1932

Abstract

Trade occurs between firms both across borders and within countries, and most trade transactions include at least one large firm with many trading partners. This article reviews the literature on firm-to-firm connections in trade. A growing body of evidence coming from domestic and international transaction data has established empirical regularities that have inspired the development of new theories emphasizing firm heterogeneity among both buyers and suppliers in production networks. Theoretical work has considered both static and dynamic matching environments in a framework of many-to-many matching. The literature on trade and production networks is at an early stage, and there are many unanswered empirical and theoretical questions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053506
2018-08-02
2024-04-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/10/1/annurev-economics-080217-053506.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053506&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Acemoglu D, Carvalho VM, Ozdaglar A, Tahbaz-Salehi A 2012. The network origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 80:51977–2016
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahn J, Khandelwal AK, Wei S 2011. The role of intermediaries in facilitating trade. J. Int. Econ. 84:173–85
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Akerman A 2018. A theory on the role of wholesalers in international trade based on economies of scope. Can. J. Econ. 51:156–85
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen T 2014. Information frictions in trade. Econometrica 82:2041–83
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Antràs P, Costinot A 2011. Intermediated trade. Q. J. Econ. 126:1319–74
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Antràs P, Fort TC, Tintelnot F 2017. The margins of global sourcing: theory and evidence from U.S. firms. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:2514–64
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Arkolakis C, Costinot A, Rodriguez-Clare A 2012. New trade models, same old gains. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:94–130
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Atalay E, Hortacsu A, Roberts J, Syverson C 2011. Network structure of production. PNAS 108:135199–202
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Atkin D, Donaldson D 2015. Who's getting globalized? The size and implications of intra-national trade costs NBER Work. Pap. 21439
  10. Barrot JN, Sauvagnat J 2016. Input specificity and the propagation of idiosyncratic shocks in production networks. Q. J. Econ. 131:1543–92
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Becker GS 1973. A theory of marriage: part I. J. Political Econ. 81:4813–46
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Benguria F 2015. The matching and sorting of exporting and importing firms: theory and evidence Tech. Rep., Univ. Ky. Lexington:
  13. Bernard AB, Blanchard EJ, Van Beveren I, Vandenbussche H 2018.a Carry-along trade. Rev. Econ. Stud. In press
  14. Bernard AB, Boler EA, Dhingra S 2018.b Firm-to-firm connections in Colombian imports. World Trade Evolution LY Ing, M Yu Oxford, UK: Routledge In press
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bernard AB, Dhingra S 2016. Importers, exporters and the division of the gains from trade Tech. Rep. London School Econ.
  16. Bernard AB, Dhyne E, Magerman G, Manova K, Moxnes A 2017. The origins of firm heterogeneity: a production network approach Tech. Rep., Eur. Cent. Adv. Res. Econ. Stat. Brussels:
  17. Bernard AB, Jensen JB, Redding SJ, Schott PK 2012. The empirics of firm heterogeneity and international trade. Annu. Rev. Econ. 4:283–313
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bernard AB, Jensen JB, Redding SJ, Schott PK 2018.c Global firms. J. Econ. Lit. In press
  19. Bernard AB, Moxnes A, Saito Y 2014. Geography and firm performance in the Japanese production network Tech. Rep. 14-E-034 Res. Inst. Econ. Trade Ind. Tokyo:
  20. Bernard AB, Moxnes A, Saito Y 2018.d Production networks, geography and firm performance. J. Political Econ. In press
  21. Bernard AB, Moxnes A, Ulltveit-Moe KH 2018.e Two-sided heterogeneity and trade. Rev. Econ. Stat. In press
  22. Blum BS, Claro S, Horstmann I 2010. Facts and figures on intermediated trade. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:419–23
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Blum BS, Claro S, Horstmann I 2011. Intermediation and the nature of trade costs: theory and evidence Unpublished manuscript Rotman School Manag., Univ. Toronto Can.:
  24. Blum BS, Claro S, Horstmann IJ 2012. Import intermediaries and trade costs: theory and evidence Unpublished manuscript Univ. Toronto Can.:
  25. Boehm C, Flaaen A, Pandalai-Nayar N 2018. Input linkages and the transmission of shocks: firm-level evidence from the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. Rev. Econ. Stat. In press
  26. Carballo J, Ottaviano GI, Martincus CV 2013. The buyer margins of firms' exports Discuss. Pap. 9584 Cent. Econ. Policy Res. Washington, DC:
  27. Carvalho VM, Nirei M, Saito YU 2016. Supply chain disruptions: evidence from great east Japan earthquake Work. Pap. Cambridge Univ. Cambridge UK:
  28. Chaney T 2014. The network structure of international trade. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:113600–34
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Dhyne E, Magerman G, Rubínová S 2015. The Belgian production network 2002–2012 Work. Pap. 288 Nat. Bank Belg. Brussels:
  30. di Giovanni J, Levchenko AA, Mejean I 2014. Firms, destinations, and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 82:1303–40
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Eaton J, Eslava M, Jinkins D, Krizan CJ, Tybout J 2014. A search and learning model of export dynamics Work. Pap. Penn. State Univ. State College:
  32. Eaton J, Jinkins D, Tybout J, Xu D 2016. Two-sided search in international markets Unpublished manuscript Penn. State Univ. State College:
  33. Eaton J, Kortum S, Kramarz F 2015. Firm-to-firm trade: imports, exports, and the labor market Unpublished manuscript Penn. State Univ. State College:
  34. Felbermayr G, Jung B 2011. Trade intermediation and the organization of exporters. Rev. Int. Econ. 19:634–48
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Furusawa T, Inui T, Ito K, Tang H 2017. Global sourcing and domestic production networks Unpublished manuscript Johns Hopkins Univ. Baltimore, MD:
  36. Graham BS 2015. Methods of identification in social networks. Annu. Rev. Econ. 7:465–85
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Heise S 2016. Firm-to-firm relationships and price rigidity: theory and evidence Work. Pap. Fed. Reserv. Bank N. Y. New York:
  38. Hightower R, Sayeed L 1995. The impact of computer mediated communication systems on biased group discussion. Comput. Hum. Behav. 11:33–44
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hightower R, Sayeed L 1996. Effects of communication mode and prediscussion information distribution characteristics on information exchange in groups. Inf. Syst. Res. 7:451–65
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Jackson MO 2009. Networks and economic behavior. Annu. Rev. Econ. 1:489–511
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Jackson MO, Rogers BW 2007. Meeting strangers and friends of friends: How random are social networks. Am. Econ. Rev. 97:890–915
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kramarz F, Martin J, Mejean I 2016. Volatility in the small and in the large: the lack of diversification in international trade Discuss. Pap. 11534 Cent. Econ. Policy Res. Washington, DC:
  43. Krolikowski PM, McCallum AH 2016. Goods-market frictions and international trade Work. Pap. 16-35 Fed. Reserve Bank Cleveland, OH:
  44. Lim K 2017. Firm-to-firm trade in sticky production networks Unpublished manuscript Univ. Toronto Can.:
  45. Magerman G, Bruyne KD, Dhyne E, Hove JV 2016. Heterogeneous firms and the micro origins of aggregate fluctuations Tech. Rep., Kathol. Univ. Leuven Belg.:
  46. Maznevski ML, Chudoba KM 2000. Bridging space over time: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 11:473–92
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Melitz MJ 2003. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71:1695–725
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Monarch R 2016. “It's not you, it's me”: breakups in U.S.-China trade relationships Unpublished manuscript Fed. Reserve Board Washington, DC:
  49. Monarch R, Schmidt-Eisenlohr T 2016. Learning and the value of trade relationships Unpublished manuscript Fed. Reserve Board Washington, DC:
  50. Morales E, Sheu G, Zahler A 2014. Gravity and extended gravity: using moment inequalities to estimate a model of export entry NBER Work. Pap. 19916
  51. Moxnes A 2010. Are sunk costs in exporting country specific. Can. J. Econ. 43:467–93
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Oberfield E 2018. A theory of input-output architecture. Econometrica 86:559–89
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Petropoulou D 2011. Information costs, networks and intermediation in international trade Work. Pap. 76 Glob. Monet. Policy Inst., Fed. Reserve Bank Dallas TX:
  54. Rauch JE 1999. Networks versus markets in international trade. J. Int. Econ. 48:17–35
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Rauch JE, Trindade V 2002. Ethnic Chinese networks in international trade. Rev. Econ. Stat. 84:1116–30
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Rauch JE, Watson J 2004. Network intermediaries in international trade. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 13:169–93
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Redding SJ 2011. Theories of heterogeneous firms and trade. Annu. Rev. Econ. 3:77–105
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Serrano MA, Boguna M 2003. Topology of the world trade web. Account. Rev. 68:015101
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Startz M 2016. The value of face-to-face: search and contracting problems in Nigerian trade Unpublished manuscript Yale Univ. New Haven, CT:
  60. Sugita Y, Teshima K, Siera E 2014. Assortative matching of exporters and importers Unpublished manuscript Inst. Tecnol. Autón. Méx. Mexico City:
  61. Tintelnot F, Kikkawa AK, Mogstad M, Dhyne E 2017. Trade and domestic production networks Unpublished manuscript Univ. Chicago
  62. Warkentin ME, Sayeed L, Hightower R 1997. Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: an exploratory study of a web-based conference system. Decis. Sci. 28:975–96
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053506
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053506
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error