1932

Abstract

Central to the field of consumer finance is that consumers make financial decisions that do not always coincide with the financial decisions ideally depicted in optimal economic models. In this review, we discuss developments in the field of household finance, focusing on how consumers make suboptimal financial decisions across different types of settings and factors that affect their decisions. Rather than conducting a comprehensive survey, we focus specifically on consumer choice in the context of research on credit card borrowing, housing and mortgage debts, investment and savings decisions, and spending and consumption. We also discuss financial product design and marketing, as well as the regulatory landscape of lenders of consumer financial products. We present five future research directions and considerations for researchers and policymakers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110716-032417
2017-11-01
2024-06-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/financial/9/1/annurev-financial-110716-032417.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110716-032417&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Agarwal S, Amromin G, Ben-David I, Chomsisengphet S, Evanoff DD. 2010. Learning to cope: voluntary financial education and loan performance during a housing crisis. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:2495–500 [Google Scholar]
  2. Agarwal S, Amromin G, Ben-David I, Chomsisengphet S, Evanoff DD. 2014. Predatory lending and the subprime crisis. J. Financ. Econ. 113:129–52 [Google Scholar]
  3. Agarwal S, Amromin G, Ben-David I, Chomsisengphet S, Piskorski T, Seru A. 2015a. Policy intervention in debt renegotiation: evidence from the Home Affordable Modification Program. J. Polit. Econ. 125:654–712 [Google Scholar]
  4. Agarwal S, Ben-David I. 2014. Loan prospecting and the loss of soft information NBER Work. Pap. 19945 Cambridge, MA: [Google Scholar]
  5. Agarwal S, Chomsisengphet S, Liu C, Souleles NS. 2015b. Do consumers choose the right credit contracts?. Rev. Corp. Finance Stud. 4:2239–57 [Google Scholar]
  6. Agarwal S, Chomsisengphet S, Mahoney N, Stroebel J. 2015c. Do banks pass through credit expansions to consumers who want to borrow? NBER Work. Pap. 21567 Cambridge, MA: [Google Scholar]
  7. Agarwal S, Chomsisengphet S, Mahoney N, Stroebel J. 2015d. Regulating consumer financial products: evidence from credit cards. Q. J. Econ. 130:1111–64 [Google Scholar]
  8. Agarwal S, Driscoll JC, Gabaix X, Laibson D. 2009. The age of reason: financial decisions over the life cycle and implications for regulation. Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. 40:251–117 [Google Scholar]
  9. Agarwal S, Driscoll JC, Laibson D. 2013. Optimal mortgage refinancing: a closed-form solution. J. Money Credit Bank. 45:4591–622 [Google Scholar]
  10. Agarwal S, Liu C, Souleles NS. 2007. The reaction of consumer spending and debt to tax rebates—evidence from consumer credit data. J. Polit. Econ. 115:6986–1019 [Google Scholar]
  11. Agarwal S, Mazumder B. 2013. Cognitive abilities and household financial decision making. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 5:1193–207 [Google Scholar]
  12. Agarwal S, Qian W. 2014. Consumption and debt response to unanticipated income shocks: evidence from a natural experiment in Singapore. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:124205–30 [Google Scholar]
  13. Agarwal S, Rosen RJ, Yao V. 2016. Why do borrowers make mortgage refinancing mistakes?. Manag. Sci. 62:123494–509 [Google Scholar]
  14. Agarwal S, Skiba PM, Tobacman J. 2009. Payday loans and credit cards: new liquidity and credit scoring puzzles?. Am. Econ. Rev. 99:2412–17 [Google Scholar]
  15. Akerlof GA, Yellen JL. 1985. A near-rational model of the business cycle, with wage and price inertia. Q. J. Econ. 100:Suppl.823–38 [Google Scholar]
  16. Amromin G. 2003. Household portfolio choices in taxable and tax-deferred accounts: another puzzle?. Eur. Finance Rev. 7:3547–82 [Google Scholar]
  17. Andersen S, Campbell JY, Nielsen KM, Ramadorai T. 2015. Inattention and inertia in household finance: evidence from the Danish mortgage market NBER Work. Pap. 21386 Cambridge, MA: [Google Scholar]
  18. Andersson F, Chomsisengphet S, Glennon D, Li F. 2013. The changing pecking order of consumer defaults. J. Money Credit Bank. 45:23251–75 [Google Scholar]
  19. Arnberg S, Barslund M. 2014. The crowding-out effect of mandatory labour market pension schemes on private savings: evidence from renters in Denmark Work. Doc. 390 Cent. Eur. Policy Stud. Brussels: [Google Scholar]
  20. Attanasio OP, DeLeire TC. 1994. IRAs and household saving revisited: some new evidence NBER Work. Pap. 4900 Cambridge, MA: [Google Scholar]
  21. Ausubel LM. 1991. The failure of competition in the credit card market. Am. Econ. Rev. 81:150–81 [Google Scholar]
  22. Badarinza C, Campbell JY, Ramadorai T. 2017. What calls to arms? International evidence on interest rates and the choice of adjustable-rate mortgages. Manag. Sci. In press [Google Scholar]
  23. Bailey M, Cao R, Kuchler T, Stroebel J. 2016. Social networks and housing markets NBER Work. Pap. 22258 Cambridge, MA: [Google Scholar]
  24. Barr M, Mullainathan S, Shafir E. 2009. The case for behaviorally informed regulation. New Perspectives on Regulation D Moss, J Cisternino 25–62 Cambridge, MA: Tobin Proj. [Google Scholar]
  25. Benjamin DJ. 2003. Does 401(k) eligibility increase saving?: evidence from propensity score subclassification. J. Public Econ. 87:5–61259–90 [Google Scholar]
  26. Bertaut CC, Haliassos M, Reiter M. 2009. Credit card debt puzzles and debt revolvers for self-control. Rev. Finance 13:4657–92 [Google Scholar]
  27. Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC. 2017. Does front-loading taxation increase savings? Evidence from Roth 401(k) introductions. J. Public Econ. 151:84–95 [Google Scholar]
  28. Bhutta N, Dokko JK, Shan H. 2010. The depth of negative equity and mortgage default decisions Work. Pap. 2010–35 Finance Econ. Discuss. Ser., Fed. Reserve Board Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  29. Bostic R, Chomsisengphet S, Engel K, McCoy P, Pennington-Cross A, Wachter S. 2012. Mortgage product substitution and state anti-predatory lending laws: better loans and better borrowers. Atl. Econ. J. 40:3273–94 [Google Scholar]
  30. Botsch M, Malmendier U. 2015. Inflation experiences and contract choice—evidence from residential mortgages Work Pap. Bowdoin Coll.: [Google Scholar]
  31. Brady PJ, Canner GB, Maki DM. 2000. The effects of recent mortgage refinancing. Fed. Reserve Bull 2000:441–50 [Google Scholar]
  32. Campbell JY. 2006. Household finance. J. Finance 61:41553–604 [Google Scholar]
  33. Campbell JY. 2013. Mortgage market design. Rev. Finance 17:11–33 [Google Scholar]
  34. Campbell JY. 2016. Restoring rational choice: the challenge of consumer financial regulation. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 106:51–30 [Google Scholar]
  35. Campbell JY, Cocco JF. 2003. Household risk management and optimal mortgage choice. Q. J. Econ. 118:41449–94 [Google Scholar]
  36. Campbell JY, Cocco JF. 2015. A model of mortgage default. J. Finance 70:41495–554 [Google Scholar]
  37. Campbell JY, Jackson HE, Madrian BC, Tufano P. 2011. Consumer financial protection. J. Econ. Perspect. 25:191–114 [Google Scholar]
  38. Canner GB, Dynan KE, Passmore W. 2002. Mortgage refinancing in 2001 and early 2002. Fed. Reserve Bull 2002:469–81 [Google Scholar]
  39. Canner GB, Elliehausen GE. 2013. Consumer experiences with credit cards. Fed. Reserve Bull 2013:1–36 [Google Scholar]
  40. Chetty R, Friedman JN, Leth-Petersen S, Nielsen TH, Olsen T. 2014. Active versus passive decisions and crowd-out in retirement savings accounts: evidence from Denmark. Q. J. Econ. 129:31141–219 [Google Scholar]
  41. Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC. 2011. $100 bills on the sidewalk: suboptimal investment in 401(k) plans. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93:3748–63 [Google Scholar]
  42. Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Metrick A. 2001. Defined contribution pensions: plan rules, participant decisions, and the path of least resistance NBER Work. Pap. 8655 Cambridge, MA: [Google Scholar]
  43. Dammon RM, Spatt CS, Zhang HH. 2004. Optimal asset location and allocation with taxable and tax-deferred investing. J. Finance 59:3999–1037 [Google Scholar]
  44. DellaVigna S, Malmendier U. 2004. Contract design and self-control: theory and evidence. Q. J. Econ. 119:2353–402 [Google Scholar]
  45. Deng Y, Quigley JM, Van Order R. 2000. Mortgage terminations, heterogeneity and the exercise of mortgage options. Econometrica 68:2275–307 [Google Scholar]
  46. Duflo E, Saez E. 2003. The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: evidence from a randomized experiment. Q. J. Econ. 118:3815–42 [Google Scholar]
  47. Elul R, Souleles NS, Chomsisengphet S, Glennon D, Hunt R. 2010. What “triggers” mortgage default?. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:2490–94 [Google Scholar]
  48. Engel KC, McCoy PA. 2001. A tale of three markets: the law and economics of predatory lending. Tex. L. Rev. 80:1255–381 [Google Scholar]
  49. Feinberg RA. 1986. Credit cards as spending facilitating stimuli: a conditioning interpretation. J. Consumer Res. 13:3348–56 [Google Scholar]
  50. Fernandes D, Lynch JG, Netemeyer RG. 2014. Financial literacy, financial education, and downstream financial behaviors. Manag. Sci. 60:81861–83 [Google Scholar]
  51. FRBNY (Fed. Reserve Bank N.Y.). 2016. Quarterly report on household debt and credit, May 2016 Res. Stat. Group, FRBNY New York: [Google Scholar]
  52. Gabaix X, Laibson D. 2006. Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. Q. J. Econ. 121:2505–40 [Google Scholar]
  53. Gale WG, Scholz JK. 1994. Intergenerational transfers and the accumulation of wealth. J. Econ. Perspect. 8:4145–60 [Google Scholar]
  54. Gelber AM. 2011. How do 401(k)s affect saving? Evidence from changes in 401(k) eligibility. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 3:4103–22 [Google Scholar]
  55. Gerardi K, Goette L, Meier S. 2013. Numerical ability predicts mortgage default. 1102811267–71
  56. Greenspan A, Kennedy J. 2008. Sources and uses of equity extracted from homes. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 24:1120–44 [Google Scholar]
  57. Grinblatt M, Keloharju M. 2001. How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades. J. Finance 56:31053–73 [Google Scholar]
  58. Gross DB, Souleles NS. 2002a. An empirical analysis of personal bankruptcy and delinquency. Rev. Financ. Stud. 15:1319–47 [Google Scholar]
  59. Gross DB, Souleles NS. 2002b. Do liquidity constraints and interest rates matter for consumer behavior? Evidence from credit card data. Q. J. Econ. 117:1149–85 [Google Scholar]
  60. Gurun UG, Matvos G, Seru A. 2016. Advertising expensive mortgages. J. Finance 71:52371–416 [Google Scholar]
  61. Heidhues P, Kőszegi B. 2010. Exploiting naïvete about self-control in the credit market. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:52279–303 [Google Scholar]
  62. Hilgert MA, Hogarth JM, Beverly SG. 2003. Household financial management: the connection between knowledge and behavior. Fed. Reserve Bull 2003:309–22 [Google Scholar]
  63. Hirschman EC. 1979. Differences in consumer purchase behavior by credit card payment system. J. Consumer Res. 6:158–66 [Google Scholar]
  64. Hong H, Kubik JD, Stein JC. 2004. Social interaction and stock market participation. J. Finance 59:1137–63 [Google Scholar]
  65. Hong H, Kubik JD, Stein JC. 2005. Thy neighbor's portfolio: word-of-mouth effects in the holdings and trades of money managers. J. Finance 60:62801–24 [Google Scholar]
  66. Keys BJ, Pope DG, Pope JC. 2016. Failure to refinance. J. Financ. Econ. 122:3482–99 [Google Scholar]
  67. Korniotis GM, Kumar A. 2011. Do older investors make better investment decisions. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93:1244–65 [Google Scholar]
  68. Korniotis GM, Kumar A. 2013. Do portfolio distortions reflect superior information or psychological biases?. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 48:11–45 [Google Scholar]
  69. Kuchler T. 2015. Sticking to your plan: empirical evidence on the role of present bias for credit card debt paydown Work. Pap. Stern Sch. Bus., N.Y. Univ. [Google Scholar]
  70. Kuchler T, Zafar B. 2015. Personal experiences and expectations about aggregate outcomes Staff Rep. 748 Fed. Reserve Bank N.Y. New York: [Google Scholar]
  71. Kumar A. 2009. Who gambles in the stock market?. J. Finance 64:41889–933 [Google Scholar]
  72. Kumar A, Lim SS. 2008. How do decision frames influence the stock investment choices of individual investors?. Manag. Sci. 54:61052–64 [Google Scholar]
  73. Laibson D. 1997. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q. J. Econ. 112:2443–78 [Google Scholar]
  74. Laibson D, Repetto A, Tobacman J. 2003. A debt puzzle. Knowledge, Information, and Expectations in Modern Macroeconomics P Aghion, R Frydman, J Stiglitz, M Woodford 228–66 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  75. Lehnert A, Maki D. 2007. Consumption, debt, and portfolio choice: testing the effects of bankruptcy law. Household Credit Usage S Agarwal, BW Ambrose 55–76 New York: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  76. Lusardi A, Mitchell OS, Curto V. 2009. Financial literacy among the young: evidence and implications for consumer policy Work. Pap. 91 Cent. Res. Pensions Welf. Policies Turin, Italy: [Google Scholar]
  77. Madrian B, Shea DF. 2001. The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Q. J. Econ. 116:41149–87 [Google Scholar]
  78. Malmendier U, Nagel S. 2016. Learning from inflation experiences. Q. J. Econ. 131:153–87 [Google Scholar]
  79. Meier S, Sprenger C. 2010. Present-biased preferences and credit card borrowing. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 2:1193–210 [Google Scholar]
  80. Miravete EJ. 2003. Choosing the wrong calling plan? Ignorance and learning. Am. Econ. Rev. 93:1297–310 [Google Scholar]
  81. Odean T. 1998. Volume, volatility, price, and profit when all traders are above average. J. Finance 53:61887–934 [Google Scholar]
  82. Parker J. 2015. Why don't households smooth consumption? Evidence from a 25 million dollar experiment NBER Work. Pap. 21369 Cambridge, MA: [Google Scholar]
  83. Perry VG, Morris MD. 2005. Who is in control? The role of self-perception, knowledge, and income in explaining consumer financial behavior. J. Consumer Aff. 39:2299–313 [Google Scholar]
  84. Posner E, Weyl EG. 2013. Benefit-cost analysis for financial regulation. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:3393–97 [Google Scholar]
  85. Prelec D, Loewenstein G. 1998. The red and the black: mental accounting of savings and debt. Mark. Sci. 17:14–28 [Google Scholar]
  86. Prelec D, Simester D. 2001. Always leave home without it: a further investigation of the credit-card effect on willingness to pay. Mark. Lett. 12:15–12 [Google Scholar]
  87. Puri M, Robinson DT. 2007. Optimism and economic choice. J. Financ. Econ. 86:171–99 [Google Scholar]
  88. Raghubir P, Srivastava J. 2008. Monopoly money: the effect of payment coupling and form on spending behavior. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 14:3213–25 [Google Scholar]
  89. Shefrin HM, Statman M. 1993. Behavioral aspects of the design and marketing of financial products. Financ. Manag. 22:2123–34 [Google Scholar]
  90. Shefrin HM, Thaler RH. 1988. The behavioural life-cycle hypothesis. Econ. Inq. 26:4609–43 [Google Scholar]
  91. Shoven JB, Sialm C. 2004. Asset location in tax-deferred and conventional savings accounts. J. Public Econ. 88:1–223–38 [Google Scholar]
  92. Shui H, Ausubel LM. 2004. Time inconsistency in the credit card market Presented at Annu. Utah Winter Finance Conf., , 14th., June 7 [Google Scholar]
  93. Soman D. 2001. Effects of payment mechanism on spending behavior: the role of rehearsal and immediacy of payments. J. Consumer Res. 27:4460–74 [Google Scholar]
  94. Soman D. 2003. The effect of payment transparency on consumption: quasiexperiments from the field. Mark. Lett. 14:3173–83 [Google Scholar]
  95. Stango V, Zinman J. 2016. Borrowing high versus borrowing higher: price dispersion and shopping behavior in the U.S. credit card market. Rev. Financ. Stud. 29:4979–1006 [Google Scholar]
  96. Stephens M. 2006. Paycheque receipt and the timing of consumption. Econ. J. 116:513680–701 [Google Scholar]
  97. Stephens M. 2008. The consumption response to predictable changes in discretionary income: evidence from the repayment of vehicle loans. Rev. Econ. Stat. 90:2241–52 [Google Scholar]
  98. Telyukova IA. 2013. Household need for liquidity and the credit card debt puzzle. Rev. Econ. Stud. 80:31148–77 [Google Scholar]
  99. Thaler RH, Benartzi S. 2004. Save More Tomorrow™: using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. J. Polit. Econ. 112:S1S164–87 [Google Scholar]
  100. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1986. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J. Bus. 59:4S251–78 [Google Scholar]
  101. Venti SF, Wise DA. 1987. IRAs and saving. The Effects of Taxation on Capital Accumulation M Feldstein 7–52 Chicago: NBER/Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  102. Venti SF, Wise DA. 1988. The determinants of IRA contributions and the effect of limit changes. Pensions in the U.S. Economy Z Bodie, JB Shoven, DA Wise 9–52 Chicago: NBER/Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  103. Wang J, Keys B. 2014. Perverse nudges: minimum payments and debt paydown in consumer credit cards Meet. Pap. 323 Soc. Econ. Dyn. Stony Brook, NY: [Google Scholar]
  104. Zhang XF. 2006. Information uncertainty and stock returns. J. Finance 61:1105–37 [Google Scholar]
  105. Zinman J. 2009. Debit or credit?. J. Bank. Finance 33:2358–66 [Google Scholar]
  106. Zinman J. 2014. Household debt: facts, puzzles, theories, and policies NBER Work. Pap. 20496 Cambridge, MA: [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110716-032417
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error