1932

Abstract

Does inflation vary across the income distribution? This article reviews the growing literature on inflation inequality, describing recent advances and opportunities for further research in four areas. First, new price index theory facilitates the study of inflation inequality. Second, new data show that inflation rates decline with household income in the United States. Accurate measurement requires granular price and expenditure data because of aggregation bias. Third, new evidence quantifies the impacts of innovation and trade on inflation inequality. Contrary to common wisdom, empirical estimates show that the direction of innovation is a significant driver of inflation inequality in the United States, whereas trade has similar price effects across the income distribution. Fourth, inflation inequality and non-homotheticities have important policy implications. They transform cost-benefit analysis, optimal taxation, the effectiveness of stabilization policies, and our understanding of secular macroeconomic trends—including structural change, the decline in the labor share and interest rates, and labor market polarization.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-091520-082042
2021-08-05
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/economics/13/1/annurev-economics-091520-082042.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-091520-082042&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Acemoglu D. 2002. Directed technical change. Rev. Econ. Stud. 69:4781–809
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Acemoglu D. 2007. Equilibrium bias of technology. Econometrica 75:51371–409
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Acemoglu D, Linn J. 2004. Market size in innovation: theory and evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Q. J. Econ. 119:31049–90
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Agarwal R, Gaule P. 2020. Invisible geniuses: Could the knowledge frontier advance faster?. Am. Econ. Rev. Insights 2:4409–24
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Aghion P, Antonin C, Bunel S, Jaravel X. 2020. What are the labor and product market effects of automation? New evidence from France. Work. Pap., London Sch. Econ. London:
  6. Aghion P, Howitt P. 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60:2323–51
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Aghion P, Howitt P. 1996. Research and development in the growth process. J. Econ. Growth 1:149–73
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Allcott H, Braghieri L, Eichmeyer S, Gentzkow M. 2020. The welfare effects of social media. Am. Econ. Rev. 110:3629–76
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Allcott H, Lockwood BB, Taubinsky D. 2019. Regressive sin taxes, with an application to the optimal soda tax. Q. J. Econ. 134:31557–626
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Almås I. 2012. International income inequality: measuring PPP bias by estimating Engel curves for food. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:21093–117
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Almås I, Beatty TK, Crossley TF. 2018. Lost in translation: What do Engel curves tell us about the cost of living? CESifo Work. Pap. Ser. 6886 CESifo, Munich Ger:.
  12. Almås I, Kjelsrud A. 2017. Rags and riches: relative prices, non-homothetic preferences, and inequality in India. World Dev. 97:102–21
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Almås I, Sorensen E. 2020. Global income inequality and cost-of-living adjustment: the Geary–Allen world accounts. NHH Dep. Econ. Work. Pap., Nor. Sch. Econ. Bergen, Nor:.
  14. Amble N, Stewart K. 1994. Experimental price index for elderly consumers. Mon. Labor Rev. 117:511–16
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Amiti M, Itskhoki O, Konings J. 2019. International shocks, variable markups, and domestic prices. Rev. Econ. Stud. 86:62356–402
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Argente D, Hsieh CT, Lee M. 2020. Measuring the cost of living in Mexico and the US NBER Work. Pap. 27806
  17. Argente D, Lee M. 2020. Cost of living inequality during the Great Recession. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc In press. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvaa018
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Arkolakis C, Costinot A, Donaldson D, Rodrguez-Clare A. 2019. The elusive pro-competitive effects of trade. Rev. Econ. Stud. 86:146–80
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Atkin D, Faber B, Fally T, Gonzalez-Navarro M. 2020. Measuring welfare and inequality with incomplete price information NBER Work. Pap. 26890
  20. Atkin D, Faber B, Gonzalez-Navarro M. 2018. Retail globalization and household welfare: evidence from Mexico. J. Political Econ. 126:11–73
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Auclert A. 2019. Monetary policy and the redistribution channel. Am. Econ. Rev. 109:62333–67
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Auclert A, Rognlie M. 2017. Aggregate demand and the top 1 percent. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:5588–92
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Auer RA, Burstein A, Lein SM. 2021. Unequal expenditure switching: evidence from the 2015 Swiss franc appreciation. Am. Econ. Rev. 111:2652–86
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Auer RA, Schoenle RS. 2016. Market structure and exchange rate pass-through. J. Int. Econ. 98:60–77
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Bachas PJ, Gadenne L, Jensen A. 2020. Informality, consumption taxes and redistribution Policy Res. Work. Pap. 9267 World Bank Washington, DC:
  26. Bai L, Stumpner S. 2019. Estimating US consumer gains from Chinese imports. Am. Econ. Rev. Insights 1:2209–24
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Bajari P, Benkard CL, Krainer J. 2005. House prices and consumer welfare. J. Urban Econ. 58:3474–87
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Bartelme DG, Costinot A, Donaldson D, Rodrguez-Clare A. 2019. The textbook case for industrial policy: Theory meets data NBER Work. Pap. 26193
  29. Beck G, Jaravel X. 2020. Prices and global inequality: new evidence from worldwide scanner data Work. Pap., Univ. Siegen Siegen, Ger:.
  30. Beerli A, Weiss FJ, Zilibotti F, Zweimüller J. 2020. Demand forces of technical change evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry. China Econ. Rev. 60:101157
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Bell A, Chetty R, Jaravel X, Petkova N, Van Reenen J. 2019. Who becomes an inventor in America? The importance of exposure to innovation. Q. J. Econ. 134:2647–713
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Boppart T. 2014. Structural change and the Kaldor facts in a growth model with relative price effects and non-Gorman preferences. Econometrica 82:62167–96
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Boppart T, Weiss F. 2013. Non-homothetic preferences and industry directed technical change Meet. Pap. 916 Soc. Econ. Dyn. Minneapolis, MN:
  34. Borusyak K, Jaravel X. 2018. The distributional effects of trade: theory and evidence from the United States. Work. Pap., Harvard Univ Cambridge, MA:
  35. Boskin MJ. 1996. Toward a more accurate measure of the cost of living Rep., Advis. Commission Study Consum. Price Index, US Senate Washington, DC:
  36. Breinlich H, Leromain E, Novy D, Sampson T. 2019. Exchange rates and consumer prices: evidence from Brexit CEPR Discuss. Pap. DP14176 Cent. Econ. Policy Res London:
  37. Brynjolfsson E, Collis A, Diewert E, Eggers F, Fox K. 2020. Measuring the impact of free goods on real household consumption. AEA Pap. Proc. 110:25–30
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Bureau D, Henriet F, Schubert K. 2019. A proposal for the climate: taxing carbon not people Note 50 Cons. Anal. Écon. Paris:
  39. Calder-Wang S. 2019. The distributional impact of the sharing economy on the housing market. Work. Pap., Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA:
  40. Caron J, Fally T, Markusen JR. 2014. International trade puzzles: a solution linking production and preferences. Q. J. Econ. 129:31501–52
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Caron J, Fally T, Markusen JR. 2020. Per capita income and the demand for skills. J. Int. Econ. 123:103306
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Cavallo A. 2020. Inflation with Covid consumption baskets NBER Work. Pap. 27352
  43. Cavallo A, Cruces G, Perez-Truglia R. 2017. Inflation expectations, learning, and supermarket prices: evidence from survey experiments. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 9:31–35
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Clayton C, Jaravel X, Schaab A. 2018. Heterogeneous price rigidities and monetary policy Work. Pap., Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA:
  45. Comin D, Danieli A, Mestieri M. 2020. Income-driven labor market polarization NBER Work. Pap. 27455
  46. Comin D, Lashkari D, Mestieri M. 2021. Structural change with long-run income and price effects. Econometrica 89:1311–74
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Costa DL. 2001. Estimating real income in the United States from 1888 to 1994: correcting CPI bias using Engel curves. J. Political Econ. 109:61288–310
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Costinot A, Donaldson D, Kyle M, Williams H 2019. The more we die, the more we sell? A simple test of the home-market effect. Q. J. Econ. 134:2843–94
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Couture V, Gaubert C, Handbury J, Hurst E. 2020. Income growth and the distributional effects of urban spatial sorting NBER Work. Pap. 26142
  50. Cravino J, Lan T, Levchenko AA. 2020. Price stickiness along the income distribution and the effects of monetary policy. J. Monet. Econ. 110:19–32
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Cravino J, Levchenko AA. 2017. The distributional consequences of large devaluations. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:113477–509
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Crawford I, Neary JP. 2019. New characteristics and hedonic price index numbers CESifo Work. Pap. 7529 CESifo, Munich Ger:.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Crawford I, Smith Z 2002. Distributional aspects of inflation Comment. 90 Inst. Fisc. Stud. London:
  54. D'Acunto F, Malmendier U, Ospina J, Weber M. 2021. Exposure to grocery prices and inflation expectations. J. Political Econ. In press. https://doi.org/10.1086/713192
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. De Loecker J, Goldberg PK, Khandelwal AK, Pavcnik N. 2016. Prices, markups, and trade reform. Econometrica 84:2445–510
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Deaton A, Friedman J, Alatas V. 2004. Purchasing power parity exchange rates from household survey data: India and Indonesia Work. Pap., Res. Program Dev. Stud., Princeton Univ Princeton, NJ:
  57. Deaton A, Heston A. 2010. Understanding PPPs and PPP-based national accounts. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 2:41–35
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Diamond R. 2016. The determinants and welfare implications of US workers' diverging location choices by skill: 1980–2000. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:3479–524
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Diamond R, McQuade T, Qian F. 2019. The effects of rent control expansion on tenants, landlords, and inequality: evidence from San Francisco. Am. Econ. Rev. 109:93365–94
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Diewert E. 1976. Exact and superlative index numbers. J. Econom. 4:2115–45
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Diewert E 1993. The early history of price index research. Essays in Index Number Theory 1 WE Diewert, AO Nakamura 33–65 Amsterdam: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Diewert E, Fox K, Schreyer P. 2020. The digital economy, pandemics and new and disappearing products Work. Pap., Univ. B. C. Vancouver, Can:.
  63. Ding X. 2020. Industry linkages from joint production. Work. Pap., Georgetown Univ. Washington, DC:
  64. Dingel JI. 2017. The determinants of quality specialization. Rev. Econ. Stud. 84:41551–82
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Dixit AK, Stiglitz JE. 1977. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am. Econ. Rev. 67:3297–308
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Dubois P, Griffith R, O'Connell M. 2020. How well targeted are soda taxes?. Am. Econ. Rev. 110:113661–704
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Einiö E, Feng J, Jaravel X. 2020. Social push and the direction of innovation Work. Pap., VATT Inst. Econ. Res. Helsinki, Finl:.
  68. Eizenberg A. 2014. Upstream innovation and product variety in the US home PC market. Rev. Econ. Stud. 81:31003–45
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Engel E. 1857. Die produktions-und ernteerträge und der getreidehandel im preussischen staate. Z. Königlichen Preuss. Stat. Bur. 1:249–89
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Faber B. 2014. Trade liberalization, the price of quality, and inequality: evidence from Mexican store prices. Work. Pap., Univ. Calif. Berkeley:
  71. Faber B, Fally T. 2020. Firm heterogeneity in consumption baskets: evidence from home and store scanner data Work. Pap., Univ. Calif Berkeley:
  72. Fajgelbaum PD, Goldberg PK, Kennedy PJ, Khandelwal AK. 2020. The return to protectionism. Q. J. Econ. 135:11–55
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Fajgelbaum PD, Khandelwal AK. 2016. Measuring the unequal gains from trade. Q. J. Econ. 131:31113–80
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Feenstra RC. 1994. New product varieties and the measurement of international prices. Am. Econ. Rev. 84:1157–77
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Feenstra RC, Weinstein DE. 2017. Globalization, markups, and US welfare. J. Political Econ. 125:41040–74
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Fracassi C, Previtero A, Sheen AW. 2020. Barbarians at the store? Private equity, products, and consumers NBER Work. Pap. 27435
  77. Furman J, Russ K, Shambaugh J. 2017. US tariffs are an arbitrary and regressive tax. VoxEU Jan. 12. https://voxeu.org/print/61402
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Garner TI, Johnson DS, Kokoski MF. 1996. An experimental consumer price index for the poor. Mon. Labor Rev. 119:932–42
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Gerschenkron A. 1947. The Soviet indices of industrial production. Rev. Econ. Stat. 29:4217–26
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Gorman W. 1965. Production functions in which the elasticities of substitution stand in fixed proportions to each other. Rev. Econ. Stud. 32:3217–24
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Hamilton BW. 2001. Using Engel's law to estimate CPI bias. Am. Econ. Rev. 91:3619–30
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Handbury J. 2019. Are poor cities cheap for everyone? Non-homotheticity and the cost of living across US cities NBER Work. Pap. 26574
  83. Handel B, Kolstad J, Minten T, Spinnewijn J. 2020. The social determinants of choice quality: evidence from health insurance in the Netherlands NBER Work. Pap. 27785
  84. Hanoch G. 1975. Production and demand models with direct or indirect implicit additivity. Econometrica 43:3395–419
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Hastings J, Washington E 2010. The first of the month effect: consumer behavior and store responses. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 2:2142–62
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Hausman J. 2003. Sources of bias and solutions to bias in the consumer price index. J. Econ. Perspect. 17:123–44
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Hayek FA. 1931. Prices and Production. New York: Augustus M. Kelly
  88. Hendren N. 2020. Measuring economic efficiency using inverse-optimum weights. J. Public Econ. 187:104198
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Hobijn B, Lagakos D. 2005. Inflation inequality in the United States. Rev. Income Wealth 51:4581–606
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Hottman CJ, Monarch R. 2020. A matter of taste: estimating import price inflation across U.S. income groups. J. Int. Econ. 127:103382
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Hottman CJ, Redding SJ, Weinstein DE. 2016. Quantifying the sources of firm heterogeneity. Q. J. Econ. 131:31291–364
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Hubmer J. 2018. The race between preferences and technology. Job Mark. Pap., Yale Univ. New Haven, CT:
  93. Ivancic L, Diewert WE, Fox KJ. 2011. Scanner data, time aggregation and the construction of price indexes. J. Econom. 161:124–35
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Jaimovich N, Rebelo S, Wong A. 2019. Trading down and the business cycle. J. Monet. Econ. 102:96–121
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Jaimovich N, Rebelo S, Wong A, Zhang MB. 2020. Trading up and the skill premium. NBER Macroecon. Annu. 34:1285–316
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Jaravel X. 2018. What is the impact of food stamps on prices and products variety? The importance of the supply response. AEA Pap. Proc. 108:557–61
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Jaravel X. 2019. The unequal gains from product innovations: evidence from the US retail sector. Q. J. Econ. 134:2715–83
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Jaravel X, Kolstad J, Lavetti K, Nguyen-Mason M. 2020. Is health care inflation biased? New evidence from Utah Work. Pap., London Sch. Econ London:
  99. Jaravel X, O'Connell M. 2020a. High-frequency changes in shopping behaviours, promotions, and the measurement of inflation: evidence from the Great Lockdown. Fiscal Stud In press. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12241
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  100. Jaravel X, O'Connell M. 2020b. Real time price indices: Inflation spike and falling product variety during the Great Lockdown. J. Public Econ. 191:104270
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Jaravel X, Olivi A. 2019. Optimal taxation and demand-led productivity. Work. Pap., London Sch. Econ. London:
  102. Jaravel X, Sager E. 2019. What are the price effects of trade? Evidence from the US and implications for quantitative trade models CEP Discuss. Pap. 1642 Cent. Econ. Perform., London Sch. Econ London:
  103. Jones CI. 1995a. Time series tests of endogenous growth models. Q. J. Econ. 110:2495–525
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Jones CI. 1995b. R&D-based models of economic growth. J. Political Econ. 103:4759–84
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Kaplan G, Menzio G, Rudanko L, Trachter N. 2019. Relative price dispersion: evidence and theory. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 11:368–124
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Kaplan G, Schulhofer-Wohl S. 2017. Inflation at the household level. J. Monet. Econ. 91:19–38
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Kim R. 2021. The effect of the credit crunch on output price dynamics: the corporate inventory and liquidity management channel. Q. J. Econ. 136:1563–619
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Krugman PR. 1979. Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. J. Int. Econ. 9:4469–79
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Leung J, Seo HK. 2018. How do government transfer payments affect retail prices and welfare? Evidence from SNAP Res. Pap., Univ. Chicago Chicago:
  110. Levell P, O'Connell M, Smith K. 2017. The exposure of households' food spending to tariff changes and exchange rate movements and exchange rate movements IFS Brief. Note BN213 Inst. Fisc. Stud. London:
  111. Lewis L, Monarch R, Sposi M, Zhang J. 2018. Structural change and global trade Glob. Monet. Policy Inst. Work. Pap. 333 Fed. Reserve Bank Dallas Dallas:
  112. Linder SB. 1961. An Essay on Trade and Transformation Stockholm, Swed: Almqvist & Wiksell
  113. Malmendier U, Nagel S. 2016. Learning from inflation experiences. Q. J. Econ. 131:153–87
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Matsuyama K. 2019. Engel's law in the global economy: demand-induced patterns of structural change, innovation, and trade. Econometrica 87:2497–528
    [Google Scholar]
  115. McGranahan L, Paulson A. 2006. Constructing the Chicago Fed income based economic index–consumer price index: inflation experiences by demographic group: 1983–2005 Work. Pap. 2005-20 Fed. Reserve Bank Chicago Chicago:
  116. Melitz MJ. 2003. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71:61695–725
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Mirrlees J. 1971. An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. Rev. Econ. Stud. 38:2175–208
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Moretti E. 2013. Real wage inequality. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 5:165–103
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Nakamura E, Steinsson J. 2008. Five facts about prices: a reevaluation of menu cost models. Q. J. Econ. 123:41415–64
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Nevo A. 2003. New products, quality changes, and welfare measures computed from estimated demand systems. Rev. Econ. Stat. 85:2266–75
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Nowak A, Smith PS. 2020. Quality-adjusted house price indexes. Am. Econ. Rev. Insights 2:3339–56
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Osborne M. 2018. Approximating the cost-of-living index for a storable good. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 10:2286–314
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Pasten E, Schoenle R, Weber M. 2019. The propagation of monetary policy shocks in a heterogeneous production economy. J. Monet. Econ. 116:1–22
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Redding SJ, Weinstein DE. 2020. Measuring aggregate price indices with taste shocks: theory and evidence for CES preferences. Q. J. Econ. 135:1503–60
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Reis R. 2009. A dynamic measure of inflation NBER Work. Pap. 11746
  126. Romer P. 1990. Endogenous technological change. J. Political Econ. 98:5S71–102
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Sampson T. 2016. Dynamic selection: an idea flows theory of entry, trade, and growth. Q. J. Econ. 131:1315–80
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Sato K. 1976. The ideal log-change index number. Rev. Econ. Stat. 58:2223–28
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Schmookler J. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  130. Shleifer A. 1986. Implementation cycles. J. Political Econ. 94:61163–90
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Straub L. 2018. Consumption, savings, and the distribution of permanent income Work. Pap., Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA:
  132. Vartia YO. 1976. Ideal log-change index numbers. Scand. J. Stat. 3:3121–26
    [Google Scholar]
  133. Vernon R. 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Q. J. Econ. 80:2190–207
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Webb M. 2019. The impact of artificial intelligence on the labor market. Work. Pap., Stanford Univ. Stanford, CA:
  135. Wimer C, Collyer S, Jaravel X. 2019. The costs of being poor: Inflation inequality leads to three million more people in poverty. Policy Brief, Cent. Poverty Soc. Policy, Columbia Univ. New York:
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-091520-082042
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-economics-091520-082042
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error