1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Economics
  4. Volume 7, 2015
  5. Article

Annual Review of Economics

Volume 7, 2015

The US Electricity Industry After 20 Years of Restructuring

Abstract

Electricity restructuring in the 1990s ended the era of vertically integrated monopolies in many states, allowing nonutility generators to sell electricity to utilities and, in fewer states, allowing retail service providers to buy electricity from generators and sell to end-use customers. We review the economic arguments for restructuring and the resulting effects in subsequent years. We argue that the greatest political motivation for restructuring was rent shifting, not efficiency improvements. Although electricity restructuring has brought efficiency improvements, it has generally been viewed as a disappointment because the price-reduction promises made by some advocates were based on politically unsustainable rent transfers. In reality, electricity rate changes since restructuring have been driven more by exogenous factors, such as generation technology advances and natural gas price fluctuations, than by restructuring. We argue that a similar dynamic underpins the current political momentum behind distributed generation, primarily rooftop solar photovoltaic systems, which remains costly from a societal viewpoint, but privately economic owing to the rent transfers it enables.

Keyword(s): deregulation, utilities
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115630
2015-08-02
2025-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/7/1/annurev-economics-080614-115630.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115630&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Apt J. 2005. Competition has not lowered U.S. industrial electricity prices. Electr. J. 18:52–61 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbose GL, Weaver S, Darghouth N. 2014. Tracking the sun VII: an historical summary of the installed price of photovoltaics in the United States from 1998–2013. Rep., Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab., Berkeley, CA
  3. Behr P. 2009. Showdown looms over Md. electricity re-regulation. New York Times: Greenwire, April 11
  4. Blumstein C, Friedman LS, Green R. 2002. The history of electricity restructuring in California. J. Ind. Compet. Trade 2:9–38 [Google Scholar]
  5. Borenstein S. 2002. The trouble with electricity markets: understanding California’s restructuring disaster. J. Econ. Perspect. 16:1191–211 [Google Scholar]
  6. Borenstein S. 2005. Time-varying retail electricity prices: theory and practice. Electricity Deregulation: Choices and Challenges Griffin JM, Puller SL. 317–57 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  7. Borenstein S. 2008. The market value and cost of solar photovoltaic electricity production. Work. Pap. 176, Cent. Study Energy Mark., Univ. Calif., Berkeley
  8. Borenstein S. 2011. Regional and income distribution effects of alternative retail electricity tariffs. Work. Pap. 225, Energy Inst. Haas, Univ. Calif., Berkeley
  9. Borenstein S. 2012. The private and public economics of renewable electricity generation. J. Econ. Perspect. 26:167–92 [Google Scholar]
  10. Borenstein S. 2013. Effective and equitable adoption of opt-in residential dynamic electricity pricing. Rev. Ind. Organ. 42:127–60 [Google Scholar]
  11. Borenstein S. 2015. The private net benefits of residential solar PV: and who gets them. Work. Pap., Energy Inst. Haas, Univ. Calif., Berkeley
  12. Borenstein S, Bushnell JB. 2000. Electricity restructuring: deregulation or reregulation?. Regulation 23:246–52 [Google Scholar]
  13. Borenstein S, Bushnell JB, Wolak FA. 2002. Measuring market inefficiencies in California’s restructured wholesale electricity market. Am. Econ. Rev. 92:1376–405 [Google Scholar]
  14. Borenstein S, Holland S. 2005. On the efficiency of competitive electricity markets with time-invariant retail prices. Rand J. Econ. 36:469–93 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bushnell JB. 2004. California’s electricity crisis: a market apart?. Energy Policy 32:1045–52 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bushnell JB, Mansur ET, Saravia C. 2008. Vertical arrangements, market structure, and competition: an analysis of restructured U.S. electricity markets. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:237–66 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bushnell JB, Wolfram C. 2009. The guy at the controls: labor quality and power plant efficiency. International Differences in the Business Practices and Productivity of Firms Freeman RB, Shaw KL. 79–102 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  18. Cohen MA, Callaway DS. 2013. Modeling the effect of geographically diverse PV generation on California’s distribution system. IEEE Int. Conf. Smart Grid Commun.702–7 New York: IEEE [Google Scholar]
  19. Darghouth N, Barbose G, Wiser R. 2013. Electricity bill savings from residential photovoltaic systems: sensitivities to changes in future electricity market conditions. Rep. LBNL-6017E, Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab., Berkeley, CA
  20. Davis LW, Wolfram C. 2012. Deregulation, consolidation, and efficiency: evidence from U.S. nuclear power. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 4:4194–225 [Google Scholar]
  21. Energy Environ. Econ 2014. Investigating a higher renewables portfolio standard in California. https://ethree.com/public_projects/renewables_portfolio_standard.php
  22. Fabrizio K, Rose NL, Wolfram C. 2007. Do markets reduce costs? Assessing the impact of regulatory restructuring on U.S. electric generation efficiency. Am. Econ. Rev. 97:1250–77 [Google Scholar]
  23. Faruqui A, George SS. 2002. The value of dynamic pricing in mass markets. Electr. J. 15:45–65 [Google Scholar]
  24. FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) 2013. Assessment of demand response and advanced metering. Staff Rep., Dep. Energy, Washington, DC
  25. Hausman C. 2014. Corporate incentives and nuclear safety. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 6:3178–206 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ida T, Ito K, Tanaka M. 2014. The persistence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: experimental evidence from energy demand. NBER Work. Pap. 20910
  27. Jessoe K, Rapson D. 2014. Knowledge is (less) power: experimental evidence from residential energy use. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:1417–38 [Google Scholar]
  28. Johnston DC. 2007. Competitively priced electricity costs more, studies show. New York Times, Nov. 6
  29. Joskow PL. 1997. Restructuring, competition and regulatory reform in the U.S. electricity sector. J. Econ. Perspect. 11:3119–38 [Google Scholar]
  30. Joskow PL. 2001. California’s electricity crisis. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 17:365–88 [Google Scholar]
  31. Joskow PL. 2006. Markets for power in the United States: an interim assessment. Energy J. 27:11–36 [Google Scholar]
  32. Joskow PL. 2008. Capacity payments in imperfect electricity markets: need and design. Util. Policy 16:159–70 [Google Scholar]
  33. Joskow PL. 2011. Comparing the costs of intermittent and dispatchable electricity generating technologies. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:238–41 [Google Scholar]
  34. Joskow PL, Kahn E. 2002. A quantitative analysis of pricing behavior in California’s wholesale electricity market during summer 2000. Energy J. 23:41–35 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kleit AN, Reitzes JD. 2008. The effectiveness of FERC’s transmission policy: Is transmission used efficiently and when is it scarce?. J. Regul. Econ. 34:1–26 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lacey S. 2014. Morgan Stanley: Fixed charges on solar may cause ‘tipping point’ for grid defection. Greentech Media. http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/Solar-Fixed-Charges-May-Cause-Grid-Defection
  37. Mansur ET. 2007. Upstream competition and vertical integration in electricity markets. J. Law Econ. 50:125–56 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mansur ET, White MW. 2012. Market organization and efficiency in electricity markets. Work. Pap., Dartmouth Univ., Hanover, NH. http://www.dartmouth.edu/~mansur/papers/mansur_white_pjmaep.htm
  39. Mills A, Wiser R. 2010. Implications of wide-area geographic diversity for short-term variability of solar power. Rep. LBNL-3884E, Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab., Berkeley, CA
  40. NYS Dep. Public Serv 2014. Reforming the energy vision. Case 14-M-0101. http://www3.dps.ny.gov/W/PSCWeb.nsf/96f0fec0b45a3c6485257688006a701a/26be8a93967e604785257cc40066b91a/$FILE/ATTK0J3L.pdf/Reforming%20The%20Energy%20Vision%20%28REV%29%20REPORT%204.25.%2014.pdf
  41. Puller SL. 2007. Pricing and firm conduct in California’s deregulated electricity market. Rev. Econ. Stat. 89:75–87 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schmalensee R. 2012. Evaluating policies to increase electricity generation from renewable energy. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 6:45–64 [Google Scholar]
  43. Sharp D. 2007. Utility rates in Maine on the rise; state lawmakers consider rollback of deregulation. Bangor Daily News, April 21, p. B1
  44. Sherwood L. 2014. U.S. solar market trends 2013. Rep., Interstate Renew. Energy Counc., Latham, NY
  45. Showalter M. 2007. Price trends for industrial electricity, deregulated vs. regulated states. Rep., Power in the Public Interest
  46. Taber J, Chapman D, Mount T. 2006. Examining the effects of deregulation on retail electricity prices. Work. Pap. WP-2005-14, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY
  47. Tabone MD, Callaway DS. 2013. Parameterizing fluctuations in solar photovoltaic generation using Hidden Markov Models. IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meet.1–6 New York: IEEE [Google Scholar]
  48. Tierney S. 2007. Decoding developments in today’s electric industry: ten points in the prism. Rep., Analysis Group, New York
  49. US Energy Inf. Admin 1995. Electric Power Annual 1994: Operational and Financial Data Vol. II Washington, DC: US Dep. Energy [Google Scholar]
  50. White MW. 1995. Valuing market trading mechanisms: evidence from electricity markets. POWER Work. Pap. PWP-033, Univ. Calif. Energy Inst., Berkeley
  51. White MW. 1996. Power struggles: explaining deregulatory reforms in electricity markets. Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. 1996:201–67 [Google Scholar]
  52. Wolak FA. 2003a. Diagnosing the California electricity crisis. Electr. J. 16:711–37 [Google Scholar]
  53. Wolak FA. 2003b. Measuring unilateral market power in wholesale electricity markets: the California market, 1998–2000. Am. Econ. Rev. 93:425–30 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wolak FA. 2011a. Do residential customers respond to hourly prices? Evidence from a dynamic pricing experiment. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:83–87 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wolak FA. 2011b. Measuring the benefits of greater spatial granularity in short-term pricing in wholesale electricity markets. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:247–52 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115630
Loading
The US Electricity Industry After 20 Years of Restructuring
Annual Review of Economics 7, 437 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115630
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115630
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115630
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error