1932

Abstract

Recent discussions of police violence in the United States and the corresponding lack of accountability have shone a light on a highly debated agent opposing police reform—police unions. Although police unionism continues to be an understudied area, a recent wave of empirical investigations, both qualitative and quantitative, have contributed to a nascent understanding of the ways in which police union mechanisms facilitate police misconduct and violence. Accordingly, in this review we first discuss the origins of police unionism in the United States, illustrating how historical forces, including racial animus, have shaped the existing landscape. Then, we highlight significant empirical work exploring the relationship between police unionism and misconduct. Thereafter, we review the potential intervening mechanisms, which are employed in ways to reduce disciplinary consequences of misconduct and excessive use of force, undermine oversight of the police, and limit police transparency. We end with a set of recommendations on future avenues for research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-034244
2023-01-27
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/criminol/6/1/annurev-criminol-030421-034244.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-034244&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abraham PM. 2015. Opening the Curtain on Government Unions Harrisburg, PA: Commonwealth Found.
  2. Alexander KL, Rich S, Thacker H. 2022. The hidden billion-dollar cost of repeated police misconduct. Washington Post March 9. https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2022/police-misconduct-repeated-settlements/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anzia S, Moe T. 2013. The politics of pensions. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting Chicago: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2300640
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ba B. 2020. Going the extra mile: the cost of complaint filing, accountability, and law enforcement outcomes in Chicago. Work. Pap. Univ. Calif. Irvine:
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ba B, Kaplan J, Knox D, Komisarchik M, Mariman R et al. 2022. Who are the police? Descriptive representation in the coercive arm of the government. Work. Pap. Princeton Univ. Princeton, NJ: https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/policing_rep.pdf
  6. Ba B, Knox D, Mummolo J, Rivera R. 2021. The role of officer race and gender in police-civilian interactions in Chicago. Science 371:696–702
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baldwin J. 1966. A report from occupied territory. The Nation July 11. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/report-occupied-territory/
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bartel A, Lewin D. 1981. Wages and unionism in the public sector: the case of police. Rev. Econ. Stat. 63:53–59
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Baumgartner FR, Jones BD. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  10. Becker GS. 1968. Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J. Political Econ. 76:2169–217
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Becker GS, Stigler GJ. 1974. Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers. J. Leg. Stud. 3:1–18
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bekemeyer A. 2021. The labor of law and order: how police unions transformed policing and politics in the United States, 19391985 PhD Diss., Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA: https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/37370101
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bell MC. 2017. Police reform and the dismantling of legal estrangement. Yale Law J. 126:2054–150
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Berg A. 2015. Chicago police unions are fighting to destroy decades of complaint records. Illinois Policy Dec. 14. https://www.illinoispolicy.org/chicago-police-unions-are-fighting-to-destroy-decades-of-complaint-records/
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bies KJ. 2017. Let the sunshine in: illuminating the powerful role police unions play in shielding officer misconduct. Stanf. Law Policy Rev 28:110949
    [Google Scholar]
  16. BondGraham D. 2020. Black people in California are stopped far more often by police, major study proves. The Guardian Jan. 3. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jan/02/california-police-black-stops-force
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Brunner EJ, Ju A. 2019. State collective bargaining laws and public-sector pay. ILR Rev 72:480–508
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Carlson JD. 2020. Policing the Second Amendment: Guns, Law Enforcement, and the Politics of Race Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chandrasekher AC. 2016. The effect of police slowdowns on crime. Am. Law Econ. Rev. 18:2385–437
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Chandrasekher AC. 2017. Police labor unrest and lengthy contract negotiations: Does police misconduct increase with time spent out of contract? SSRN Work. Pap. 2470344. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2470344
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cheng C, Long W. 2022. The effect of highly publicized police killings on policing: evidence from large US cities. J. Public Econ. 206:104557
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Corley C. 2022. The officer who killed Laquan McDonald is free after three years. Activists are angry. NPR Febr. 3. https://www.npr.org/2022/02/03/1077574977/jason-van-dyke-chicago-police-released-laquan-mcdonald?t=1646175433337
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Crifasi CK, Pollack KM, Webster DW. 2016. Effects of state-level policy changes on homicide and nonfatal shootings of law enforcement officers. Inj. Prev. 22:274–78
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Cunningham J, Feir D, Gillezeau R. 2020. Overview of research on collective bargaining rights and law enforcement officer's bills of rights Work. Pap. Univ. Memphis Memphis, TN:
  25. Cunningham J, Feir D, Gillezeau R. 2021. Collective bargaining rights, policing, and civilian deaths IZA Discuss Pap. No. 14208
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Cunningham J, Feir D, Gillezeau R, Harvey M, Rad A 2022. Law enforcement officers’ bills of rights and police violence. Am. Econ. Assoc. Pap. Proc. 112:174–77
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Damien C. 2018. California police unions defeat use-of-deadly-force bill; supporters vow to keep fighting shootings. Palm Springs Desert Sun Aug. 30. https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/politics/2018/08/30/california-police-unions-defeat-use-deadly-force-bill/1146185002/
    [Google Scholar]
  28. DeLord R, Burpo J, Shannon M, Spearing J. 2008. Police Union Power, Politics, and Confrontation in the 21st Century: New Challenges, New Issues Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. DeLord R, York R. 2016. Law Enforcement, Police Unions, and the Future: Educating Police Management and Unions About the Challenges Ahead Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Desmond MS, Papachristos AV, Kirk DS. 2020. Evidence of the effect of police violence on citizen crime reporting: reply. Am. Sociol. Rev. 85:1184–90
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Dharmapala D, McAdams RH, Rappaport J. 2022. Collective bargaining rights and police misconduct: evidence from Florida. J. Law Econ. Org. 38:11–41
    [Google Scholar]
  32. D'Onofrio M. 2021. Court rolls back public hearing mandate for police contract proposals. Axios Oct. 20. https://www.axios.com/local/philadelphia/2021/10/20/philadelphia-public-hearing-law-police-contracts
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Emmanuel A. 2015. Chicago police contract scrutinized in the aftermath of Laquan McDonald's death. The Chicago Reporter Dec. 10. http://www.chicagoreporter.com/chicago-police-contract-scrutinized-in-the-aftermath-of-laquan-mcdonalds-death/
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Emmanuel A. 2016. How union contracts shield police departments from DOJ reforms. . In These Times June 21. http://www.inthesetimes.com/features/police-killings-union-contracts.html
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Evans E, Emmanuel A 2021. How Chicago's most powerful police union preserves tradition of problematic leadership. Injustice Watch Sept. 13. https://www.injusticewatch.org/news/2021/analysis-heres-how-chicagos-most-powerful-police-union-maintains-tradition-of-problematic-leadership/
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Feuille P, Delaney JT. 2016. Collective bargaining, interest arbitration, and police salaries. . ILR Rev 39:2228–40
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Fisk C, Richardson LS. 2017. Police unions. George Wash. Law Rev. 85:3712–99
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Frandsen BR. 2016. The effects of collective bargaining rights on public employee compensation: evidence from teachers, firefighters, and police. . ILR Rev 69:184–112
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Fratern. Order Police (FOP) 2022. Legislation supported by the FOP in the 117th Congress. Fraternal Order of Police. https://fop.net/government-and-media-affairs/legislation-we-support/
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Fraternal Order of Police, Chi. Lodge No. 7 v. City of Chicago, No. 2016 CH 16529 (Ill. Cir. Ct. 2017)
  41. Freivogel W, Wagman P. 2021. Wandering cops move from department to department. ABC News April 28. https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/wandering-cops-move-department-department-77366107
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Goldman R, Puro S. 1987. Decertification of police: an alternative to traditional remedies for police misconduct. Hastings Const. Law Q. 15:145–80
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Goncalves F. 2021. Do police unions increase misconduct? Work. Pap. Dep. Econ., Univ. Calif Los Angeles:
  44. Greenhouse S. 2020. How police unions enable and conceal abuses of power. The New Yorker June 18. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/how-police-union-power-helped-increase-abuses
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Grunwald B, Rappaport J. 2020. The wandering officer. Yale Law J. 129:1676–782
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Hardaway AB. 2019. Time is not on our side: why specious claims of collective bargaining rights should not be allowed to delay police reform efforts. Stanf. J. Civ. Rights Civ. Lib. 15:2137–200
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Hardaway AB. 2022. The rise of police unions on the back of the Black Freedom Movement Case Leg. Stud. Res. Pap. No. 2022-5
  48. Harper N. 2022. Substantive differences in proposed 2020–2022 MPD union contract. Medium. https://medium.com/@nharpermn/substantive-differences-in-proposed-2020–2022-mpd-union-contract-e2c8547f7e20
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Harris C, Sweeney MM. 2021. Police union contracts: an analysis of large cities. Polic. J. Policy Pract. 15:1622–34
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Hinkel D. 2017. Judge rules against new police disciplinary guidelines in victory for FOP. Chicago Tribune Nov. 14. https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/breaking/ct-met-chicago-police-discipline-fop-20171114-story.html
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Holmes MD, Smith BW. 2014. Police use of excessive force in minority communities: a test of the minority threat, place, and community accountability hypotheses. Soc. Probl. 61:183–104
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Huq AZ, McAdams RH. 2016. Litigating the blue wall of silence: how to challenge the police privilege to delay investigation. Univ. Chic. Leg. Forum 2016 213–54
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Iafolla R. 2022. D.C. police reform faces union challenge at U.S. appeal court. Bloomberg Law Febr. 2. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/d-c-police-reform-faces-union-challenge-at-u-s-appeals-court
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Ichniowski C 1988. Public sector union growth and bargaining laws: a proportional hazards approach with time-varying treatments. When Public Sector Workers Unionize RB Freeman, C Ichniowski 19–40 Cambridge, MA: NBER
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Int. Assoc. Chiefs Police 2018. Firearms policy position statement Firearms Position Pap., IACP Alexandria, VA: https://www.theiacp.org/sites/default/files/2018-08/IACP%20Firearms%20Position%20Paper_2018.pdf
  56. Invisible Inst 2022. Citizens police data project. Invisible Institute. https://cpdp.co/
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Jones WP. 2021. Police collective bargaining and police violence Work. Pap. Univ. Minn. Minneapolis, MN:
  58. Juris H, Feuille P. 1973. Police Unionism: Power and Impact in Public-Sector Bargaining Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Katz W. 2021. Beyond transparency: police union collective bargaining and participatory democracy. SMU Law Rev. 74:3419–46
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Kearney RC, Carnevale DG. 2001.. Labor Relations in the Public Sector New York: Routledge. , 3rd ed..
  61. Keenan KM, Walker S. 2005. An impediment to police accountability? An analysis of statutory law enforcement officers’ bill of rights. Public Interest Law J 14:185–244
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Keller MH, Barker K. 2021. Police unions won power using his playbook. Now he's negotiating the backlash. New York Times March 10. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/10/us/police-unions.html
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Kelly G. 2020. Police transparency hinges on legal battle. Investigative Post Sept. 1. https://www.investigativepost.org/2020/09/01/police-transparency-hinges-on-legal-battle/
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Kelly K, Lowery W, Rich S. 2017. Fired/rehired: Police chiefs are often forced to put officers fired for misconduct back on the streets. Washington Post Aug. 3. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2017/investigations/police-fired-rehired/
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Kindy K. 2021. Dozens of states have tried to end qualified immunity. Police officers and unions helped beat nearly every bill. The Washington Post Oct. 7. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/qualified-immunity-police-lobbying-state-legislatures/2021/10/06/60e546bc-0cdf-11ec-aea1-42a8138f132a_story.html
    [Google Scholar]
  66. King D, Smith R. 2005. Racial orders in American political development. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 99:75–92
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Kirk DS, Papachristos AV. 2011. Cultural mechanisms and the persistence of neighborhood violence. Am. J. Sociol. 116:41190–233
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Lauer C. 2022. Philadelphia police union sues city over ban stopping drivers for low-level offenses. PBS Febr. 23. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/philadelphia-police-union-sues-city-over-ban-stopping-drivers-for-low-level-offenses
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Levi M. 1977. Bureaucratic Insurgency: The Case of Police Unions New York: Lexington Books
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Levin B. 2020. What's wrong with police unions?. Columbia Law Rev. 120:1333–402
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Levine MJ. 1988. Historical overview of police unionization in the United States. Police J 61:4334–43
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Magenau JM, Hunt RG. 1996. Police unions and the police role. Hum. Relat 49:101315–43
    [Google Scholar]
  73. McCormick ML. 2015. Our uneasiness with police unions: power and voice for the powerful? Saint Louis Univ. Public Law Rev 35:47–66
    [Google Scholar]
  74. McMahon S, Moore C. 2019. To reform the police, target their union contract. New York Times April 8. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/08/opinion/austin-police-union-contract.html
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Mladenka KR. 1991. Public employee unions, reformism, and black employment in 1,200 American cities. Urban Aff. Q. 26:4532–48
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Moe TM. 2015. Vested interests and political institutions. Political Sci. Q. 130:2277–318
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Morabito M. 2014. American police unions: a hindrance or help to innovation?. Int. J. Public Adm. 37:11773–80
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Morabito M, Shelley TO. 2015. Representative bureaucracy: understanding the correlates of the lagging progress of diversity in policing. Race Justice 5:4330–55
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Navratil L. 2022. Minneapolis city council approves police union contract in divided vote. Star Tribune March 24. https://www.startribune.com/minneapolis-city-council-approves-police-union-contract-in-divided-vote/600159042/
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Nowacki JS, Willits D 2018. Adoption of body cameras by United States police agencies: an organisational analysis. Polic. Soc 28:7841–53
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Off. Community Oriented Polic. Serv 2015. Final Report of the President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing Washington, DC: Off. Community Oriented Polic. Serv.
  82. Ouellet M, Hashimi S, Gravel J, Papachristos AV. 2019. Network exposure and excessive use of force. Criminol. Public Policy 18:3675–704
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Pierson P. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 94:2251–61
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Pilkington E. 2015. Laquan McDonald shooting puts Rahm Emanuel in battle over the truth. The Guardian Dec. 3. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/dec/03/laquan-mcdonald-shooting-rahm-emanuel-chicago-political-battle
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Pogarsky G, Piquero AR. 2004. Studying the reach of deterrence: Can deterrence theory help explain police misconduct?. J. Crim. Justice 32:4371–86
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Pyrooz DC, Decker SH, Wolfe SE, Shjarback JA. 2016. Was there a Ferguson Effect on crime rates in large U.S. cities?. J. Crim. Justice 46:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Rad AN. 2018. Police institutions and police abuse: evidence from the US SSRN Work. Pap. 3246419. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3246419
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  88. Rad AN, Wunschel F, McKelvey K. 2022. Developing an index of police protectionism: a research note. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/nuhcd
    [Crossref]
  89. Rosenfeld J. 2019. US labor studies in the twenty-first century: understanding laborism without labor. Annu. Rev. Sociol 45:449–65
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Rozema K, Schanzenbach M. 2019. Good cop, bad cop: using civilian allegations to predict police misconduct. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 11:2225–68
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Rushin S. 2017. Police union contracts. Duke Law J. 66:61191–266
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Rushin S. 2019a. Police disciplinary appeals. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 67:3545–610
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Rushin S 2019b. Unions and police reform. The Cambridge Handbook of Policing in the United States T Lave, E Miller 533–44 Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Rushin S, Edwards G. 2017. De-policing. Cornell Law Rev. 102:3721–82
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Rushin S, Garnett A. 2017. State labor law and federal police reform. Ga. Law Rev. 51:1209–27
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Sanes M, Schmitt J. 2014. Regulation of public sector collective bargaining in the states Rep. Cent. Econ. Policy Res. Washington, DC: https://cepr.net/documents/state-public-cb-2014-03.pdf
  97. Sass TR, Troyer JL. 1999. Affirmative action, political representation, unions, and female police employment. J. Labor Res. 20:571–87
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Schanzenbach MM. 2021. Policing the police: personnel management and police misconduct Northwest: Law Econ. Res Pap. No. 21-11
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Schuck AM. 2014. Female representation in law enforcement: the influence of screening, unions, incentives, community policing, CALEA, and size. Police Q 17:154–78
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Schwartz J. 2014. Police indemnification. New York Univ. Law Rev. 89:3885–1005
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Serrin W. 1969. God help our city. Atlantic Monthly March 115–21
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Shjarback JA, Pyrooz DC, Wolfe SE, Decker SH. 2017. De-policing and crime in the wake of Ferguson: racialized changes in the quantity and quality of policing among Missouri police departments. J. Crim. Justice 50:42–52
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Sierra-Arévalo M. 2021. American policing and the danger imperative. Law Soc. Rev. 55:170–103
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Sierra-Arévalo M, Nix J. 2020. Gun victimization in the line of duty: fatal and non-fatal firearm assaults on police officers in the United States, 2014–2019. Criminol. Public Policy 19:31041–66
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Simpson CR, Kirk DS. 2022. Is police misconduct contagious? Non-trivial null findings from Dallas, Texas. J. Quant. Criminol In press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-021-09532-7
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  106. Slater JE. 2004. Public Workers: Government Employee Unions, the Law, and the State, 19001962 New York: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Southall A. 2018. New York police union sues to stop release of body camera videos. New York Times Jan. 18. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/09/nyregion/new-york-police-union-body-camera-lawsuit.html
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Stoughton SW. 2015. Law enforcement's “warrior” problem. Harv. Law Rev. Forum 128:225–34
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Sullivan CM, O'Keeffe ZP. 2017. Evidence that curtailing proactive policing can reduce major crime. Nat. Hum. Behav 1:730–37
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Swedler DI, Simmons MM, Dominici F, Hemenway D. 2015. Firearm prevalence and homicides of law enforcement officers in the United States. Am. J. Public Health 105:2042–48
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Trejo SJ. 1991. Public sector unions and municipal employment. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 45:1166–80
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Tyler TR. 1990. Why People Obey the Law New Haven, CT: Yale
  113. Walker S. 2001. Police Accountability: The Role of Citizen Oversight Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Walker S. 2008. The neglect of police unions: exploring one of the most important areas of American policing. Police Pract. Res. Int. J. 9:295–112
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Walker S. 2015. The Baltimore police union contract and the law enforcement officer's bill of rights: impediments to accountability Rep. Univ. Neb. Lincoln:
    [Google Scholar]
  116. [Google Scholar]
  117. Wiggins O. 2021. The first state to pass a police ‘Bill of Rights’ could become the first to repeal it. Washington Post Febr. 10. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/police-reform-maryland-/2021/02/08/58519c34-601a-11eb-9061-07abcc1f9229_story.html
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Wiggins O, Cox E. 2021. Maryland enacts landmark police overhaul, first state to repeal police bill of rights. Washington Post April 10. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/hogan-vetoes-police-accountibility/2021/04/09/c0ac4096-9967-11eb-962b-78c1d8228819_story.html
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-034244
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-034244
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error