Progress and Perspectives in the Study of Political Selection

Literature Cited

1. Acemoglu D, Naidu S, Restrepo P, Robinson JA. 2014. Democracy does cause growthNBER Work. Pap. 20004
   [Google Scholar]
2. Adams J. 1999. Policy divergence in multicandidate probabilistic spatial voting. Public Choice 100:103–22
   [Google Scholar]
3. Adida C. 2015. Do African voters favor coethnics? Evidence from a survey experiment in Benin. J. Exp. Political Sci. 2:1–11
   [Google Scholar]
4. Alt J, de Mesquita EB, Rose S. 2011. Disentangling accountability and competence in elections: evidence from U.S. term limits. J. Politics 73:171–86
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ansolabehere S, Snyder JM Jr. 2000. Valence politics and equilibrium in spatial election models. Public Choice 103:327–36
   [Google Scholar]
6. Aragones E, Palfrey TR. 2002. Mixed equilibrium in a Downsian model with a favored candidate. J. Econ. Theory 103:131–61
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ashworth S, Bueno de Mesquita E. 2009. Elections with platform and valence competition. Games Econ. Behav. 67:191–216
   [Google Scholar]
8. Atkinson M, Enos R, Hill S. 2009. Candidate faces and election outcomes: Is the face-vote correlation caused by candidate selection?. Q. J. Political Sci. 4:229–49
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bagues MF, Campa P 2017. Can gender quotas in candidate lists empower women? Evidence from a regression discontinuity design. Discuss. Pap. 10888, Inst. Labor Econ., Bonn, Switz.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Baltrunaite A, Bello P, Casarico A, Profeta P. 2014. Gender quotas and the quality of politicians. J. Public Econ. 118:62–74
    [Google Scholar]
11. Banerjee A, Green D, McManus J, Pande R. 2014. Are poor leaders indifferent to whether elected leaders are criminal or corrupt? A vignette experiment in rural India. Political Commun. 31:391–407
    [Google Scholar]
12. Banerjee A, Kumar S, Pande R, Su F. 2011. Do informed voters make better choices? Experiment evidence from urban India Unpublished manuscript Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA:
    [Google Scholar]
13. Banerjee A, Pande R. 2009. Parochial politics: ethnic preferences and politician corruption Unpublished manuscript Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA:
    [Google Scholar]
14. Banks JS, Sundaram RK. 1993. Adverse selection and moral hazard in a repeated elections model. In Political Economy: Institutions, Competition, and Representation WA Barnett M Hinich N Schofield295–311 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
15. Beath A, Christia F, Egorov G, Enikolopov R. 2016. Electoral rules and political selection: theory and evidence from a field experiment in Afghanistan. Rev. Econ. Stud. 83:932–68
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bernhardt D, Câmara O, Squintani F. 2011. Competence and ideology. Rev. Econ. Stud. 78:487–522
    [Google Scholar]
17. Besley T. 2004. Paying politicians. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 2:193–215
    [Google Scholar]
18. Besley T. 2005. Political selection. J. Econ. Perspect. 19:43–60
    [Google Scholar]
19. Besley T, Coate S. 1997. An economic model of representative democracy. Q. J. Econ. 112:85–114
    [Google Scholar]
20. Besley T, Folke O, Persson T, Rickne J. 2017. Gender quotas and the crisis of the mediocre man: theory and evidence from Sweden. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:2204–42
    [Google Scholar]
21. Besley T, Montalvo JG, Reynal-Querol M. 2011. Do educated leaders matter?. Econ. J. 121:F205–27
    [Google Scholar]
22. Besley T, Persson T, Sturm DM. 2010. Political competition, policy and growth: theory and evidence from the US. Rev. Econ. Stud. 77:1329–52
    [Google Scholar]
23. Besley T, Preston I. 2007. Electoral bias and policy choice: theory and evidence. Q. J. Econ. 122:1473–510
    [Google Scholar]
24. Besley T, Reyal-Querol M. 2011. Do democracies select more educated leaders?. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 105:552–66
    [Google Scholar]
25. Best H, Cotta M. 2000. Parliamentary Representatives in Europe 1848–2000 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
26. Bidwell K, Casey K, Glennerster R. 2015. Debates: the impact of voter knowledge initiatives in Sierra Leone Unpublished manuscript Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA:
    [Google Scholar]
27. Bobonis G, Cámara Fuertes L, Schwabe R. 2016. Monitoring corruptible politicians. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:2371–405
    [Google Scholar]
28. Braendle T. 2013. Does remuneration affect the discipline and the selection of politicians? Evidence from pay harmonization in the European Parliament WWZ Discuss. Pap. 2013/03 Univ. Basel, Switz.:
    [Google Scholar]
29. Brollo F, Nannicini T, Perotti R, Tabellini G. 2013. The political resource curse. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:1759–96
    [Google Scholar]
30. Butler D, Powell E. 2014. Understanding the party brand: experiment evidence on the role of valence. J. Politics 76:492–505
    [Google Scholar]
31. Caillaud B, Tirole J. 2002. Parties as political intermediaries. Q. J. Econ. 117:1453–89
    [Google Scholar]
32. Caillier J. 2010. Citizen trust, political corruption, and voting behavior: connecting the dots. Politics Policy 38:1015–35
    [Google Scholar]
33. Carrillo JD, Mariotti T. 2001. Electoral competition and politician turnover. Eur. Econ. Rev. 45:1–25
    [Google Scholar]
34. Carter J, Patty JW. 2015. Valence and campaigns. Am. J. Political Sci. 59:825–40
    [Google Scholar]
35. Caselli F, Morelli M. 2004. Bad politicians. J. Public Econ. 88:759–82
    [Google Scholar]
36. Casey K. 2015. Crossing party lines: the effects of information on redistributive politics. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:2410–48
    [Google Scholar]
37. Chang E, Golden M, Hill S. 2010. Legislative malfeasance and political accountability. World Politics 62:177–220
    [Google Scholar]
38. Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E. 2004. Women as policy makers: evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica 72:1409–42
    [Google Scholar]
39. Chong A, De La O AL, Karlan D, Wantchekon L. 2014. Does corruption information inspire the fight or quash the hope? A field experiment in Mexico on voter turnout, choice and party identification. J. Politics 77:55–71
    [Google Scholar]
40. Clots-Figueras I. 2012. Are female leaders good for education? Evidence from India. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 4:212–44
    [Google Scholar]
41. Conroy-Krutz J. 2012. Information and ethnic politics in Africa. Br. J. Political Sci. 43:345–73
    [Google Scholar]
42. Dal Bó E, Dal Bó P, Di Tella R. 2006. “Plata o plomo?” Bribe and punishment in a theory of political influence. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 100:41–53
    [Google Scholar]
43. Dal Bó E, Dal Bó P, Snyder J. 2009. Political dynasties. Rev. Econ. Stud. 76:115–42
    [Google Scholar]
44. Dal Bó E, Di Tella R. 2003. Capture by threat. J. Political Econ. 111:1123–52
    [Google Scholar]
45. Dal Bó E, Finan F, Folke O, Persson T, Rickne J. 2017. Who becomes a politician?. Q. J. Econ. 132:1877–914
    [Google Scholar]
46. de Figueiredo M, Hidalgo D, Kasahara Y. 2012. When do voters punish corrupt politicians? Experiment evidence from Brazil Unpublished manuscript Univ. Conn., Storrs:
    [Google Scholar]
47. De Paola M, Scoppa V. 2011. Political competition and politician quality: evidence from Italian municipalities. Public Choice 148:547–59
    [Google Scholar]
48. Di Lonardo L. 2017. Valence uncertainty and the nature of the candidate pool in elections. J. Theor. Politics 29:327–50
    [Google Scholar]
49. Diermeier D, Keane M, Merlo A. 2005. A political economy model of congressional careers. Am. Econ. Rev. 95:347–73
    [Google Scholar]
50. Eggers A, Hainmueller J. 2009. MPs for sale? Returns to office in postwar British politics. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 103:513–33
    [Google Scholar]
51. Eifert B, Miguel E, Posner D. 2010. Political competition and ethnic identification in Africa. Am. J. Political Sci. 54:494–510
    [Google Scholar]
52. Faccio M. 2006. Politically connected firms. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:369–86
    [Google Scholar]
53. Fafchamps M, Labonne J. 2017. Do politicians’ relatives get better jobs? Evidence from municipal elections. J. Law Econ. Organ. 33:268–300
    [Google Scholar]
54. Fearon JD. 1999. Electoral accountability and the control of politicians: selecting good types versus sanctioning poor performance. Democracy, Accountability, and Representationed A Przeworski SC Stokes B Manin55–97 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
55. Ferejohn J. 1986. Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice 50:5–25
    [Google Scholar]
56. Ferraz C, Finan F. 2008. Exposing corrupt politicians: the effects of Brazil's publicly released audits on electoral outcomes. Q. J. Econ.123703–45
    [Google Scholar]
57. Ferraz C, Finan F. 2011. Electoral accountability and corruption: evidence from the audits of local governments. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:1274–311
    [Google Scholar]
58. Ferree K. 2006. Explaining South Africa's racial census. J. Politics 68:803–15
    [Google Scholar]
59. Fisman R. 2001. Estimating the value of political connections. Am. Econ. Rev. 91:1095–102
    [Google Scholar]
60. Fisman R, Harmon N, Kamenica E, Munk I. 2015. Labor supply of politicians. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 13:871–905
    [Google Scholar]
61. Fisman R, Schulz F, Vig V. 2014. The private returns to public office. J. Political Econ. 122:806–62
    [Google Scholar]
62. Fisman R, Schulz F, Vig V. 2016. Financial disclosure and political selection: evidence from India Unpublished manuscript Boston Univ.:
    [Google Scholar]
63. Folke O, Persson T, Rickne J. 2016. Dynastic political rents? Economic benefits to relatives of top politicians Unpublished manuscript Univ. Uppsala, Swed.:
    [Google Scholar]
64. Gagliarducci S, Manacorda M. 2016. Politics in the family: nepotism and the hiring decisions of Italian firms Tech. Rep. 9841 Inst. Labor Econ., Bonn, Ger.:
    [Google Scholar]
65. Gagliarducci S, Nannicini T. 2013. Do better paid politicians perform better? Disentangling incentives from selection. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 11:369–98
    [Google Scholar]
66. Galasso V, Nannicini T. 2011. Competing on good politicians. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 105:79–99
    [Google Scholar]
67. Galasso V, Nannicini T. 2017. Political selection under alternative electoral rules. Public Choice 171:257–81
    [Google Scholar]
68. Gavoille N, Verschelde M. 2017. Electoral competition and political selection: an analysis of the activity of French deputies, 1958–2012. Eur. Econ. Rev. 92:180–95
    [Google Scholar]
69. Gehlbach S, Sonin K, Zhuravskaya E. 2010. Businessman candidates. Am. J. Political Sci. 54:718–36
    [Google Scholar]
70. Groseclose T. 2001. A model of candidate location when one candidate has a valence advantage. Am. J. Political Sci. 45:862–86
    [Google Scholar]
71. Hirano S, Snyder J. 2014. Primary elections and the quality of elected officials. Q. J. Political Sci. 9:473–500
    [Google Scholar]
72. Hobolt S, Hoyland B. 2011. Selection and sanctioning in European parliamentary elections. Br. J. Political Sci. 41:477–98
    [Google Scholar]
73. Hummel P. 2013. Candidate strategies in primaries and general elections with candidates of heterogeneous quality. Games Econ. Behav. 78:85–102
    [Google Scholar]
74. Humphreys M, Weinstein J. 2012. Policing politicians: citizen empowerment and political accountability in Uganda Unpublished manuscript Columbia Univ., New York:
    [Google Scholar]
75. Jones BF, Olken BA. 2005. Do leaders matter? National leadership and growth since World War II. Q. J. Econ. 120:835–64
    [Google Scholar]
76. Kamada Y, Sugaya T. 2014. Valence candidates and ambiguous platforms in policy announcement games Unpublished manuscript Univ. Calif., Berkeley:
    [Google Scholar]
77. Kendall C, Nannicini T, Trebbi F. 2015. How do voters respond to information? Evidence from a randomized campaign. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:322–53
    [Google Scholar]
78. Khwaja AI, Mian A. 2005. Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. Q. J. Econ. 120:1371–411
    [Google Scholar]
79. Kostadinova T. 2009. Abstain or rebel: corruption perceptions and voting in East European elections. Politics Policy 37:691–714
    [Google Scholar]
80. Kotakorpi K, Poutvaara P. 2011. Pay for politicians and candidate selection: an empirical analysis. J. Public Econ. 95:877–85
    [Google Scholar]
81. Kotakorpi K, Poutvaara P, Terviö M. 2016. Returns to office in national and local politics Tech. Rep. 10003 Inst. Labor Econ., Bonn, Ger.:
    [Google Scholar]
82. Lamba S, Spears D. 2013. Caste, cleanliness and cash: effects of caste-based political reservations in Rajasthan on a sanitation prize. J. Dev. Stud. 49:1592–606
    [Google Scholar]
83. Lee DS. 2008. Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections. J. Econom. 142:675–97
    [Google Scholar]
84. Lee DS, Moretti E, Butler MJ. 2004. Do voters affect or elect policies? Evidence from the U.S. House. Q. J. Econ. 119:807–59
    [Google Scholar]
85. Lenz G, Lim K. 2009. Getting rich(er) in office? Corruption and wealth accumulation in Congress Unpublished manuscript Univ. Calif., Berkeley:
    [Google Scholar]
86. Londregan J, Romer T. 1993. Polarization, incumbency, and the personal vote. Political Economy: Institutions, Competition, and Representationed WA Barnett M Hinich N Schofield355–78 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
87. Lublin D. 1994. Quality, not quantity: strategic politicians in U.S. Senate elections, 1951–1990. J. Politics 56:228–41
    [Google Scholar]
88. Lundqvist H. 2013. Is it worth it? On the returns to holding political office Work. Pap. Barc. Inst. Econ., Spain:
    [Google Scholar]
89. Malesky E, Schuler P, Tran A. 2012. The adverse effects of sunshine: a field experiment on legislative transparency in an authoritarian assembly. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 106:762–86
    [Google Scholar]
90. Mattozzi A, Merlo A. 2008. Political careers or career politicians?. J. Public Econ. 92:597–608
    [Google Scholar]
91. Mattozzi A, Merlo A. 2015. Mediocracy. J. Public Econ. 130:32–44
    [Google Scholar]
92. McMillan J, Zoido P. 2004. How to subvert democracy: Montesinos in Peru. J. Econ. Perspect. 18:69–92
    [Google Scholar]
93. Messner M, Polborn M. 2004. Paying politicians. J. Public Econ. 88:2423–45
    [Google Scholar]
94. Meyersson E. 2014. Islamic rule and the empowerment of the poor and pious. Econometrica 82:229–69
    [Google Scholar]
95. Munshi K, Rosenzweig M. 2016. Insiders and outsiders: local ethnic politics and public good provision Unpublished manuscript Yale Univ., New Haven, CT:
    [Google Scholar]
96. Muralidharan K, Niehaus P, Sukhtankar S. 2016. Building state capacity: evidence from biometric smartcards in India. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:2895–929
    [Google Scholar]
97. Niehaus P, Sukhtankar S. 2013. The marginal rate of corruption in public programs: evidence from India. J. Public Econ. 104:52–64
    [Google Scholar]
98. Norris P, Mattes R. 2003. Does ethnicity determine support for the governing party? The structural and attitudinal basis of partisan identification in 12 African nations Unpublished manuscript Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA:
    [Google Scholar]
99. Osborne M, Slivinski A. 1996. A model of political competition with citizen-candidates. Q. J. Econ. 111:65–96
    [Google Scholar]
100. Padró i Miquel G, Snyder J. 2006. Legislative effectiveness and legislative careers. Legis. Stud. Q. 31:347–81
     [Google Scholar]
101. Pande R. 2003. Can mandated political representation increase policy influence for disadvantaged minorities? Theory and evidence from India. Am. Econ. Rev. 93:1132–51
     [Google Scholar]
102. Pande R. 2011. Can informed voters enforce better governance? Experiments in low-income democracies. Annu. Rev. Econ. 3:215–37
     [Google Scholar]
103. Pecenco M, Sukhtankar S. 2018. The impact of political rents on political selection: evidence from India Work. Pap. Univ. Calif., Berkeley:
     [Google Scholar]
104. Peichl A, Pestel N, Siegloch S. 2013. The politicians wage gap: insights from German members of parliament. Public Choice 156:653–76
     [Google Scholar]
105. Persson T, Tabellini G. 2000. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
     [Google Scholar]
106. Poutvaara P, Takalo T. 2007. Candidate quality. Int. Tax Public Finance 14:7–27
     [Google Scholar]
107. Querubin P. 2015. Family and politics: dynastic persistence in the Philippines Unpublished manuscript N. Y. Univ.:
     [Google Scholar]
108. Querubin P, Snyder J. 2009. The returns to US Congressional seats in the mid-19th century. In The Political Economy of Democracyed E Aragones C Bevia H Llavador N Schofield225–40 Madrid: Fund. BBCA
     [Google Scholar]
109. Reinikka R, Svensson J. 2004. Local capture: evidence from a central government transfer program in Uganda. Q. J. Econ. 119:679–705
     [Google Scholar]
110. Schofield N. 2003. Valence competition in the spatial stochastic model. J. Theor. Politics 15:371–83
     [Google Scholar]
111. Smart M, Sturm DM. 2013. Term limits and electoral accountability. J. Public Econ. 107:93–102
     [Google Scholar]
112. Squire P. 1995. Candidates, money, and voters: assessing the state of congressional elections research. Political Res. Q. 48:891–917
     [Google Scholar]
113. Stokes DE. 1963. Spatial models of party competition. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 57:368–77
     [Google Scholar]
114. Szakonyi D. 2018. Businesspeople in elected office: identifying private benefits from firm-level returns. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 112:322–38
     [Google Scholar]
115. Washington EL. 2008. Female socialization: how daughters affect their legislator fathers. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:311–32
     [Google Scholar]
116. Winters M, Weitz-Shapiro R. 2013. Lacking information or condoning corruption: When do voters support corrupt politicians?. Comp. Politics 45:418–36
     [Google Scholar]