1932

Abstract

Online marketplaces have become ubiquitous, as sites such as eBay, Taobao, Uber, and Airbnb are frequented by billions of users. The success of these marketplaces is attributed to not only the ease in which buyers can find sellers, but also the trust that these marketplaces help facilitate through reputation and feedback systems. I begin by briefly describing the basic ideas surrounding the role of reputation in facilitating trust and trade, and offer an overview of how feedback and reputation systems work in online marketplaces. I then describe the literature that explores the effects of reputation and feedback systems on online marketplaces and highlight some of the problems of bias in feedback and reputation systems as they appear today. I discuss ways to address these problems to improve the practical design of online marketplaces and suggest some directions for future research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015325
2016-10-31
2024-06-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/8/1/annurev-economics-080315-015325.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015325&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Akerlof GA. 1970. The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q. J. Econ. 84:488–500 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bajari P, Hortaçsu A. 2004. Economic insights from Internet auctions. J. Econ. Lit. 42:2457–86 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bar-Isaac H, Tadelis S. 2008. Seller reputation. Found. Trends Microecon. 4:4273–351 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolton G, Greiner B, Ockenfels A. 2013. Engineering trust: reciprocity in the production of reputation information. Manag. Sci. 59:2265–85 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolton GE, Katok E, Ockenfels A. 2004. How effective are electronic reputation mechanisms? An experimental investigation. Manag. Sci. 50:111587–602 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bond E. 1982. A direct test of the “lemons” model: the market for used pickup trucks. Am. Econ. Rev. 72:4836–40 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown J, Morgan J. 2006. Reputation in online auctions: the market for trust. Calif. Manag. Rev. 49:161–81 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cabral L, Hortaçsu A. 2010. The dynamics of seller reputation: evidence from eBay. J. Ind. Econ. 58:154–78 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cai H, Jin GZ, Liu C, Zhou L-A. 2014. Seller reputation: from word-of-mouth to centralized feedback. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 34:C51–65 [Google Scholar]
  10. DailyMail.com. 2010. eBay buyer sued for defamation after leaving negative feedback on auction site. DailyMail.com April 13. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1265490/eBay-buyer-sued-defamation-leaving-negative-feedback-auction-site.html [Google Scholar]
  11. Dellarocas C. 2003. The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Manag. Sci. 49:101407–24 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dellarocas C, Wood CA. 2008. The sound of silence in online feedback: estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias. Manag. Sci. 54:3460–76 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fradkin A, Grewal E, Holtz D, Pearson M. 2015. Bias and reciprocity in online reviews: evidence from experiments on Airbnb. Proc. Sixt. ACM Conf. Econ. Comput. (EC'15)641 New York: ACM [Google Scholar]
  14. Genesove D. 1993. Adverse selection in the wholesale used car market. J. Pol. Econ. 101:4644–65 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG, Li B. 2014. Examining the impact of ranking on consumer behavior and search engine revenue. Manag. Sci. 60:1632–54 [Google Scholar]
  16. Greif A. 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  17. Hendricks K, Porter RH. 1988. An empirical study of an auction with asymmetric information. Am. Econ. Rev. 78:5865–83 [Google Scholar]
  18. Horton JJ, Golden JM. 2015. Reputation inflation: evidence from an online labor market Work. Pap., Stern Sch. Bus. New York: Univ., New York [Google Scholar]
  19. Hubbard T. 2002. How do consumers motivate experts? Reputational incentives in an auto repair market. J. Law Econ. 45:2437–68 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hui X, Saeedi M, Shen Z, Sundaresan N. 2016. Reputation and regulations: evidence from eBay. Manag. Sci. In press [Google Scholar]
  21. Jin GZ, Kato A. 2006. Price, quality, and reputation: evidence from an online field experiment. RAND J. Econ. 37:4983–1005 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jin GZ, Leslie P. 2009. Reputational incentives for restaurant hygiene. Am. Econ. J.: Microecon. 1:1237–67 [Google Scholar]
  23. Klein T, Lambertz C, Stahl K. 2016. Adverse selection and moral hazard in anonymous markets. J. Pol. Econ. In press [Google Scholar]
  24. Kreps DM. 1990. Corporate culture and economic theory. Perspectives on Positive Political Economy JE Alt, KA Shepsle 90–143 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  25. Kreps DM, Milgrom P, Roberts J, Wilson R. 1982. Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma. J. Econ. Theory 27:2245–52 [Google Scholar]
  26. Li LI. 2010. Reputation, trust, and rebates: how online auction markets can improve their feedback mechanisms. J. Econ. Manag. Strat. 19:2303–31 [Google Scholar]
  27. Li LI, Tadelis S, Zhou X. 2016. Buying reputation as a signal of quality: evidence from an online marketplace NBER Work. Pap. w22584 [Google Scholar]
  28. Li LI, Xiao E. 2014. Money talks: rebate mechanisms in reputation system design. Manag. Sci. 60:82054–72 [Google Scholar]
  29. Livingston JA. 2005. How valuable is a good reputation? A sample selection model of Internet auctions. Rev. Econ. Stat. 87:3453–65 [Google Scholar]
  30. Masterov DV, Mayer UF, Tadelis S. 2015. Canary in the e-commerce coal mine: detecting and predicting poor experiences using buyer-to-seller messages. Proc. Sixt. ACM Conf. Econ. Comput. (EC '15)81–93 New York: ACM [Google Scholar]
  31. Mayzlin D, Dover Y, Chevalier J. 2014. Promotional reviews: an empirical investigation of online review manipulation. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:82421–55 [Google Scholar]
  32. McDonald CG, Slawson VC. 2002. Reputation in an Internet auction market. Econ. Inq. 40:4633–50 [Google Scholar]
  33. Melnik MI, Alm J. 2002. Does a seller's ecommerce reputation matter? Evidence from eBay auctions. J. Ind. Econ. 50:3337–49 [Google Scholar]
  34. Milgrom PR, North DC, Weingast BR. 1990. The role of institutions in the revival of trade: the law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs. Econ. Polit. 2:11–23 [Google Scholar]
  35. Nosko C, Tadelis S. 2015. The limits of reputation in platform markets: an empirical analysis and field experiment.NBER Work. Pap.20830 [Google Scholar]
  36. Resnick P, Kuwabara K, Zeckhauser R, Friedman E. 2000. Reputation systems. Commun. ACM 43:1245–48 [Google Scholar]
  37. Resnick P, Zeckhauser R, Swanson J, Lockwood K. 2006. The value of reputation on eBay: a controlled experiment. Exp. Econ. 9:279–101 [Google Scholar]
  38. Roth AE. 2002. The economist as engineer: game theory, experimentation, and computation as tools for design economics. Econometrica 70:41341–78 [Google Scholar]
  39. TheDenverChannel.com. 2009. eBay shopper says he was harassed by seller: CSU student wants to return bike, gets recorded threats. TheDenverChannel.com May 4. http://www.thedenverchannel.com/lifestyle/technology/ebay-shopper-says-he-was-harassed-by-seller [Google Scholar]
  40. Xu H, Liu D, Wang H, Stavrou A. 2015. E-commerce reputation manipulation: the emergence of reputation-escalation-as-a-service. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2015) IW3C2 Conference Committee 1296–306 New York: ACM [Google Scholar]
  41. Zervas G, Proserpio D, John B. 2015. A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average. Work. Pap., Questrom Sch. Bus. Boston Univ., Cambridge, Mass. [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015325
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015325
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error