1932

Abstract

In this article, we review the desirability and feasibility of a universal basic income (UBI) scheme from the theoretical point of view. We first discuss the possible theoretical justifications of UBI, contrasting the unconditionality of UBI with the many conditions that typically accompany other welfare policies. These justifications range from pure normative reasons to practical reasons due to the problem of screening beneficiaries and imperfections in institutions in charge of implementing tax and welfare policies. Next, we explore the conditions that determine the feasibility and size of a UBI. The broad picture that emerges from our review is that both normative and practical considerations make UBI easier to defend as a tool of poverty alleviation in developing countries than as a tool to achieve social justice in developed ones.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030220
2019-08-02
2024-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/11/1/annurev-economics-080218-030220.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030220&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Akerlof GA 1978. The economics of “tagging” as applied to the optimal income tax, welfare programs, and manpower planning. Am. Econ. Rev. 68:18–19
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alstadsæter A, Johannesen N, Zucman G 2019. Tax evasion and inequality. Am. Econ. Rev. 1092073–103
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkinson AB 1995. Public Economics in Action Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  4. Atkinson AB, Stiglitz JE 1976. The design of tax structure: direct versus indirect taxation. J. Public Econ. 6:1–255–75
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baird S, McKenzie D, Özler B 2018. The effects of cash transfers on adult labor market outcomes GLM-LIC Synth. Pap. 9, Inst. Labor Econ., Bonn, Ger.
  6. Banerjee AV, Duflo E 2011. Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty New York: Public Aff.
  7. Banerjee AV, Niehaus P, Suri T 2019. Universal basic income in the developing world. Annu. Rev. Econ. 11961–85
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Besley T, Coate S 1992. Workfare versus welfare: incentive arguments for work requirements in poverty-alleviation programs. Am. Econ. Rev. 82:1249–61
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Besley T, Coate S 1995. The design of income maintenance programmes. Rev. Econ. Stud. 62:2187–221
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Besley T, Kanbur R 1995. The principles of targeting Policy Res. Extern. Aff. Work. Pap. WPS 385, World Bank, Washington, DC
  11. Boadway R 2012. From Optimal Tax Theory to Tax Policy Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  12. Boadway R, Jacquet L 2008. Optimal marginal and average income taxation under maximin. J. Econ. Theory 143:1425–41
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Boadway R, Marchand M, Pestieau P, Del Mar Racionero M 2002. Optimal redistribution with heterogeneous preferences for leisure. J. Public Econ. Theory 4:475–98
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cremer H, Gahvari F, Lozachmeur J-M 2010. Tagging and income taxation: theory and an application. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 2:131–50
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Currie J 2006. The take-up of social benefits. Poverty, The Distribution of Income, and Public Policy A Auerbach, D Card, J Quigley80–148 New York: Russell Sage
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Currie J, Gahvari F 2008. Transfers in cash and in-kind: theory meets the data. J. Econ. Lit. 46:2333–83
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Evans DK, Popova A 2017. Cash transfers and temptation goods. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 65:2189–221
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fleurbaey M, Maniquet F 2011. A Theory of Fairness and Social Welfare Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  19. Fleurbaey M, Maniquet F 2018. Optimal income taxation theory and principles of fairness. J. Econ. Lit. 56:31029–79
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Friedman M 1968. The case for a negative income tax: a view from the right. Issues of American Public Policies J Bunzel111–20 Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Galbraith JK 1969. The Affluent Society London: Hamish Hamilton. 2nd ed.
  22. Ghatak M 2015. Theories of poverty traps and anti-poverty policies. World Bank Econ. Rev. Papers Proc. 29:Suppl. 1S77–105
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ghatak M, Kumar C, Mitra S 2016. Cash versus kind: understanding the preferences of the bicycle programme beneficiaries in Bihar. Econ. Political Wkly. 51:1151–60
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hoynes H, Rothstein J 2019. Universal basic income in the United States and advanced countries. Annu. Rev. Econ. 11929–58
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hoynes HW, Schanzenbach DW 2009. Consumption responses to in-kind transfers: evidence from the introduction of the food stamp program. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 1:4109–39
    [Google Scholar]
  26. IMF (Int. Monet. Fund) 2017. IMF fiscal monitor: tackling inequality, October 2017 Rep., Int. Monet. Fund, Washington, DC. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM/Issues/2017/10/05/fiscal-monitor-october-2017
  27. Kanbur R, Keen M, Tuomala M 1994a. Labor supply and targeting in poverty alleviation programs. World Bank Econ. Rev. 8:191–211
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kanbur R, Keen M, Tuomala M 1994b. Optimal non-linear income taxation for the alleviation of income-poverty. Eur. Econ. Rev. 38:1613–32
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kasy M 2018. Why a universal basic income is better than subsidies of low-wage work Work. Pap. 2, Data For Progress http://filesforprogress.org/pdfs/UBI_EITC_Kasy_DFP_Working_Paper.pdf
  30. Langenbucher K 2015. How demanding are eligibility criteria for unemployment benefits, quantitative indicators for OECD and EU countries OECD Soc. Employ. Migr. Work. Pap., Org. Econ. Co-op. Dev., Paris
  31. Lockwood BB 2016. Optimal income taxation with present bias Work. Pap., Univ. Penn., Philadelphia
  32. Maniquet F, Neumann D 2016. Well-being, poverty and labor income taxation: theory and application to Europe and the U.S CORE Discuss. Pap. 2016029, Univ. Cathol. Louvain, Belg.
  33. Matsuyama K, Ushchev P 2017. Beyond CES: three alternative classes of flexible homothetic demand systems Work. Pap., Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL
  34. Mirrlees JA 1971. An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. Rev. Econ. Stud. 38:175–208
    [Google Scholar]
  35. MISSOC (Mutual Inform. Syst. Soc. Prot.) 2011. Guaranteed minimal resources MISSOC Anal. MISSOC:
  36. Muralidharan K, Niehaus P, Sukhantkar S 2017. Direct benefits transfer in food: results from one year of process monitoring in union territories Work. Pap., Univ. Calif., San Diego
  37. Piketty T, Saez E 2013. Optimal labor income taxation. Handbook of Public Economics 5 AJ Auerbach, R Chetty, M Feldstein, E Saez391–474 Amsterdam: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ravallion M 2018. Guaranteed employment or guaranteed income? Work. Pap. 482 Cent. Glob. Dev., Washington, DC:
  39. Romer T 1975. Individual welfare, majority voting, and the properties of a linear income tax. J. Public Econ. 4:2163–85
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Saez E, Stantcheva S 2016. Generalized social marginal welfare weights for optimal tax theory. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:124–45
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Salehi-Isfahani D, Mostafavi-Dehzooei MH 2018. Cash transfers and labor supply: evidence from a large-scale program in Iran. J. Dev. Econ. 135:349–67
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sen A 1970. The impossibility of a Paretian liberal. J. Political Econ. 78:1152–57
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Tirole J 1986. Hierarchies and bureaucracies: on the role of collusion in organizations. J. Law Econ. Organ. 2:2181–214
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Tobin J, Pechman JA, Mieszkowski PM 1967. Is a negative income tax practical. Yale Law J. 7711
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Van Parijs P, Vanderborght Y 2017. Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  46. Weinzierl M 2011. The surprising power of age-dependent taxes. Rev. Econ. Stud. 78:41490–518
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030220
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030220
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error