Why Does Globalization Fuel Populism? Economics, Culture, and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism

Literature Cited

1. Ahlquist J, Copelovitch M, Walter S. 2020.. The political consequences of external economic shocks: evidence from Poland. . Am. J. Political Sci. 64:(4):904–20
   [Google Scholar]
2. Algan Y, Guriev S, Papaioannou E, Passari E. 2017.. The European trust crisis and the rise of populism. . Brook. Pap. Econ. Act. 2017:(Fall):309–82
   [Google Scholar]
3. book. 2019.. User's guide and codebook for the ANES 2016 Time Series study. User Guide, Am. Natl. Elect. Stud., Univ. Mich./Stanford Univ., Sept. 4. https://electionstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/anes_timeseries_2016_userguidecodebook.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
4. Anelli M, Colantone I, Stanig P. 2019.. We were the robots: automation and voting behavior in Western Europe. BAFFI CAREFIN Cent. Res. Pap. 2019-115 , Bocconi Univ., Milan, Italy:
   [Google Scholar]
5. Autor D, Dorn D, Hanson G, Majlesi K. 2020.. Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure. . Am. Econ. Rev. 110:(10):3139–83
   [Google Scholar]
6. Autor DH, Dorn D, Hanson GH. 2013.. The China syndrome: local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. . Am. Econ. Rev. 103:(6):2121–68
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ballard-Rosa C, Jensen A, Scheve K. 2018.. Economic decline, social identity, and authoritarian values in the United States. Work. Pap., Univ. N.C., Chapel Hill:
   [Google Scholar]
8. Barone G, D'Ignazio A, de Blasio G, Naticchioni P. 2016.. Mr. Rossi, Mr. Hu and politics: the role of immigration in shaping natives’ voting behavior. . J. Public Econ. 136::1–13
   [Google Scholar]
9. Barone G, Kreuter H. 2019.. Low-wage import competition and populist backlash: the case of Italy. Marco Fanno Work. Pap. 241 , Univ. Padua, Padua, Italy:
   [Google Scholar]
10. Becker SO, Fetzer T. 2017.. Did Eastern European immigration cause an increase in anti-European sentiment in the UK? Work. Pap., Univ. Warwick, Coventry, UK:
    [Google Scholar]
11. Becker SO, Fetzer T, Novy D. 2017.. Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis. . Econ. Policy 32:(92):601–50
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bergh A, Gustafsson A. 2020.. Globalization and populism in Europe. . Public Choice. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-020-00857-8
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
13. Bornschier S. 2018.. Globalization, cleavages and the radical right. . In The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right, ed. J Rydgren , pp. 212–38. Oxford, UK:: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bossert W, Clark AE, D'Ambrosio C, Lepinteur A. 2019.. Economic insecurity and the rise of the right. CEP Discuss. Pap. dp1659 , Cent. Econ. Perform., London Sch. Econ., London:
    [Google Scholar]
15. Broz JL, Frieden J, Weymouth S. 2019.. Populism in place: the economic geography of the globalization backlash. Work. Pap., Univ. Calif., San Diego:
    [Google Scholar]
16. Brunner B, Kuhn A. 2018.. Immigration, cultural distance and natives’ attitudes towards immigrants: evidence from Swiss voting results. . Kyklos 71:(1):28–58
    [Google Scholar]
17. Caselli M, Fracasso A, Traverso S. 2021.. Globalization, robotization and electoral outcomes: evidence from spatial regressions for Italy. . J. Reg. Sci. 61::86–111
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cerrato A, Ferrara FM, Ruggieri F. 2018.. Why does import competition favor Republicans? Work. Pap., Univ. Calif., Berkeley:
    [Google Scholar]
19. Che YI, Lu Y, Pierce JR, Schott PK, Tao Z. 2016.. Did trade liberalization with China influence U.S. elections? Financ. Econ. Discuss. Ser. 2016-039 , Fed. Reserve Board, Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
20. Chen S. 2018.. Unemployment, immigration, and populism: evidence from two quasi-natural experiments in the United States. Work. Pap., Luxemb. Inst. Socio-Econ. Res., Luxembourg:
    [Google Scholar]
21. Choi J, Kuziemko I, Washington E, Wright G. 2020.. Local employment and political effects of trade deals: evidence from NAFTA. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ:
    [Google Scholar]
22. Colantone I, Stanig P. 2018a.. Global competition and Brexit. . Am. Political Sci. Rev. 112:(2):201–18
    [Google Scholar]
23. Colantone I, Stanig P. 2018b.. The economic determinants of the “cultural backlash”: globalization and attitudes in Western Europe. BAFFI CAREFIN Cent. Res. Pap. 2018-91 , Bocconi Univ., Milan, Italy:
    [Google Scholar]
24. Colantone I, Stanig P. 2018c.. The trade origins of economic nationalism: import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. . Am. J. Political Sci. 62:(4):936–53
    [Google Scholar]
25. Dal Bó E, Finan F, Folke O, Persson T, Rickne J. 2019.. Economic losers and political winners: Sweden's radical right. Work. Pap., Univ. Calif., Berkeley:
    [Google Scholar]
26. de Bromhead A, Eichengreen B, O'Rourke KH. 2013.. Political extremism in the 1920s and 1930s: Do German lessons generalize?. J. Econ. Hist. 73::371–406
    [Google Scholar]
27. Di Tella R, Rodrik D. 2020.. Labour market shocks and the demand for trade protection: evidence from online surveys. . Econ. J. 130:(628):1008–30
    [Google Scholar]
28. Dinas E, Matakos K, Xefteris D, Hangartner D. 2019.. Waking up the Golden Dawn: Does exposure to the refugee crisis increase support for extreme-right parties?. Political Anal. 27:(2):244–54
    [Google Scholar]
29. Dippel C, Gold R, Heblich S, Pinto R. 2018.. Instrumental variables and causal mechanisms: unpacking the effect of trade on workers and voters. CESifo Work. Pap. Ser. 6816 , Cent. Econ. Stud., Munich, Ger:
    [Google Scholar]
30. Doerr S, Gissler S, Peydró J-L, Voth H-J. 2020.. From finance to fascism. Work. Pap. 1092 , Barcelona Grad. Sch. Econ., Barcelona, Spain:
    [Google Scholar]
31. Dustmann C, Vasiljeva K, Damm AP. 2018.. Refugee migration and electoral outcomes. . Rev. Econ. Stud. 86:(5):2035–91
    [Google Scholar]
32. book. 2016.. The Economy After Brexit. London:: Econ. Brexit. https://issuu.com/efbkl/docs/economists_for_brexit_v2
    [Google Scholar]
33. Edo A, Giesing Y, Öztunc J, Poutvaara P. 2019.. Immigration and electoral support for the far-left and the far-right. . Eur. Econ. Rev. 115::99–143
    [Google Scholar]
34. Eichengreen B, Haines M, Jaremski M, Leblang D. 2017.. Populists at the polls: economic factors in the 1896 presidential election. NBER Work. Pap. 23932
    [Google Scholar]
35. Enos RD. 2017.. The Space Between Us: Social Geography and Politics. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
36. Erickson J, ed. 2014.. The middle-class squeeze: a picture of stagnant incomes, rising costs, and what we can do to strengthen America's middle class. Rep., Cent. Am. Prog., Washington, DC:. https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/MiddeClassSqueeze.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
37. book. 2017.. Income inequalities and employment patterns in Europe before and after the Great Recession. Rep., Off. Eur. Union, Luxembourg:. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef1663en.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
38. Fetzer T. 2019.. Did austerity cause Brexit?. Am. Econ. Rev. 109::3849–86
    [Google Scholar]
39. Funke M, Schularick M, Trebesch C. 2016.. Going to extremes: politics after financial crises, 1870–2014. . Eur. Econ. Rev. 88:( 2016.):227–60
    [Google Scholar]
40. Gerdes C, Wadensjö E. 2010.. The impact of immigration on election outcomes in Danish municipalities. SULCIS Work. Pap. 3 , Stockholm Univ. Linnaeus Cent. Integr. Stud., Stockholm Univ., Stockholm, Swed:
    [Google Scholar]
41. Gidron N, Hall PA. 2017.. The politics of social status: economic and cultural roots of the populist right. . Br. J. Sociol. 68:(S1):S57–84
    [Google Scholar]
42. Gomez R, Ramiro L. 2019.. Beyond the 2008 Great Recession: economic factors and electoral support for the radical left in Europe. . Party Politics 25:(3):358–68
    [Google Scholar]
43. Grossman GM, Helpman E. 2021.. Identity politics and trade policy. . Rev. Econ. Stud. 88:(3):1101–26
    [Google Scholar]
44. Guiso L, Herrera H, Morelli M, Sonno T. 2018.. Populism: demand and supply. Work. Pap., Einaudi Inst. Econ. Finance, Rome, Italy:
    [Google Scholar]
45. Guriev S, Papaioannou E. 2020.. The political economy of populism. CEPR Discuss. Pap. 14433 , Cent. Econ. Policy Res., London:
    [Google Scholar]
46. Gyöngyösi G, Verner E. 2020.. Financial crisis, creditor-debtor conflict, and populism. Work. Pap., Kiel Inst. World Econ., Kiel, Ger:
    [Google Scholar]
47. Hacker JS, Pierson P. 2020.. Let Them Eat Tweets: How the Right Rules in an Age of Extreme Inequality. New York:: Liveright
    [Google Scholar]
48. Hakobyan S, McLaren J. 2016.. Looking for local labor market effects of NAFTA. . Rev. Econ. Stat. 98:(4):728–41
    [Google Scholar]
49. Halla M, Wagner AF, Zweimüller J. 2017.. Immigration and voting for the far right. . J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 15:(6):1341–85
    [Google Scholar]
50. Harmon NA. 2018.. Immigration, ethnic diversity, and political outcomes: evidence from Denmark. . Scand. J. Econ. 120:(4):1043–74
    [Google Scholar]
51. Hill SJ, Hopkins DJ, Huber GA. 2019.. Local demographic changes and US presidential voting, 2012 to 2016. . PNAS 116:(50):25023–28
    [Google Scholar]
52. Hobolt SB, Tilley J. 2016.. Fleeing the centre: the rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the Euro crisis. . West Eur. Politics 39::971–91
    [Google Scholar]
53. Hochschild AR. 2016.. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. New York:: New Press
    [Google Scholar]
54. Hopkins DJ. 2021.. The activation of prejudice and presidential voting: panel evidence from the 2016 U.S. election. . Political Behav. 43::663–86
    [Google Scholar]
55. Im ZJ, Mayer N, Palier B, Rovny J. 2019.. The “losers of automation”: a reservoir of votes for the radical right?. Res. Politics 6:(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018822395
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
56. Inglehart R, Norris P. 2016.. Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: economic have-nots and cultural backlash. HKS Work. Pap. RWP16-026 , John F. Kennedy Sch. Gov., Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA:
    [Google Scholar]
57. Irwin DA. 2017.. Clashing over Commerce: A History of US Trade Policy. Chicago:: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
58. Iversen T, Soskice D, Xu A. 2017.. Transition to the knowledge economy and the rise of populism: a human capital perspective. Work. Pap., Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA:
    [Google Scholar]
59. Jensen JB, Quinn DP, Weymouth S. 2017.. Winners and losers in international trade: the effects on US presidential voting. . Int. Organ. 71:(3):423–57
    [Google Scholar]
60. Kuk J. 2019.. The effects of economic distress on racial attitudes. Work. Pap., Univ. Okla., Norman:
    [Google Scholar]
61. Kurer T. 2020.. The declining middle: occupational change, social status and the populist right. . Comp. Political Stud. 53:(10–11):1798–835
    [Google Scholar]
62. Malgouyres C. 2017.. Trade shocks and far-right voting: evidence from French presidential elections. Res. Pap. RSCAS 2017/21 , Robert Schuman Cent. Adv. Stud., Eur. Univ. Inst., Florence, Italy:
    [Google Scholar]
63. Margalit Y. 2011.. Costly jobs: trade-related layoffs, government compensation, and voting in U.S. elections. . Am. Political Sci. Rev. 105:(1):166–88
    [Google Scholar]
64. Margalit Y. 2019.. Economic insecurity and the causes of populism, reconsidered. . J. Econ. Perspect. 33:(4):152–70
    [Google Scholar]
65. Mayda AM, Peri G, Steingress W. 2019.. The political impact of immigration: evidence from the United States. . Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. In press
    [Google Scholar]
66. Mehrotra AK. 2004. More mighty than the waves of the sea”: toilers, tariffs, and the income tax movement, 1880–1913. . Labor Hist. 45:(2):165–98
    [Google Scholar]
67. Mendez I, Cutillas IM. 2014.. Has immigration affected Spanish presidential elections results?. J. Popul. Econ. 27::135–71
    [Google Scholar]
68. Mian A, Sufi A, Trebbi F. 2014.. Resolving debt overhang: political constraints in the aftermath of financial crises. . Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 6:(2):1–28
    [Google Scholar]
69. Moriconi S, Peri G, Turati R. 2018.. Skill of the immigrants and vote of the natives: immigration and nationalism in European elections 2007–2016. NBER Work. Pap. 25077
    [Google Scholar]
70. Moriconi S, Peri G, Turati R. 2019.. Immigration and voting for redistribution: evidence from European elections. . Labour Econ. 61::101765
    [Google Scholar]
71. Mukand S, Rodrik D. 2018.. The political economy of ideas: on ideas versus interests in policymaking. Work. Pap., John F. Kennedy Sch. Gov., Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA:
    [Google Scholar]
72. Naoi M. 2020.. Survey experiments in international political economy: what we (don't) know about the backlash against globalization. . Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 23::333–56
    [Google Scholar]
73. Norris P, Inglehart R. 2019.. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
74. Otto AH, Steinhardt MF. 2014.. Immigration and election outcomes—evidence from city districts in Hamburg. . Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 45::67–79
    [Google Scholar]
75. Rodrik D. 1997.. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Washington, DC:: Inst. Int. Econ
    [Google Scholar]
76. Rodrik D. 2011.. The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York:: W.W. Norton
    [Google Scholar]
77. Rodrik D. 2018.. Populism and the economics of globalization. . J. Int. Bus. Policy 1:(1–2):12–33
    [Google Scholar]
78. Rommel T, Walter S. 2018.. The electoral consequences of offshoring: how the globalization of production shapes party preferences. . Comp. Political Stud. 51:(5):621–58
    [Google Scholar]
79. Rothwell JT, Diego-Rosell P. 2016.. Explaining nationalist political views: the case of Donald Trump. Work. Pap., Gallup, Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
80. Roupakias S, Chletsos M. 2020.. Immigration and far-right voting: evidence from Greece. . Ann. Reg. Sci. 65::591–617
    [Google Scholar]
81. Schwartz C, Simon M, Hudson D, van-Heerde-Hudson J. 2020.. A populist paradox? How Brexit softened anti-immigrant attitudes. . Br. J. Political Sci. In press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000656
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
82. Sides J, Tesler M, Vavreck L. 2018.. Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America. Princeton, NJ:: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
83. Steiner ND, Harms P. 2020.. Local trade shocks and the nationalist backlash in political attitudes: panel data evidence from Great Britain. Work. Pap. 2014 , Gutenberg Sch. Manag. Econ., Johannes Gutenberg Univ. Mainz, Mainz, Ger:
    [Google Scholar]
84. Strain MR, Veuger SA. 2019.. Economic shocks and clinging. Work. Pap., Am. Enterp. Inst., Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
85. Swank D, Betz H-G. 2003.. Globalization, the welfare state and right-wing populism in Western Europe. . Socio-Econ. Rev. 1:(2):215–45
    [Google Scholar]
86. Tabellini M. 2019.. Gifts of the immigrants, woes of the natives: lessons from the age of mass migration. . Rev. Econ. Stud. 87:(1):454–86
    [Google Scholar]
87. Vertier P, Viskanic M. 2019.. Dismantling the “jungle”: migrant relocation and extreme voting in France. Work. Pap., Sciences Po, Paris:
    [Google Scholar]
88. Wilkinson W. 2019.. The density divide: urbanization, polarization, and populist backlash. Exec. Summ., Niskanen Cent., Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
89. Young AR. 2019.. Two wrongs make a right? The politicization of trade policy and European trade strategy. . J. Eur. Public Policy 26:(12):1883–99
    [Google Scholar]