1932

Abstract

Rates of street crime have dropped substantially over the past several decades, but important nuances of this decline are underappreciated and the reasons for it remain unclear. We suggest that the narrow conception of change adopted within criminology has hindered the field's capacity to develop a stronger scientific understanding of crime trends. Criminology has focused heavily on within-person changes in crime, devoting comparatively little attention to changes in aggregate crime rates. In this review, we make a case for integrating research on crime trends into the core of criminology. After describing the late twentieth century crime drop, we present a conceptual framework that situates the study of crime trends in the criminological theoretical literature and illuminates several unresolved questions central to criminological inquiry. We then highlight major shortcomings of current empirical approaches and outline several methodological improvements that would enhance our capacity to describe and explain crime trends.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092339
2018-01-13
2024-06-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/criminol/1/1/annurev-criminol-032317-092339.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092339&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson E. 1999. Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City New York: Norton [Google Scholar]
  2. Andresen MA, Curman AS, Linning SJ. 2016. The trajectories of crime at places: understanding the patterns of disaggregated crime types. J. Quant. Criminol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9301-1 [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baumer EP. 2008. An empirical assessment of the contemporary crime trends puzzle: a modest step toward a more comprehensive research agenda. Understanding Crime Trends A Goldberger, R Rosenfeld 127–76 Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  4. Baumer EP, Cundiff K. 2017. The contemporary transformation of American youth: an analysis of changes in the prevalence of criminal activity, 1991–2015 Work. Pap., Dep. Soc. Criminol. Pa. State Univ. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumer EP, Rosenfeld R, Wolff KT. 2012. Expanding the scope of research on recent crime trends Natl. Inst. Justice Rep. 2008-IJ-CX-0014 Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  6. Baumer EP, Wolff KT. 2014a. The breadth and causes of contemporary cross-national homicide trends. Crime Justice 43:1231–87 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baumer EP, Wolff KT. 2014b. Evaluating contemporary crime drops in America, New York City, and many other places. Justice Q 31:5–38 [Google Scholar]
  8. Baumer EP, Lauritsen J, Rosenfeld R, Wright R. 1998. The influence of crack cocaine on robbery, burglary, and homicide rates: a cross city, longitudinal analysis. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 33:316–40 [Google Scholar]
  9. Berg MT, Baumer EP, Rosenfeld R. 2016. Dissecting the prevalence and incidence of offending during the crime drop of the 1990s. J. Quant. Criminol. 32:377–96 [Google Scholar]
  10. Blumstein A. 1995. Youth violence, guns, and the illicit-drug industry. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 86:10–36 [Google Scholar]
  11. Blumstein A, Rosenfeld R. 1998. Explaining recent trends in US homicide rates. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 88:1175–216 [Google Scholar]
  12. Blumstein A, Wallman J. 2006. The Crime Drop in America Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  13. Braga AA, Hureau DM, Papachristos AV. 2011. The relevance of micro places to citywide robbery trends: a longitudinal analysis of robbery incidents at street corners and block faces in Boston. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 48:7–32 [Google Scholar]
  14. Braga AA, Papachristos AV, Hureau DM. 2010. The concentration and stability of gun violence at micro places in Boston, 1980–2008. J Quant. Criminol. 26:33–53 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bur. Justice Stat. 2017a. National Crime Victimization Survey (1973–2015) Washington, DC: US Dep. Justice. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bur. Justice Stat. 2017b. Uniform Crime Reporting Statistics Washington, DC: US Dep. Justice. https://www.bjs.gov/ucrdata/ [Google Scholar]
  17. Burt CH, Sweeten G, Simons RL. 2014. Self-control through emerging adulthood: instability, multidimensionality, and criminological significance. Criminology 52:450–87 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cantor D, Land KC. 1985. Unemployment and crime rates in the post-World War II United States: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Am. Sociol. Rev. 50:317–32 [Google Scholar]
  19. Carr PJ. 2003. The new parochialism: the implications of the beltway case for arguments concerning informal social control. Am. J. Sociol. 108:1249–91 [Google Scholar]
  20. Carr PJ. 2005. Clean Streets: Controlling Crime, Maintaining Order, and Building Community Activism New York: NYU Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Cohen LE, Felson M. 1979. Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am. Sociol. Rev. 44:4588–608 [Google Scholar]
  22. Contreras R. 2012. The Stickup Kids: Race, Drugs, Violence, and the American Dream Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  23. Cook PJ, Laub JH. 1998. The unprecedented epidemic in youth violence. Crime Justice 24:127–64 [Google Scholar]
  24. Cook PJ, Laub JH. 2002. After the epidemic: recent trends in youth violence in the United States. Crime Justice 29:11–37 [Google Scholar]
  25. Cook PJ, MacDonald J. 2011. Public safety through private action: an economic assessment of BIDS. Econ. J. 121:445–62 [Google Scholar]
  26. Cooper A, Smith EL. 2011. Homicide trends in the United States, 1980–2008 Bur. Justice Stat. Rep. NCJ 236018, US Dep. Justice Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  27. Curman AS, Andresen MA, Brantingham PJ. 2015. Crime and place: a longitudinal examination of street segment patterns in Vancouver, BC. J. Quant. Criminol. 31:127–47 [Google Scholar]
  28. Denzin NK. 1970. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publ. [Google Scholar]
  29. Donohue JJ, Levitt SD. 2001. The impact of legalized abortion on crime. Q. J. Econ. 116:1379–420 [Google Scholar]
  30. Duck W. 2016. No Way Out: Precarious Living in the Shadow of Poverty and Drug Dealing Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Eisner M. 2008. Modernity strikes back? A historical perspective on the latest increase in interpersonal violence (1960–1990). Int. J. Confl. Violence 2:2288–316 [Google Scholar]
  32. Farrell G, Tilley N, Tseloni A. 2014. Why the crime drop?. Crime Justice 43:421–90 [Google Scholar]
  33. Farrell G, Tseloni A, Mailley J, Tilley N. 2011. The crime drop and the security hypothesis. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 48:2147–75 [Google Scholar]
  34. Fay RE, Diallo MS. 2015. Developmental estimates of subnational crime rates based on the National Crime Victimization Survey Bur. Justice Stat. Rep. NCJ 249238, US Dep. Justice Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  35. Fed. Bur. Investig. 2014. Crime in the U.S. US Dep. Justice Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  36. Fed. Bur. Investig. 2015. Crime in the U.S. US Dep. Justice Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  37. Fed. Bur. Investig. 2017. Crime in the U.S. US Dep. Justice. Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  38. Felson M, Clarke VG. 1998. Opportunity Makes the Thief: Practical Theory for Crime Prevention London: Home Office [Google Scholar]
  39. Fox JA, Zawitz MW. 2007. Homicide Trends in the United States Washington, DC: Bur. Justice Stat https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/htius.pdf [Google Scholar]
  40. Friedson M, Sharkey P. 2015. Violence and neighborhood disadvantage after the crime decline. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 660:1341–58 [Google Scholar]
  41. Fryer RG, Heaton PS, Levitt SD, Murphy KM. 2013. Measuring crack cocaine and its impact. Econ. Inq. 51:1651–81 [Google Scholar]
  42. Glueck S, Glueck E. 1950. Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency New York: Commonwealth [Google Scholar]
  43. Goldberger A, Rosenfeld R. 2008. Understanding Crime Trends Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  44. Goodkind S, Wallace JM, Shook JJ, Bachman J, O'Malley P. 2009. Are girls really becoming more delinquent? Testing the gender convergence hypothesis by race and ethnicity, 1976–2005. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 31:8885–95 [Google Scholar]
  45. Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T. 1990. A General Theory of Crime Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  46. Greenberg DF. 2014. Studying New York City's crime decline: methodological issues. Justice Q 31:153–88 [Google Scholar]
  47. Griffiths E, Chavez JM. 2004. Communities, street guns and homicide trajectories in Chicago, 1980–1995: merging methods for examining homicide trends across space and time. Criminology 42:941–78 [Google Scholar]
  48. Harding DJ. 2010. Living the Drama: Community, Conflict, and Culture Among Inner-City Boys Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  49. Hirschi T. 1989. Exploring alternatives to integrated theory. Theoretical Integration in the Study of Deviance and Crime: Problems and Prospects SF Messner, MD Krohn, AE Liska 37–50 Albany, NY: SUNY Press [Google Scholar]
  50. Jensen GF, Karpos M. 1993. Managing rape: exploratory research on the behavior of rape statistics. Criminology 31:363–85 [Google Scholar]
  51. Johnson R, Raphael S. 2012. How much crime reduction does the marginal prisoner buy?. J. Law Econ. 55:275–310 [Google Scholar]
  52. Kann L, McManus T, Harris WA, Shanklin SL, Flint KH. et al. 2016. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—United States, 2015 Atlanta, GA: Cent. Dis. Control [Google Scholar]
  53. Katz J. 1988. Seductions of Crime: Moral and Sensual Attractions in Doing Evil New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
  54. Klick J, MacDonald J, Stratmann T. 2012. Mobile phones and crime deterrence: an underappreciated link. Research Handbook on the Economics of Criminal Law A Harel, KN Hylton 243–56 Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publ. [Google Scholar]
  55. Kornhauser RR. 1978. Social Sources of Delinquency: An Appraisal of Analytic Models Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  56. Krivo LJ, Vélez MB, Lyons CJ. 2014. Collaborative research: crime and community in a changing society: the National Neighborhood Crime Study 2 Natl. Sci. Found. Rep. 1356252, Natl. Sci Found. Arlington, Va: https://nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1357207 [Google Scholar]
  57. LaFree G. 1998. Losing Legitimacy: Street Crime and the Decline of Social Institutions in America Boulder, CO: Westview Press [Google Scholar]
  58. LaFree G. 1999. Declining violent crime rates in the 1990s: predicting crime booms and busts. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 25:1145–68 [Google Scholar]
  59. Lauritsen JL, Heimer K, Lang JB. 2017. The enduring significance of race and ethnic disparities in male violent victimization: an analysis of U.S. NCVS micro-data, 1973–2010. Work. Pap. Univ. Mo., St. Louis: Dep. Criminol. Crim. Justice [Google Scholar]
  60. Lauritsen JL, Cork DL. 2016. Modernizing Crime Statistics: Report 1—Defining and Classifying Crime Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  61. Lauritsen JL, Rezey ML, Heimer K. 2014. Violence and economic conditions in the U.S., 1973–2011: gender, race, and ethnicity patterns in the NCVS. J. Contemp. Crim. Justice 30:7–28 [Google Scholar]
  62. Lauritsen JL, Rezey ML, Heimer K. 2016. When choice of data matters: analyses of U.S. crime trends, 1973–2012. J. Quant. Criminol. 32:335–55 [Google Scholar]
  63. Levitt SD. 2004. Understanding why crime fell in the 1990s: four factors that explain the decline and six that do not. J. Econ. Perspect. 18:1163–90 [Google Scholar]
  64. Lidsky TI, Schneider JS. 2003. Lead neurotoxicity in children: basic mechanisms and clinical correlates. Brain 126:5–19 [Google Scholar]
  65. Mac Donald H. 2016. The War on Cops: How the New Attack on Law and Order Makes Everyone Less Safe New York: Encounter Books [Google Scholar]
  66. Major Cities Chiefs Assoc. 2017. Violent crime survey—totals. Year end comparison, January 1 to December 31, 2016 and 2015. https://www.majorcitieschiefs.com/pdf/news/violent_crime_data_20162015_year_end_report.pdf
  67. Marvell TB, Moody CE. 1996. Specification problems, police levels, and crime rates. Criminology 34:609–46 [Google Scholar]
  68. McCall PL, Land KC, Parker KF. 2010. An empirical assessment of what we know about structural covariates of homicide rates: a return to a classic 20 years later. Homicide Stud 14:3219–43 [Google Scholar]
  69. McDowall D, Loftin C. 2009. Do US city crime rates follow a national trend? The influence of nationwide conditions on local crime patterns. J. Quant. Criminol. 25:3307–24 [Google Scholar]
  70. Meier RF, Kennedy LW, Sacco VF. 2001. Advances in Criminological Theory 9 The Process and Structure of Crime: Criminal Events and Crime Analysis New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publ. [Google Scholar]
  71. Meithe TD, Hughes M, McDowall D. 1991. Social change and crime rates: an evaluation of alternative theoretical approaches. Soc. Forces 70:165–85 [Google Scholar]
  72. Narag RE, Pizarro J, Gibbs C. 2009. Lead exposure and its implications for criminological theory. Crim. Justice Behav. 36:954–73 [Google Scholar]
  73. Natl. Cent. Health Stat. 2017. Web-Based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System Atlanta, GA: Cent. Dis. Control https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/fatal_injury_reports.html [Google Scholar]
  74. Needleman H. 2004. Lead poisoning. Annu. Rev. Med. 55:209–22 [Google Scholar]
  75. Nevin R. 2007. Understanding international crime trends: the legacy of preschool lead exposure. Environ. Res. 104:3315–36 [Google Scholar]
  76. O'Brien RM. 2003. UCR violent crime rates, 1958–2000: recorded and offender-generated trends. Soc. Sci. Res. 32:499–518 [Google Scholar]
  77. Orrick EA, Piquero AR. 2015. Were cell phones associated with lower crime in the 1990s and 2000s?. J. Crim. Justice 38:2222–34 [Google Scholar]
  78. Ousey GC, Kubrin CE. 2009. Exploring the connection between immigration and violent crime rates in US cities, 1980–2000. Soc. Probl. 56:2447–73 [Google Scholar]
  79. Ousey GC, Lee MR. 2004. Investigating the connections between race, illicit drug markets, and lethal violence, 1984–1997. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 41:352–83 [Google Scholar]
  80. Pratt TC, Cullen FT. 2000. The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime: a meta-analysis. Criminology 38:931–64 [Google Scholar]
  81. Reyes JW. 2007. Environmental policy as social policy? The impact of childhood lead exposure on crime. B.E. J. Econ. Anal. 7:11–51 [Google Scholar]
  82. Reyes JW. 2015. Lead exposure and behavior: effects on aggression and risky behavior among children and adolescents. Econ. Inq. 53:1580–605 [Google Scholar]
  83. Rosenfeld R. 2016. Documenting and Explaining the 2015 Homicide Rise: Research Directions Washington, DC: Natl. Inst. Justice [Google Scholar]
  84. Rosenfeld R. 2015. Was There a “Ferguson Effect” on Crime in St. Louis? Washington, DC: Sentencing Proj http://sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Ferguson-Effect.pdf [Google Scholar]
  85. Rosenfeld R. 2009. Crime is the problem: homicide, acquisitive crime, and economic conditions. J. Quant. Criminol. 25:287–306 [Google Scholar]
  86. Rosenfeld R. 2007. Explaining the divergence between UCR and NCVS aggravated assault trends. Understanding Crime Statistics: Revisiting the Divergence of the NCVS and the UCR JP Lynch, LA Addington 251–68 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  87. Rosenfeld R. 2000. Patterns in adult homicide: 1980–1995. The Crime Drop in America A Blumstein, J Wallman 130–63 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  88. Rosenfeld R, Deckard MJ, Blackburn E. 2014. The effects of directed patrol and self‐initiated enforcement on firearm violence: a randomized controlled study of hot spot policing. Criminology 52:428–49 [Google Scholar]
  89. Rosenfeld R, Edberg M, Fang X, Florence CS. 2013. Economics and Youth Violence Crime, Disadvantage, and Community New York: NYU Press [Google Scholar]
  90. Rosenfeld R, Fornango R. 2007. The impact of economic conditions on robbery and property crime: the role of consumer sentiment. Criminology 45:4735–69 [Google Scholar]
  91. Rosenfeld R, Fornango R, Baumer EP. 2005. Did Ceasefire, Compstat, and Exile reduce homicide?. Criminol. Public Policy 4:419–50 [Google Scholar]
  92. Rosenfeld R, Levin A. 2016. Acquisitive crime and inflation in the United States: 1960–2012. J. Quant. Criminol. 32:427–47 [Google Scholar]
  93. Rosenfeld R, Weisburd D. 2016. Explaining recent crime trends: introduction to the special issue. J. Quant. Criminol. 32:329–34 [Google Scholar]
  94. Roth R. 2010. American Homicide Cambridge, MA: Harv. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  95. Sampson R. 2008. Rethinking immigration and crime. Contexts 7:128–33 [Google Scholar]
  96. Sampson RJ. 2012. Great American city: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  97. Shaw CR, McKay HD. 1942. Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  98. Small ML. 2002. Culture, cohorts, and social organization theory: understanding local participation in a Latino housing project. Am. J. Sociol. 108:11–54 [Google Scholar]
  99. Snyder HN. 2013. Building a system of national crime statistics for the 21st century. Criminologist 38:19–21 [Google Scholar]
  100. Spelman W. 2013. Prisons and crime, backwards in high heels. J. Quant. Criminol. 29:643–74 [Google Scholar]
  101. Stowell JI, Messner SF, McGeever KF, Raffalovich LE. 2009. Immigration and the recent violent crime drop in the United States: a pooled, cross-sectional time-series analysis of metropolitan areas. Criminology 47:3889–928 [Google Scholar]
  102. Stults BJ. 2010. Determinants of Chicago neighborhood homicide trajectories: 1965–1995. Homicide Stud 14:3244–67 [Google Scholar]
  103. Tittle CR. 1995. Control Balance: Toward a General Theory of Deviance Boulder, CO: Westview Press [Google Scholar]
  104. Travis J, Western B, Redburn S. 2014. The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  105. Truman JL, Morgan RE. 2016. Criminal Victimization, 2015 Washington, DC: US Dep. Justice [Google Scholar]
  106. US Dep. Justice. 2013. Reporting Rape in 2014: Summary Reporting System (SRS) User Manual and Technical Specification Washington, DC: Fed. Bur. Investig. Crim. Justice Inf. Serv. Div. [Google Scholar]
  107. Vargas R. 2016. Wounded City: Violent Turf Wars in a Chicago Barrio Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  108. Weisburd D, Braga AA, Groff ER, Wooditch A. 2017. Can hot spots policing reduce crime in urban areas? An agent-based simulation. Criminology 55:137–73 [Google Scholar]
  109. Weisburd D, Groff ER, Yang S. 2012. The Criminology of Place: Street Segments and Our Understanding of the Crime Problem New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  110. Weisburd D, Bushway S, Lum C, Yang S. 2004. Trajectories of crime at places: a longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology 42:283–322 [Google Scholar]
  111. Wheeler AP, Worden RE, McLean SJ. 2016. Replicating group-based trajectory models of crime at micro-places in Albany, NY. J. Quant. Criminol. 32:589–612 [Google Scholar]
  112. Wright R, Decker S. 1994. Burglars on the Job: Streetlife and Residential Break-Ins Boston: Northeastern Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  113. Wright R, Decker S. 1997. Armed Robbers in Action: Stickups and Street Culture Boston: Northeastern Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  114. Wright R, Tekin E, Topalli V, McClellan C, Dickinson T, Rosenfeld R. 2014. Less cash, less crime: evidence from the electronic benefit transfer program Work. Pap., Natl. Bur. Econ. Res. [Google Scholar]
  115. Xie M, Lauritsen JL, Heimer K. 2012. Intimate partner violence in U.S. metropolitan areas: the contextual influences of police and social services. Criminology 50:4961–92 [Google Scholar]
  116. Zimring FE. 2007. The Great American Crime Decline Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092339
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092339
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error