1932

Abstract

This article reviews the evidence on the deterrent effect of police, imprisonment, and capital punishment and additionally summarizes knowledge of sanction risk perceptions. Studies of changes in police presence, whether achieved by changes in police numbers or in their strategic deployment, consistently find evidence of deterrent effects. Studies of the deterrent effect of increases in already long prison sentences find at most a modest deterrent effect. Studies of the deterrent effect of capital punishment provide no useful information on the topic. Four high-priority areas for future research are identified: developing and testing an integrated model of the effects of the threat and experience of punishment, measuring perceptions of sanction regimes, developing and testing a theory of criminal opportunities, and estimating the deterrent effect of shorter prison sentences and identifying high-deterrence policies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-072412-131310
2013-08-02
2024-06-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/5/1/annurev-economics-072412-131310.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-072412-131310&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Andenaes J. 1974. Punishment and Deterrence. Ann Arbor: Univ. Michigan Press [Google Scholar]
  2. Anwar S, Loughran TA. 2011. Testing a Bayesian learning theory of deterrence among serious juvenile offenders. Criminology 49:667–98 [Google Scholar]
  3. Apel R. 2013. Sanctions, perceptions and crime: implications for criminal deterrence. J. Quant. Criminol 28: In press [Google Scholar]
  4. Assem. Comm. Crim. Proced 1968. Deterrent effects of criminal sanctions: progress report of the Assembly Committee on Criminal Procedure. Rep. Assembly State Calif.
  5. Becker GS. 1968. Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J. Polit. Econ. 79:169–217 [Google Scholar]
  6. Blumstein A, Nagin DS. 1978. On the optimal use of incarceration. Oper. Res. 26:381–405 [Google Scholar]
  7. Braga AA. 2008. Police Enforcement Strategies to Prevent Crime in Hot Spot Areas. Washington, DC: US Dep. Justice, Off. Commun. Oriented Polic. Serv. [Google Scholar]
  8. Braga AA, Flynn EA, Kelling GL, Cole CM. 2011. Moving the work of criminal investigators towards crime control: new perspectives in policing. New Perspect. Policing Pap. Kennedy School, Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA: [Google Scholar]
  9. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2006. Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2006 Washington, DC: Off. Justice Programs [Google Scholar]
  10. Canela-Cacho JA, Blumstein A, Cohen J. 1997. Relationship between the offending frequency (λ) of imprisoned and free offenders. Criminology 35:133–76 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chalfin A, Haviland AM, Raphael S. 2013. What do panel studies tell us about a deterrent effect of capital punishment? A critique of the literature. J. Quant. Criminol In press [Google Scholar]
  12. Clarke RV. 1995. Situational crime prevention. Crime Justice 91:91–150 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cohen LE, Felson M. 1979. Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am. Sociol. Rev. 44:588–608 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cook PJ. 1979. The clearance rate as a measure of criminal justice system effectiveness. J. Public Econ. 11:135–42 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cook PJ. 2009. Potential savings from abolition of the death penalty in North Carolina. Am. Law Econ. Rev. 11:498–529 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cook PJ. 2012. The impact of drug market pulling levers policing on neighborhood violence: an evaluation of the High Point drug market intervention. Criminol. Public Policy 11:161–64 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cook PJ, Ludwig J. 2006. Aiming for evidence-based gun policy. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 48:691–735 [Google Scholar]
  18. Corsaro N, Hunt ED, Hipple NK, McGarrell EF. 2012. The impact of drug market pulling levers policing on neighborhood violence: an evaluation of the High Point drug market intervention. Criminol. Public Policy 11:167–99 [Google Scholar]
  19. DeAngelo G, Hansen B. 2008. Life and death in the fast lane: police enforcement and roadway safety Work. Pap., Univ. Calif., Santa Barbara [Google Scholar]
  20. Di Tella R, Schargrodsky E. 2004. Do police reduce crime? Estimates using the allocation of police forces after a terrorist attack. Am. Econ. Rev. 94:115–33 [Google Scholar]
  21. Donohue JJ, Wolfers J. 2005. Uses and abuses of empirical evidence in the death penalty debate. Stanford Law Rev. 58:791–846 [Google Scholar]
  22. Donohue JJ, Wolfers J. 2009. Estimating the impact of the death penalty on murder. Am. Law Econ. Rev. 11:249–309 [Google Scholar]
  23. Draca M, Machin S, Witt R.. 2011. Panic on the streets of London: police, crime and the July 2005 terror attacks. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:2157–81 [Google Scholar]
  24. Drago F, Galbiati R, Vertova P. 2009. The deterrent effects of prison: evidence from a natural experiment. J. Polit. Econ 117:257–80 [Google Scholar]
  25. Durlauf SN, Charles K. 2013. Pitfalls in the use of time series methods to study deterrence and capital punishment. J. Quant. Criminol In press [Google Scholar]
  26. Durlauf S, Fu C, Navarro S. 2013. Capital punishment and deterrence: understanding disparate results. J. Quant. Criminol In press [Google Scholar]
  27. Durlauf SN, Nagin DS. 2011a. Imprisonment and crime: Can both be reduced?. Criminol. Public Policy 10:9–54 [Google Scholar]
  28. Durlauf SN, Nagin DS. 2011b. The deterrent effect of imprisonment. Controlling Crime: Strategies and Tradeoffs Cook PJ, Ludwig J, McCrary J. 43–94 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  29. Eck JE. 1992. Helpful hints for the tradition-bound chief. Fresh Perspect. Pap Police Exec. Res. Forum Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  30. Ehrlich I. 1975. The deterrent effect of capital punishment: a question of life and death. Am. Econ. Rev. 65:397–417 [Google Scholar]
  31. Erickson ML, Gibbs JP. 1979. On the perceived severity of legal penalties. J. Crim. Law Criminol. Police Sci. 70:102–16 [Google Scholar]
  32. Evans WN, Owens EG. 2007. COPS and crime. J. Public Econ. 91:181–201 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ferrier M, Ludwig J. 2011. Crime policy and informal social control. Criminol. Public Policy 10:1029–36 [Google Scholar]
  34. Freeman RB. 1996. Why do so many young American men commit crimes and what might we do about it?. J. Econ. Perspect. 10:25–42 [Google Scholar]
  35. Greenwood P, Chaiken J, Petersilla J. 1977. The Criminal Investigation Process Lexington, MA: Lexington Books [Google Scholar]
  36. Hawken A, Kleiman M. 2009. Managing drug-involved probationers with swift and certain sanctions: evaluating Hawaii’s HOPE. Rep. 230444 Natl. Inst. Justice, Washington, DC:
  37. Heaton P. 2010. Understanding the effects of anti-profiling policies. J. Law Econ. 53:29–64 [Google Scholar]
  38. Helland E, Tabarrok A. 2007. Does three strikes deter? A nonparametric estimation. J. Hum. Resour. 42:309–30 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hjalmarsson R. 2009. Crime and expected punishment: changes in perceptions at the age of criminal majority. Am. Law Econ. Rev. 7:209–48 [Google Scholar]
  40. Johnson R, Raphael S. 2013. How much crime reduction does the marginal prisoner buy?. J. Law Econ. In press [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-072412-131310
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-072412-131310
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error