.  Ge H, Qian M, Qian H 2012. Phys. Rep. 510:87
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 16.  van den Broeck C, Esposito M 2015. Physica A 418:6
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 17.  Parrondo JMR, Horowitz JM, Sagawa T 2015. Nat. Phys. 11:131
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 18.  Martinez IA, Roldan E, Dinis L, Petrov D, Parrondo JMR, Rica RA 2016. Nat. Phys. 12:67
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 19.  Ciliberto S 2017. Phys. Rev. X 7:021051
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 20.  Marsland R III, England J 2018. Rep. Prog. Phys. 81:016601
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 21.  Gnesotto F, Mura F, Gladrow J, Broedersz CP 2018. Rep. Prog. Phys. 81:066601
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 22.  Alemany A, Ribezzi-Crivellari M, Ritort F 2015. New J. Phys. 17:075009
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 23.  Garcia-Garcia R, Lahiri S, Lacoste D 2016. Phys. Rev. E 93:032103
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 24.  Talkner P, Hänggi P 2016. Phys. Rev. E 94:022143
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 25.  Seifert U 2016. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116:020601
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 26.  Jarzynski C 2017. Phys. Rev. X 7:011008
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 27.  Strasberg P, Esposito M 2017. Phys. Rev. E 95:062101
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 28.  Miller HJD, Anders J 2017. Phys. Rev. E 95:062123
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 29.  Aurell E 2018. Phys. Rev. E 97:042112
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 30.  van Kampen NG 1981. Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry Amsterdam: North-Holland
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 31.  Maes C, Netocný K 2003. J. Stat. Phys. 110:269
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 32.  Seifert U 2011. Eur. Phys. J. E 34:26
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 33.  Schnakenberg J 1976. Rev. Mod. Phys. 48:571
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 34.  Puglisi A, Sarracino A, Vulpiani A 2017. Phys. Rep. 709–710:1
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 35.  Dieterich E, Camunas-Soler J, Ribezzi-Crivellari M, Seifert U, Ritort F 2015. Nat. Phys. 11:971
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 36.  Falasco G, Baiesi M 2016. New J. Phys. 18:043039
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 37.  Esposito M 2012. Phys. Rev. E 85:041125
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 38.  Cover TM, Thomas JA 2006. Elements of Information Theory. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 2nd ed
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 39.  Kawai R, Parrondo JMR, van den Broeck C 2007. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98:080602
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 40.  Gomez-Marin A, Parrondo JMR, van den Broeck C 2008. Phys. Rev. E 78:011107
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 41.  Parrondo JMR, van den Broeck C, Kawai R 2009. New J. Phys. 11:073008
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 42.  Vaikuntanathan S, Jarzynski C 2009. Europhys. Lett. 87:60005
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 43.  Blythe RA 2008. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100:010601
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 44.  Roldan E, Parrondo JMR 2010. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105:150607
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 45.  Roldan E, Parrondo JMR 2012. Phys. Rev. E 85:031129
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 46.  Muy S, Kundu A, Lacoste D 2013. J. Chem. Phys. 139:124109
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 47.  Kawaguchi K, Nakayama Y 2013. Phys. Rev. E 88:022147
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 48.  Mehl J, Lander B, Bechinger C, Blickle V, Seifert U 2012. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108:220601
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 49.  Pietzonka P, Zimmermann E, Seifert U 2014. Europhys. Lett. 107:20002
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 50.  Uhl M, Pietzonka P, Seifert U 2018. J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. 2018:023203
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 51.  Knoch F, Speck T 2015. New J. Phys. 17:115004
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 52.  Puglisi A, Pigolotti S, Rondoni L, Vulpiani A 2010. J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. 2010:P05015
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 53.  Bo S, Celani A 2014. J. Stat. Phys. 154:1325
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 54.  Rahav S, Jarzynski C 2007. J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. 2007:P09012
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 55.  Wang SW, Kawaguchi K, Sasa Si, Tang LH 2016. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117:070601
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 56.  Harada T, Sasa S 2005. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95:130602
    [Google Scholar]
  57. 57.  Hartich D, Barato AC, Seifert U 2014. J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. 2014:P02016
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 58.  Horowitz JM, Esposito M 2014. Phys. Rev. X 4:031015
    [Google Scholar]
  59. 59.  Shiraishi N, Sagawa T 2015. Phys. Rev. E 91:012130
    [Google Scholar]
  60. 60.  Bisker G, Polettini M, Gingrich TR, Horowitz JM 2017. J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. 2017:093210
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 61.  Zimmermann E, Seifert U 2015. Phys. Rev. E 91:022709
    [Google Scholar]
  62. 62.  Romanczuk P, Bär M, Ebeling W, Lindner B, Schimansky-Geier L 2012. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 202:1
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 63.  Cates ME 2012. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75:042601
    [Google Scholar]
  64. 64.  Marchetti MC, Joanny JF, Ramaswamy S, Liverpool TB, Prost J et al. 2013. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85:1143
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 65.  Elgeti J, Winkler RG, Gompper G 2015. Rep. Prog. Phys. 78:056601
    [Google Scholar]
  66. 66.  Cates ME, Tailleur J 2015. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6:219
    [Google Scholar]
  67. 67.  Prost J, Jülicher F, Joanny JF 2015. Nat. Phys. 11:111
    [Google Scholar]
  68. 68.  Bialké J, Speck T, Löwen H 2015. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 407:367
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 69.  Marconi UMB, Maggi C 2015. Soft Matter 11:8768
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 70.  Bechinger C, Di Leonardo R, Löwen H, Reichhardt C, Volpe G, Volpe G 2016. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88:045006
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 71.  Oshanin G, Popescu MN, Dietrich S 2017. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50:134001
    [Google Scholar]
  72. 72.  Illien P, Golestanian R, Sen A 2017. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46:5508
    [Google Scholar]
  73. 73.  Ramaswamy S 2017. J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. 2017:054002
    [Google Scholar]
  74. 74.  Fodor E, Nardini C, Cates ME, Tailleur J, Visco P, van Wijland F 2016. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117:038103
    [Google Scholar]
  75. 75.  Mandal D, Klymko K, DeWeese MR 2017. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119:258001
    [Google Scholar]
  76. 76.  Jülicher F, Prost J 2009. Eur. Phys. J. E 29:27
    [Google Scholar]
  77. 77.  Yan W, Brady JF 2015. Soft Matter 11:6235
    [Google Scholar]
  78. 78.  Pietzonka P, Seifert U 2018. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51:01LT01
    [Google Scholar]
  79. 79.  Gaspard P, Kapral R 2017. J. Chem. Phys. 147:211101
    [Google Scholar]
  80. 80.  Speck T 2016. Europhys. Lett. 114:30006
    [Google Scholar]
  81. 81.  Ganguly C, Chaudhuri D 2013. Phys. Rev. E 88:032102
    [Google Scholar]
  82. 82.  Chaudhuri D 2014. Phys. Rev. E 90:022131
    [Google Scholar]
  83. 83.  Szamel G 2014. Phys. Rev. E 90:012111
    [Google Scholar]
  84. 84.  Speck T 2017. Europhys. Lett. 123:20007
    [Google Scholar]
  85. 85.  Puglisi A, Marconi UMB 2017. Entropy 19:356
    [Google Scholar]
  86. 86.  Wu XL, Libchaber A 2000. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84:3017
    [Google Scholar]
  87. 87.  Chen DTN, Lau AWC, Hough LA, Islam MF, Goulian M et al. 2007. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99:148302
    [Google Scholar]
  88. 88.  Maggi C, Paoluzzi M, Pellicciotta N, Lepore A, Angelani L, Di Leonardo R 2014. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113:238303
    [Google Scholar]
  89. 89.  Argun A, Soni J, Dabelow L, Bo S, Pesce G et al. 2017. Phys. Rev. E 96:052106
    [Google Scholar]
  90. 90.  Krishnamurthy S, Ghosh S, Chatterji D, Ganapathy R, Sood AK 2016. Nat. Phys. 12:1134
    [Google Scholar]
  91. 91.  Schmiedl T, Seifert U 2008. Europhys. Lett. 81:20003
    [Google Scholar]
  92. 92.  Blickle V, Bechinger C 2012. Nat. Phys. 8:143
    [Google Scholar]
  93. 93.  Zakine R, Solon A, Gingrich T, van Wijland F 2017. Entropy 19:193
    [Google Scholar]
  94. 94.  Steffenoni S, Kroy K, Falasco G 2016. Phys. Rev. E 94:062139
    [Google Scholar]
  95. 95.  Barato AC, Seifert U 2015. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114:158101
    [Google Scholar]
  96. 96.  Gingrich TR, Horowitz JM, Perunov N, England JL 2016. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116:120601
    [Google Scholar]
  97. 97.  Barato AC, Seifert U 2016. Phys. Rev. X 6:041053
    [Google Scholar]
  98. 98.  Pietzonka P, Barato AC, Seifert U 2016. J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp.124004
    [Google Scholar]
  99. 99.  Seifert U 2018. Physica A 504:176
    [Google Scholar]
  100. 100.  Visscher K, Schnitzer M, Block SM 1999. Nature 400:184
    [Google Scholar]
  101. 101.  Hwang W, Hyeon C 2018. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9:513
    [Google Scholar]
  102. 102.  Pietzonka P, Seifert U 2018. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120:190602
    [Google Scholar]
  103. 103.  Pietzonka P, Ritort F, Seifert U 2017. Phys. Rev. E 96:012101
    [Google Scholar]
  104. 104.  Horowitz JM, Gingrich TR 2017. Phys. Rev. E 96:020103
    [Google Scholar]
  105. 105.  Pietzonka P, Barato AC, Seifert U 2016. Phys. Rev. E 93:052145
    [Google Scholar]
  106. 106.  Gingrich TR, Rotskoff GM, Horowitz JM 2017. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50:184004
    [Google Scholar]
  107. 107.  Pietzonka P, Barato AC, Seifert U 2016. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49:34LT01
    [Google Scholar]
  108. 108.  Polettini M, Lazarescu A, Esposito M 2016. Phys. Rev. E 94:052104
    [Google Scholar]
  109. 109.  Barato AC, Seifert U 2015. J. Phys. Chem. B 119:6555
    [Google Scholar]
  110. 110.  Nardini C, Touchette H 2018. Eur. Phys. J. B 91:16
    [Google Scholar]
  111. 111.  Dechant A, Sasa S 2018. J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. 2018:063209
    [Google Scholar]
  112. 112.  Fischer LP, Pietzonka P, Seifert U 2018. Phys. Rev. E 97:022143
    [Google Scholar]
  113. 113.  Maes C 2017. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119:160601
    [Google Scholar]
  114. 114.  Brandner K, Hanazato T, Saito K 2018. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120:090601
    [Google Scholar]
  115. 115.  Barato AC, Seifert U 2017. New J. Phys. 19:073021
    [Google Scholar]
  116. 116.  Machta BB 2015. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115:260603
    [Google Scholar]
  117. 117.  Proesmans K, van den Broeck C 2017. Europhys. Lett. 119:20001
    [Google Scholar]
  118. 118.  Shiraishi N 2017. arXiv:1706.00892
  119. 119.  Chiuchiù D, Pigolotti S 2018. Phys. Rev. E 97:032109
    [Google Scholar]
  120. 120.  Brandner K, Saito K, Seifert U 2015. Phys. Rev. X 5:031019
    [Google Scholar]
  121. 121.  Esposito M, Parrondo JMR 2015. Phys. Rev. E 91:052114
    [Google Scholar]
  122. 122.  Raz O, Subasi Y, Jarzynski C 2016. Phys. Rev. X 6:021022
    [Google Scholar]
  123. 123.  Rotskoff GM 2017. Phys. Rev. E 95:030101
    [Google Scholar]
  124. 124.  Ray S, Barato AC 2017. Phys. Rev. E 96:052120
    [Google Scholar]
  125. 125.  Macieszczak K, Brandner K, Garrahan JP 2018. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121:130601
    [Google Scholar]
  126. 126.  Garrahan JP 2017. Phys. Rev. E 95:032134
    [Google Scholar]
  127. 127.  Ray S, Barato AC 2017. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50:355001
    [Google Scholar]
  128. 128.  Saito K, Dhar A 2016. Europhys. Lett. 114:50004
    [Google Scholar]
  129. 129.  Gingrich TR, Horowitz JM 2017. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119:170601
    [Google Scholar]
  130. 130.  Neri I, Roldán E, Jülicher F 2017. Phys. Rev. X 7:011019
    [Google Scholar]
  131. 131.  Pigolotti S, Neri I, Roldán E, Jülicher F 2017. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119:140604
    [Google Scholar]
  132. 132.  Barato AC, Roldán E, Martinez IA, Pigolotti S 2018. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121:090601
    [Google Scholar]
  133. 133.  Goldt S, Seifert U 2017. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118:010601
    [Google Scholar]
  134. 134.  Goldt S, Seifert U 2017. New J. Phys. 19:113001
    [Google Scholar]
  135. 135.  Lan G, Sartori P, Neumann S, Sourjik V, Tu Y 2012. Nat. Phys. 8:422
    [Google Scholar]
  136. 136.  Mehta P, Schwab DJ 2012. PNAS 109:17978
    [Google Scholar]
  137. 137.  Govern CC, ten Wolde PR 2014. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113:258102
    [Google Scholar]
  138. 138.  Hartich D, Barato AC, Seifert U 2015. New J. Phys. 17:055026
    [Google Scholar]
  139. 139.  Sartori P, Pigolotti S 2015. Phys. Rev. X 5:041039
    [Google Scholar]
  140. 140.  Bo S, Giudice MD, Celani A 2015. J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. 2015:P01014
    [Google Scholar]
  141. 141.  Mora T 2015. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115:038102
    [Google Scholar]
  142. 142.  ten Wolde PR, Becker NB, Ouldridge TE, Mugler A 2016. J. Stat. Phys. 162:1395
    [Google Scholar]
  143. 143.  Polettini M, Esposito M 2014. J. Chem. Phys. 141:024117
    [Google Scholar]
  144. 144.  Brown AI, Sivak DA 2017. PNAS 114:11057
    [Google Scholar]
  145. 145.  Nguyen B, Hartich D, Seifert U, De Los Rios P 2017. Biophys. J. 113:362
    [Google Scholar]
  146. 146.  Wang CH, Mehta P, Elbaum M 2017. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118:158101
    [Google Scholar]
  147. 147.  Ouldridge TE, Govern CC, ten Wolde PR 2017. Phys. Rev. X 7:021004
    [Google Scholar]
  148. 148.  Cao Y, Wang H, Ouyang Q, Tu Y 2015. Nat. Phys. 11:772
    [Google Scholar]
  149. 149.  Barato AC, Seifert U 2017. Phys. Rev. E 95:062409
    [Google Scholar]
  150. 150.  Nguyen M, Vaikuntanathan S 2016. PNAS 113:14231
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013554
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013554
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error