Legislative and Multilateral Bargaining

Literature Cited

1. Adachi T, Watanabe Y 2007. Ministerial weights and government formation: estimation using a bargaining model. J. Law Econ. Organ. 24:95–119
   [Google Scholar]
2. Adams G, Rausser G, Simon L 1996. Modelling multilateral negotiations: an application to California water policy. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 30:97–111
   [Google Scholar]
3. Agranov M, Eraslan H, Tergiman C 2018. Multilateral bargaining in the shadow of uncertainty Work. Pap., Calif. Inst. Technol. Pasadena:
4. Agranov M, Tergiman C 2014. Communication in multilateral bargaining. J. Public Econ. 118:75–85
   [Google Scholar]
5. Albouy D 2013. Partisan representation in Congress and the geographic distribution of federal funds. Rev. Econ. Stat. 95:127–41
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ali SN 2015. Recognition for sale. J. Econ. Theory 155:16–29
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ali SN, Bernheim BD, Fan X 2018. Predictability and power in legislative bargaining. Rev. Econ. Stud. 86:500–25
   [Google Scholar]
8. Alon N, Edelman PH 2010. The inverse Banzhaf problem. Soc. Choice Welf. 34:371–77
   [Google Scholar]
9. Anesi V, Seidmann DJ 2015. Bargaining in standing committees with an endogenous default. Rev. Econ. Stud. 82:825–67
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ansolabehere S, Snyder JMJ, Strauss AB, Ting MM 2005. Voting weights and formateur advantages in the formation of coalition governments. Am. J. Political Sci. 49:550–63
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ansolabehere S, Snyder JMJ, Ting MM 2003. Bargaining in bicameral legislatures: When and why does malapportionment matter. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 97:471–81
    [Google Scholar]
12. Arrow KJ 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values New York: Wiley
13. Austen-Smith D, Banks J 1988. Elections, coalitions, and legislative outcomes. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 82:405–22
    [Google Scholar]
14. Austen-Smith D, Banks J 1990. Stable governments and the allocation of policy portfolios. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 84:891–906
    [Google Scholar]
15. Austen-Smith D, Banks JS 1999. Positive Political Theory I: Collective Preference Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. Mich. Press
16. Austen-Smith D, Banks JS 2005. Positive Political Theory II: Strategy and Structure Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. Mich. Press
17. Austen-Smith D, Duggan J 2005. Choice and Strategic Decisions: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey S. Banks Berlin: Springer
18. Austen-Smith D, Feddersen T 2005. Deliberation and voting rules. See Austen-Smith & Duggan 2005. 269–316
    [Google Scholar]
19. Austen-Smith D, Feddersen T 2006. Deliberation, preference uncertainty, and voting rules. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 100:209–17
    [Google Scholar]
20. Baliga S, Serrano R 1995. Multilateral bargaining with imperfect information. J. Econ. Theory 67:578–89
    [Google Scholar]
21. Banks JS 1985. Sophisticated voting outcomes and agenda control. Soc. Choice Welf. 1:295–306
    [Google Scholar]
22. Banks JS, Duggan J 2000. A bargaining model of collective choice. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 94:73–88
    [Google Scholar]
23. Banks JS, Duggan J 2006. A general bargaining model of legislative policy-making. Q. J. Political Sci. 1:49–85
    [Google Scholar]
24. Banzhaf JF 1965. Weighted voting doesn't work: a mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Rev. 19:317–43
    [Google Scholar]
25. Baranski A 2016a. Pre-distribution: bargaining over incentives with endogenous production Work. Pap., Maastricht Univ. Neth:
26. Baranski A 2016b. Voluntary contributions and collective redistribution. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 8:149–73
    [Google Scholar]
27. Baranski A 2018. Endogenous claims and collective production: an experimental study on the timing of profit-sharing negotiations and production Work. Pap., Maastricht Univ. Neth:
28. Baron DP 1991. A spatial theory of government formation in parliamentary system. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 85:137–64
    [Google Scholar]
29. Baron DP 1993. Government formation and endogenous parties. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 87:34–47
    [Google Scholar]
30. Baron DP 1996. A dynamic theory of collective goods programs. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 90:316–30
    [Google Scholar]
31. Baron DP 1998. Comparative dynamics of parliamentary governments. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 92:593–609
    [Google Scholar]
32. Baron DP 2017. Simple dynamics of legislative bargaining: coalitions and proposal power. Econ. Theory 67:319–44
    [Google Scholar]
33. Baron DP 2018. Elections and durable governments in parliamentary governments. J. Theor. Politics 30:74–118
    [Google Scholar]
34. Baron DP, Bowen TR 2015. Dynamic coalitions Work. Pap., Grad. School Bus. Stanford Univ. Stanford, CA:
35. Baron DP, Bowen TR, Nunnari S 2017. Durable coalitions and communication: public versus private negotiations. J. Public Econ. 156:1–13
    [Google Scholar]
36. Baron DP, Diermeier D 2001. Elections, governments, and parliaments in proportional representation systems. Q. J. Econ. 116:933–67
    [Google Scholar]
37. Baron DP, Ferejohn JA 1989. Bargaining in legislatures. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 83:1181–206
    [Google Scholar]
38. Baron DP, Kalai E 1993. The simplest equilibrium of a majority-rule division game. J. Econ. Theory 61:290–301
    [Google Scholar]
39. Bassi A 2013. A model of endogenous government formation. Am. J. Political Sci. 57:777–93
    [Google Scholar]
40. Battaglini M, Coate S 2007. Inefficiency in legislative policymaking: a dynamic analysis. Am. Econ. Rev. 97:118–49
    [Google Scholar]
41. Battaglini M, Coate S 2008. A dynamic theory of public spending, taxation, and debt. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:201–36
    [Google Scholar]
42. Battaglini M, Nunnari S, Palfrey TR 2012. Legislative bargaining and the dynamics of public investment. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 106:407–29
    [Google Scholar]
43. Bennedsen M, Feldmann SE 2002. Lobbying legislatures. J. Political Econ. 110:919–46
    [Google Scholar]
44. Bernheim BD, Rangel A, Rayo L 2006. The power of the last word in legislative policy making. Econometrica 74:1161–90
    [Google Scholar]
45. Besley T, Coate S 1998. Sources of inefficiency in a representative democracy: a dynamic analysis. Am. Econ. Rev. 88:139–56
    [Google Scholar]
46. Bils P, Spaniel W 2017. Policy bargaining and militarized conflict. J. Theor. Politics 29:647–78
    [Google Scholar]
47. Binmore KG 1985. Bargaining and coalitions. Game Theoretic Models of Bargaining AE Roth269–304 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
48. Black D 1948. On the rationale of group decision-making. J. Political Econ. 56:23–34
    [Google Scholar]
49. Bond P, Eraslan H 2010. Strategic voting over strategic proposals. Rev. Econ. Stud. 77:459–90
    [Google Scholar]
50. Bondareva ON 1963. Some applications of linear programming methods to the theory of cooperative games. Probl. Kibern. 10:119–39
    [Google Scholar]
51. Bowen TR, Chen Y, Eraslan H 2014. Mandatory versus discretionary spending: the status quo effect. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:2941–74
    [Google Scholar]
52. Bowen TR, Chen Y, Eraslan H, Zápal J 2017. Efficiency of flexible budgetary institutions. J. Econ. Theory 167:148–76
    [Google Scholar]
53. Breitmoser Y 2009. Demand commitments in majority bargaining or how formateurs get their way. Int. J. Game Theory 38:183
    [Google Scholar]
54. Breitmoser Y 2011. Parliamentary bargaining with priority recognition for committee members. Soc. Choice Welf. 37:149–69
    [Google Scholar]
55. Britz V, Herings PJJ, Predtetchinski A 2010. Non-cooperative support for the asymmetric Nash bargaining solution. J. Econ. Theory 145:1951–67
    [Google Scholar]
56. Britz V, Herings PJJ, Predtetchinski A 2014. On the convergence to the Nash bargaining solution for action-dependent bargaining protocols. Games Econ. Behav. 86:178–83
    [Google Scholar]
57. Britz V, Herings PJJ, Predtetchinski A 2015. Delay, multiplicity, and non-existence of equilibrium in unanimity bargaining games. J. Math. Econ. 61:192–202
    [Google Scholar]
58. Cai H 2000. Delay in multilateral bargaining under complete information. J. Econ. Theory 93:260–76
    [Google Scholar]
59. Cai H 2003. Inefficient Markov perfect equilibria in multilateral bargaining. Econ. Theory 22:583–606
    [Google Scholar]
60. Calvert RL, Dietz N 2005. Legislative coalitions in a bargaining model with externalities. See Austen-Smith & Duggan 2005. 228–47
    [Google Scholar]
61. Cardona D, Polanski A 2013. Voting rules and efficiency in one-dimensional bargaining games with endogenous protocol. Soc. Choice Welf. 41:217–40
    [Google Scholar]
62. Cardona D, Ponsatí C 2007. Bargaining one-dimensional social choices. J. Econ. Theory 137:627–51
    [Google Scholar]
63. Cardona D, Ponsatí C 2011. Uniqueness of stationary equilibria in bargaining one-dimensional policies under (super) majority rules. Games Econ. Behav. 73:65–75
    [Google Scholar]
64. Cardona D, Rubí-Barceló A 2014. On the efficiency of equilibria in a legislative bargaining model with particularistic and collective goods. Public Choice 161:345–66
    [Google Scholar]
65. Çelik L, Karabay B 2016. Veto players and equilibrium uniqueness in the Baron–Ferejohn model. Theory Decis. 81:33–52
    [Google Scholar]
66. Çelik L, Karabay B, McLaren J 2013. Trade policy-making in a model of legislative bargaining. J. Int. Econ. 91:179–90
    [Google Scholar]
67. Chatterjee K, Dutta B, Ray D, Sengupta K 1993. A noncooperative theory of coalitional bargaining. Rev. Econ. Stud. 60:463–77
    [Google Scholar]
68. Chatterjee K, Sabourian H 2000. Multiperson bargaining and strategic complexity. Econometrica 68:1491–509
    [Google Scholar]
69. Chen Y, Eraslan H 2013. Informational loss in bundled bargaining. J. Theor. Politics 25:338–62
    [Google Scholar]
70. Chen Y, Eraslan H 2014. Rhetoric in legislative bargaining with asymmetric information. Theor. Econ. 9:483–513
    [Google Scholar]
71. Chen Y, Eraslan H 2017. Dynamic agenda setting. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 9:1–32
    [Google Scholar]
72. Cho S, Duggan J 2003. Uniqueness of stationary equilibria in a one-dimensional model of bargaining. J. Econ. Theory 113:118–30
    [Google Scholar]
73. Cho S, Duggan J 2009. Bargaining foundations of the median voter theorem. J. Econ. Theory 144:851–68
    [Google Scholar]
74. Cho S, Duggan J 2015. A folk theorem for the one-dimensional spatial bargaining model. Int. J. Game Theory 44:933–48
    [Google Scholar]
75. Choate T, Weymark JA, Wiseman AE 2018a. Legislative bargaining and partisan delegation Work. Pap., Grad. School Bus. Stanford Univ. Stanford, CA:
76. Choate T, Weymark JA, Wiseman AE 2018b. Partisan strength and legislative bargaining Work. Pap., Grad. School Bus. Stanford Univ
77. Christiansen N 2013. Strategic delegation in a legislative bargaining model with pork and public goods. J. Public Econ. 97:217–29
    [Google Scholar]
78. Christiansen N, Georganas S, Kagel JH 2014. Coalition formation in a legislative voting game. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 6:182–204
    [Google Scholar]
79. Deegan J, Packel EW 1978. A new index of power in simple -person games. Int. J. Game Theory 7:113–23
    [Google Scholar]
80. Denzau AT, Mackay RJ 1981. Structure-induced equilibria and perfect-foresight expectations. Am. J. Political Sci. 25:762–79
    [Google Scholar]
81. Diermeier D, Egorov G, Sonin K 2017. Political economy of redistribution. Econometrica 85:851–70
    [Google Scholar]
82. Diermeier D, Eraslan H, Merlo A 2002. Coalition governments and comparative constitutional design. Eur. Econ. Rev. 46:893–907
    [Google Scholar]
83. Diermeier D, Eraslan H, Merlo A 2003. A structural model of government formation. Econometrica 71:27–70
    [Google Scholar]
84. Diermeier D, Eraslan H, Merlo A 2007. Bicameralism and government formation. Q. J. Political Sci. 2:227–52
    [Google Scholar]
85. Diermeier D, Feddersen TJ 1998. Cohesion in legislatures and the vote of confidence procedure. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 92:611–21
    [Google Scholar]
86. Diermeier D, Merlo A 2000. Government turnover in parliamentary democracies. J. Econ. Theory 94:46–79
    [Google Scholar]
87. Diermeier D, Merlo A 2004. An empirical investigation of coalitional bargaining procedures. J. Public Econ. 88:783–97
    [Google Scholar]
88. Diermeier D, Morton R 2005. Experiments in majoritarian bargaining. See Austen-Smith & Duggan 2005. 201–26
    [Google Scholar]
89. Diermeier D, Myerson RB 1999. Bicameralism and its consequences for the internal organization of legislatures. Am. Econ. Rev. 89:1182–96
    [Google Scholar]
90. Diermeier D, Prato C, Vlaicu R 2015. Procedural choice in majoritarian organizations. Am. J. Political Sci. 59:866–79
    [Google Scholar]
91. Diermeier D, Prato C, Vlaicu R 2016. A bargaining model of endogenous procedures. Soc. Choice Welf. 47:985–1012
    [Google Scholar]
92. Drouvelis M, Montero M, Sefton M 2010. Gaining power through enlargement: strategic foundations and experimental evidence. Games Econ. Behav. 69:274–92
    [Google Scholar]
93. Dziuda W, Loeper A 2016. Dynamic collective choice with endogenous status quo. J. Political Econ. 124:1148–86
    [Google Scholar]
94. Eguia JX, Shepsle KA 2015. Legislative bargaining with endogenous rules. J. Politics 77:1076–88
    [Google Scholar]
95. Epple D, Riordan MH 1987. Cooperation and punishment under repeated majority voting. Public Choice 55:41–73
    [Google Scholar]
96. Eraslan H 2002. Uniqueness of stationary equilibrium payoffs in the Baron-Ferejohn model. J. Econ. Theory 103:11–30
    [Google Scholar]
97. Eraslan H 2008. Corporate bankruptcy reorganizations: estimates from a bargaining model. Int. Econ. Rev. 49:659–81
    [Google Scholar]
98. Eraslan H 2016. Uniqueness of stationary equilibrium payoffs in the Baron-Ferejohn model with risk-averse players. Int. J. Econ. Theory 12:29–40
    [Google Scholar]
99. Eraslan H, Evdokimov KS, Zápal J 2019. Legislative bargaining with endogenous status quo Unpublished manuscript Rice Univ.: Houston, TX:
100. Eraslan H, McLennan A 2013. Uniqueness of stationary equilibrium payoffs in coalitional bargaining. J. Econ. Theory 148:2195–222
     [Google Scholar]
101. Eraslan H, Merlo A 2002. Majority rule in a stochastic model of bargaining. J. Econ. Theory 103:31–48
     [Google Scholar]
102. Eraslan H, Merlo A 2017. Some unpleasant bargaining arithmetic. J. Econ. Theory 171:293–315
     [Google Scholar]
103. Feddersen T, Pesendorfer W 1996. The swing voter's curse. Am. Econ. Rev. 86:408–24
     [Google Scholar]
104. Feddersen T, Pesendorfer W 1997. Voting behavior and information aggregation in elections with private information. Econometrica 65:1029–58
     [Google Scholar]
105. Feddersen T, Pesendorfer W 1998. Convicting the innocent: the inferiority of unanimous jury verdicts under strategic voting. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 92:23–35
     [Google Scholar]
106. Feddersen T, Pesendorfer W 1999. Abstention in elections with asymmetric information and diverse preferences. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 93:381–98
     [Google Scholar]
107. Fréchette GR, Kagel JH, Morelli M 2005a. Behavioral identification in coalitional bargaining: an experimental analysis of demand bargaining and alternating offers. Econometrica 73:1893–937
     [Google Scholar]
108. Fréchette GR, Kagel JH, Morelli M 2005b. Gamson's law versus non-cooperative bargaining theory. Games Econ. Behav. 51:365–90
     [Google Scholar]
109. Gamson WA 1961. A theory of coalition formation. Am. Sociol. Rev. 26:373–82
     [Google Scholar]
110. Gilligan TW, Krehbiel K 1987. Collective decisionmaking and standing committees: an informational rationale for restrictive amendment procedures. J. Law Econ. Organ. 3:287–335
     [Google Scholar]
111. Gilligan TW, Krehbiel K 1990. Organization of informative committees by a rational legislature. Am. J. Political Sci. 34:531–64
     [Google Scholar]
112. Gomes A 2005. Multilateral contracting with externalities. Econometrica 73:1329–50
     [Google Scholar]
113. Gomes A 2015. Multilateral negotiations and formation of coalitions. J. Math. Econ. 59:77–91
     [Google Scholar]
114. Gomes A 2017. Coalitional bargaining games: a new concept of value and coalition formation Work. Pap. Wash. Univ. St. Louis MO:
115. Gomes A, Jehiel P 2005. Dynamic processes of social and economic interactions: on the persistence of inefficiencies. J. Political Econ. 113:626–67
     [Google Scholar]
116. Gül F 1989. Bargaining foundations of Shapley value. Econometrica 57:81–95
     [Google Scholar]
117. Harrington JEJ 1990a. The power of the proposal maker in a model of endogenous agenda formation. Public Choice 64:1–20
     [Google Scholar]
118. Harrington JEJ 1990b. The role of risk preferences in bargaining when acceptance of a proposal requires less than unanimous approval. J. Risk Uncertain. 3:135–54
     [Google Scholar]
119. Helpman E, Persson T 2001. Lobbying and legislative bargaining. Adv. Econ. Anal. Policy 1:3
     [Google Scholar]
120. Herings PJJ, Houba H 2016. The Condorcet paradox revisited. Soc. Choice Welf. 47:141–86
     [Google Scholar]
121. Herings PJJ, Meshalkin A, Predtetchinski A 2017. A one-period memory folk theorem for multilateral bargaining games. Games Econ. Behav. 103:185–98
     [Google Scholar]
122. Herings PJJ, Meshalkin A, Predtetchinski A 2018. Subgame perfect equilibria in majoritarian bargaining. J. Math. Econ. 76:101–12
     [Google Scholar]
123. Herings PJJ, Predtetchinski A 2010. One-dimensional bargaining with Markov recognition probabilities. J. Econ. Theory 145:189–215
     [Google Scholar]
124. Hyndman K, Ray D 2007. Coalition formation with binding agreements. Rev. Econ. Stud. 74:1125–47
     [Google Scholar]
125. Iaryczower M, Oliveros S 2016. Power brokers: middlemen in legislative bargaining. J. Econ. Theory 162:209–36
     [Google Scholar]
126. Inman RP 1987. Markets, governments, and the “new” political economy. Handbook of Public Economics 2 M Feldstein, AJ Auerbach647–777 Amsterdam: Elsevier
     [Google Scholar]
127. Jackson MO, Moselle B 2002. Coalition and party formation in a legislative voting game. J. Econ. Theory 103:49–87
     [Google Scholar]
128. Johnston RJ 1978. On the measurement of power: some reactions to Laver. Environ. Plan. A 10:907–14
     [Google Scholar]
129. Kalandrakis T 2004a. Bicameral winning coalitions and equilibrium federal legislatures. Legisl. Stud. Q. 29:49–79
     [Google Scholar]
130. Kalandrakis T 2004b. Equilibria in sequential bargaining games as solutions to systems of equations. Econ. Lett. 84:407–11
     [Google Scholar]
131. Kalandrakis T 2004c. A three-player dynamic majoritarian bargaining game. J. Econ. Theory 116:294–322
     [Google Scholar]
132. Kalandrakis T 2006. Proposal rights and political power. Am. J. Political Sci. 50:441–48
     [Google Scholar]
133. Kalandrakis T 2010. Minimum winning coalitions and endogenous status quo. Int. J. Game Theory 39:617–43
     [Google Scholar]
134. Kalandrakis T 2015. Computation of equilibrium values in the Baron and Ferejohn bargaining model. Games Econ. Behav. 94:29–38
     [Google Scholar]
135. Kalandrakis T 2016. Pareto efficiency in the dynamic one-dimensional bargaining model. J. Theor. Politics 28:525–36
     [Google Scholar]
136. Kawamori T 2004. Legislative bargaining and parties’ patience Master's Thesis, Univ. Tokyo:
137. Kawamori T 2005. Players’ patience and equilibrium payoffs in the Baron-Ferejohn model. Econ. Bull. 3:1–5
     [Google Scholar]
138. Kawamori T 2013. Rejecter-proposer legislative bargaining with heterogeneous time and risk preferences. Soc. Choice Welf. 40:27–40
     [Google Scholar]
139. Kennan J, Wilson R 1993. Bargaining with private information. J. Econ. Lit. 31:45–104
     [Google Scholar]
140. Kim DG 2018a. The cycle-stationary subgame perfect equilibrium in legislative bargaining without replacement Work. Pap. Univ. Mannheim Ger:
141. Kim DG 2018b. “One bite at the apple”: legislative bargaining without replacement Work. Pap. Univ. Mannheim Ger:
142. Knight B 2004. Parochial interests and the centralized provision of local public goods: evidence from Congressional voting on transportation projects. J. Public Econ. 88:845–66
     [Google Scholar]
143. Knight B 2005. Estimating the value of proposal power. Am. Econ. Rev. 95:1639–52
     [Google Scholar]
144. Knight B 2008. Legislative representation, bargaining power and the distribution of federal funds: evidence from the US Congress. Econ. J. 118:1785–803
     [Google Scholar]
145. Koh Y 2018. Universalism and the value of political power. Int. Econ. Rev. 59:1375–402
     [Google Scholar]
146. Konishi H, Ray D 2003. Coalition formation as a dynamic process. J. Econ. Theory 110:1–41
     [Google Scholar]
147. Krishna V, Morgan J 2001. Asymmetric information and legislative rules: some amendments. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 95:435–52
     [Google Scholar]
148. Krishna V, Serrano R 1996. Multilateral bargaining. Rev. Econ. Stud. 63:61–80
     [Google Scholar]
149. Kurz S 2012. On the inverse power index problem. Optimization 61:989–1011
     [Google Scholar]
150. Kurz S 2016. The inverse problem for power distributions in committees. Soc. Choice Welf. 47:65–88
     [Google Scholar]
151. Kurz S, Napel S, Nohn A 2014. The nucleolus of large majority games. Econ. Lett. 123:139–43
     [Google Scholar]
152. Le Breton M, Montero M, Zaporozhets V 2012. Voting power in the EU Council of Ministers and fair decision making in distributive politics. Math. Soc. Sci. 63:159–73
     [Google Scholar]
153. LeBlanc W, Snyder JM, Tripathi M 2000. Majority rule and the underprovision of public investment. J. Public Econ. 75:21–47
     [Google Scholar]
154. Levy G, Razin R 2013. Dynamic legislative decision making when interest groups control the agenda. J. Econ. Theory 148:1862–90
     [Google Scholar]
155. Li H, Suen W 2009. Decision-making in committees. Can. J. Econ./Rev. Can. Écon. 42:359–92
     [Google Scholar]
156. Lupia A, Strøm K 1995. Coalition termination and the strategic timing of parliamentary elections. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 89:648–65
     [Google Scholar]
157. Martin GJ 2018. Dividing the dollar with formulas. J. Politics 80:479–93
     [Google Scholar]
158. Matthews SA 1989. Veto threats: rhetoric in a bargaining game. Q. J. Econ. 104:347–69
     [Google Scholar]
159. McCarty NM 2000a. Presidential pork: executive veto power and distributive politics. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 94:117–29
     [Google Scholar]
160. McCarty NM 2000b. Proposal rights, veto rights, and political bargaining. Am. J. Political Sci. 44:506–22
     [Google Scholar]
161. McKelvey RD 1976. Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control. J. Econ. Theory 12:472–82
     [Google Scholar]
162. McKelvey RD 1979. General conditions for global intransitivities in formal voting models. Econometrica 47:1085–112
     [Google Scholar]
163. McKelvey RD 1986. Covering, dominance, and institution-free properties of social choice. Am. J. Political Sci. 30:283–314
     [Google Scholar]
164. McKelvey RD, Niemi RG 1978. A multistage game representation of sophisticated voting for binary procedures. J. Econ. Theory 18:1–22
     [Google Scholar]
165. McKelvey RD, Riezman R 1992. Seniority in legislatures. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 86:951–65
     [Google Scholar]
166. Merlo A 1997. Bargaining over governments in a stochastic environment. J. Political Econ. 105:101–31
     [Google Scholar]
167. Merlo A, Wilson C 1995. A stochastic model of sequential bargaining with complete information. Econometrica 63:371–99
     [Google Scholar]
168. Merlo A, Wilson C 1998. Efficient delays in a stochastic model of bargaining. Econ. Theory 11:39–55
     [Google Scholar]
169. Miller NR 1980. A new solution set for tournaments and majority voting: further graph-theoretical approaches to the theory of voting. Am. J. Political Sci. 24:68–96
     [Google Scholar]
170. Montero M 2006. Noncooperative foundations of the nucleolus in majority games. Games Econ. Behav. 54:380–97
     [Google Scholar]
171. Montero M 2017. Proportional payoffs in legislative bargaining with weighted voting: a characterization. Q. J. Political Sci. 12:325–46
     [Google Scholar]
172. Montero M, Vidal-Puga JJ 2007. Demand commitment in legislative bargaining. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 101:847–50
     [Google Scholar]
173. Montero M, Vidal-Puga JJ 2011. Demand bargaining and proportional payoffs in majority games. Games Econ. Behav. 71:395–408
     [Google Scholar]
174. Morelli M 1999. Demand competition and policy compromise in legislative bargaining. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 93:809–20
     [Google Scholar]
175. Muthoo A, Shepsle KA 2014. Seniority and incumbency in legislatures. Econ. Politics 26:13–37
     [Google Scholar]
176. Nakamura K 1979. The vetoers in a simple game with ordinal preferences. Int. J. Game Theory 8:55–61
     [Google Scholar]
177. Nash J 1953. Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica 21:128–40
     [Google Scholar]
178. Noe TH, Wang J 2004. Fooling all of the people some of the time: a theory of endogenous sequencing in confidential negotiations. Rev. Econ. Stud. 71:855–81
     [Google Scholar]
179. Norman P 2002. Legislative bargaining and coalition formation. J. Econ. Theory 102:322–53
     [Google Scholar]
180. Nunnari S, Zápal J 2016. Gambler's fallacy and imperfect best response in legislative bargaining. Games Econ. Behav. 99:275–94
     [Google Scholar]
181. Okada A 1996. A noncooperative coalitional bargaining game with random proposers. Games Econ. Behav. 16:97–108
     [Google Scholar]
182. Okada A 2000. The efficiency principle in non-cooperative coalitional bargaining. Jpn. Econ. Rev. 51:34–50
     [Google Scholar]
183. Okada A 2011. Coalitional bargaining games with random proposers: theory and application. Games Econ. Behav. 73:227–35
     [Google Scholar]
184. Osborne MJ, Rubinstein A 1990. Bargaining and Markets Cambridge, MA: Academic Press
185. Osborne MJ, Rubinstein A 1994. A Course in Game Theory Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
186. Parameswaran G 2018. Bargaining and bicameralism. Legisl. Stud. Q. 43:101–39
     [Google Scholar]
187. Parameswaran G, Cameron CM, Kornhauser LA 2017. Bargaining on appellate courts Work. Pap. Haverford Coll. Haverford, PA:
188. Persson T 1998. Economic policy and special interest politics. Econ. J. 108:310–27
     [Google Scholar]
189. Persson T, Roland G, Tabellini G 1998. Towards micropolitical foundations of public finance. Eur. Econ. Rev. 42:685–94
     [Google Scholar]
190. Persson T, Roland G, Tabellini G 2000. Comparative politics and public finance. J. Political Econ. 108:1121–61
     [Google Scholar]
191. Plott CR 1967. A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule. Am. Econ. Rev. 57:787–806
     [Google Scholar]
192. Predtetchinski A 2011. One-dimensional bargaining. Games Econ. Behav. 72:526–43
     [Google Scholar]
193. Proost S, Zaporozhets V 2013. The political economy of fixed regional public expenditure shares with an illustration for Belgian railway investments. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 43:808–15
     [Google Scholar]
194. Ray D 2007. A Game-Theoretic Perspective on Coalition Formation Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
195. Ray D, Vohra R 1999. A theory of endogenous coalition structures. Games Econ. Behav. 26:286–336
     [Google Scholar]
196. Ray D, Vohra R 2015. Coalition formation. Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications 4 HP Young, S Zamir239–326 Amsterdam: Elsevier
     [Google Scholar]
197. Romer T, Rosenthal H 1978. Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo. Public Choice 33:27–43
     [Google Scholar]
198. Roth AE 1985. A note on risk aversion in a perfect equilibrium model of bargaining. Econometrica 53:207–11
     [Google Scholar]
199. Rubinstein A 1982. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50:97–109
     [Google Scholar]
200. Scarf HE 1967. The core of an n person game. Econometrica 35:50–69
     [Google Scholar]
201. Schmeidler D 1969. The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 17:1163–70
     [Google Scholar]
202. Schofield N 2007. The Spatial Model of Politics Abingdon, UK: Routledge
203. Seidmann DJ, Winter E 1998. A theory of gradual coalition formation. Rev. Econ. Stud. 65:793–815
     [Google Scholar]
204. Shapley LS 1967. On balanced sets and cores. Naval Res. Logist. Q. 14:453–60
     [Google Scholar]
205. Shapley LS, Shubik M 1954. A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 81:935–45
     [Google Scholar]
206. Shepsle KA 1979. Institutional arrangements and equilibrium in multidimensional voting models. Am. J. Political Sci. 23:27–59
     [Google Scholar]
207. Shepsle KA, Weingast BR 1984. Uncovered sets and sophisticated voting outcomes with implications for agenda institutions. Am. J. Political Sci. 28:49–74
     [Google Scholar]
208. Snyder JM, Ting MM, Ansolabehere S 2005. Legislative bargaining under weighted voting. Am. Econ. Rev. 95:981–1004
     [Google Scholar]
209. Tarar A 2005. Constituencies and preferences in international bargaining. J. Confl. Resolut. 49:383–407
     [Google Scholar]
210. Thomas A, Zaporozhets V 2017. Bargaining over environmental budgets: a political economy model with application to French water policy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 68:227–48
     [Google Scholar]
211. Tsai TS, Yang C 2010a. Minimum winning versus oversized coalitions in public finance: the role of uncertainty. Soc. Choice Welf. 34:345–61
     [Google Scholar]
212. Tsai TS, Yang C 2010b. On majoritarian bargaining with incomplete information. Int. Econ. Rev. 51:959–79
     [Google Scholar]
213. Uyanık M 2017. Computation of stationary equilibrium payoffs in coalitional bargaining Work. Pap. Univ. Queensland Aust:
214. Vanberg G 1998. Abstract judicial review, legislative bargaining, and policy compromise. J. Theor. Politics 10:299–326
     [Google Scholar]
215. Volden C, Wiseman AE 2007. Bargaining in legislatures over particularistic and collective goods. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 101:79–92 Erratum. 2008. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 102:385–86
     [Google Scholar]
216. Weber RJ 1994. Games in coalitional form. Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications 2 HP Young, S Zamir1285–303 Amsterdam: Elsevier
     [Google Scholar]
217. Winter E 1996. Voting and vetoing. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 90:812–23
     [Google Scholar]
218. Woon J, Anderson S 2012. Political bargaining and the timing of Congressional appropriations. Legisl. Stud. Q. 37:409–36
     [Google Scholar]
219. Yıldırım H 2007. Proposal power and majority rule in multilateral bargaining with costly recognition. J. Econ. Theory 136:167–96
     [Google Scholar]
220. Yıldırım H 2010. Distribution of surplus in sequential bargaining with endogenous recognition. Public Choice 142:41
     [Google Scholar]
221. Yıldırım M 2018. Legislative bargaining with a stochastic surplus and costly recognition. Econ. Lett. 163:102–5
     [Google Scholar]
222. Zápal J 2016. Markovian equilibria in dynamic spatial legislative bargaining: existence with three players. Games Econ. Behav. 98:235–42
     [Google Scholar]
223. Zápal J 2018. Simple Markovian equilibria in dynamic spatial legislative bargaining Work. Pap. CERGE-EI/IAE-CSIC/Barcelona Grad. School Econ.: Prague/Barcelona: