1932

Abstract

In this article, we introduce an empirical framework to analyze how firm performance is affected by increased globalization. Using this framework, we discuss recent work on measuring the impact of various shocks firms face in the global marketplace, such as reductions in trade costs (through lowering tariffs and abolishing quotas). Our analytical framework nests most empirical approaches to estimating the impact of trade and industrial policies on firms active in international markets. We identify outstanding issues surrounding the identification of the underlying mechanisms and conclude with suggestions for future research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080113-104741
2014-08-02
2024-04-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/6/1/annurev-economics-080113-104741.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080113-104741&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ackerberg D, Benkard LC, Berry S, Pakes A. 2007. Econometric tools for analyzing market outcomes. Handbook of Econometrics Vol 6 Heckman J, Leamer E. 4171–276 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  2. Amiti M, Itshkhoki O, Konings J. 2014. Importers, exporters and exchange rate disconnect. Am. Econ. Rev. In press [Google Scholar]
  3. Amiti M, Konings J. 2007. Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: evidence from Indonesia. Am. Econ. Rev. 97:1611–38 [Google Scholar]
  4. Arkolakis C, Costinot A, Donaldson D, Rodríguez-Clare A. 2012. The elusive pro-competitive effects of trade. Unpublished manuscript, Mass. Inst. Technol., Cambridge, MA
  5. Aw BY, Roberts MJ, Xu DY. 2011. R&D investment, exporting, and productivity dynamics. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:1312–44 [Google Scholar]
  6. Berman N, Martin P, Mayer T. 2012. How do different exporters react to exchange rate changes?. Q. J. Econ. 127:437–92 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bernard AB, Redding SJ, Schott PK. 2010. Multiple-product firms and product switching. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:70–97 [Google Scholar]
  8. Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A. 1995. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63:841–90 [Google Scholar]
  9. Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A. 1999. Voluntary export restraints on automobiles: evaluating a strategic trade policy. Am. Econ. Rev. 89:400–30 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bloom N, Romer P, Terry S, Van Reenen J. 2013. A trapped-factors model of innovation. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:208–13 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bustos P. 2011. Trade liberalization, exports, and technology upgrading: evidence on the impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian firms. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:304–40 [Google Scholar]
  12. Collard-Wexler A, De Loecker J. 2013. Reallocation and technology: evidence from the U.S. steel industry. NBER Work. Pap. 18739
  13. De Loecker J. 2011. Product differentiation, multiproduct firms, and estimating the impact of trade liberalization on productivity. Econometrica 79:1407–51 [Google Scholar]
  14. De Loecker J. 2013. Detecting learning by exporting. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 5:31–21 [Google Scholar]
  15. De Loecker J, Goldberg PK, Khandelwal AK, Pavcnik N. 2012. Prices, markups and trade reform. NBER Work. Pap. 17925
  16. De Loecker J, Warzynski F. 2012. Markups and firm-level export status. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:2437–71 [Google Scholar]
  17. Feenstra RC, Weinstein DE. 2010. Globalization, markups, and the U.S. price level. NBER Work. Pap. 15749
  18. Foster L, Haltiwanger J, Syverson C. 2008. Reallocation, firm turnover, and efficiency: selection on productivity or profitability?. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:394–425 [Google Scholar]
  19. Foster L, Haltiwanger JC, Syverson C. 2012. The slow growth of new plants: learning about demand? NBER Work. Pap. 17853
  20. Goldberg PK. 1995. Product differentiation and oligopoly in international markets: the case of the U.S. automobile industry. Econometrica 63:891–951 [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldberg PK, Hellerstein R. 2013. A structural approach to identifying the sources of local currency price stability. Rev. Econ. Stud. 80:175–210 [Google Scholar]
  22. Goldberg PK, Khandelwal A, Pavcnik N, Topalova P. 2009. Trade liberalization and new imported inputs. Am. Econ. Rev. 99:494–500 [Google Scholar]
  23. Goldberg PK, Khandelwal AK, Pavcnik N, Topalova P. 2010. Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: evidence from India. Q. J. Econ. 125:1727–67 [Google Scholar]
  24. Goldberg PK, Knetter MM. 1997. Goods prices and exchange rates: What have we learned?. J. Econ. Lit. 35:1243–72 [Google Scholar]
  25. Goldberg PK, Verboven F. 2001. The evolution of price dispersion in the European car market. Rev. Econ. Stud. 68:811–48 [Google Scholar]
  26. Halpern L, Koren M, Szeidl A. 2011. Imported inputs and productivity. Unpublished manuscript, Cent. Eur. Univ., Budapest
  27. Hsieh C-T, Klenow PJ. 2009. Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Q. J. Econ. 124:1403–48 [Google Scholar]
  28. Katayama H, Lu S, Tybout JR. 2009. Firm-level productivity studies: illusions and a solution. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 27:403–13 [Google Scholar]
  29. Khandelwal A. 2010. The long and short (of) quality ladders. Rev. Econ. Stud. 77:1450–76 [Google Scholar]
  30. Khandelwal A, Topalova P. 2011. Trade liberalization and firm productivity: the case of India. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93:995–1009 [Google Scholar]
  31. Klette TJ, Griliches Z. 1996. The inconsistency of common scale estimators when output prices are unobserved and endogenous. J. Appl. Econ. 11:343–61 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kugler M, Verhoogen E. 2012. Prices, plant size, and product quality. Rev. Econ. Stud. 79:307–39 [Google Scholar]
  33. Levinsohn J, Petrin A. 2012. Measuring aggregate productivity growth using plant-level data. Rand J. Econ. 43:705–25 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lileeva A, Trefler D. 2010. Improved access to foreign markets raises plant-level productivity… for some plants. Q. J. Econ. 125:1051–99 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mayer T, Melitz MJ, Ottaviano GI. 2011. Market size, competition, and the product mix of exporters. NBER Work. Pap. 16959
  36. Melitz MJ. 2003. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71:1695–725 [Google Scholar]
  37. Melitz MJ, Ottaviano GI. 2008. Market size, trade, and productivity. Rev. Econ. Stud. 75:295–316 [Google Scholar]
  38. Melitz MJ, Redding SJ. 2014. Heterogenous firms and trade. Handbook of International Economics Vol 4 Gopinath G, Helpman E, Rogoff K. 1–54 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  39. Melitz MJ, Trefler D. 2012. Gains from trade when firms matter. J. Econ. Perspect. 26(2):91–118 [Google Scholar]
  40. Nakamura E, Zerom D. 2010. Accounting for incomplete pass-through. Rev. Econ. Stud. 77:1192–230 [Google Scholar]
  41. Olley S, Pakes A. 1996. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications industry. Econometrica 64:1263–98 [Google Scholar]
  42. Pavcnik N. 2002. Trade liberalization, exit, and productivity improvement: evidence from Chilean plants. Rev. Econ. Stud. 69:245–76 [Google Scholar]
  43. Schmalensee R. 1989. Inter-industry studies of structure and performance. Handbook of Industrial Organization Vol 2 Schmalensee R, Willig R. 951–1009 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  44. Schmidt KM. 1997. Managerial incentives and product market competition. Rev. Econ. Stud. 64:191–213 [Google Scholar]
  45. Schott PK. 2004. Across-product versus within-product specialization in international trade. Q. J. Econ. 119:646–77 [Google Scholar]
  46. Syverson C. 2004. Market structure and productivity: a concrete example. J. Polit. Econ. 112:1181–222 [Google Scholar]
  47. Verhoogen EA. 2008. Trade, quality upgrading, and wage inequality in the Mexican manufacturing sector. Q. J. Econ. 123:489–530 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080113-104741
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080113-104741
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error