1932

Abstract

Social justice considerations are incorporated into welfare economics via properties of the social welfare function and measures of individual utility. The ethical issues underlying various approaches are illustrated through intriguing paradoxes that have emerged in the literature. Such puzzles point to the tensions among certain important values (such as respecting preferences, giving priority to the worse off, personal responsibility, and informational simplicity) and suggest the relevant ways in which reasonable compromise can be sought. Welfare economics is now able to accommodate a large range of conceptions of justice, including utilitarianism and various forms of egalitarianism and libertarianism.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030429
2019-08-02
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/11/1/annurev-economics-080218-030429.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030429&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adler MD 2016. Benefit–cost analysis and distributional weights: an overview. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 10:264–85
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arrow KJ 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press. 2nd ed.
  3. Arrow KJ, Sen AK, Suzumura K eds 2011. Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare 2 Amsterdam: Elsevier
  4. Asheim GB, Zuber S 2014. Escaping the repugnant conclusion: rank-discounted utilitarianism with variable population. Theor. Econ. 9:629–50
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Balinski M, Laraki R 2011. Majority Judgment: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  6. Bergson A 1938. A reformulation of certain aspects of welfare economics. Q. J. Econ. 52:310–34
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergstrom TC 2006. Benefit-cost in a benevolent society. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:339–51
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Blackorby C, Bossert W, Donaldson D 2005. Population Issues in Social-Choice Theory, Welfare Economics and Ethics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  9. Boadway RW 1974. The welfare foundations of cost-benefit analysis. Econ. J. 84:926–39
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bommier A, Zuber S 2008. Can preferences for catastrophe avoidance reconcile social discounting with intergenerational equity. Soc. Choice Welf. 31415–34
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Broome J 1991. Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty and Time Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  12. Broome J 2004. Weighing Lives Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  13. Brun BC, Tungodden B 2004. Non-welfaristic theories of justice: Is the intersection approach a solution to the indexing impasse. Soc. Choice Welf. 2249–60
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Coate S 2000. An efficiency approach to the evaluation of policy changes. Econ. J. 110:437–55
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cohen GA 1989. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99:906–44
    [Google Scholar]
  16. d'Aspremont C, Gevers L 1977. Equity and the informational basis of collective choice. Rev. Econ. Stud. 44:199–209
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Diamond PA 1967. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility: comment. J. Political Econ. 75:765–66
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dufwenberg M, Heidhues P, Kirchsteiger G, Riedel F, Sobel J 2011. General equilibrium with other-regarding preferences. Rev. Econ. Stud. 218:613–39
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dworkin R 2000. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  20. Epstein LG, Segal U 1992. Quadratic social welfare functions. J. Political Econ. 100:691–712
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fehr E, Schmidt KM 1999. A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 114:817–68
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Finkelstein A, Luttmer EFP, Notowidigdo MJ 2013. What good is wealth without health? The effect of health on the marginal utility of consumption. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 11:221–58
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fleurbaey M 2008. Freedom, Responsibility, and Welfare Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  24. Fleurbaey M 2010. Assessing risky social situations. J. Political Econ. 118:649–80
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fleurbaey M, Abi-Rafeh R 2016. The use of distributional weights in benefit-cost analysis: insights from welfare economics. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 10:286–307
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fleurbaey M, Blanchet D 2013. Beyond GDP: Measuring Welfare and Assessing Sustainability Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  27. Fleurbaey M, Maniquet F 2011. A Theory of Fairness and Social Welfare Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  28. Fleurbaey M, Maniquet F 2018. Optimal income taxation theory and principles of fairness. J. Econ. Lit. 56:31029–79
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Fleurbaey M, Peragine V 2013. Ex ante versus ex post equality of opportunity. Economica 80:118–30
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Fleurbaey M, Trannoy A 2003. The impossibility of a Paretian Egalitarian. Soc. Choice Welf. 21:243–64
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Fleurbaey M, Tungodden B 2010. The tyranny of non-aggregation versus the tyranny of aggregation in social choices: a real dilemma. Econ. Theory 44:399–414
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Fleurbaey M, Zuber S 2017. Fair management of social risk. J. Econ. Theory 169:666–706
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Frank RH 1985. Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  34. Gaertner W, Pattanaik P, Suzumura K 1992. Individual rights revisited. Economica 59:161–77
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Gaertner W, Schokkaert E 2011. Empirical Social Choice: Questionnaire-Experimental Studies on Distributive Justice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  36. Gibbard A 1974. A Pareto-consistent libertarian claim. J. Econ. Theory 7:388–410
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Graham C 2009. Happiness Around the World: The Paradox of Happy Peasants and Miserable Millionaires Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  38. Hammond PJ 1982. Utilitarianism, uncertainty and information. Utilitarianism and Beyond AK Sen, B Williams85–102 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Harsanyi JC 1955. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J. Political Econ. 63:309–21
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Harsanyi JC 1977. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  41. Hicks JR 1940. The valuation of social income. Economica 7:105–24
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Jones CI, Klenow PJ 2016. Beyond GDP? Welfare across countries and time. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:2426–57
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Kaldor N 1939. Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Econ. J. 49:549–52
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Kannai Y 1970. Continuity properties of the core of a market. Econometrica 38:791–815
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Layard R, Mayraz G, Nickell S 2008. The marginal utility of income. J. Public Econ. 92:1846–57
    [Google Scholar]
  46. List C, Puppe C 2009. Judgment aggregation: a survey. Handbook of Rational and Social Choice P Anand, P Pattanaik, C Puppe457–82 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Machina MJ 1989. Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty. J. Econ. Lit. 27:1622–68
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Mongin P 1995. Consistent Bayesian aggregation. J. Econ. Theory 66:313–51
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Mongin P 2016. Spurious unanimity and the Pareto principle. Econ. Philos. 32:511–32
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Mongin P, Pivato M 2016. Social evaluation under risk and uncertainty. Oxford Handbook on Well-Being and Public Policy MD Adler, M Fleurbaey711–45 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Nozick R 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia New York: Basic Books
  52. Nurmi H 1998. Voting paradoxes and referenda. Soc. Choice Welf. 15:333–50
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Parfit D 1984. Reasons and Persons Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press
  54. Pazner E, Schmeidler D 1978. Egalitarian equivalent allocations: a new concept of economic equity. Q. J. Econ. 92:671–87
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Pigou AC 1920. The Economics of Welfare London: Macmillan
  56. Rawls J 1971. A Theory of Justice Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  57. Rawls J. 1982. Social unity and primary goods. Utilitarianism and Beyond AK Sen, B Williams159–85 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Roemer JE 1998. Equality of Opportunity Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  59. Saari DG 1989. A dictionary for voting paradoxes. J. Econ. Theory 48:443–75
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Saez E 2001. Using elasticities to derive optimal income tax rates. Rev. Econ. Stud. 68:205–29
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Saez E, Stantcheva S 2016. Generalized social marginal welfare weights for optimal tax theory. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:24–45
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Samson AL, Schokkaert E, Thébaut C, Dormont B, Fleurbaey M, et al. 2018. Fairness in cost-benefit analysis: a methodology for health technology assessment. Health Econ. 27:102–14
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Samuelson PA 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  64. Samuelson PA 1974. Complementarity: an essay on the 40th anniversary of the Hicks-Allen revolution in demand theory. J. Econ. Lit. 12:1255–89
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Samuelson PA 1977. Reaffirming the existence of “reasonable” Bergson-Samuelson social welfare functions. Economica 44:81–88
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Scanlon TM 1999. What We Owe to Each Other Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  67. Sen AK 1970. The impossibility of a Paretian liberal. J. Political Econ. 78:152–57
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Sen AK 1985. Commodities and Capabilities Amsterdam: North-Holland
  69. Sen AK 2011. The informational basis of social choice. See Arrow et al 2011.29–46
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Sobel J 2005. Interdependent preferences and reciprocity. J. Econ. Lit. 43:392–436
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Suzumura K 2011. Welfarism, individual rights, and procedural fairness. See Arrow et al. 2011.605–85
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Thomson W 2011. Fair allocation. See Arrow et al. 2011.393–506
  73. Treibich R 2019. Welfare egalitarianism with other-regarding preferences. Soc. Choice Welf. 521–28
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Tuomala M 2015. Optimal Redistributive Taxation Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  75. Zuber S, Asheim GB 2012. Justifying social discounting: the rank-discounted utilitarian approach. J. Econ. Theory 147:1572–601
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030429
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030429
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error