1932

Abstract

This article presents a selective review of economic research on attentional choice, taking an observation of Block & Marschak (1960) as its starting point. Because standard choice data conflate utilities and perception, they point out that it is inadequate for research in which attention is endogenous. The review focuses on their thesis that advances in our understanding of attention require modeling of novel choice-based data sets, and corresponding methods of measurement. By way of example, recent attentional research based on measuring and modeling state-dependent stochastic choice data is detailed. Next research steps in relation to strategic attention and the dynamics of learning are outlined. If the thesis of Block & Marschak is valid, engineering of new data sets will become an increasingly essential professional activity as attentional research advances.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015417
2016-10-31
2024-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/8/1/annurev-economics-080315-015417.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015417&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Achtziger A, Alos-Ferrer C. 2014. Fast or rational? A response-times study of Bayesian updating. Manag. Sci. 60:923–38 [Google Scholar]
  2. Afriat S. 1967. The construction of a utility function from demand data. Int. Econ. Rev. 8:67–77 [Google Scholar]
  3. Agranov M, Caplin A, Tergiman C. 2015. Naive play and the process of choice in guessing games. J. Econ. Sci. Assoc. 1:1–12 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahn DS, Sarver T. 2013. Preference for flexibility and random choice. Econometrica 81:341–61 [Google Scholar]
  5. Allcott H, Mullainathan S. 2010. Behavioral science and energy policy. Science 327:1204–5 [Google Scholar]
  6. Alonso R, Brocas I, Carrillo JD. 2014. Resource allocation in the brain. Rev. Econ. Stud. 81:501–34 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ameriks J, Zeldes S. 2000. How do household portfolio shares vary with age? Work. Pap., Columbia Univ., New York. https://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/mygsb/faculty/research/pubfiles/16/Ameriks_Zeldes_age_Sept_2004d.pdf [Google Scholar]
  8. Bénabou R, Tirole J. 2002. Self-confidence and personal motivation. Q. J. Econ. 117:871–915 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bénabou R, Tirole J. 2011. Identity, morals, and taboos: beliefs as assets. Q. J. Econ. 126:805–55 [Google Scholar]
  10. Benoît J-P, Dubra J. 2011. Apparent overconfidence. Econometrica 79:1591–625 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bergemann D, Morris S. 2014. Bayes correlated equilibrium and the comparison of information structures in games Discuss. Pap. 1909RR, Cowles Found., Yale Univ., New Haven, CT [Google Scholar]
  12. Blackwell D. 1953. Equivalent comparisons of experiments. Ann. Math. Stat. 24:265–72 [Google Scholar]
  13. Block HD, Marschak J. 1960. Random orderings and stochastic theories of response. Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling I Olkin 97–132 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  14. Bordalo P, Gennaioli N, Shleifer A. 2013. Salience and consumer choice. J. Polit. Econ. 121:803–43 [Google Scholar]
  15. Brocas I, Carrillo JD. 2008. The brain as a hierarchical organization. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:1312–46 [Google Scholar]
  16. Campbell D. 1978. Realization of choice functions. Econometrica 46:171–80 [Google Scholar]
  17. Caplin A. 2003. Fear as a policy instrument. Time and Decision: Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Intertemporal Choice G Loewenstein, D Read, RF Baumeister 441–58 New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  18. Caplin A, Dean M. 2011. Search, choice, and revealed preference. Theor. Econ. 6:19–48 [Google Scholar]
  19. Caplin A, Dean M. 2015. Revealed preference, rational inattention, and costly information acquisition. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:2183–203 [Google Scholar]
  20. Caplin A, Dean M, Leahy J. 2015a. Consideration sets and rational inattention Work. Pap., New York Univ., New York [Google Scholar]
  21. Caplin A, Dean M, Martin D. 2011. Search and satisficing. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:2899–922 [Google Scholar]
  22. Caplin A, Leahy J. 2001. Psychological expected utility theory and anticipatory feelings. Q. J. Econ. 116:55–79 [Google Scholar]
  23. Caplin A, Leahy J, Matějka F. 2015b. Learning from market share when consumers are rationally inattentive Work. Pap., New York Univ., New York [Google Scholar]
  24. Caplin A, Lowrance R. 2014. The mortgage mess, the press, and the politics of inattention. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:577–81 [Google Scholar]
  25. Caplin A, Martin D. 2015. A testable theory of imperfect perception. Econ. J. 125:184–202 [Google Scholar]
  26. Caplin A, Martin D. 2016. The dual-process drift diffusion model: evidence from response times. Econ. Inq. 54:1274–82 [Google Scholar]
  27. Caplin A, Spulber D. 1987. Menu costs and the neutrality of money. Q. J. Econ. 102:703–25 [Google Scholar]
  28. Chabris C, Morris C, Taubinsky D, Laibson D, Schuldt J. 2009. The allocation of time in decision-making. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 7:628–37 [Google Scholar]
  29. Chetty R, Looney A, Kroft K. 2009. Salience and taxation: theory and evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 99:1145–77 [Google Scholar]
  30. Choi S, Fisman R, Gale D, Kariv S. 2007. Consistency and heterogeneity of individual behavior under uncertainty. Am. Econ. Rev. 97:1921–38 [Google Scholar]
  31. Colombo L, Femminis G, Pavan A. 2014. Information acquisition and welfare. Rev. Econ. Stud. 81:1438–83 [Google Scholar]
  32. Cover T, Thomas J. 2006. Elements of Information Theory New York: Wiley, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  33. De Oliveira H, Denti T, Mihm M, Ozbek MK. 2013. Rationally inattentive preferences SSRN Work. Pap. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2274286 [Google Scholar]
  34. Delavande A, Rohwedder S. 2008. Eliciting subjective probabilities in Internet surveys. Public Opin. Q. 72:866–91 [Google Scholar]
  35. DellaVigna S. 2007. Psychology and economics: evidence from the field NBER Work. Pap. 13420 [Google Scholar]
  36. Dixit A. 2012. Paul Samuelson's legacy. Annu. Rev. Econ. 4:1–31 [Google Scholar]
  37. Dye RA. 1985. Costly contract contingencies. Int. Econ. Rev. 26:233–50 [Google Scholar]
  38. Eliaz K, de Clippel G, Rozen K. 2014. Competing for consumer inattention. J. Polit. Econ. 122:1203–34 [Google Scholar]
  39. Eliaz K, Spiegler R. 2011. Consideration sets and competitive marketing. Rev. Econ. Stud. 78:235–62 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ergin H, Sarver T. 2010. A unique costly contemplation representation. Econometrica 78:1285–339 [Google Scholar]
  41. Fehr E, Rangel A. 2011. Neuroeconomic foundations of economic choice—recent advances. J. Econ. Perspect. 25:43–30 [Google Scholar]
  42. Fudenberg D, Strack P, Strzalecki T. 2015. Stochastic choice and optimal sequential sampling. arXiv:1505.03342 [q-bio.NC]
  43. Gabaix X. 2014. A sparsity-based model of bounded rationality. Q. J. Econ. 129:1661–710 [Google Scholar]
  44. Gabaix X, Laibson D. 2001. The 6D bias and the equity-premium puzzle. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2001 BS Bernanke, K Rogoff 257–330 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  45. Gabaix X, Laibson D. 2006. Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. Q. J. Econ. 121:505–40 [Google Scholar]
  46. Gabaix X, Laibson D, Moloche G, Weinberg S. 2006. Costly information acquisition: experimental analysis of a boundedly rational model. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:1043–68 [Google Scholar]
  47. Geng S. 2016. Decision time, consideration time, and status quo bias. Econ. Inq. 54:433–49 [Google Scholar]
  48. Glimcher P. 2011. Foundations of Neuroeconomic Analysis New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  49. Golman R, Hagmann D, Loewenstein G. 2015. Information avoidance SSRN Work. Pap. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2633226 [Google Scholar]
  50. Golosov M, Lucas R. 2007. Menu costs and Phillips curves. J. Polit. Econ. 115:171–99 [Google Scholar]
  51. Gul F, Pesendorfer W. 2001. Temptation and self-control. Econometrica 69:1403–35 [Google Scholar]
  52. Hayek FA. 1937. Economics and knowledge. Economica 4:33–54 [Google Scholar]
  53. Hayek FA. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. Am. Econ. Rev. 35:519–30 [Google Scholar]
  54. Hellwig C, Kohls S, Veldkamp L. 2012. Information choice technologies. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:335–40 [Google Scholar]
  55. Ho T, Camerer C, Weigelt K. 1998. Iterated dominance and iterated best-response in experimental “p-beauty contests.” Am. Econ. Rev. 88:947–69 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hommes C. 2013. Behavioral Rationality and Heterogeneous Expectations in Complex Economic Systems Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  57. Iyengar SS, Lepper MR. 2000. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 79:995–1006 [Google Scholar]
  58. Jehiel P. 2005. Analogy-based expectation equilibrium. J. Econ. Theory 123:81–104 [Google Scholar]
  59. Jin G, Luca M, Martin D. 2015. Is no news (perceived as) bad news? An experimental investigation of information disclosure NBER Work. Pap. 21099 [Google Scholar]
  60. Johnson EJ, Camerer C, Sen S, Rymon T. 2002. Detecting failures of backward induction: monitoring information search in sequential bargaining. J. Econ. Theory 104:16–47 [Google Scholar]
  61. Jovanovic B, MacDonald GM. 1994. Competitive diffusion. J. Polit. Econ. 102:24–52 [Google Scholar]
  62. Juster FT. 1966. Consumer buying intentions and purchase probability: an experiment in survey design. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 61:658–96 [Google Scholar]
  63. Kamenica E, Gentzkow M. 2011. Bayesian persuasion. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:2590–615 [Google Scholar]
  64. Kézdi G, Willis RJ. 2003. Who becomes a stockholder? Expectations, subjective uncertainty, and asset allocation Res. Pap. WP 39, Mich. Retire. Res. Cent., Ann Arbor [Google Scholar]
  65. Kocher MG, Sutter M. 2006. Time is money—time pressure, incentives, and the quality of decision-making. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 61:375–39 [Google Scholar]
  66. Koopmans TC. 1964. On flexibility of future preference Discuss. Pap. 150, Cowles Found. Res. Econ., Yale Univ., New Haven, CT [Google Scholar]
  67. Kőszegi B, Szeidl A. 2013. A model of focusing in economic choice. Q. J. Econ. 128:53–104 [Google Scholar]
  68. Krajbich I, Lu D, Camerer C, Rangel A. 2012. The attentional drift-diffusion model extends to simple purchasing decisions. Front. Psychol. 3:193 [Google Scholar]
  69. Krajbich I, Rangel A. 2011. Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions. PNAS 108:13852–57 [Google Scholar]
  70. Kreps DM. 1979. A representation theorem for preference for flexibility. Econometrica 47:565–77 [Google Scholar]
  71. Kreps DM, Porteus EL. 1978. Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice theory. Econometrica 46:185–200 [Google Scholar]
  72. Kuhnen CM. 2015. Asymmetric learning from financial information. J. Finance 70:2029–62 [Google Scholar]
  73. Lichtenstein S, Slovic P. 1971. Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. J. Exp. Psychol. 89:46–55 [Google Scholar]
  74. Madrian BC, Shea DF. 2001. The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and saving behavior. Q. J. Econ. 116:1149–87 [Google Scholar]
  75. Mankiw NG, Reis R. 2002. Sticky information versus sticky prices: a proposal to replace the New Keynesian Phillips curve. Q. J. Econ. 117:1295–328 [Google Scholar]
  76. Manski CF. 1990. The use of intentions data to predict behavior: a best-case analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 85:934–40 [Google Scholar]
  77. Manski CF. 2004. Measuring expectations. Econometrica 72:1329–76 [Google Scholar]
  78. Manzini P, Mariotti M. 2007. Sequentially rationalizable choice. Am. Econ. Rev. 97:1824–40 [Google Scholar]
  79. Marcet A, Sargent TJ. 1989. Convergence of least-squares learning in environments with hidden state variables and private information. J. Polit. Econ. 97:1306–22 [Google Scholar]
  80. Martin D. 2014. Strategic pricing and rational inattention to quality Work. Pap., New York Univ., New York [Google Scholar]
  81. Martin D. 2015. Consumer theory with inattention to prices Unpublished manuscript, Manag. Econ. Decis. Sci., Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL [Google Scholar]
  82. Masatlioglu Y, Nakajima D, Ozbay E. 2011. Revealed attention. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:2183–205 [Google Scholar]
  83. Matějka F, McKay A. 2015. Rational inattention to discrete choices: a new foundation for the multinomial logit model. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:272–98 [Google Scholar]
  84. McCall JJ. 1970. Economics of information and job search. Q. J. Econ. 84:113–26 [Google Scholar]
  85. McFadden D. 1999. Rationality for economists?. J. Risk Uncertain. 19:73–105 [Google Scholar]
  86. Milgrom PR. 1981. Good news and bad news: representation theorems and applications. Bell J. Econ. 12:380–91 [Google Scholar]
  87. Munshi K. 2003. Social learning in a heterogeneous population: technology diffusion in the Indian Green Revolution. Rev. Econ. Stud. 73:175–203 [Google Scholar]
  88. Nagel R. 1995. Unraveling in guessing games: an experimental study. Am. Econ. Rev. 85:1313–26 [Google Scholar]
  89. Natenzon P. 2016. Random choice and learning Unpublished manuscript, Univ. Washington St. Louis. https://pages.wustl.edu/files/pages/imce/pnatenzon/2016-06-13-rcl-natenzon.pdf [Google Scholar]
  90. Nyarko Y, Schotter A. 2002. An experimental study of belief learning using elicited beliefs. Econometrica 70:971–1005 [Google Scholar]
  91. Paciello L, Wiederholt M. 2014. Exogenous information, endogenous information, and optimal monetary policy. Rev. Econ. Stud. 81:356–88 [Google Scholar]
  92. Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ. 1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  93. Ratcliff R. 1978. A theory of memory retrieval. Psychol. Rev. 85:259–108 [Google Scholar]
  94. Ratcliff R, McKoon G. 2008. The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Comput. 20:873–922 [Google Scholar]
  95. Recalde M, Riedl A, Vesterlund L. 2013. Intuitive generosity and error prone inference from response time Unpublished manuscript, Univ. Pittsburgh, PA [Google Scholar]
  96. Reutskaja E, Pulst-Korenberg J, Nagel R, Camerer C, Rangel A. 2011. Economic decision-making under conditions of extreme time pressure and option overload: an eye-tracking study. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:900–26 [Google Scholar]
  97. Rubinstein A. 1988. Similarity and decision-making under risk (is there a utility theory resolution to the Allais paradox?). J. Econ. Theory 46:145–53 [Google Scholar]
  98. Rubinstein A. 2007. Instinctive and cognitive reasoning: a study of response times. Econ. J. 117:1243–59 [Google Scholar]
  99. Rubinstein A, Salant Y. 2006. A model of choice from lists. Theor. Econ. 1:3–17 [Google Scholar]
  100. Salant Y, Rubinstein A. 2008. (A, f): choice with frames. Rev. Econ. Stud. 75:1287–96 [Google Scholar]
  101. Samuelson PA. 1938. A note on the pure theory of consumer's choice. Economica 5:61–71 [Google Scholar]
  102. Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R. 1988. Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertain. 1:7–59 [Google Scholar]
  103. Selten R. 1998. Aspiration adaptation theory. J. Math. Psychol. 42:191–214 [Google Scholar]
  104. Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27:379–423 [Google Scholar]
  105. Shaw ML, Shaw P. 1977. Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. J. Exp. Psychol. 3:201–11 [Google Scholar]
  106. Simon H. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 69:99–118 [Google Scholar]
  107. Sims CA. 1998. Stickiness. Carnegie-Rochester Conf. Ser. Public Policy 49:317–56 [Google Scholar]
  108. Sims CA. 2003. Implications of rational inattention. J. Monet. Econ. 50:665–90 [Google Scholar]
  109. Sims CA. 2010. Rational inattention and monetary economics. Handbook of Monetary Economics 3 BM Friedman, M Woodford 155–81 Amsterdam: North-Holland [Google Scholar]
  110. Spiegler R. 2011. Bounded Rationality and Industrial Organization New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  111. Spiliopoulos L, Ortmann A. 2014. The BCD of response time analysis in experimental economics SSRN Work. Pap. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2401325 [Google Scholar]
  112. Stigler GJ. 1961. The economics of information. J. Polit. Econ. 69:213–25 [Google Scholar]
  113. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  114. Tversky A. 1969. Intransitivity of preferences. Psychol. Rev. 76:31–48 [Google Scholar]
  115. Tversky A. 1972. Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice. Psychol. Rev. 79:281–99 [Google Scholar]
  116. Van Nieuwerburgh S, Veldkamp L. 2009. Information immobility and the home bias puzzle. J. Finance 64:1187–215 [Google Scholar]
  117. Van Nieuwerburgh S, Veldkamp L. 2010. Information acquisition and under-diversification. Rev. Econ. Stud. 77:779–805 [Google Scholar]
  118. Varian HR. 1982. The nonparametric approach to demand analysis. Econometrica 50:945–73 [Google Scholar]
  119. Wald A. 1973. Sequential Analysis New York: Dover [Google Scholar]
  120. Weber EH. 1996 (1834). On the Tactile Senses HE Ross, DJ Murray New York: Exp. Psychol. Soc, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  121. Wilcox NT. 1993. Lottery choice: incentives, complexity and decision time. Econ. J. 103:1397–417 [Google Scholar]
  122. Wiswall M, Zafar B. 2015. Determinants of college major choice: identification using an information experiment. Rev. Econ. Stud. 82:791–824 [Google Scholar]
  123. Woodford M. 2009. Information-constrained state-dependent pricing. J. Monetary Econ. 56:100–24 [Google Scholar]
  124. Woodford M. 2012. Inattentive valuation and reference dependent choice Work. Pap., Columbia Univ., New York [Google Scholar]
  125. Yang M. 2015. Coordination with flexible information acquisition. J. Econ. Theory 158:721–38 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015417
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error