This article reviews recent research regarding high-skilled migration. We adopt a data-driven perspective, bringing together and describing several ongoing research streams that range from the construction of global migration databases, to the legal codification of national policies regarding high-skilled migration, to the analysis of patent data regarding cross-border inventor movements. A common theme throughout this research is the importance of agglomeration economies for explaining high-skilled migration. We highlight some key recent findings and outline major gaps in the literature that we hope will be tackled in the near future.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Agrawal A, Kapur D, McHale J, Oettl A. 2011. Brain drain or brain bank? The impact of skilled emigration on poor-country innovation. J. Urban Econ. 69:43–55 [Google Scholar]
  2. Akcigit U, Baslandze S, Stantcheva S. 2016. Taxation and the international migration of inventors. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:102930–81 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alesina A, Harnoss J, Rapoport H. 2016. Birthplace diversity and economic growth. J. Econ. Growth 21:101101–38 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson S. 2013. The importance of international students to America Policy Brief, Natl. Found. Am. Policy Arlington, VA: [Google Scholar]
  5. Antecol H, Cobb-Clark DA, Trejo SJ. 2003. Immigration policy and the skills of immigrants to Australia, Canada, and the United States. J. Hum. Resour. 38:1192–218 [Google Scholar]
  6. Arslan C, Dumont J-C, Kone Z, Moullan Y, Özden Ç. et al. 2014. A new profile of migrants in the aftermath of the recent economic crisis Work. Pap. 160, Soc. Employ. Migr., Org. Econ. Coop. Dev. Paris: [Google Scholar]
  7. Artuç E, Docquier F, Özden Ç, Parsons C. 2015. A global assessment of human capital mobility: the role of non-OECD destinations. World Dev 65:16–26 [Google Scholar]
  8. Artuç E, Özden Ç. 2017. Transit migration: All roads lead to America. Econ. J. In press [Google Scholar]
  9. Aydemir A, Robinson C. 2008. Global labor markets, return and onward migration. Can. J. Econ. 41:41285–311 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bandiera O, Rasul I, Viarengo M. 2013. The making of modern America: migratory flows in the age of mass migration. J. Dev. Econ. 102:123–47 [Google Scholar]
  11. Barro R, Lee J-W. 2013. A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. J. Dev. Econ. 104:184–98 [Google Scholar]
  12. Beine M, Boucher A, Burgoon B, Crock M, Gest J. et al. 2015a. Comparing immigration policies: an overview from the IMPALA database. Int. Migr. Rev. 50:827–63 [Google Scholar]
  13. Beine M, Boucher A, Burgoon B, Crock M, Gest J. et al. 2015b. Measuring immigration policies: preliminary evidence from IMPALA. CESifo Econ. Stud. 61:527–59 [Google Scholar]
  14. Beine M, Docquier F, Ozden C. 2011. Diasporas. J. Dev. Econ. 95:130–41 [Google Scholar]
  15. Beine M, Docquier F, Rapoport H. 2007. Measuring international skilled migration: a new database controlling for age of entry. World Bank Econ. Rev. 21:2249–54 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bhagwati J. 1976. Taxing the brain drain. Challenge 19:334–48 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bhargava A, Docquier F, Moullan Y. 2011. Modeling the effect of physician emigration on human development. Econ. Hum. Biol. 2:9172–83 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bijwaard G. 2010. Immigrant migration dynamics model for the Netherlands. J. Popul. Econ. 23:1213–47 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bijwaard G, Wahba J. 2014. Do high or low income immigrants leave faster?. J. Dev. Econ. 108:54–68 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bjerre L, Helbling M, Römer F, Zobel M. 2014. Conceptualizing and measuring immigration policies: a comparative perspective. Int. Migr. Rev. 49:3555–600 [Google Scholar]
  21. Boeri T, Brücker H, Docquier F, Rapoport H. 2012. Brain Drain and Brain Gain: The Global Competition to Attract High-Skilled Migrants Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  22. Borjas G. 1987. Self-selection and the earnings of immigrants. Am. Econ. Rev. 77:531–53 [Google Scholar]
  23. Borjas G. 1991. Immigrants in the US labor market: 1940–80. Am. Econ. Rev. 81:2287–91 [Google Scholar]
  24. Borjas G. 2005. Do foreign students crowd out native students from graduate programs?. Science and the University R Ehrenberg, P Stephan 134–49 Madison, WI: Univ. Wisc. Press [Google Scholar]
  25. Borjas G. 2006. Immigration in high-skill labor markets: the impact of foreign students on the earnings of doctorates NBER Work. Pap 12085 [Google Scholar]
  26. Borjas G, Doran K. 2012. The collapse of the Soviet Union and the productivity of American mathematicians. Q. J. Econ. 127:31143–203 [Google Scholar]
  27. Bosetti V, Cattaneo C, Verdolini E. 2015. Migration of skilled workers and innovation: a European perspective. J. Int. Econ. 96:311–22 [Google Scholar]
  28. Bound J, Braga B, Golden J, Khanna G. 2015a. Recruitment of foreigners in the market for computer scientists in the United States. J. Labor Econ. 33:S1S187–223 [Google Scholar]
  29. Bound J, Demirci M, Khanna G, Turner S. 2015b. Finishing degrees and finding jobs: US higher education and the flow of foreign IT workers. Innov. Policy Econ. 15:127–72 [Google Scholar]
  30. Branstetter L, Li G, Veloso F. 2015. The rise of international co-invention. The Changing Frontier: Rethinking Science and Innovation Policy A Jaffe, B Jones 135–68 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Breschi S, Lissoni F, Miguelez E. 2015. Foreign inventors in the US: testing for diaspora and brain gain effects CReAM Work. Pap. 09/15, Cent. Res. Anal. Migr, Univ. Coll London: [Google Scholar]
  32. Breschi S, Lissoni F, Tarasconi G. 2014. Inventor data for research on migration and innovation: a survey and a pilot Work. Pap. 17, WIPO Econ. Res. Geneva: [Google Scholar]
  33. Carlino G, Kerr W. 2015. Agglomeration and innovation. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics 5 G Duranton, JV Henderson, W Strange 349–404 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  34. Chiquiar D, Hanson G. 2005. International migration, self-selection, and the distribution of wages: evidence from Mexico and the United States. J. Polit. Econ. 113:2239–81 [Google Scholar]
  35. Choudhury P. 2016. Return migration and geography of innovation in MNEs: a natural experiment of knowledge production by local workers reporting to return migrants. J. Econ. Geogr. 16:3585–610 [Google Scholar]
  36. Clemens M. 2013. Why do programmers earn more in Houston than Hyderabad? Evidence from randomized processing of US visas. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 103:3198–202 [Google Scholar]
  37. Clemens M, Pettersson G. 2008. New data on African health professionals abroad. Hum. Resour. Health 6:1 https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-6-1 [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  38. Cobb-Clark DA. 2003. Public policy and the labor market adjustment of new immigrants to Australia. J. Popul. Econ. 16:4655–81 [Google Scholar]
  39. Czaika M, Parsons C. 2016. High skilled migration in times of global economic crisis Work. Pap. 126, Int. Migr. Inst. Oxford, UK: [Google Scholar]
  40. Czaika M, Parsons C. 2017. The gravity of high-skilled migration policies. Demography 54:603–30 [Google Scholar]
  41. Czaika M, Toma S. 2015. Path-dependency in international academic careers Work. Pap. 108, Int. Migr. Inst. Oxford, UK: [Google Scholar]
  42. Dao TH, Docquier F, Parsons C, Peri G. 2016. Migration and development: dissecting the anatomy of the mobility transition Work. Pap. 10272, Inst. Study Labor Bonn, Ger.: [Google Scholar]
  43. de Haas H, Natter K, Vezzoli S. 2016. Growing restrictiveness or changing selection? The nature and evolution of migration policies. Int. Migr. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/imre.12288 [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  44. Docquier F, Lodigiani E. 2010. Skilled migration and business networks. Open Econ. Rev. 21:4565–88 [Google Scholar]
  45. Docquier F, Lowell L, Marfouk A. 2009. A gendered assessment of highly skilled emigration. Popul. Dev. Rev. 35:2297–322 [Google Scholar]
  46. Docquier F, Marfouk A. 2006. International migration by educational attainment (1990–2000) International Migration, Remittances and Development Ç Özden, M Schiff 151–201 New York: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  47. Docquier F, Özden Ç, Peri G. 2014. The labor market effects of immigration and emigration in OECD countries. Econ. J. 124:5791106–45 [Google Scholar]
  48. Docquier F, Rapoport H. 2012. Globalization, brain drain, and development. J. Econ. Lit. 50:3681–730 [Google Scholar]
  49. Doran K, Gelber A, Isen A. 2014. The effects of high-skilled immigration policy on firms: evidence from visa lotteries NBER Work. Pap 20668 [Google Scholar]
  50. Dumont J-C, Lemaître G. 2005. Counting immigrants and expatriates in OECD countries. OECD Econ. Stud. 3:149–83 [Google Scholar]
  51. Dumont J-C, Martin JP, Spielvogel G. 2007. Women on the move: the neglected gender dimension of the brain drain Work. Pap. 2920, Inst. Study Labor Bonn, Ger.: [Google Scholar]
  52. Dumont J-C, Spielvogel G, Widmaier S. 2010. International migrants in developed, emerging and developing countries: an extended profile Working Pap. 114, Soc. Employ. Migr., Org. Econ. Coop. Dev. Paris: [Google Scholar]
  53. Dustmann C, Frattini T. 2014. The fiscal impacts of immigration into the UK. Econ. J. 124:F593–643 [Google Scholar]
  54. Dustmann C, Weiss Y. 2007. Return migration: theory and empirical evidence from the UK. Br. J. Ind. Relat. 45:2236–56 [Google Scholar]
  55. Eaton J, Kortum S. 2002. Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica 70:51741–79 [Google Scholar]
  56. Facchini G, Mayda AM, Mishra P. 2011. Do interest groups affect US immigration policy?. J. Int. Econ. 85:1114–28 [Google Scholar]
  57. Fairlie R, Lofstrom M. 2014. Immigration and entrepreneurship. Handbook on the Economics of International Migration B Chiswick, P Miller 877–911 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  58. Falkner R. 1895. The International Statistical Institute. Publ. Am. Stat. Assoc. 4:32358–65 [Google Scholar]
  59. Finn M. 2007. Stay rates of foreign doctorate recipients from US universities, 2005 Rep., Oak Ridge Inst. Sci. Educ. Oak Ridge, TN: [Google Scholar]
  60. Foley CF, Kerr W. 2013. Ethnic innovation and US multinational firm activity. Manag. Sci. 59:71529–44 [Google Scholar]
  61. Franzoni C, Scellato G, Stephan P. 2012. Foreign born scientists: mobility patterns for sixteen countries. Nat. Biotechnol. 30:121250–53 [Google Scholar]
  62. Freeman R. 2013. One ring to rule them all? Globalization of knowledge and knowledge creation NBER Work. Pap 19301 [Google Scholar]
  63. Freeman R, Huang W. 2015. China's “Great Leap Forward” in science and engineering. Global Mobility of Research Scientists: The Economics of Who Goes Where and Why A Geuna 155–75 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  64. Gaule P. 2014. Who comes back and when? Return migration decisions of academic scientists. Econ. Lett. 124:3461–64 [Google Scholar]
  65. Gest JM, Beine M, Boucher A, Burgoon B, Crock M. et al. 2014. Measuring and comparing immigration, asylum and naturalization policies across countries: challenges and solutions. Glob. Policy 5:3261–74 [Google Scholar]
  66. Ghani E, Kerr W, Stanton C. 2014. Diasporas and outsourcing: evidence from oDesk and India. Manag. Sci. 60:71677–97 [Google Scholar]
  67. Ghosh A, Mayda AM, Ortega F. 2016. The impact of skilled migration on firm-level productivity: an investigation of publicly traded US firms Work. Pap. Georgetown Univ Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  68. Gibson J, McKenzie D. 2009. The microeconomic determinants of emigration and return migration of the best and the brightest: evidence from the Pacific Work. Pap. 3926, Inst. Study Labor Bonn, Ger.: [Google Scholar]
  69. Glaeser E. 2008. Cities, Agglomeration and Spatial Equilibrium Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  70. Green A, Green D. 1995. Canadian immigration policy: the effectiveness of the point system and other instruments. Can. J. Econ. 28:4b1006–41 [Google Scholar]
  71. Grogger J, Hanson GH. 2011. Income maximization and the selection and sorting of international migrants. J. Dev. Econ. 95:142–57 [Google Scholar]
  72. Grogger J, Hanson GH. 2015. Attracting talent: location choices of foreign-born PhDs in the United States. J. Labor Econ. 33:S1S5–38 [Google Scholar]
  73. Grossman G, Rossi-Hansberg E. 2008. Trading tasks: a simple theory of offshoring. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:51978–97 [Google Scholar]
  74. Gundel S, Peters H. 2008. What determines the duration of stay of immigrants in Germany? Evidence from a longitudinal duration analysis. Int. J. Soc. Econ. 35:11769–82 [Google Scholar]
  75. Hanson G, Kerr W, Turner S. 2017. High-Skilled Migration to the United States and Its Economic Consequences Cambridge, MA: NBER [Google Scholar]
  76. Harvey W. 2009. British and Indian scientists in Boston considering returning to their home countries. Popul. Space Place 15:493–508 [Google Scholar]
  77. Hatzigeorgiou A, Lodefalk M. 2011. Trade and migration: firm-level evidence Working Pap Örebro Univ. Örebro, Swed.: [Google Scholar]
  78. Hicks J. 1932. The Theory of Wages London: Macmillian [Google Scholar]
  79. Hira R. 2010. The H-1B and L-1 visa programs: out of control Brief. Pap., Econ. Policy Inst. Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  80. Hovhannisyan N, Keller W. 2015. International business travel: an engine of innovation?. J. Econ. Growth 20:175–104 [Google Scholar]
  81. Hunt J. 2011. Which immigrants are most innovative and entrepreneurial? Distinctions by entry visa. J. Labor Econ. 29:3417–57 [Google Scholar]
  82. Hunt J, Gauthier-Loiselle M. 2010. How much does immigration boost innovation?. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 2:231–56 [Google Scholar]
  83. Javorcik B, Özden Ç, Spatareanu M, Neagu C. 2011. Migrant networks and foreign direct investment. J. Dev. Econ. 94:2231–41 [Google Scholar]
  84. Jones C. 1995. R&D-based models of economic growth. J. Polit. Econ. 103:759–84 [Google Scholar]
  85. Kahn S, MacGarvie M. 2016. How important is US location for research in science. Rev. Econ. Stat. 98:2397–414 [Google Scholar]
  86. Kato T, Sparber C. 2013. Quotas and quality: the effect of H-1B visa restrictions on the pool of prospective undergraduate students from abroad. Rev. Econ. Stat. 95:1109–26 [Google Scholar]
  87. Keller W. 2004. International technology diffusion. J. Econ. Lit. 42:3752–82 [Google Scholar]
  88. Kerr S, Kerr W. 2011. Economic impacts of immigration: a survey. Finn. Econ. Pap. 24:11–32 [Google Scholar]
  89. Kerr S, Kerr W. 2016. Immigrant entrepreneurship NBER Work. Pap 22385 [Google Scholar]
  90. Kerr S, Kerr W. 2017. Global collaborative patents. Econ. J. In press [Google Scholar]
  91. Kerr S, Kerr W, Lincoln W. 2015a. Firms and the economics of skilled immigration. Innov. Policy Econ. 15:1115–52 [Google Scholar]
  92. Kerr S, Kerr W, Lincoln W. 2015b. Skilled immigration and the employment structures of US firms. J. Labor Econ. 33:S1S109–45 [Google Scholar]
  93. Kerr S, Kerr W, Özden Ç, Parsons C. 2016. Global talent flows. J. Econ. Perspect. 30:483–106 [Google Scholar]
  94. Kerr W. 2008. Ethnic scientific communities and international technology diffusion. Rev. Econ. Stat. 90:3518–37 [Google Scholar]
  95. Kerr W. 2013. Heterogeneous technology diffusion and Ricardian trade patterns NBER Work. Pap 19657 [Google Scholar]
  96. Kerr W. 2017. US high-skilled immigration, innovation, and entrepreneurship: empirical approaches and evidence. The International Mobility of Talent and Innovation—New Evidence and Policy Implications C Fink, E Miguelez Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press In press [Google Scholar]
  97. Kerr W, Lincoln W. 2010. The supply side of innovation: H-1B visa reforms and US ethnic invention. J. Labor Econ. 28:3473–508 [Google Scholar]
  98. Kerr W, Lincoln W, Mishra P. 2014. The dynamics of firm lobbying. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 6:4343–79 [Google Scholar]
  99. Kim J, Park J. 2013. Foreign direct investment and country-specific human capital. Econ. Inq. 51:1198–210 [Google Scholar]
  100. Kugler M, Rapoport H. 2007. International labor and capital flows: complements or substitutes. Econ. Lett. 92:2155–62 [Google Scholar]
  101. Kugler M, Rapoport H. 2011. Migration, FDI and the margins of trade Work. Pap., Cent. Int. Dev. Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA: [Google Scholar]
  102. Liebig T, Mo J. 2013. The fiscal impact of immigration in OECD countries. International Migration Outlook 2013125–89 Paris: OECD Pub. [Google Scholar]
  103. Lofstrom M, Hayes J. 2011. H-1Bs: How do they stack up to US born workers Work. Pap. 6259, Inst. Study Labor Bonn, Ger.: [Google Scholar]
  104. Lowell BL. 2015. Flows of students, computer workers, and entrepreneurs. Immigration Policy and the Search for Skilled Workers: Summary of a Workshop Washington, DC: Nat. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  105. Lowell BL, Salzman H. 2007. Into the eye of the storm: assessing the evidence on science and engineering education, quality, and workforce demand Working Pap. Urban Inst. Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  106. Matloff N. 2003. On the need for reform of the H-1B non-immigrant work visa in computer-related occupations. Univ. Mich. J. Law Reform 36:4815–914 [Google Scholar]
  107. Mayda AM. 2010. International migration: a panel data analysis of the determinants of bilateral flows. J. Popul. Econ. 23:41249–74 [Google Scholar]
  108. McKenzie D, Rapoport H. 2010. Self-selection patterns in Mexico–US migration: the role of migration networks. Rev. Econ. Stat. 92:4811–21 [Google Scholar]
  109. Miguelez E. 2014. Inventor diasporas and the internationalization of technology Discuss. Pap. 25/14, Cent. Res. Anal. Migr. London: [Google Scholar]
  110. Miguelez E, Fink C. 2013. Measuring the international mobility of inventors: a new database Work. Pap. 8, World Intellect. Prop. Org. Geneva: [Google Scholar]
  111. Miller P. 1999. Immigration policy and immigrant quality: the Australian points system. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 89:2192–97 [Google Scholar]
  112. Moraga JF-H. 2011. New evidence on emigrant selection. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93:172–96 [Google Scholar]
  113. Moretti E. 2012. The New Geography of Jobs Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt [Google Scholar]
  114. Moser P, Voena A, Waldinger F. 2014. German Jewish émigrés and US invention. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:103222–55 [Google Scholar]
  115. Nanda R, Khanna T. 2010. Diasporas and domestic entrepreneurs: evidence from the Indian software industry. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 19:4991–1012 [Google Scholar]
  116. Nathan M. 2015. Same difference? Minority ethnic inventors, diversity and innovation in the UK. J. Econ. Geogr. 15:1129–68 [Google Scholar]
  117. Neal L, Uselding P. 1972. Immigration, a neglected source of American economic growth: 1790 to 1912. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 24:168–88 [Google Scholar]
  118. Neeley T. 2012. Global business speaks English: why you need a language strategy now. Harv. Bus. Rev. 90:5116–24 [Google Scholar]
  119. OECD (Org. Econ. Coop. Dev.). 2008. International Migration Outlook: SOPEMI—2008 Edition Paris: OECD (Org. Econ. Coop. Dev.) [Google Scholar]
  120. Oettl A, Agrawal A. 2008. International labor mobility and knowledge flow externalities. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 39:81242–60 [Google Scholar]
  121. Orrenius P, Zavodny M. 2015. Does immigration affect whether US natives major in science and engineering?. J. Labor Econ. 33:S1S79–108 [Google Scholar]
  122. Özden Ç, Parsons C. 2016. On the economic geography of international migration. World Econ 39:478–95 [Google Scholar]
  123. Özden Ç, Parsons C, Schiff M, Walmsley T. 2011. Where on Earth is everybody? The evolution of global bilateral migration, 1960–2000. World Bank Econ. Rev. 25:12–56 [Google Scholar]
  124. Özden Ç, Phillips D. 2015. What really is brain drain? Location of birth, education and migration dynamics of African doctors Work. Pap. 4, KNOMAD (Glob. Knowl. Partn. Migr. Dev.) Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  125. Ozgen C, Nijkamp P, Poot J. 2011. Immigration and innovation in European regions Work. Pap. 5676, Inst. Study Labor, Bonn, Ger.: [Google Scholar]
  126. Papademetriou D, Sumption M. 2013. Attracting and Selecting from the Global Talent Pool—Policy Challenges Washington, DC: Migr. Policy Inst. [Google Scholar]
  127. Parrotta P, Pozzoli D, Pytlikova M. 2014. The nexus between labor diversity and firm's innovation. J. Popul. Econ. 27:2303–64 [Google Scholar]
  128. Parsons C, Rojon S, Samanani F, Wettach L. 2014. Conceptualising international high-skilled migration Work. Pap. Ser. 104, Int. Migr. Inst. Oxford, UK: [Google Scholar]
  129. Parsons C, Winters A. 2015. Migration, trade and aid: a survey. International Handbook on Migration and Economic Development REB Lucas 65–112 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
  130. Peri G, Shih K, Sparber C. 2015. STEM workers, H-1B visas and productivity in US cities. J. Labor Econ. 33:S1S225–55 [Google Scholar]
  131. Peri G, Sparber C. 2011. Highly-educated immigrants and native occupational choice. Ind. Relat. 50:3385–411 [Google Scholar]
  132. Pohl C. 2006. Return migration of low- and high-skilled immigrants from Germany Work. Pap., IFO Inst. Econ. Res. Dresden, Ger.: [Google Scholar]
  133. Rauch J. 2001. Business and social networks in international trade. J. Econ. Lit. 39:41177–203 [Google Scholar]
  134. Rauch J, Trindade V. 2002. Ethnic Chinese networks in international trade. Rev. Econ. Stat. 84:1116–30 [Google Scholar]
  135. Ravenstein EG. 1885. The laws of migration. J. Stat. Soc. 48:2167–235 [Google Scholar]
  136. Rinne U. 2013. The evaluation of immigration policies. International Handbook on the Economics of Migration A Constant, K Zimmermann 530–51 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
  137. Rosenzweig M. 2006. Global wage differences and international student flows. Brookings Trade Forum 2006: Global Labor Markets? SM Collins, C Graham 57–96 Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. Press [Google Scholar]
  138. Roy AD. 1951. Some thoughts on the distribution of earnings. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 3:2135–46 [Google Scholar]
  139. Ruggles S, Genadek K, Goeken R, Grover J, Sobek M. 2015. Integrated public use microdata series: version 6.0 Dataset, Univ. Minnesota Minneapolis: http://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V6.0 [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  140. Saiz A. 2007. Immigration and housing rents in American cities. J. Urban Econ. 61:2345–71 [Google Scholar]
  141. Santo Tomas PA, Summers LH, Clemens M. 2009. Migrants count: five steps toward better migration data Rep., Comm. Int. Migr. Data Dev. Res. Policy, Cent. Glob. Dev Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  142. Saxenian A. 2006. The New Argonauts Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  143. Saxenian A, Motoyama Y, Quan X. 2002. Local and Global Networks of Immigrant Professionals in Silicon Valley San Francisco: Public Policy Inst. Calif. [Google Scholar]
  144. Silicon Valley Compet. Innov. Proj. 2016. A Dashboard and Policy Scorecard for a Shared Agenda of Prosperity and Opportunity Burlingame, CA: Collaborative Economics [Google Scholar]
  145. Sjaastad LA. 1962. The costs and returns of human migration. J. Polit. Econ. 70:580–93 [Google Scholar]
  146. Smith A. 1776. The Wealth of Nations London: W. Strahan & T. Cadell [Google Scholar]
  147. Stephan P. 2010. The I's have it: immigration and innovation, the perspective from academe. Innovation Policy and the Economy J Lerner, S Stern 83–127 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  148. Stephan P, Levin S. 2001. Exceptional contributions to US science by the foreign-born and foreign-educated. Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 20:159–79 [Google Scholar]
  149. Storesletten K. 2000. Sustaining fiscal policy through immigration. J. Polit. Econ. 108:2300–23 [Google Scholar]
  150. Storesletten K. 2003. Fiscal implications of immigration: a net present value approach. Scand. J. Econ. 105:3487–506 [Google Scholar]
  151. Stuen E, Mobarak A, Maskus K. 2012. Skilled immigration and innovation: evidence from enrollment fluctuations in US doctoral programs. Econ. J. 122:5651143–76 [Google Scholar]
  152. U. N. 1998. Recommendations on statistics of international migration Stat. Pap. Ser. M 58/1, Dep. Econ. Soc. Aff., Stat. Div., U. N. New York: United Nations. [Google Scholar]
  153. Wasmer E, Fredriksson P, Lamo A, Messina J, Peri G. 2007. The macroeconomics of education in Europe. Education and Training in Europe G Brunello, P Garibaldi, E Wasmer 3–20 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  154. Weinberg B. 2011. Developing science: scientific performance and brain drains in the developing world. J. Dev. Econ. 95:195–104 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error