1932

Abstract

US labor and total factor productivity have historically been procyclical—rising in booms and falling in recessions. After the mid-1980s, however, total factor productivity became much less procyclical with respect to hours while labor productivity turned strongly countercyclical. We find that the key empirical “fact” driving these changes is reduced variation in factor utilization—conceptually, the workweek of capital and labor effort. We discuss a range of theories that seek to explain the changes in productivity's cyclicality. Increased flexibility, changes in the structure of the economy, and shifts in relative variances of technology and “demand” shocks all play key roles.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015018
2016-10-31
2024-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/8/1/annurev-economics-080315-015018.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015018&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aruoba S, Boragan FX, Diebold JN, Frank S, Dongho S. 2015. Improving GDP measurement: a measurement-error perspective. J. Econom. 191:384–97 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnichon R. 2010. Productivity and unemployment over the business cycle. J. Monet. Econ. 571013–25 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnichon R. 2014. The Shimer puzzle and the endogeneity of productivity Work. Pap., CREI, Barcelona [Google Scholar]
  4. Basu S. 1996. Cyclical productivity: increasing returns or cyclical utilization?. Q. J. Econ. 111:719–51 [Google Scholar]
  5. Basu S, Fernald J. 1995. Are apparent productive spillovers a figment of specification error?. J. Monet. Econ. 36165–88 [Google Scholar]
  6. Basu S, Fernald J. 1997. Returns to scale in U.S. manufacturing: estimates and implications. J. Polit. Econ. 105:249–83 [Google Scholar]
  7. Basu S, Fernald J. 2001. Why is productivity procyclical? Why do we care?. New Development in Productivity Analysis CR Hulten, ER Dean, MJ Harper 224–96 Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  8. Basu S, Fernald J. 2002. Aggregate productivity and aggregate technology. Eur. Econ. Rev. 46963–91 [Google Scholar]
  9. Basu S, Fernald J, Fisher J, Kimball M. 2013. Sector-specific technical change Unpublished manuscript, Fed. Reserve Bank San Francisco [Google Scholar]
  10. Basu S, Fernald J, Kimball M. 2006. Are technology improvements contractionary?. Am. Econ. Rev. 9651418–48 [Google Scholar]
  11. Basu S, Fernald J, Oulton N, Srinivasan S. 2004. The case of the missing productivity growth, or does information technology explain why productivity accelerated in the United States but not the United Kingdom?. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2003 M Gertler, K Rogoff 9–63 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Basu S, Fernald J, Shapiro MD. 2001. Productivity growth in the 1990s: technology, utilization, or adjustment?. Carnegie-Rochester Conf. Ser. Public Policy 55117–65 [Google Scholar]
  13. Basu S, Kimball M. 1997. Cyclical productivity with unobserved input variation NBER Work. Pap. 5915 [Google Scholar]
  14. Berger D. 2012. Countercyclical restructuring and jobless recoveries Work. Pap., Yale Univ., New Haven [Google Scholar]
  15. Bernanke BS. 2004. The Great Moderation Remarks at East. Econ. Assoc. Meet., Feb. 20, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  16. Bernanke BS, Parkinson ML. 1991. Procyclical labor productivity and competing theories of the business cycle: some evidence from interwar U.S. manufacturing industries. J. Polit. Econ. 993439–59 [Google Scholar]
  17. Biddle JE. 2014. Retrospectives: the cyclical behavior of labor productivity and the emergence of the labor hoarding concept. J. Econ. Perspect. 282197–212 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bils M, Cho J-O. 1994. Cyclical factor utilization. J. Monet. Econ. 33319–54 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bosler C, Fernald JG, Hobijn B, Daly MC. 2016. The outlook for U.S. labor quality growth. Work. Pap. 2016-14, Fed. Reserve Bank San Franc. http://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/working-papers/wp2016-14.pdf [Google Scholar]
  20. Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM. 2000. Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J. Econ. Perspect. 14423–48 [Google Scholar]
  21. Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM. 2003. Computing productivity: firm-level evidence. Rev. Econ. Stat. 85793–808 [Google Scholar]
  22. Burda MC, Genadek KR, Hamermesh DS. 2015. Not working at work: loafing, unemployment and labor productivity IZA Discuss. Pap. 9095 [Google Scholar]
  23. Burda MC, Hunt J. 2011. What explains the German labor market miracle in the Great Recession?. Brook. Pap. Econ. Act. 2011:1273–335 [Google Scholar]
  24. Burnside C, Eichenbaum M. 1996. Factor-hoarding and the propagation of business-cycle shocks. Am. Econ. Rev. 861154–74 [Google Scholar]
  25. Burnside C, Eichenbaum M, Rebelo S. 1995. Capital utilization and returns to scale. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1995 10 BS Bernanke, JJ Rotemberg 67–124 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  26. Byrne DM, Fernald JG, Reinsdorf MB. 2016. Does the United States have a productivity slowdown or a measurement problem?. Brook. Pap. Econ. Act. 2016:109–57 [Google Scholar]
  27. Caballero RJ, Lyons RK. 1992. External effects in U.S. procyclical productivity. J. Monet. Econ. 29:209–26 [Google Scholar]
  28. Cantore C, Ferroni F, León-Ledesma MA. 2014. The dynamics of hours worked and technology Work. Pap. 1238, Banco Esp., Madrid [Google Scholar]
  29. Christiano LJ, Eichenbaum M, Evans CL. 2005. Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy. J. Polit. Econ. 11311–45 [Google Scholar]
  30. Christiano LJ, Fitzgerald TJ. 2003. The band pass filter. Int. Econ. Rev. 44:2435–65 [Google Scholar]
  31. Cociuba S, Prescott EC, Ueberfeldt A. 2012. U.S. hours and productivity behavior using CPS hours worked data: 1947-III to 2011-IV Unpublished manuscript, Fed. Reserve Bank Dallas [Google Scholar]
  32. Corrado C, Haskel J, Jona-Lasinio C, Iommi M. 2014. Intangibles and industry productivity growth: evidence from the EU Presented at IARIW Gen. Conf., 33rd, Rotterdam [Google Scholar]
  33. Corrado CA, Hulten CR, Sichel DE. 2006. Intangible capital and economic growth NBER Work. Pap. 11948 [Google Scholar]
  34. Daly MC, Fernald JG, Jordà O, Nechio F. 2011. Okun's macroscope: changes in the cyclical behavior of productivity and the comovement between output and unemployment Work. Pap., Fed. Reserve Bank San Francisco [Google Scholar]
  35. Daly MC, Fernald JG, Jordà O, Nechio F. 2014. Interpreting deviations from Okun's Law Econ. Lett. 2014-12, Fed. Reserve Bank San Francisco [Google Scholar]
  36. Daly MC, Fernald JG, Jordà O, Nechio F. 2015. Output and unemployment dynamics Work. Pap. 2013-32, Fed. Reserve Bank San Francisco [Google Scholar]
  37. Daula T, Kay B. 2014. International employment and the business cycle: new stylized facts with an application to the Great Moderation Unpublished manuscript, Dep. Econ., Univ. Calif. San Diego [Google Scholar]
  38. Fay JA, Medoff JL. 1985. Labor and output over the business cycle: some direct evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 754638–55 [Google Scholar]
  39. Fernald JG. 2007. Trend breaks, long-run restrictions, and contractionary technology improvement. J. Monet. Econ. 542467–85 [Google Scholar]
  40. Fernald JG. 2014. A quarterly, utilization-adjusted series on total factor productivity Work. Pap. 2012-19, Fed. Reserve Bank San Francisco [Google Scholar]
  41. Fernald JG. 2015. Productivity and potential output before, during, and after the Great Recession. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2014, Vol. 29: JA Parker, M Woodford 1–51 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  42. Fernald J, Neiman B. 2011. Growth accounting with misallocation: or, doing less with more in Singapore. Am. Econ. J. 3229–74 [Google Scholar]
  43. Foster L, Haltiwanger JC, Krizan CJ. 2001. Aggregate productivity growth: lessons from microeconomic evidence. New Developments in Productivity Analysis CR Hulten, ER Dean, MJ Harper 303–72 Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  44. Foster L, Haltiwanger JC, Krizan CJ. 2006. Market selection, reallocation, and restructuring in the U.S. retail trade sector in the 1990s. Rev. Econ. Stat. 88(4748–58 [Google Scholar]
  45. Francis N, Ramey VA. 2005. Is the Technology-driven real business cycle hypothesis dead? Shocks and aggregate fluctuations revisited. J. Monet. Econ. 5281379–99 [Google Scholar]
  46. Galí J. 1999. Technology, employment, and the business cycle: Do technology shocks explain aggregate fluctuations?. Am. Econ. Rev. 891249–71 [Google Scholar]
  47. Galí J, Gambetti L. 2009. On the sources of the Great Moderation. Am. Econ. J. 1126–57 [Google Scholar]
  48. Galí J, López -Salido JD, Vallés J. 2003. Technology shocks and monetary policy: assessing the Fed's performance. J. Monet. Econ. 504723–43 [Google Scholar]
  49. Galí J, van Rens T. 2014. The vanishing procyclicality of labor productivity CEPR Discuss. Pap. DP9853 [Google Scholar]
  50. Garin J, Pries M, Sims E. 2013. Reallocation and the changing nature of business cycle fluctuations Work. Pap., Kellogg Inst. Int. Stud., Univ. Notre Dame [Google Scholar]
  51. Gordon RJ. 2003. Are procyclical productivity fluctuations a figment of measurement error?. Productivity Growth, Inflation, and Unemployment: The Collected Essays of Robert J. Gordon239–72 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  52. Gordon RJ. 2010. Okun's Law and productivity innovations. Am. Econ. Rev. 100211–15 [Google Scholar]
  53. Gordon RJ. 2011. The evolution of Okun's Law and of cyclical productivity fluctuations in the United States and in the EU-15 Presented at EES/IAB Workshop Labor Mark. Inst. Macroecon., Nuremberg, June 17–18 [Google Scholar]
  54. Gorodnichenko Y, Shapiro MD. 2011. Using the survey of plant capacity to measure capital utilization Work. Pap. CES-WP-11-19, US Census Bur. Cent. Econ. Stud., Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  55. Griliches Z, Jorgenson DW. 1966. Sources of measured productivity change: capital input. Am. Econ. Rev. 56:1/250–61 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hagedorn M, Manovskii I. 2011. Productivity and the labor market: co-movement over the business cycle. Int. Econ. Rev. 523603–19 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hall RE. 1988. The relation between price and marginal cost in U.S. industry. J. Polit. Econ. 96921–47 [Google Scholar]
  58. Hall RE. 1990. Invariance properties of Solow's productivity residual. Growth/Productivity/Employment P Diamond 71–112 Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  59. Helpman E, Trajtenberg M. 1998. General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  60. Hultgren T. 1960. Changes in labor cost during cycles in production and business NBER Occas. Pap. 74 [Google Scholar]
  61. Inklaar R. 2007. Cyclical productivity in Europe and the United States: evaluating the evidence on returns to scale and input utilization. Econ. N. Ser. 74296822–41 [Google Scholar]
  62. Jordà Ò. 2005. Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections. Am. Econ. Rev. 951161–82 [Google Scholar]
  63. Jorgenson D, Griliches Z. 1967. The explanation of productivity change. Rev. Econ. Stud. 343249–83 [Google Scholar]
  64. Jorgenson DW, Gollop F, Fraumeni B. 1987. Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  65. Justiniano A, Primiceri GE. 2008. The time-varying volatility of macroeconomic fluctuations. Am. Econ. Rev. 983604–41 [Google Scholar]
  66. King RG, Rebelo S. 2000. Resuscitating real business cycles. Handbook of Macroeconomics J Taylor, M Woodford 927–1007 Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ. [Google Scholar]
  67. Kydland FE, Prescott EC. 1982. Time to build and aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica 5061345–70 [Google Scholar]
  68. Lazear EP, Shaw KL, Stanton C. 2016. Making do with less: working harder during recessions. The Labor Market in the Aftermath of the Great Recession D Card, A Mas 333–60 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  69. Lucas RE. 1970. Capacity, overtime, and empirical production functions. Am. Econ. Rev. 60223–27 [Google Scholar]
  70. Marris R. 1964. The Economics of Capital Utilisation Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  71. McGrattan ER, Prescott EC. 2007. Unmeasured investment and the puzzling U.S. boom in the 1990s NBER Work. Pap. 13499 [Google Scholar]
  72. McGrattan ER, Prescott EC. 2012. The Great Recession and delayed economic recovery: a labor productivity puzzle. Government Policies and the Delayed Economic Recovery LE Ohanian, JB Taylor, I Wright 115–54 Stanford, CA: Hoover Press [Google Scholar]
  73. Mitchell WC. 1913. Business Cycle Berkeley, CA: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  74. Nalewaik JJ. 2010. The income- and expenditure-side estimates of U.S. output growth. Brook. Pap. Econ. Act. 2010:171–127 [Google Scholar]
  75. Nucci F, Riggi M. 2009. The Great Moderation and changes in the structure of labor compensation Work. Pap. 124, Dep. Public Econ., Univ. Rome La Sapienza [Google Scholar]
  76. Oi WY. 1962. Labor as a quasi-fixed factor. J. Polit. Econ.70(6538–55 [Google Scholar]
  77. Okun A. 1963. Potential GNP: its measurement and significance Cowles Found. Pap. 190, Yale Univ., New Haven [Google Scholar]
  78. Oliner SD, Sichel DE, Stiroh KJ. 2007. Explaining a productive decade. Brook. Pap. Econ. Act. 2007:281–137 [Google Scholar]
  79. Ramey VA. 2012. The impact of hours measures on the trend and cycle behavior of U.S. labor productivity. Work. Pap., Univ. Calif. San Diego [Google Scholar]
  80. Ramey VA, Vine DJ. 2006. Declining volatility in the U.S. automobile industry. Am. Econ. Rev. 9651876–89 [Google Scholar]
  81. Rotemberg JJ, Woodford M. 1995. Dynamic general equilibrium models with imperfectly competitive product markets. Frontiers of Business Cycle Research TF Cooley 243–293 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  82. Rotemberg JJ, Woodford M. 1999. The cyclical behavior of prices and costs. Handbook of Macroeconomics Volume 1B JB Taylor, M Woodford 1051–135 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  83. Rua A. 2010. Measuring comovement in the time-frequency space. J. Macroecon. 32685–91 [Google Scholar]
  84. Sbordone AM. 1997. Interpreting the procyclical productivity of manufacturing sectors: external effects or labor hoarding?. J. Money Credit Bank. 29126–45 [Google Scholar]
  85. Shapiro MD. 1993. Cyclical productivity and the workweek of capital. Am. Econ. Rev. 832229–33 [Google Scholar]
  86. Shapiro MD. 1996. Macroeconomic implications of variation in the workweek of capital. Brook. Pap. Econ. Act. 1996:279–119 [Google Scholar]
  87. Shimer R. 2005. The cyclical behavior of equilibrium unemployment and vacancies. Am. Econ. Rev. 95125–49 [Google Scholar]
  88. Smets F, Wouters R. 2007. Shocks and frictions in US business cycles: a Bayesian DSGE approach. Am. Econ. Rev. 973586–606 [Google Scholar]
  89. Solow RM. 1957. Technological change and the aggregate production function. Rev. Econ. Stat. 39312–20 [Google Scholar]
  90. Solow RM. 1964. Draft of Presidential Address on the short-run relation of employment and output Pers. papers, David M. Rubenstein Rare Book Manuscr. Libr., Duke Univ., Durham [Google Scholar]
  91. Stiroh KJ. 2009. Volatility accounting: a production perspective on increased economic stability. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 74671–96 [Google Scholar]
  92. Stock JH, Watson MW. 2002. Has the business cycle changed and why?. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2002 17 M Gertler, K Rogoff 159–218 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  93. Wang JC. 2014. Vanishing procyclicality of productivity? Industry evidence Work. Pap. 14-15, Fed. Reserve Bank Boston [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015018
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015018
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error