1932

Abstract

This manuscript provides an overview of state-level research on penal change in the United States in the latter half of the twentieth century. It outlines how research focused on developments in the states provides unique insights into the forces that helped drive mass incarceration and has generated rich historical accounts of how mass incarceration emerged within specific contexts. It charts some of the new theorizing that has emerged from state case studies, including those emphasizing how penal change is characterized by conflict and others that conceptualize state developments as they interact with federal processes. These insights are then considered against broader national theories of punishment. The manuscript outlines how some of the key forces operating at the state level, including penal cultures, institutional structures, and interest-group activism, conditioned state penal trajectories. Lastly, the piece identifies potential avenues for future state-level research on the forces shaping penal law and policy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-091957
2018-01-13
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/criminol/1/1/annurev-criminol-032317-091957.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-091957&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Alexander M. 2010. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Color Blindness New York: The New Press
  2. Aviram H. 2015. Cheap on Crime: Recession Era Politics and the Transformation of American Punishment Berkeley, CA: Univ. Calif. Press
  3. Ball D. 2012. Tough on crime (on the state's dime): how violent crime does not drive California counties’ incarceration rate and why it should. Ga. St. L. Rev. 28:987–1084 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barker V. 2009. The Politics of Imprisonment: How the Democratic Process Shapes the Way America Punishes Offenders Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  5. Beckett K. 1997. Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  6. Beckett K, Sasson T. 2001. The Politics of Injustice: Crime and Punishment in America Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publ.
  7. Berk RA, Brassman H, Lesser S. 1977. A Measure of Justice: An Empirical Study of Changes in the California Penal Code, 1955–1971 New York: Academic
  8. Bourdieu P. 1987. The force of law: toward a sociology of the juridicial field. Hastings Law Rev 38:805–53 [Google Scholar]
  9. Campbell MC. 2011. Politics, prisons, and law enforcement: an examination of “law and order” politics in Texas. Law Soc. Rev. 45:3631–66 [Google Scholar]
  10. Campbell MC. 2012. Ornery alligators and soap on a rope: Texas prosecutors and punishment reform in the Lone Star State. Theor. Criminol. 16:289–311 [Google Scholar]
  11. Campbell MC. 2014. The emergence of penal extremism in California: a dynamic view of institutional structures and political processes. Law Soc. Rev. 48:2377–409 [Google Scholar]
  12. Campbell MC. 2016. Are all politics local? A case study of local conditions in a period of law and order politics. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 664:43–61 [Google Scholar]
  13. Campbell MC, Schoenfeld H. 2013. The transformation of America's penal order: a historicized political sociology of punishment. Am. J. Sociol. 118:51375–423 [Google Scholar]
  14. Campbell MC, Vogel M, Williams J. 2015. Historical contingencies and the evolving importance of race, violent crime and region in explaining mass incarceration in the United States. Criminology 53:2180–203 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cate SD. 2010. Untangling prison expansion in Oregon: political narratives and policy outcomes MA Thesis, Univ. Or Eugene:
  16. Clear TR, Frost NA. 2014. The Punishment Imperative: The Rise and Fall of Mass Incarceration in America New York: New York Univ. Press
  17. Feeley MM, Sarat AD. 1980. The Policy Dilemma: Federal Crime Policy and the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration Minneapolis, MN: Univ. Minn. Press
  18. Feeley MM, Simon J. 1992. The new penology: notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology 30:4449–74 [Google Scholar]
  19. Garland D. 1985. Punishment and Penal Welfare: A History of Penal Strategies. Farnham, UK: Gower Publ. [Google Scholar]
  20. Garland D. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press
  21. Gilmore RW. 2007. Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, and Opposition in Globalizing California Los Angeles: Univ. Calif. Press
  22. Goodman. 2012. “Another second chance”: rethinking rehabilitation through the lens of California's prison fire camps. Soc. Probl. 59:4437–58 [Google Scholar]
  23. Goodman P, Page J, Phelps M. 2017. Breaking the Pendulum: The Long Struggle Over Criminal Justice New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  24. Gottschalk M. 2006. The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  25. Gottschalk M. 2014. Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  26. Gray V. 2008. The socioeconomic and political contexts of the states. Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis V Gray, RL Hanson 1–39 Washington, DC: CQ Press [Google Scholar]
  27. Greenberg DF, West V. 2001. State prison populations and their growth, 1971–1991. Criminology 39:3615–54 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hinton E. 2016. From the War on Poverty to the War on Crime: The Making of Mass Incarceration in America Cambridge: MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  29. Irwin J. 2005. The Warehouse Prison: Disposal of the New Dangerous Class Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publ.
  30. Jacobs D, Carmichael JT. 2001. The politics of punishment across time and space: a pooled time-series analysis of imprisonment rates. Soc. Forces 80:61–89 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kaeble D, Glaze L. 2016. Correctional Populations in the United States, 2015 Bur. Justice Stat. Rep. NCJ 250374, U.S. Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
  32. Kruttschnitt C, Gartner R. 2005. Making Time in the Golden State: Women's Imprisonment in California New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  33. Lacey N, Soskice D. 2015. Crime, punishment and segregation in the United States: the paradox of local democracy. Punishm. Soc. 17:4454–81 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lynch M. 2010. Sunbelt Justice: Arizona and the Transformation of American Punishment Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  35. Lynch M. 2011. Mass incarceration, legal change and locale: understanding and remediating American penal overindulgence. Crime Public Policy 10:3673–98 [Google Scholar]
  36. Miller L. 2008. The Perils of Federalism: Race, Poverty, and the Politics of Crime Control New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  37. Murakawa N. 2014. The First Civil Right: How Liberals Built Prison in America New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  38. Neptune JH. 2012. The Making of the Carceral State: Street Crime, the War on Drugs, and Punitive Politics in New York, 1951–1973 Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago
  39. Page J. 2011. The “Toughest Beat”: Politics, Punishment, and the Prison Officers’ Union in California New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  40. Page J. 2012. The state of the job: an embedded work role perspective on prisoner officer attitudes. Punishm. Soc. 15:5503–29 [Google Scholar]
  41. Perkinson R. 2010. Texas Tough: The Rise of America's Prison Empire. New York: Metropolitan Books [Google Scholar]
  42. Phelps M. 2017. Mass probation: toward a more robust theory of state variation in punishment. Punishm. Soc. 19:153–73 [Google Scholar]
  43. President's Comm. Law Enforc. Adm. Justice. 1967. The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society Washington, DC: U.S. Gov. Print. Office
  44. Rubin A. 2015. A neo-institutional account of prison diffusion. Law Soc 49:2365–400 [Google Scholar]
  45. Schoenfeld H. 2010. Mass incarceration and the paradox of prison conditions litigation. Law Soc. 443–4731–68
  46. Shannon SKS. 2013. Does the right hand know what the left hand is doing? General assistance welfare, crime and punishment in the United States Ph.D. Diss., Univ. Minn St. Paul:
  47. Simon J. 2007. Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  48. Simon J. 2014. Mass Incarceration on Trial: A Remarable Court Decision and the Future of Prisons in America New York: New Press
  49. Soss J, Fording RC, Schram SF. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press
  50. Spelman W. 2009. Crime, cash, and limited options: explaining the prison boom. Crime Public Policy 8:129–77 [Google Scholar]
  51. Stuntz WJ. 2008. Unequal justice. Harv. Law Rev. 121:81969–2040 [Google Scholar]
  52. Tonry M. 1995. Malign Neglect: Race, Crime and Punishment in America New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  53. Verma A. 2016. A turning point in mass incarceration? Local imprisonment trajectories and decarceration under California's realignment. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 664:108–35 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wacquant L. 2001. Deadly symbiosis: when ghetto and prison meet and mesh. Punishm. Soc. 3:195–134 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wacquant L. 2006. Deadly Symbiosis: Race and the Rise of Neoliberal Penality Oxford: Polity Press
  56. Walker S. 1998. Popular Justice: A History of American Criminal Justice New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2nd ed..
  57. Weaver VM. 2007. Frontlash: race and the development of punitive crime policy. Stud. Am. Political Dev. 21:230–65 [Google Scholar]
  58. Zimring F. 2010. The scale of imprisonment in the United States: 20th century patterns and 21st century prospects. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 100:1225–45 [Google Scholar]
  59. Zimring F, Hawkins G. 1991. The Scale of Imprisonment Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press
  60. Zimring F, Hawkins G, Kamin S. 2001. Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You're Out in California Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-091957
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error