1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Criminology
  4. Volume 6, 2023
  5. Article

Annual Review of Criminology

Volume 6, 2023

Six Questions About Overcriminalization

Abstract

The allegation that criminal justice systems (and that of the United States in particular) have become guilty of overcriminalization is widely accepted by academics and practitioners on nearly all points along the political spectrum (Dillon 2012). Many commentators respond by recommending that states decriminalize given kinds of conduct that supposedly exemplify the problem. I urge those who are theoretically minded to proceed cautiously and address several preliminary matters that must be resolved before genuine progress is possible. In the absence of a position on several controversial normative and conceptual issues, discussions of overcriminalization and decriminalization are bound to be oversimplified and superficial. My review is organized around six of these issues. I invite commentators to examine () what the criminal law is; () what overcriminalization means; () why overcriminalization is thought to be pernicious; () whether overcriminalization is a de jure or de facto phenomenon, i.e., whether it is a function of the law on the books or the law in action; () what normative criteria might be invoked to alleviate the predicament; and () whether and to what extent overcriminalization is a serious concern in our penal system. Even though these six issues are analytically distinct, positions about one invariably blur into commitments about the others. Although theorists rarely dissent from the claim that states are guilty of something called overcriminalization, uncertainties about the foregoing topics mar their treatments. I conclude that a deep understanding of the problem of overcriminalization depends on how these six issues are resolved.

Keyword(s): criminalization, defenses, discretion, enforcement, harm, offenses, punishment
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-040411
2023-01-27
2024-05-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/criminol/6/1/annurev-criminol-030421-040411.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-040411&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abrams N. 1989. The new ancillary offenses. Crim. Law Forum 1:1–39
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashworth A. 2000. Is the criminal law a lost cause?. Law Q. Rev. 116:225–56
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashworth A. 2007–2008. Conceptions of overcriminalization. Ohio State J. Crim. Law 5:407–25
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashworth A, Zedner L 2010. Preventive orders: a problem of undercriminalization?. The Boundaries of the Criminal Law RA Duff, L Farmer, S Marshall, M Renzo, V Tadros 59–87 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Ashworth A, Zedner L. 2014. Preventive Justice Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  6. Baer M. 2021. Corporate criminal law unbounded. The Oxford Handbook of Prosecutors and Prosecution RF Wright, KL Levine, RM Gold 475–96 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Barkow AS, Barkow RE, eds. 2011. Prosecutors in the Boardroom New York: NYU Press
  8. Barkow RE. 2019. Prisoners of Politics: Breaking the Cycle of Mass Incarceration Cambridge, UK: Belknap Press
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Barnett RE. 1977. Restitution: a new paradigm of criminal justice. Ethics 87:279–301
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bazelon E. 2019. Charged: The New Movement to Transform American Prosecution and End Mass Incarceration New York: Random House
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Beale SS. 2005. The many faces of overcriminalization: from morals and mattress tags to overfederalization. Am. Univ. Law Rev. 54:747–80
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bell MC. 2021. John Stuart Mill's harm principle and free speech: expanding the notion of harm. Utilitas 33:162–79
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bibas S. 2012. The Machinery of Criminal Justice Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  14. Bittner E 1974. Florence Nightingale in Pursuit of Willie Sutton: A Theory of the Police. The Potential for Reform of Criminal Justice H Jacob 17–44 Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Boonin D. 2008. The Problem of Punishment Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  16. Brenan M. 2021. Stricter gun laws less popular in U.S. Gallup Nov. 17. https://news.gallup.com/poll/357317/stricter-gun-laws-less-popular.aspx
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Briffault R. 2018. The challenge of the new preemption. Stanf. Law Rev. 70:1995–2027
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Bromwich JE. 2021. Manhattan to stop prosecuting prostitution, part of nationwide shift. New York Times April 21. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/21/nyregion/manhattan-to-stop-prosecuting-prostitution.html#:∼:text=The%20Manhattan%20district%20attorney's%20office,system's%20approach%20to%20sex%20work
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Brown DK. 2009. History's challenge to criminal law theory. Crim. Law Philos. 3:271–87
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Brown DK. 2011. Criminal law's unfortunate triumph over administrative law. J. Econ. Policy 7:657–83
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Brown DK. 2016a. Decriminalization, regulation, privatization: a response to Professor Natapoff. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 69:En Banc1–16
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Brown DK. 2016b. Free Market Criminal Justice: How Democracy and Laissez Faire Undermine the Rule of Law Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Buell S. 2019. Fraud. The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law L Alexander, KK Ferzan 265–82 New York: Palgrave MacMillan
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Chiao V. 2019. Criminal Law in the Age of the Administrative State Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  25. Cipriano A. 2021. Progressive prosecutors refuse to prosecute GOP laws. Crime Report Oct. 19. https://thecrimereport.org/2021/10/19/progressive-prosecutors-refuse-to-prosecute-gop-laws/
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Coca-Vila I. 2022. What's really wrong with fining crimes? On the hard treatment of criminal monetary fines. Crim. Law Philos. 16:395–415
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Coffee J. 1991. Does ‘unlawful’ mean ‘criminal’? Reflections on the disappearing tort/crime distinction in criminal law. Boston Univ. Law Rev. 71:193–246
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Coffee J. 2020. Corporate Crime and Punishment: The Crisis of Underenforcement Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Cornford A. 2017. Rethinking the wrongness constraint on criminalization. Law Philos 36:615–49
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Dempsey M. 2019. Prostitution. The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law L Alexander, KK Ferzan 599 New York: Palgrave MacMillan
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Dillon Z. 2012. Foreword. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 102:525
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Duff RA. 2014. Towards a modest legal moralism. Crim. Law Philos. 8:217–35
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Duff RA. 2018. The Realm of Criminal Law Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  34. Duff RA, Marshall S 2014.. “ Remote harms” and the two harm principles. Liberal Criminal Theory: Essays for Andreas Von Hirsch AP Simester, AD Bois-Pedain, U Neumann 205–23 Oxford, UK: Hart Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Edwards J. 2014. Harm principles. Leg. Theory 20:253–85
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Edwards J. 2017. Criminalization without punishment. Leg. Theory 23:69–95
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Executive Off. Pres 2021a. Protecting Americans from overcriminalization through regulatory reform Executive Order 13980 Fed. Regist. Washington, DC: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/22/2021-01645/protecting-americans-from-overcriminalization-through-regulatory-reform
  38. Executive Off. Pres 2021b. Revocation of certain presidential actions and technical amendment Executive Order 14029 Fed. Regist. Washington, DC: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/05/19/2021-10691/revocation-of-certain-presidential-actions-and-technical-amendment
  39. Feinberg J. 1984. Harm to Others. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  40. Feldman Y. 2018. The Law of Good People: Challenging States’ Ability to Regulate Human Behavior Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Fields G, Emshwiller JR 2011. Many failed efforts to count nation's federal criminal laws. Wall Street Journal July 23. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304319804576389601079728920
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Flanders C, Hoskins Z, eds. 2016. The New Philosophy of Criminal Law New York: Rowman & Littlefield
  43. Gardner J. 2000. The virtue of justice and the character of law. Curr. Leg. Probl. 53:1
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Gardner J. 2008. Review of Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law by Douglas Husak. Notre Dame Philos. Rev. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/overcriminalization-the-limits-of-the-criminal-law/
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Garland D. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Gilchrist G. 2019. Regulation by prosecutor. Am. Crim. Law Rev. 56:315–55
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Golash D. 2005. The Case Against Punishment New York: NYU Press
  48. Goldrosen N. 2021. The new preemption of progressive prosecutors. Univ. Ill. Law Rev. 2021:150–57
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Green SP. 1997. Why it's a crime to tear the tag off a mattress: overcriminalization and the moral content of regulatory offenses. Emory Law J 46:1533–615
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Green SP. 2020. Criminalizing Sex: A Unified Liberal Theory Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Hanser M. 2008. The metaphysics of harm. Philos. Phenomenol. Res. 82:459–69
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Harcourt BE. 1999. The collapse of the harm principle. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 90:109–94
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Harmon R. 2016. Why arrest?. Mich. Law Rev. 116:307–64
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Hart CL. 2014. Money laundering. Am. Crim. Law Rev. 51:1449–96
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Hart HM. 1958. The aims of the criminal law. Law Contemp. Probl. 23:401–41
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Haugh T. 2015. Overcriminalization's new harm paradigm. Vanderbilt Law Rev 68:1191–241
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Healy G 2004. Go Directly to Jail: The Criminalization of Almost Everything Washington, DC: Cato Inst.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Hopwood S. 2017. Clarity in criminal law. Am. Crim. Law Rev. 54:695–749
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Hoskins Z. 2019. Beyond Punishment: A Normative Account of the Collateral Consequences of Conviction Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Hurd HM. 2019. Crimes against animals. The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Ethics and the Criminal Law L Alexander, KK Ferzan 71–93 New York: Palgrave MacMillan
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Husak D. 2003. Is the criminal law important?. Ohio State J. Crim. Law 1:261–71
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Husak D. 2008. Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  63. Husak D. 2010. Malum prohibitum and retributivism. The Philosophy of Criminal Law: Selected Essays D Husak 410–32 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Husak D. 2011. Reservations about overcriminalization. New Crim. Law Rev. 14:97–107
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Husak D. 2017. Drug proscriptions as proxy crimes. Law Philos 36:345–66
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Husak D. 2022. Retribution and over-punishment. Law Philos 41:169–91
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Jacobs JB. 2015. The Eternal Criminal Record Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  68. Jacobs JB, Fuhr Z. 2019. The Toughest Gun Control Law in the Nation New York: NYU Press
  69. Jacobs JB, Potter K. 1998. Hate Crimes: Criminal Law and Identity Politics New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  70. Kadish SH. 1967. The crisis of overcriminalization. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 374:157–70
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Kennedy C. 2021. Criminalising deceptive sex: sex, identity, and recognition. Legal Stud 41:91–110
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Kohler-Hausmann I. 2018. Misdemeanorland: Criminal Courts and Social Control in an Age of Broken Windows Policing Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Krinsky M, Cox B. 2021. Ending unnecessary traffic stops that can kill. Crime Report Dec. 20. https://thecrimereport.org/2021/12/20/ending-unnecessary-traffic-stops-that-can-kill/
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Laqueur H. 2015. Uses and abuses of drug decriminalization in Portugal. Law Soc. Inq. 40:746–81
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Larkin PJ Jr. 2014. Regulation, prohibition, and overcriminalization: the proper and improper uses of the criminal law. Hofstra Law Rev 42:745–58
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Larkin PJ Jr. 2017. The folly of requiring complete knowledge of the criminal law. Liberty Univ. Law Rev. 12:335–74
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Levin B. 2018. The consensus myth in criminal justice reform. Mich. Law Rev. 117:259–318
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Levin B. 2019. Mens rea reform and its discontents. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 109:491–558
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Luna E. 2005. The overcriminalization phenomenon. Am. Univ. Law Rev. 54:703–43
     [Google Scholar]
  80. McKinley J. 2019. Could prostitution be next to be decriminalized?. New York Times May 31. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/31/nyregion/presidential-candidates-prostitution.html
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Mill JS. 1859. On Liberty London: Everyman Library
  82. Molina F. 2011. A comparison between continental European and Anglo-American approaches to overcriminalization and some remarks on how to deal with it. New Crim. Law Rev. 14:123–38
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Moohr GS. 2005. Defining overcriminalization through cost-benefit analysis: the example of criminal copyright laws. Am. Univ. Law Rev. 54:783–806
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Moore M. 1997. Placing Blame: A Theory of the Criminal Law. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Moore M. 2009. A tale of two theories. Crim. Justice Ethics 28:27–48
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Murray J. 2022. Prosecutorial nonenforcement and residual criminalization. Ohio State J. Crim. Law. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Natapoff A. 2018. Punishment Without Crime: How Our Misdemeanor System Traps the Innocent and Makes America More Unequal New York: Basic Books
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Noorda H. 2021. Regulation as punishment. Crim. Justice Ethics 40:2108–23
     [Google Scholar]
  89. O'Sullivan JR. 2006. The federal criminal ‘code’ is a disgrace: obstruction statutes as case study. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 96:643–726
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Packer HL. 1968. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction Stanford: Stanf. Univ. Press
  91. Page J, Soss J. 2017. Criminal justice predation and neoliberal governance. Rethinking Neoloberalism: Resisting the Disciplinary Regime S Schram, M Pavlovskava 139–59 New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Parfit D. 2011. On What Matters Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  93. Price Z. 2022. Faithful execution in the fifty states. Ga. Law Rev. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Purnell D. 2021. Becoming Abolitionists: Police, Protests, and the Pursuit of Freedom New York: Astra House
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Roberts J. 2021. Prosecuting misdemeanors. The Oxford Handbook of Prosecutors and Prosecution RF Wright, KL Levine, RM Gold 513–37 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Robinson PH. 1997. Structure and Function in Criminal Law Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press
  97. Robinson PH. 2014. The rise and fall and resurrection of American penal codes. Univ. Louisville Law Rev. 53:173–91
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Robinson PH, Cahill MT, Mohammad U. 2000. The five worst (and five best) American criminal codes. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. 95:1–90
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Ryberg J, Roberts JV, de Keijser JW, eds. 2018. Sentencing Multiple Crimes Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  100. Sandler R. 2020. Berkeley will become 1st U.S. city to remove police from traffic stops. Forbes July 15. https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelsandler/2020/07/14/berkeley-may-become-1st-us-city-to-remove-police-from-traffic-stops/?sh=26dff93c70fa
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Silverglate H. 2011. Three Felonies A Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent New York: Encounter Books
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Simester AP, von Hirsch A. 2002. Rethinking the offense principle. Leg. Theory 8:269–95
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Simester AP, von Hirsch A. 2009. Remote harms and non-constitutive crimes. Crim. Justice Ethics 28:89–107
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Simester AP, von Hirsch A. 2011. Crimes, Harms, and Wrongs: On the Principles of Criminalisation Oxford, UK: Hart Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Stuntz WJ. 2001. The pathological politics of criminal law. Mich. Law Rev. 100:505–600
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Tadros V. 2011. The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Thomas WR. 2021. Corporate criminal law is too broad—worse, it's too narrow. Ariz. State Law J. 53:199–271
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Thrush G, Bogel-Burroughs N. 2021. Why G.O.P.-led states are banning the police from enforcing federal gun laws. New York Times June 18. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/18/us/missouri-federal-gun-laws.html
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Tomlin P. 2014. Retributivists! The harm principle is not for you. ! Ethics 124:272–98
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Tonry M. 2013. Remodeling American sentencing: a ten-step blueprint for moving past mass incarceration. Criminol. Public Policy 13:503–33
     [Google Scholar]
  111. US Sentencing Comm 2017. Federal alternative-to-incarceration court programs Rep. US Sentencing Comm. Washington, DC: https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/research-publications/2017/20170928_alternatives.pdf
  112. Von Hirsch A, Ashworth A. 2005. Proportionate Sentences: Exploring the Principles Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Von Hirsch A, Jareborg N. 1991. Gauging criminal harm: a living-standard analysis. Oxford J. Legal Stud. 11:1–38
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Woods JB. 2015. Decriminalization, police authority, and routine traffic stops. UCLA Law Rev 62:672–759
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Woods JB. 2021. Traffic without the police. Stanf. Law Rev. 73:1471–549
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Xiong M, Liang B. 2013. Solving the puzzle of overcriminalization? The experience of decriminalization in China. Crime Justice Int 21:47–98
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Yaffe G. 2018. Mens rea by the numbers. Crim. Law Philos. 12:393–409
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Yaffe G. 2022. The norm-shift theory of punishment. Ethics 132:478–507
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Zimmerman MJ. 2011. The Immorality of Punishment Buffalo, NY: Broadview Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030421-040411
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error