1932

Abstract

Peer-to-peer markets such as eBay, Uber, and Airbnb allow small suppliers to compete with traditional providers of goods or services. We view the primary function of these markets as making it easy for buyers to find sellers and engage in convenient, trustworthy transactions. We discuss elements of market design that make this possible, including search and matching algorithms, pricing, and reputation systems. We then develop a simple model of how these markets enable entry by small or flexible suppliers, and how they impact existing firms. Finally, we consider the regulation of peer-to-peer markets and the economic arguments for different approaches to licensing and certification, data, and employment regulation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015334
2016-10-31
2024-06-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/8/1/annurev-economics-080315-015334.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015334&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Armstrong M, Zhou J. 2011. Paying for prominence. Econ. J. 121:F368–95 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnosti N, Johari R, Kanoria Y. 2015. Managing congestion in dynamic matching markets Work. Pap., Stanford Univ. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bolton G, Greiner B, Ockenfels A. 2013. Engineering trust: Reciprocity in the production of reputation information. Manag. Sci. 59:265–85 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown J, Morgan J. 2009. How much is a dollar worth? Tipping versus equilibrium coexistence on competing auction sites. J. Polit. Econ. 117:668–700 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cabral L, Hortacsu A. 2010. The dynamics of seller reputation: evidence from eBay. J. Ind. Econ. 58:54–78 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cullen Z, Farronato F. 2015. Outsourcing tasks online: matching demand and supply on peer-to-peer Internet platforms Work. Pap., Stanford Univ. [Google Scholar]
  7. David PA. 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Am. Econ. Rev. 77:332–37 [Google Scholar]
  8. de Corniere A, Taylor G. 2014. Integration and search engine bias. RAND J. Econ. 45:576–97 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dellarocas C. 2003. The digitization of word-of-mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Manag. Sci. 49:1407–24 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dinerstein M, Einav L, Levin J, Sundaresan N. 2014. Consumer price search and platform design in Internet commerce Work. Pap., Stanford Univ. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dowd M. 2015. Driving Uber mad. New York Times May 23, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/24/opinion/sunday/maureen-dowd-driving-uber-mad.html [Google Scholar]
  12. Einav L, Farronato C, Levin J, Sundaresan N. 2015. Auctions versus posted prices in online markets Work. Pap., Stanford Univ. [Google Scholar]
  13. Einav L, Knoepfle D, Levin J, Sundaresan N. 2014. Sales taxes and Internet commerce. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:1–26 [Google Scholar]
  14. Eliaz K, Spiegler R. 2011. A simple model of search engine pricing. Econ. J. 121:F329–39 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ellison G, Ellison SF. 2014. Match quality, search, and the Internet market for used books Work. Pap., Mass. Inst. Technol. [Google Scholar]
  16. Farronato C, Fradkin A. 2015. Market structure with the entry of peer-to-peer platforms: the case of hotels and Airbnb Work. Pap., Stanford Univ. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fourquet L, Scott M. 2015. Uber drivers face fines in Paris. New York Times Feb. 22, http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/uber-drivers-face-fines-in-paris/ [Google Scholar]
  18. Fradkin A. 2015. Search frictions and the design of online marketplaces Work. Pap., Mass. Inst. Technol. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fradkin A, Grewal E, Holtz D, Pearson M. 2015. Bias and reciprocity in online reviews: evidence from field experiments on Airbnb Work. Pap., Mass. Inst. Technol. [Google Scholar]
  20. Goldman M, Rao J. 2014. Experiments as instruments: heterogeneous position effects in sponsored search auctions. Work. Pap., Microsoft Res., http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2524688\ [Google Scholar]
  21. Goolsbee A. 2000. In a world without borders: the impact of taxes on Internet commerce. Q. J. Econ. 115:561–76 [Google Scholar]
  22. Grossman N. 2015. Regulation, the Internet way Work. Pap., Harvard Univ. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hagiu A, Jullien B. 2011. Why do intermediaries divert search?. RAND J. Econ. 42:337–62 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hall J, Krueger A. 2015. An analysis of the labor market for Uber's driver-partners in the United States Work. Pap., Princeton Univ. [Google Scholar]
  25. Horton JJ. 2014. Misdirected search effort in a matching market: causes, consequences and a partial solution. Proc. ACM Conf. Econ. Comput., 15th357–57 New York: ACM [Google Scholar]
  26. Horton JJ, Golden JM. 2015. Reputation inflation: evidence from an online labor market Work. Pap., New York Univ. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hui XA, Saeedi M, Sundaresan N, Shen Z. 2014. From lemon markets to managed markets: the evolution of eBay's reputation system Work. Pap., Ohio State Univ. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jin GZ, Kato A. 2007. Dividing online and offline: a case study. Rev. Econ. Stud. 74:981–1004 [Google Scholar]
  29. Leiber R. 2015. Airbnb horror story points to need for precautions. New York Times Aug. 14, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/15/your-money/airbnb-horror-story-points-to-need-for-precautions.html [Google Scholar]
  30. Leland H. 1979. Quacks, lemons, and licensing: a theory of minimum quality standards. J. Polit. Econ. 87:1328–46 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lemmen Meyer AG. 2015. Pricing mechanisms in peer-to-peer online credit markets PhD Diss., Stanford Univ. [Google Scholar]
  32. Levin J. 2013. The economics of Internet markets. Advances in Economics and Econometrics Vol. 1 D Acemoglu, M Arellano, E Dekel 48–75 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  33. Lewis G. 2011. Asymmetric information, adverse selection and online disclosure: the case of eBay motors. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:1535–46 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mayzlin D, Dover Y, Chevalier J. 2014. Promotional reviews: an empirical investigation of online review manipulation. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:2421–55 [Google Scholar]
  35. Milgrom P. 2010. Simplified mechanisms with an application to sponsored-search auctions. Games Econ. Behav. 70:62–70 [Google Scholar]
  36. Milgrom P, Roberts J. 1994. Comparing equilibria. Am. Econ. Rev. 84:441–59 [Google Scholar]
  37. Nosko C, Tadelis S. 2015. The Limits of reputation in platform markets: an empirical analysis and field experiment Work. Pap., Univ. Calif. Berkeley [Google Scholar]
  38. Pallais A. 2014. Inefficient hiring in entry-level labor markets. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:3565–99 [Google Scholar]
  39. Prescott EC. 1975. Efficiency of the natural rate. J. Polit. Econ. 83:1229–36 [Google Scholar]
  40. Quan TW, Williams KR. 2015. Product variety, across market demand heterogeneity, and the value of online retail Work. Pap., Yale Univ. [Google Scholar]
  41. Resnick P, Zeckhauser R, Friedman E, Kuwabara K. 2002. Reputation systems: facilitating trust in Internet interactions. Commun. ACM 43:45–48 [Google Scholar]
  42. Roberts J. 2011. Can warranties substitute for reputations?. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 3:369–85 [Google Scholar]
  43. Seamans R, Zhu F. 2013. Responses to entry in multi-sided markets: the impact of Craigslist on local newspapers NET Inst. Work. Pap. No. 10–11 [Google Scholar]
  44. Sheldon M. 2015. Income targeting and the ride-sharing market Work. Pap., Univ. Chicago [Google Scholar]
  45. Stigler G. 1971. The theory of economic regulations. Bell J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 2:13–21 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tucker C. 2015. Privacy and the Internet. Handbook of Media Economics Vol. 1B SP Anderson, D Stromberg, J Waldfogel 441–62 Amsterdam: North-Holland [Google Scholar]
  47. Varian H. 2010. Computer-mediated transactions. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:1–10 [Google Scholar]
  48. Wallsten S. 2015. Has Uber forced taxi drivers to step up their game?. Atlantic July 9, http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/07/uber-taxi-drivers-complaints-chicago-newyork/397931/ [Google Scholar]
  49. Zervas G, Proserpio D, Byers JW. 2014. The rise of the sharing economy: estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry Work. Pap., Boston Univ. [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015334
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015334
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error