New Developments in Revealed Preference Theory: Decisions Under Risk, Uncertainty, and Intertemporal Choice

Literature Cited

1. Adams A, Cherchye L, De Rock B, Verriest E 2014. Consume now or later? Time inconsistency, collective choice, and revealed preference. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:4147–83
   [Google Scholar]
2. Afriat SN. 1967. The construction of utility functions from expenditure data. Int. Econ. Rev. 8:67–77
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ahn D, Choi S, Gale D, Kariv S 2014. Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment. Quant. Econ. 5:195–223
   [Google Scholar]
4. Andreoni J, Sprenger C. 2012. Estimating time preferences from convex budgets. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:3333–56
   [Google Scholar]
5. Blundell RW, Browning M, Crawford IA 2003. Nonparametric Engel curves and revealed preference. Econometrica 71:205–40
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bossaerts P, Ghirardato P, Guarnaschelli S, Zame WR 2010. Ambiguity in asset markets: theory and experiment. Rev. Financ. Stud. 23:1325–59
   [Google Scholar]
7. Browning M. 1989. A nonparametric test of the life-cycle rational expectations hypothesis. Int. Econ. Rev. 30:979–92
   [Google Scholar]
8. Camerer C, Weber M. 1992. Recent developments in modeling preferences: uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertain. 5:325–70
   [Google Scholar]
9. Carvajal A, Ray I, Snyder S 2004. Equilibrium behavior in markets and games: testable restrictions and identification. J. Math. Econ. 40:1–40
   [Google Scholar]
10. Carvalho L, Meier S, Wang SW 2016. Poverty and economic decision making: evidence from changes in financial resources at payday. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:260–84
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chambers CP, Echenique F. 2009. Supermodularity and preferences. J. Econ. Theory 144:1004–14
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chambers CP, Echenique F. 2016. Revealed Preference Theory Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
13. Chambers CP, Echenique F, Saito K 2016a. Testing theories of financial decision making. PNAS 113:4003–8
    [Google Scholar]
14. Chambers CP, Echenique F, Shmaya E 2014. The axiomatic structure of empirical content. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:2303–19
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chambers CP, Echenique F, Shmaya E 2017. General revealed preference theory. Theor. Econ. 12:493–511
    [Google Scholar]
16. Chambers CP, Liu C, Martinez SK 2016b. A test for risk-averse expected utility. J. Econ. Theory 163:775–85
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cherchye L, Crawford I, De Rock B, Vermeulen F 2009. The revealed preference approach to demand. Quantifying Consumer Preferences: Estimating Demand Systems D Slottje 247–80 Bingley, UK: Emerald
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cherchye L, Demuynck T, De Rock B 2018. Normality of demand in a two-goods setting. J. Econ. Theory 173:361–82
    [Google Scholar]
19. Choi S, Fisman R, Gale D, Kariv S 2007. Consistency and heterogeneity of individual behavior under uncertainty. Am. Econ. Rev. 97:1921–38
    [Google Scholar]
20. Choi S, Kariv S, Müller W, Silverman D 2014. Who is (more) rational. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:1518–50
    [Google Scholar]
21. Crawford I. 2010. Habits revealed. Rev. Econ. Stud. 77:1382–402
    [Google Scholar]
22. Crawford I, De Rock B 2014. Empirical revealed preference. Annu. Rev. Econ. 6:503–24
    [Google Scholar]
23. Debreu G. 1959. Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
24. Demuynck T, Verriest E. 2013. I'll never forget my first cigarette: a revealed preference analysis of the “habits as durables” model. Int. Econ. Rev. 54:717–38
    [Google Scholar]
25. Diewert WE. 1973. Afriat and revealed preference theory. Rev. Econ. Stud. 40:419–25
    [Google Scholar]
26. Diewert WE. 2012. Afriat's theorem and some extensions to choice under uncertainty. Econ. J. 122:305–31
    [Google Scholar]
27. Dziewulski P. 2018. Revealed time preference. Games Econ. Behav. 112:67–77
    [Google Scholar]
28. Echenique F, Imai T, Saito K 2018. Approximate expected utility rationalization Work. Pap. 1441, Calif. Inst. Technol Pasadena, CA:
29. Echenique F, Imai T, Saito K 2019a. Decision making under uncertainty: an experimental study in market settings Work. Pap., Calif. Inst. Technol Pasadena, CA:
30. Echenique F, Imai T, Saito K 2019b. Testable implications of models of intertemporal choice: exponential discounting and its generalizations Work. Pap. 1388, Calif. Inst. Technol Pasadena, CA:
31. Echenique F, Saito K. 2015. Savage in the market. Econometrica 83:1467–95
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ellsberg D. 1961. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q. J. Econ. 75:643–69
    [Google Scholar]
33. Epstein LG. 2000. Are probabilities used in markets. J. Econ. Theory 91:86–90
    [Google Scholar]
34. Fishburn PC. 1975. Separation theorems and expected utilities. J. Econ. Theory 11:16–34
    [Google Scholar]
35. Fishburn PC. 1979. Utility Theory for Decision Making Malabar, FL: Krieger
36. Fudenberg D, Iijima R, Strzalecki T 2014. Stochastic choice and revealed perturbed utility Work. Pap., Harvard Univ Cambridge, MA:
37. Gilboa I, Schmeidler D. 1989. Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econ. 18:141–53
    [Google Scholar]
38. Green RC, Srivastava S. 1986. Expected utility maximization and demand behavior. J. Econ. Theory 38:313–23
    [Google Scholar]
39. Halevy Y, Persitz D, Zrill L 2018. Parametric recoverability of preferences. J. Political Econ. 126:1558–93
    [Google Scholar]
40. Hansen LP, Sargent TJ. 2008. Robustness Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
41. Hey J, Pace N. 2014. The explanatory and predictive power of non two-stage-probability theories of decision making under ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertain. 49:1–29
    [Google Scholar]
42. Houthakker H. 1950. Revealed preference and the utility function. Economica 17:159–74
    [Google Scholar]
43. Kubler F, Selden L, Wei X 2014. Asset demand based tests of expected utility maximization. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:3459–80
    [Google Scholar]
44. Machina MJ, Schmeidler D. 1992. A more robust definition of subjective probability. Econometrica 60:745–80
    [Google Scholar]
45. Matzkin RL. 1994. Restrictions of economic theory in nonparametric methods. In Handbook of EconometricsVol. 4ed. RF Engle, DL McFaddenpp. 2523–58. Amsterdam: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
46. Matzkin RL, Richter MK. 1991. Testing strictly concave rationality. J. Econ. Theory 53:287–303
    [Google Scholar]
47. Nishimura H, Ok EA, Quah J 2017. A comprehensive approach to revealed preference theory. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:1239–63
    [Google Scholar]
48. Polisson M. 2018. A lattice test for additive separability IFS Work. Pap. W18-08, Inst. Fiscal Stud London:
49. Polisson M, Quah J, Renou L 2017. Revealed preferences over risk and uncertainty Discuss. Pap. 1706, Univ. St. Andrews, St. Andrews, UK:
50. Quah J. 2014. A test for weakly separable preferences Discuss. Pap. 708, Univ. Oxford Oxford, UK:
51. Rockafellar RT. 1997. Convex Analysis Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
52. Samuelson P. 1938. A note on the pure theory of consumer's behaviour. Economica 5:61–71
    [Google Scholar]
53. Trautmann ST, van de Kuilen G 2015. Ambiguity attitudes. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making G Keren, G Wu 89–116 Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons
    [Google Scholar]
54. Varian HR. 1982. The nonparametric approach to demand analysis. Econometrica 50:945–73
    [Google Scholar]
55. Varian HR. 1983a. Nonparametric tests of consumer behaviour. Rev. Econ. Stud. 50:99–110
    [Google Scholar]
56. Varian HR. 1983b. Nonparametric tests of models of investor behavior. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 18:269–78
    [Google Scholar]
57. Varian HR. 1988. Estimating risk aversion from Arrow-Debreu portfolio choice. Econometrica 56:973–79
    [Google Scholar]
58. Varian HR. 2006. Revealed preference. Samuelsonian Economics and the Twenty-First Century M Szenberg, L Ramrattan, AA Gottesman 99–115 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]