Economic Theories of Justice

Literature Cited

1. Adler MD 2016. Benefit–cost analysis and distributional weights: an overview. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 10:264–85
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arrow KJ 1963. Social Choice and Individual Values New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press. 2nd ed.
3. Arrow KJ, Sen AK, Suzumura K eds 2011. Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare 2 Amsterdam: Elsevier
4. Asheim GB, Zuber S 2014. Escaping the repugnant conclusion: rank-discounted utilitarianism with variable population. Theor. Econ. 9:629–50
   [Google Scholar]
5. Balinski M, Laraki R 2011. Majority Judgment: Measuring, Ranking, and Electing Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
6. Bergson A 1938. A reformulation of certain aspects of welfare economics. Q. J. Econ. 52:310–34
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bergstrom TC 2006. Benefit-cost in a benevolent society. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:339–51
   [Google Scholar]
8. Blackorby C, Bossert W, Donaldson D 2005. Population Issues in Social-Choice Theory, Welfare Economics and Ethics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
9. Boadway RW 1974. The welfare foundations of cost-benefit analysis. Econ. J. 84:926–39
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bommier A, Zuber S 2008. Can preferences for catastrophe avoidance reconcile social discounting with intergenerational equity. Soc. Choice Welf. 31415–34
    [Google Scholar]
11. Broome J 1991. Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty and Time Oxford, UK: Blackwell
12. Broome J 2004. Weighing Lives Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
13. Brun BC, Tungodden B 2004. Non-welfaristic theories of justice: Is the intersection approach a solution to the indexing impasse. Soc. Choice Welf. 2249–60
    [Google Scholar]
14. Coate S 2000. An efficiency approach to the evaluation of policy changes. Econ. J. 110:437–55
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cohen GA 1989. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99:906–44
    [Google Scholar]
16. d'Aspremont C, Gevers L 1977. Equity and the informational basis of collective choice. Rev. Econ. Stud. 44:199–209
    [Google Scholar]
17. Diamond PA 1967. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility: comment. J. Political Econ. 75:765–66
    [Google Scholar]
18. Dufwenberg M, Heidhues P, Kirchsteiger G, Riedel F, Sobel J 2011. General equilibrium with other-regarding preferences. Rev. Econ. Stud. 218:613–39
    [Google Scholar]
19. Dworkin R 2000. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
20. Epstein LG, Segal U 1992. Quadratic social welfare functions. J. Political Econ. 100:691–712
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fehr E, Schmidt KM 1999. A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 114:817–68
    [Google Scholar]
22. Finkelstein A, Luttmer EFP, Notowidigdo MJ 2013. What good is wealth without health? The effect of health on the marginal utility of consumption. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 11:221–58
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fleurbaey M 2008. Freedom, Responsibility, and Welfare Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
24. Fleurbaey M 2010. Assessing risky social situations. J. Political Econ. 118:649–80
    [Google Scholar]
25. Fleurbaey M, Abi-Rafeh R 2016. The use of distributional weights in benefit-cost analysis: insights from welfare economics. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 10:286–307
    [Google Scholar]
26. Fleurbaey M, Blanchet D 2013. Beyond GDP: Measuring Welfare and Assessing Sustainability Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
27. Fleurbaey M, Maniquet F 2011. A Theory of Fairness and Social Welfare Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
28. Fleurbaey M, Maniquet F 2018. Optimal income taxation theory and principles of fairness. J. Econ. Lit. 56:31029–79
    [Google Scholar]
29. Fleurbaey M, Peragine V 2013. Ex ante versus ex post equality of opportunity. Economica 80:118–30
    [Google Scholar]
30. Fleurbaey M, Trannoy A 2003. The impossibility of a Paretian Egalitarian. Soc. Choice Welf. 21:243–64
    [Google Scholar]
31. Fleurbaey M, Tungodden B 2010. The tyranny of non-aggregation versus the tyranny of aggregation in social choices: a real dilemma. Econ. Theory 44:399–414
    [Google Scholar]
32. Fleurbaey M, Zuber S 2017. Fair management of social risk. J. Econ. Theory 169:666–706
    [Google Scholar]
33. Frank RH 1985. Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
34. Gaertner W, Pattanaik P, Suzumura K 1992. Individual rights revisited. Economica 59:161–77
    [Google Scholar]
35. Gaertner W, Schokkaert E 2011. Empirical Social Choice: Questionnaire-Experimental Studies on Distributive Justice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
36. Gibbard A 1974. A Pareto-consistent libertarian claim. J. Econ. Theory 7:388–410
    [Google Scholar]
37. Graham C 2009. Happiness Around the World: The Paradox of Happy Peasants and Miserable Millionaires Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
38. Hammond PJ 1982. Utilitarianism, uncertainty and information. Utilitarianism and Beyond AK Sen, B Williams85–102 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
39. Harsanyi JC 1955. Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J. Political Econ. 63:309–21
    [Google Scholar]
40. Harsanyi JC 1977. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
41. Hicks JR 1940. The valuation of social income. Economica 7:105–24
    [Google Scholar]
42. Jones CI, Klenow PJ 2016. Beyond GDP? Welfare across countries and time. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:2426–57
    [Google Scholar]
43. Kaldor N 1939. Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Econ. J. 49:549–52
    [Google Scholar]
44. Kannai Y 1970. Continuity properties of the core of a market. Econometrica 38:791–815
    [Google Scholar]
45. Layard R, Mayraz G, Nickell S 2008. The marginal utility of income. J. Public Econ. 92:1846–57
    [Google Scholar]
46. List C, Puppe C 2009. Judgment aggregation: a survey. Handbook of Rational and Social Choice P Anand, P Pattanaik, C Puppe457–82 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
47. Machina MJ 1989. Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty. J. Econ. Lit. 27:1622–68
    [Google Scholar]
48. Mongin P 1995. Consistent Bayesian aggregation. J. Econ. Theory 66:313–51
    [Google Scholar]
49. Mongin P 2016. Spurious unanimity and the Pareto principle. Econ. Philos. 32:511–32
    [Google Scholar]
50. Mongin P, Pivato M 2016. Social evaluation under risk and uncertainty. Oxford Handbook on Well-Being and Public Policy MD Adler, M Fleurbaey711–45 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
51. Nozick R 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia New York: Basic Books
52. Nurmi H 1998. Voting paradoxes and referenda. Soc. Choice Welf. 15:333–50
    [Google Scholar]
53. Parfit D 1984. Reasons and Persons Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press
54. Pazner E, Schmeidler D 1978. Egalitarian equivalent allocations: a new concept of economic equity. Q. J. Econ. 92:671–87
    [Google Scholar]
55. Pigou AC 1920. The Economics of Welfare London: Macmillan
56. Rawls J 1971. A Theory of Justice Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
57. Rawls J. 1982. Social unity and primary goods. Utilitarianism and Beyond AK Sen, B Williams159–85 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
58. Roemer JE 1998. Equality of Opportunity Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
59. Saari DG 1989. A dictionary for voting paradoxes. J. Econ. Theory 48:443–75
    [Google Scholar]
60. Saez E 2001. Using elasticities to derive optimal income tax rates. Rev. Econ. Stud. 68:205–29
    [Google Scholar]
61. Saez E, Stantcheva S 2016. Generalized social marginal welfare weights for optimal tax theory. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:24–45
    [Google Scholar]
62. Samson AL, Schokkaert E, Thébaut C, Dormont B, Fleurbaey M, et al. 2018. Fairness in cost-benefit analysis: a methodology for health technology assessment. Health Econ. 27:102–14
    [Google Scholar]
63. Samuelson PA 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
64. Samuelson PA 1974. Complementarity: an essay on the 40th anniversary of the Hicks-Allen revolution in demand theory. J. Econ. Lit. 12:1255–89
    [Google Scholar]
65. Samuelson PA 1977. Reaffirming the existence of “reasonable” Bergson-Samuelson social welfare functions. Economica 44:81–88
    [Google Scholar]
66. Scanlon TM 1999. What We Owe to Each Other Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
67. Sen AK 1970. The impossibility of a Paretian liberal. J. Political Econ. 78:152–57
    [Google Scholar]
68. Sen AK 1985. Commodities and Capabilities Amsterdam: North-Holland
69. Sen AK 2011. The informational basis of social choice. See Arrow et al 2011.29–46
    [Google Scholar]
70. Sobel J 2005. Interdependent preferences and reciprocity. J. Econ. Lit. 43:392–436
    [Google Scholar]
71. Suzumura K 2011. Welfarism, individual rights, and procedural fairness. See Arrow et al. 2011.605–85
    [Google Scholar]
72. Thomson W 2011. Fair allocation. See Arrow et al. 2011.393–506
73. Treibich R 2019. Welfare egalitarianism with other-regarding preferences. Soc. Choice Welf. 521–28
    [Google Scholar]
74. Tuomala M 2015. Optimal Redistributive Taxation Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
75. Zuber S, Asheim GB 2012. Justifying social discounting: the rank-discounted utilitarian approach. J. Econ. Theory 147:1572–601
    [Google Scholar]