Full text loading...
Review Article
Open Access
Data-Driven Discovery of Robust Materials for Photocatalytic Energy Conversion
- Arunima K. Singh1, Rachel Gorelik2, and Tathagata Biswas1
- Vol. 14:237-259 (Volume publication date March 2023) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031620-100957
- First published as a Review in Advance on November 29, 2022
-
Copyright © 2023 by the author(s).This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See credit lines of images or other third-party material in this article for license information
Abstract
The solar–to–chemical energy conversion of Earth-abundant resources like water or greenhouse gas pollutants like CO2 promises an alternate energy source that is clean, renewable, and environmentally friendly. The eventual large-scale application of such photo-based energy conversion devices can be realized through the discovery of novel photocatalytic materials that are efficient, selective, and robust. In the past decade, the Materials Genome Initiative has led to a major leap in the development of materials databases, both computational and experimental. Hundreds of photocatalysts have recently been discovered for various chemical reactions, such as water splitting and carbon dioxide reduction, employing these databases and/or data informatics, machine learning, and high-throughput computational and experimental methods. In this article, we review these data-driven photocatalyst discoveries, emphasizing the methods and techniques developed in the last few years to determine the (photo)electrochemical stability of photocatalysts, leading to the discovery of photocatalysts that remain robust and durable under operational conditions.
Article metrics loading...
Literature Cited
-
1.Fujishima A, Honda K. 1972. Nature 238:535837–38
-
2.Katz JE, Gingrich TR, Santori EA, Lewis NS. 2009. Energy Environ. Sci. 2:103–12
-
3.Sivula K, Van De Krol R. 2016. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1:215010
-
4.Cui Z, Zeng D, Tang T, Liu J, Xie C. 2010. J. Hazard. Mater. 183:1–3211–17
-
5.Maschmeyer T, Che M 2010. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49:91536–39
-
6.Zhao ZG, Miyauchi M. 2008. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47:377051–55
-
7.Zhou L, Wang W, Xu H, Sun S, Shang M. 2009. Chem. Eur. J. 15:71776–82
-
8.Ikeda M, Kusumoto Y, Somekawa S, Ngweniform P, Ahmmad B. 2006. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 184:3306–12
-
9.Jaramillo TF, Baeck SH, Kleiman-Shwarsctein A, McFarland EW. 2004. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 25:1297–301
-
10.Qiu Y, Yang M, Fan H, Zuo Y, Shao Y et al. 2011. CrystEngComm 13:61843–50
-
11.Habisreutinger SN, Schmidt-Mende L, Stolarczyk JK. 2013. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52:297372–408
-
12.Shinde A, Suram SK, Yan Q, Zhou L, Singh AK et al. 2017. ACS Energy Lett. 2:102307–12
-
13.Yan Q, Yu J, Suram SK, Zhou L, Shinde A et al. 2017. PNAS 114:123040–43
-
14.Xiong Y, Campbell QT, Fanghanel J, Badding CK, Wang H et al. 2021. Energy Environ. Sci. 14:42335–48
-
15.Wang Z, Zhang H, Li J. 2021. Nano Energy 81:105655
-
16.Singh AK, Montoya JH, Gregoire JM, Persson KA. 2019. Nat. Commun. 10:443
-
17.Singh AK, Mathew K, Zhuang HL, Hennig RG. 2015. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6:61087–98
-
18.Sawada K, Nakajima T 2018. APL Mater. 6:101103
-
19.Jain A, Wang Z, Nørskov JK. 2019. ACS Energy Lett. 4:61410–11
-
20.Zhou L, Shinde A, Guevarra D, Richter MH, Stein HS et al. 2020. J. Mater. Chem. A 8:84239–43
-
21.Torrisi SB, Singh AK, Montoya JH, Biswas T, Persson KA. 2020. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 4:24
-
22.Hydrog. Fuel Cell Technol. Off. 2014. Multi-year research, development, and demonstration plan Res. Rep., Off. Energy Effic. Renew. Energy Washington, DC: https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/downloads/hydrogen-and-fuel-cell-technologies-office-multi-year-research-development
-
23.Zhou M, Lou XW, Xie Y. 2013. Nano Today 8:6598–618
-
24.Abe R 2010. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 11:4179–209
-
25.Ni M, Leung MKH, Leung DYC, Sumathy K. 2007. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11:3401–25
-
26.Basic Energy Sci. Roundtable Liq. Solar Fuels Panel. 2019. Report of the Basic Energy Sciences Roundtable on Liquid Solar Fuels Final Rep., Off. Sci. Basic Energy Sci., US Dep. Energy Washington, DC: https://science.osti.gov/-/media/bes/pdf/reports/2020/Liquid_Solar_Fuels_Report.pdf?la=en&hash=06D037C1887D2FF8B872035E4C51FFDDEC11D4C8
-
27.Siahrostami S, Villegas SJ, Bagherzadeh Mostaghimi AH, Back S, Farimani AB et al. 2020. ACS Catal. 10:147495–511
-
28.Rajan AG, Martirez JMP, Carter EA. 2020. ACS Catal. 10:1911177–234
-
29.Zhou L, Shinde A, Guevarra D, Haber JA, Persson KA et al. 2020. ACS Energy Lett. 5:51413–21
-
30.Hoye RL, Schulz P, Schelhas LT, Holder AM, Stone KH et al. 2017. Chem. Mater. 29:51964–88
-
31.Stein HS, Gregoire JM. 2019. Chem. Sci. 10:429640–49
-
32.Jain A, Montoya J, Dwaraknath S, Zimmermann NE, Dagdelen J et al. 2020. Handbook of Materials Modeling: Methods, Theory and Modeling W Andreoni, S Yip 1751–84. Cham, Switz: Springer
-
33.Pan J, Yan Q 2018. J. Semicond. 39:071001
-
34.Holby EF, Wang G, Zelenay P. 2020. ACS Catal. 10:2414527–39
-
35.White A. 2012. MRS Bull. 37:8715–16
-
36.Jain A, Ong SP, Hautier G, Chen W, Richards WD et al. 2013. APL Mater. 1:011002
-
37.Curtarolo S, Setyawan W, Wang S, Xue J, Yang K et al. 2012. Comput. Mater. Sci. 58:227–35
-
38.Saal JE, Kirklin S, Aykol M, Meredig B, Wolverton C. 2013. JOM 65:111501–9
-
39.Verduzco Gastelum JC, Strachan A. 2021. Citrine tools for materials informatics Software Package, nanoHub. https://doi/org/10.21981/DRKB-XX94
-
40.Gražulis S, Chateigner D, Downs RT, Yokochi A, Quirós M et al. 2009. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 42:4726–29
-
41.Winther KT, Hoffmann MJ, Boes JR, Mamun O, Bajdich M, Bligaard T. 2019. Sci. Data 6:75
-
42.Blaiszik B, Chard K, Pruyne J, Ananthakrishnan R, Tuecke S, Foster I. 2016. JOM 68:82045–52
-
43.Kim S, Chen J, Cheng T, Gindulyte A, He J et al. 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47:D1D1102–D1109
-
44.Luo J, Zhang S, Sun M, Yang L, Luo S, Crittenden JC. 2019. ACS Nano 13:99811–40
-
45.EPA (Environ. Prot. Agency). 2022. Overview of greenhouse gases Environ. Top., EPA Washington, DC: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases
-
46.Benson EE, Kubiak CP, Sathrum AJ, Smieja JM. 2009. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38:89–99
-
47.Jin H, Zhang H, Li J, Wang T, Wan L et al. 2019. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10:175211–18
-
48.Barrett J. 2003. Inorganic Chemistry in Aqueous Solution Cambridge, UK: R. Soc. Chem.
-
49.Xiang C, Weber AZ, Ardo S, Berger A, Chen Y et al. 2016. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55:4212974–88
-
50.Ringe S, Hormann NG, Oberhofer H, Reuter K. 2022. Chem. Rev. 122:1210777–820. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00675
-
51.Schwarz K, Sundararaman R. 2020. Surf. Sci. Rep. 75:2100492
-
52.Singh AK, Zhou L, Shinde A, Suram SK, Montoya JH et al. 2017. Chem. Mater. 29:2310159–67
-
53.Pourbaix M. 1974. Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions Houston, TX: Natl. Assoc. Corros. Eng.
-
54.Back S, Na J, Ulissi ZW 2021. ACS Catal. 11:52483–91
-
55.Karmodak N, Andreussi O. 2020. ACS Energy Lett. 5:3885–91
-
56.Zhou L, Shinde A, Montoya JH, Singh A, Gul S et al. 2018. ACS Catal. 8:1210938–48
-
57.Gunasooriya GTKK, Nørskov JK. 2020. ACS Energy Lett. 5:123778–87
-
58.Wang Z, Zheng YR, Chorkendorff I, Nørskov JK. 2020. ACS Energy Lett. 5:92905–8
-
59.Persson KA, Waldwick B, Lazic P, Ceder G. 2012. Phys. Rev. B 85:235438
-
60.Koyama M, Zhang Z, Wang M, Ponge D, Raabe D et al. 2017. Science 355:63291055–57
-
61.Kazemi F, Saberi A, Malek-Ahmadi S, Sohrabi S, Rezaie H, Tahriri M. 2011. Ceram. Silik. 55:26–30
-
62.Luo G, Yang S, Jenness GR, Song Z, Kuech TF, Morgan D. 2016. NPG Asia Mater. 9:e345
-
63.Belsky A, Hellenbrandt M, Karen VL, Luksch P. 2002. Acta Crystallogr. B 58:3364–69
-
64.Sun W, Dacek ST, Ong SP, Hautier G, Jain A et al. 2016. Sci. Adv. 2:11e1600225
-
65.Kumari S, Gutkowski R, Junqueira JRC, Kostka A, Hengge K et al. 2018. ACS Comb. Sci. 20:9544–53
-
66.Wygant BR, Kawashima K, Mullins CB. 2018. ACS Energy Lett. 3:122956–66
-
67.Hubert MA, Patel AM, Gallo A, Liu Y, Valle E et al. 2020. ACS Catal. 10:2012182–96
-
68.Stevens MB, Kreider ME, Patel AM, Wang Z, Liu Y et al. 2020. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3:1212433–46
-
69.Mai H, Le TC, Hisatomi T, Chen D, Domen K et al. 2021. iScience 24:9103068
-
70.Kumar R, Singh AK. 2021. npj Comput. Mater. 7:197
-
71.Tao Q, Lu T, Sheng Y, Li L, Lu W, Li M. 2021. J. Energy Chem. 60:351–59
-
72.Agarwal A, Goverapet Srinivasan S, Rai B 2021. Front. Mater. 8:292
-
73.Mazheika A, Wang YG, Valero R, Viñes F, Illas F et al. 2022. Nat. Commun. 13:419
-
74.Li X, Maffettone PM, Che Y, Liu T, Chen L, Cooper AI 2021. Chem. Sci. 12:3210742–54
-
75.Ding J, Bao J, Sun S, Luo Z, Gao C. 2009. J. Comb. Chem. 11:4523–26
-
76.Seyler M, Stoewe K, Maier WF. 2007. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 76:1–2146–57
-
77.Lettmann C, Hinrichs H, Maier WF. 2001. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40:173160–64
-
78.Parr RG. 1983. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 34:631–56
-
79.Chase MW Jr. 1998. NIST-JANAF Themochemical Tables. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data Monogr. 9. Woodbury, NY: Am. Chem. Soc./AIP. , 4th ed..
-
80.Kulik HJ. 2015. J. Chem. Phys. 142:240901
-
81.Garza AJ, Scuseria GE. 2016. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7:204165–70
-
82.Gerber IC, Angyán JG. 2005. Chem. Phys. Lett. 415:1–3100–5
-
83.Onida G, Reining L, Rubio A. 2002. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74:2601–59
-
84.Wu Y, Lazic P, Hautier G, Persson K, Ceder G. 2013. Energy Environ. Sci. 6:157–68
-
85.Castelli IE, Hüser F, Pandey M, Li H, Thygesen KS et al. 2015. Adv. Energy Mater. 5:21400915
-
86.Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B et al. 2011. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12:2825–30
-
87.Bonaccorso G. 2017. Machine Learning Algorithms: A Reference Guide to Popular Algorithms for Data Science and Machine Learning Birmingham, UK: Packt
-
88.Masood H, Toe CY, Teoh WY, Sethu V, Amal R 2019. ACS Catal. 9:1211774–87
-
89.Zhang Q, Chang D, Zhai X, Lu W. 2018. Chemom. Intel. Lab. Syst. 177:26–34
-
90.Biswas T, Singh AK. 2021. npj Comput. Mater. 7:189
-
91.Mounet N, Gibertini M, Schwaller P, Campi D, Merkys A et al. 2018. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13:3246–52
-
92.Back S, Tran K, Ulissi ZW. 2020. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12:3438256–65
-
93.McCafferty E. 2010. Introduction to Corrosion Science New York: Springer
-
94.Hansen HA, Rossmeisl J, Nørskov JK. 2008. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10:253722–30
-
95.Mathew K, Singh AK, Gabriel JJ, Choudhary K, Sinnott SB et al. 2016. Comput. Mater. Sci. 122:183–90
-
96.Boland TM, Singh AK. 2022. Comput. Mater. Sci. 207:111238
-
97.Ong SP, Richards WD, Jain A, Hautier G, Kocher M et al. 2013. Comput. Mater. Sci. 68:314–19
-
98.Wang Z, Guo X, Montoya J, Nørskov JK. 2020. npj Comput. Mater. 6:160
-
99.Huang LF, Rondinelli JM. 2019. npj Mater. Degrad. 3:14
-
100.Ayodele BV, Alsaffar MA, Mustapa SI, Cheng CK, Witoon T. 2021. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 145:120–32
Data & Media loading...
- Article Type: Review Article
Most Read This Month
Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed
-
-
Many-Body Localization and Thermalization in Quantum Statistical Mechanics
Vol. 6 (2015), pp. 15–38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Correlated Quantum Phenomena in the Strong Spin-Orbit Regime
Vol. 5 (2014), pp. 57–82
-
-
-
-
-
Interface Physics in Complex Oxide Heterostructures
Vol. 2 (2011), pp. 141–165
-
-
-
-
-
Strong Correlations from Hund’s Coupling
Vol. 4 (2013), pp. 137–178
-
- More Less