1932

Abstract

Historically, the trade research field has usually ignored dynamic adjustment of workers, but a recent wave of work has developed a rich set of theoretical and empirical tools to analyze this factor. Empirical approaches have ranged from reduced-form regressions to the structural estimation of underlying parameters, which is necessary to understand welfare effects. A major distinction is that between models that do and those that do not allow for unobserved heterogeneity across workers; these models are useful for different purposes. Consistent findings across methods and countries indicate that costs of switching sectors and occupations are high and that both switching costs and option value are crucial in computing the welfare effects of globalization for workers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-063016-103720
2017-08-02
2024-06-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/9/1/annurev-economics-063016-103720.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-063016-103720&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Arcidiacono P, Miller RA. 2011. CCP estimation of dynamic models with unobserved heterogeneity. Econometrica 79:61823–68 [Google Scholar]
  2. Artuç E. 2012. Workers’ age and the impact of trade shocks Policy Res. Work. Pap. 6035 World Bank Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  3. Artuç E, Chaudhuri S, McLaren J. 2008. Delay and dynamics in labor market adjustment: simulation results. J. Int. Econ. 75:11–13 [Google Scholar]
  4. Artuç E, Chaudhuri S, McLaren J. 2010. Trade shocks and labor adjustment: a structural empirical approach. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:31008–45 [Google Scholar]
  5. Artuç E, Chaudhuri S, McLaren J. 2014. Some simple analytics of trade and labor mobility Policy Res. Work. Pap. 7089 World Bank Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  6. Artuç E, Lederman D, Porto G. 2015. A mapping of labor mobility costs in the developing world. J. Int. Econ. 95:28–41 [Google Scholar]
  7. Artuç E, McLaren J. 2015. Trade policy and wage inequality: a structural analysis with occupational and sectoral mobility. J. Int. Econ. 97:278–94 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ashournia D. 2015. Labour market effects of international trade when mobility is costly Discuss. Pap. 751, Dep Econ., Oxford Univ. Oxford, UK: [Google Scholar]
  9. Autor DH, Dorn D, Hanson GH. 2013. The China syndrome: local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:62121–68 [Google Scholar]
  10. Autor DH, Dorn D, Hanson GH, Song J. 2014. Trade adjustment: worker-level evidence. Q. J. Econ. 129:41799–860 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brussevich M. 2016. Does trade liberalization narrow the gender wage gap? The role of sectoral mobility Work. Pap., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN [Google Scholar]
  12. Caliendo L, Dvorkin M, Parro F. 2015. The impact of trade on labor market dynamics. NBER Work. Pap. 21149 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cameron S, Chaudhuri S, McLaren J. 2007. Trade shocks and labor adjustment: theory NBER Work. Pap. 13463 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cortes GM, Gallipoli G. 2014. The costs of occupational mobility: an aggregate analysis Work. Pap., Dep. Econ., Univ. B.C., Vancouver, Can. [Google Scholar]
  15. Coşar AK. 2013. Adjusting to trade liberalization: reallocation and labor market policies Work. Pap., Booth School Bus., Univ Chicago: [Google Scholar]
  16. Coşar AK, Guner N, Tybout J. 2016. Firm dynamics, job turnover, and wage distributions in an open economy. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:3625–63 [Google Scholar]
  17. Currie J, Harrison A. 1997. Trade reform and labor market adjustment in Morocco. J. Labor Econ. 15:S44–71 [Google Scholar]
  18. Davidson C, Martin L, Matusz SJ. 1999. Trade and search generated unemployment. J. Int. Econ. 48:2271–99 [Google Scholar]
  19. Davidson C, Matusz SJ. 2006. Long-run lunacy, short-run sanity: a simple model of trade with labor market turnover. Rev. Int. Econ. 14:2261–76 [Google Scholar]
  20. Davidson C, Matusz SJ. 2010. International Trade with Equilibrium Unemployment Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  21. Dehejia V. 2002. Will gradualism work when shock therapy doesn't?. Econ. Polit. 15:133–59 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dekle R, Eaton J, Kortum SS. 2008. Global rebalancing with gravity: measuring the burden of adjustment. IMF Staff Pap. 55:3511–40 [Google Scholar]
  23. Dix-Carneiro R. 2014. Trade liberalization and labor market dynamics. Econometrica 82:2825–85 [Google Scholar]
  24. Dix-Carneiro R, Kovak B. 2015. Trade reform and regional dynamics: evidence from 25 years of Brazilian matched employer-employee data NBER Work. Pap 20908 [Google Scholar]
  25. Eaton J, Kortum S. 2002. Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica 70:51741–79 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ebenstein A, Harrison A, McMillan M, Phillips S. 2014. Estimating the impact of trade and offshoring on American workers using the current population surveys. Rev. Econ. Stat. 96:4581–95 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hakobyan S, McLaren J. 2016. Looking for local labor-market effects of NAFTA. Rev. Econ. Stat. 98:4728–41 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hosios AJ. 1990. Factor market search and the structure of simple general equilibrium models. J. Polit. Econ. 98:2325–55 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hotz VJ, Miller RA. 1993. Conditional choice probabilities and the estimation of dynamic models. Rev. Econ. Stud. 60:3497–529 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hummels D, Jørgensen R, Munch JR, Xiang C. 2014. The wage effects of offshoring: evidence from Danish matched worker-firm data. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:61597–629 [Google Scholar]
  31. Itskhoki O, Helpman E. 2014. Firms, trade and labor market dynamics Work. Pap., Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA [Google Scholar]
  32. Kambourov G. 2009. Labour market regulations and the sectoral reallocation of workers: the case of trade reforms. Rev. Econ. Stud. 76:1321–58 [Google Scholar]
  33. Keane MP, Wolpin KI. 1997. The career decisions of young men. J. Polit. Econ. 105:3473–522 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kovak BK. 2013. Regional effects of trade reform: What is the correct measure of liberalization?. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:51960–76 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee D, Wolpin KI. 2006. Intersectoral labor mobility and the growth of the service sector. Econometrica 74:11–46 [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu R, Trefler D. 2011. A sorted tale of globalization: white collar jobs and the rise of service offshoring NBER Work. Pap. 17559 [Google Scholar]
  37. Matsuyama K. 1992. A simple model of sectoral adjustment. Rev. Econ. Stud. 59:375–88 [Google Scholar]
  38. Menezes-Filho NA, Muendler M-A. 2011. Labor reallocation in response to trade reform NBER Work. Pap. 17372 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mortensen DT, Pissarides CA. 1994. Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment. Rev. Econ. Stud. 61:3397–415 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mussa M. 1978. Dynamic adjustment in the H-O-S model. J. Polit. Econ. 86:775–91 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pierce JR, Schott PK. 2016. The surprisingly swift decline of US manufacturing employment. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:71632–62 [Google Scholar]
  42. Revenga AL. 1992. Exporting jobs? The impact of import competition on employment and wages in US manufacturing. Q. J. Econ. 107:1255–84 [Google Scholar]
  43. Santos Silva JMC, Tenreyro S. 2006. The log of gravity. Rev. Econ. Stat. 88:4641–58 [Google Scholar]
  44. Topalova P. 2007. Trade liberalization, poverty and inequality: evidence from Indian districts. Globalization and Poverty A Harrison 291–336 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  45. Traiberman S. 2016. Occupations and import competition: evidence from Danish matched employee-employer data Work. Pap., New York Univ. [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-063016-103720
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error