1932

Abstract

This article provides a nontechnical review of the literature and issues related to the measurement of aggregate productivity. I begin with a discussion of productivity measures, their performance in recent decades, and key measurement puzzles that emerge from the data. The remainder of the review focuses on two important questions. First, how do we make more accurate the measures of prices used to deflate nominal output so as to win (or at least not lose) the race for economic measurement to keep up with a changing economy? I frame the issues and point to the most important and promising areas for further research. Second, what does or should GDP measure? I defend GDP as a valuable measure of production and offer suggestions for improving it. At the same time, I emphasize the importance of measuring economic welfare (well-being) and argue that GDP should be supplemented with a satellite account that measures economic welfare.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030439
2019-08-02
2024-06-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/11/1/annurev-economics-080218-030439.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030439&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abel JR, Berndt ER, White AG 2003. Price indexes for Microsoft's personal computer software products NBER Work. Pap9966
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. 2017. Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor markets NBER Work. Pap23285
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aghion P, Bergeaud A, Boppart T, Klenow PJ, Li H 2017. Missing growth from creative destruction NBER Work. Pap24023
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Aizcorbe A. 2014. A Practical Guide to Price Index and Hedonic Techniques Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Aizcorbe A, Baker C, Berndt ER, Cutler DM 2018. Measuring and Modeling Health Care Costs Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Basu S, Fernald J, Kimball M 2006. Are technology improvements contractionary?. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:1418–48
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Berndt ER. 2006. The Boskin Commission report after a decade: after-life or requiem?. Int. Product. Monitor 2006. 12:61–73
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Berndt ER, Cutler DM, Frank R, Griliches Z, Newhouse JP, Triplett JE 2001. Price indexes for medical care goods and services—an overview of measurement issues. Medical Care Output and Productivity DM Cutler, ER Berndt 141–202 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Berndt ER, Rappaport NJ. 2001. Price and quality of desktop and mobile personal computers: a quarter-century historical overview. Am. Econ. Rev. 91:268–73
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Berndt ER, Triplett JE. 1990. Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: The Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Boskin MJ, Dulberger ER, Gordon RJ, Griliches Z, Jorgenson D 1996. Toward a more accurate measure of the cost of living: final report to the Senate Finance Committee from the Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index Rep., Advis. Comm. Study Consum. Price Index Washington, DC: https://www.ssa.gov/history/reports/boskinrpt.html
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bosler C, Daly MC, Fernald JG, Hobijn B 2016. The outlook for U.S. labor-quality growth NBER Work. Pap22555
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bridgman B. 2016. Accounting for household production in the national accounts: an update, 1965–2014. Surv. Curr. Bus. 96:1–5
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Brynjolfsson E, Eggers F, Gannamaneni A 2018. Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being NBER Work. Pap 24514
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Brynjolfsson E, Kemerer CF. 1996. Network externalities in microcomputer software: an econometric analysis of the spreadsheet market. Manag. Sci. 42:1627–47
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Brynjolfsson E, Oh JH. 2012. The attention economy: measuring the value of free digital services on the Internet Paper presented at the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando, FL, Dec 16–19
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Byrne D. 2015. Domestic electronics manufacturing: medical, military, and aerospace equipment and what we don't know about high-tech productivity FEDS Notes, US Board Gov. Fed. Reserve Syst Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Byrne D, Corrado C. 2017. ICT services and their prices: What do they tell us about productivity and technology?. Int. Product. Monitor 2017.33150–81
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Byrne D, Corrado C, Sichel D 2018a. The rise of cloud computing: minding your P's and Q's NBER Work. Pap25188
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Byrne D, Fernald J, Reinsdorf M 2016a. Does the United States have a productivity slowdown or a measurement problem?. Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. 2016.109–82
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Byrne D, Oliner SD, Sichel DE 2016b. A new look at prices of personal computers: desktops, laptops, and tablets. Paper presented at the NBER Summer Institute CRIW Workshop Cambridge, MA:July 18–19
  22. Byrne D, Oliner SD, Sichel DE 2018b. How fast are semiconductor prices falling?. Rev. Income Wealth 64:3679–702
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Byrne D, Oliner SD, Sichel DE 2017. Prices of high-tech products, mismeasurement, and the pace of innovation. Bus. Econ. 52:103–13
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Chow GC. 1967. Technological change and the demand for computers. Am. Econ. Rev. 57:1117–30
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Copeland A. 2013. Seasonality, consumer heterogeneity and price indexes: the case of prepackaged software. J. Product. Anal. 39:47–59
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Corrado C, Fox K, Goodridge P, Haskel J, Jona-Lasinio C et al. 2017. Improving GDP: demolishing, repointing or extending?. Glob. Perspect. 2: http://global-perspectives.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CFGHJSW_Indigo_Prize_submission_15Sep17_submitted.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Corrado C, Haltiwanger J, Sichel D 2005. Measuring Capital in the New Economy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Corrado C, Haskel J, Jona-Lasinio C, Iommi M 2012. Intangible capital and growth in advanced economies: measurement and comparative results IZA Discuss. Pap 6733 Bonn, Ger:
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Corrado C, Hulten C, Sichel D 2004. Measuring capital and technology: an expanded framework. Measuring Capital in the New Economy C Corrado, J Haltiwanger, D Sichel 11–46 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Corrado C, Hulten C, Sichel D 2009. Intangible capital and US economic growth. Rev. Income Wealth 55:661–85
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Court AT. 1939. Hedonic price indexes with automotive examples. The Dynamics of Automobile Demand98–119 New York: Gen. Motors Corp
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Coyle D. 2014. GDP: A Brief but Affectionate History Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Coyle D, Mitra-Kahn B. 2017. Making the future count. Glob. Perspect. 2: https://indigo.testudo.goodcaesar.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/making-the-future-count.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Dauda S, Dunn A, Hall A 2018. Are medical care prices still declining? A systematic examination of quality-adjusted price index alternatives for medical care Paper presented at the NBER Summer Institute CRIW Workshop Cambridge, MA: July 16–17
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Diewert E, Fixler D, Zieschang K 2016. Problems with the measurement of banking services in a national accounting framework. National Accounting and Economic Growth J Hartwick 117–76 Cheltham, UK: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Diewert E, Fox K. 2017. The digital economy, GDP, and consumer welfare Paper presented at the NBER Summer Institute CRIW Workshop Cambridge, MA: July 17–18
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Diewert E, Greenlees J, Hulten CR 2010a. Introduction: What are the issues?. See Diewert et al. 2010b 1–16
  38. Diewert WE, Greenlees J, Hulten CR 2010b. Price Index Concepts and Measurement Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Dunn A, Rittmueller L, Whitmire B 2015. Introducing the new BEA health care satellite account. Surv. Curr. Bus. 95:1–21
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Dynan K, Sheiner L. 2018. GDP as a measure of economic well-being Work. Pap. 43, Hutchins Cent., Brookings Inst Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Eldridge LP, Pabilonia SW. 2007. Are those who bring work home really working longer hours? Implications for BLS productivity measures Work. Pap., US Bur. Labor Stat Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Erickson T, Pakes A. 2011. An experimental component index for the CPI: from annual computer data to monthly data on other goods. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:1707–38
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Feldstein M. 2017. Underestimating the real growth of GDP, personal income, and productivity. J. Econ. Perspect. 31:2145–64
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Fernald JG. 2015. Productivity and potential output before, during, and after the Great Recession. NBER Macroecon. Annu. 29:1–51
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Fischer S. 1988. Symposium on the slowdown in productivity growth. J. Econ. Perspect. 2:43–7
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Foss M, Manser M, Young A 1993. Price Measurements and Their Uses Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Fraumeni BM, Christian MS, Samuels JD 2017. The accumulation of human and nonhuman capital, revisited. Rev. Income Wealth 63:S381–410
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Gandal N. 1994. Hedonic price indexes for spreadsheets and an empirical test for network externalities. RAND J. Econ. 25:1160–70
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Gilman CP. 1898. Women and Economics: A Study of the Economic Relation Between Men and Women as a Factor in Social Condition Boston: Small, Maynard & Company
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Goldman Sachs 2018. iPhones, eBay, and the fate of productivity growth Rep., Goldman Sachs New York:
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Goolsbee A, Klenow PJ. 2006. Valuing consumer products by the time spent using them: an application to the Internet. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:108–13
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Goolsbee AD, Klenow PJ. 2018. Internet rising, prices falling: measuring inflation in a world of e-commerce. AEA Pap. Proc. 108:488–92
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Gordon RJ. 1987. The postwar evolution of computer prices NBER Work. Pap 2227
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Gordon RJ. 1990. The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Gordon RJ. 2006. The Boskin Commission report: a retrospective one decade later NBER Work. Pap12311
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Gordon RJ. 2017. The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The US Standard of Living Since the Civil War Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Griliches Z. 1961. Hedonic price indexes for automobiles: an econometric of quality change. The Price Statistics of the Federal Government173–96 New York: Natl. Bur. Econ. Res
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Griliches Z. 1992. Output Measurement in the Service Sectors Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Griliches Z. 1994. Productivity, R&D, and the data constraint. Am. Econ. Rev. 84:1–23
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Groshen EL, Moyer BC, Aizcorbe AM, Bradley R, Friedman DM 2017. How government statistics adjust for potential biases from quality change and new goods in an age of digital technologies: a view from the trenches. J. Econ. Perspect. 31:2187–210
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Guvenen F, Mataloni RJ Jr, Rassier DG, Ruhl KJ 2017. Offshore profit shifting and domestic productivity measurement NBER Work. Pap 23324
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Haskel J, Westlake S. 2017. Capitalism without Capital: The Rise of the Intangible Economy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Hausman JA. 1996. Valuation of new goods under perfect and imperfect competition. The Economics of New Goods TF Bresnahan, RJ Gordon 207–48 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Houseman S, Kurz C, Lengermann P, Mandel B 2011. Offshoring bias in US manufacturing. J. Econ. Perspect. 25:2111–32
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Hulten CR. 2015. Measuring the economy of the 21st century. NBER Rep 2015:41–7
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Hulten CR, Dean ER, Harper M 2001. New Developments in Productivity Analysis Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Hulten CR, Nakamura L. 2017. Measuring GDP and welfare in the 21st century Presented at CRIW/NBER Conference Measuring and Accounting for Innovation in the 21st Century Washington, DC: March 10–11
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Jones CI, Klenow PJ. 2016. Beyond GDP? Welfare across countries and time. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:2426–57
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Jorgenson DW. 2017. Productivity and economic growth in the world economy: an introduction. Int. Product. Monitor 2017:331–7
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Jorgenson DW. 2018. Production and welfare: progress in economic measurement. J. Econ. Lit. 56:867–919
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Jorgenson DW, Fraumeni BM. 1989. The accumulation of human and non-human capital, 1948–1984. The Measurement of Savings, Investment and Wealth RE Lipsey, HS Tice 227–82 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Jorgenson DW, Griliches Z. 1967. The explanation of productivity change. Rev. Econ. Stud. 34:249–83
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Jorgenson DW, Slesnick DT. 2014. Measuring social welfare in the US national accounts. Measuring Economic Sustainability and Progress DW Jorgenson, JS Landefeld, P Schreyer 43–88 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Lancaster KJ. 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. J. Political Econ. 74:132–57
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Lebow DE, Roberts JM, Stockton DJ 1994. Monetary Policy and the Price Level Washington, DC: Board Gov. Fed. Reserve Syst
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Lebow DE, Rudd JB. 2003. Measurement error in the consumer price index: Where do we stand?. J. Econ. Lit. 41:159–201
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Moulton B. 2018. The measurement of output, prices, and productivity: What's changed since the Boskin Commission Rep., Brookings Inst Washington, DC: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Moulton-report-v2.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Nakamura LI, Samuels JD, Soloveichik RH 2017. Measuring the “free” digital economy within the GDP and productivity accounts Work. Pap., Bur. Econ. Anal Suitland, MD:
    [Google Scholar]
  79. NBER (Natl. Bur. Econ. Res.). 1961. The Price Statistics of the Federal Government: Review, Appraisal, and Recommendations New York: Natl. Bur. Econ. Res
    [Google Scholar]
  80. NRC (Natl. Res. Counc.). 2002. At What Price? Conceptualizing and Measuring Cost-of-Living and Price Indexes Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Nordhaus WD, Tobin J. 1972. Is growth obsolete?. Economic Research: Retrospect and prospect Vol. 5 Economic Growth WD Nordhaus, J Tobin 1–80 New York: Natl. Bur. Econ. Res
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Oliner SD, Sichel DE. 1994. Computers and output growth revisited: How big is the puzzle?. Brook. Pap. Econ. Act. 25:2273–334
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Oulton N. 2012. Hooray for GDP! GDP as a measure of wellbeing. VoxEU.org Dec. 22. https://voxeu.org/article/defence-gdp-measure-wellbeing
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Oulton N. 2013. Has the growth of real GDP in the UK been overstated because of mismeasurement of banking output?. Natl. Inst. Econ. Rev. 224:R59–65
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Oulton N. 2016. The mystery of TFP. Int. Product. Monitor 2016.3168–87
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Pakes A. 2003. A reconsideration of hedonic price indexes with an application to PC's. Am. Econ. Rev. 93:1578–96
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Schreyer P. 2001. OECD Productivity Manual: A Guide to the Measurement of Industry-Level and Aggregate Productivity Growth Paris: Org. Econ. Co-op. Dev
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Schreyer P. 2010. Towards measuring the volume output of education and health services: a handbook Stat. Work Pap. 2010/2, OECD Paris:
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Scitovsky AA. 1964. An index of the cost of medical care—a proposed new approach. The Economics of Health and Medical Care SJ Axelrod 128–47 Ann Arbor, MI: Bur. Public Health Econ
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Shapiro MD, Wilcox DW. 1996. Mismeasurement in the consumer price index: an evaluation. NBER Macroecon. Annu. 11:93–154
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Sharpe A. 2006. Editor's overview. Int. Product. Monitor 2006.121–4
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Sichel DE. 1997. The productivity slowdown: Is a growing unmeasurable sector the culprit. Rev. Econ. Stat. 79:367–70
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Sichel DE, Von Hippel E 2019. Household innovation, R&D, and new measures of intangible capital NBER Work. Pap. 25599
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Smith A. 1963 (1776). The Wealth of Nations 1 New York: Richard D. Irwin
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Solow R. 1987. We'd better watch out. New York Times Book Review July 1236
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Stevenson B, Wolfers J. 2008. Economic growth and happiness: reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Brookings Pap. Econ. Activity 39:1–102
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Stiglitz J, Sen A, Fitoussi J-P 2009. The measurement of economic performance and social progress revisited: reflections and overview Rep., Comm. Meas. Econ. Perform. Soc. Prog Paris: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/118025/118123/Fitoussi+Commission+report
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Syverson C. 2011. What determines productivity?. J. Econ. Lit. 49:326–65
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Syverson C. 2017. Challenges to mismeasurement explanations for the US productivity slowdown. J. Econ. Perspect. 31:2165–86
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Triplett J. 1989. Price and technological change in a capital good: a survey of research on computers. Technology and Capital Formation D Jorgenson, R Landau 127–213 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Triplett J. 2006. Handbook on Hedonic Indexes and Quality Adjustments in Price Indexes: Special Application to Information Technology Products Paris: OECD
    [Google Scholar]
  102. US Bur. Labor Stat. 2018. Multifactor productivity trends, 2017 News Release, Mar. 21, US Bur. Labor Stat Washington, DC: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/prod3.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Von Hippel E. 2017. Free Innovation Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Weitzman ML. 1976. On the welfare significance of national product in a dynamic economy. Q. J. Econ. 90:156–62
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030439
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-030439
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error