1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Financial Economics
  4. Volume 15, 2023
  5. Article

Annual Review of Financial Economics

Volume 15, 2023

Short-Term Rate Benchmarks: The Post-LIBOR Regime

Abstract

The London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), the predominant family of global short-term rate benchmarks for the past 40 years, ceased to exist in June 2023. Given the low volumes of interbank loans on which LIBOR had been based, the revelations that LIBOR had been manipulated, and the risks that countless LIBOR-dependent financial instruments without fallback rates would be cast into limbo, regulators over the last decade pushed to replace LIBOR with risk-free overnight rate benchmarks. In the United States, the new benchmark, Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), is an overnight rate based on US Treasury repo transactions: Use of term rates and derivatives on term rates is limited, and use of credit-sensitive term rates is discouraged. This article recounts the rise and fall of LIBOR; reviews the academic literature on the efficiency benefits of benchmarks, the LIBOR scandal, and the pros and cons of risk-free versus credit-sensitive rate benchmarks; and calls for further academic work on the current policy of entrenching a single-benchmark SOFR regime relative to the alternative of encouraging a two- or multi-benchmark regime of SOFR and one or more credit-sensitive term rates.

Keyword(s): Ameribor, AXI, BSBY, credit-sensitive rates, Euribor, interest rate derivatives, JEL G12, JEL G13, JEL G18, JEL G21, JEL G28, LIBOR, London Interbank Offered Rate, rate benchmarks, risk-free rates, Secured Overnight Financing Rate, SOFR
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-015054
2023-11-01
2024-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/financial/15/1/annurev-financial-110921-015054.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-015054&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abrantes-Metz R, Kraten M, Metz A, Seow G. 2012. LIBOR manipulation?. J. Bank. Finance 36:136–50
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Amor J. 2021. The new Euribor gets through a challenging 2020. Funcas SEFO 10:149–61
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aquilina M, Ibikunle G, Mollica V, Steffen T. 2022. The visible hand: benchmarks, regulation, and liquidity. J. Financ. Markets 61:100734
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Aquilina M, Pirrone F. 2020. The effects of regulating benchmarks. Econ. Lett. 186:108512
     [Google Scholar]
  5. ARRC (Alternative Reference Rates Committee) 2021. Frequently asked questions Fed. Reserve Bank New York, Aug. 27. https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/Microsites/arrc/files/ARRC-faq.pdf
  6. Aspris A, Foley S, O'Neill P. 2020. Benchmarks in the spotlight: the impact on exchange traded markets. J. Futures Markets 40:1691–710
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bailey A. 2017. The future of LIBOR Speech, July 27 Financial Conduct Authority London: https://www.fca.org.uk/news/speeches/the-future-of-libor
  8. Baker L, Haynes R, Roberts J, Sharma R, Tuckman B. 2021. Risk transfer with interest rate swaps. Financ. Markets Inst. Instrum. 30:3–28
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bartholomew H. 2021a. Pick a rate: pitfalls and prizes in the post-LIBOR World. Risk.net July 6. https://www.risk.net/derivatives/7851711/pick-a-rate-pitfalls-and-prizes-in-the-post-libor-world
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bartholomew H. 2021b. SOFR alternatives remain on track despite regulatory warnings. Risk.net June 21. https://www.risk.net/derivatives/7845596/sofr-alternatives-remain-on-track-despite-regulatory-warnings
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bartholomew H. 2022. SOFR swap basis could pose ‘systemic risk. .’ Risk.net Sept. 19. https://www.risk.net/derivatives/7954512/sofr-swap-basis-could-pose-systemic-risk
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Berndt A, Duffie D, Zhu Y. 2020. Across-the-curve credit spread indices. Res. Pap. 3884 Grad. Sch. Bus., Stanford Univ. Stanford, CA:
  13. Bonaldi P. 2017. Motives and consequences of LIBOR strategic reporting: How much can we learn from banks' self-reported borrowing rates? Work. Pap. Carnegie Mellon Tepper Sch. Bus. Pittsburgh, PA: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxwaWV0cm9ib25hbGRpfGd4OjU0NTE0ZmUzYTI2ZDdlY2Q
  14. Bowman D, Scotti C, Vojtech C. 2020. How correlated is LIBOR with bank funding costs. FEDS Notes June 29. https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/how-correlated-is-libor-with-bank-funding-costs-20200629.html
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cereda F, Chague F, De-Losso R, Genaro A, Giovannetti B 2022. Price transparency in OTC equity lending markets: evidence from a loan fee benchmark. J. Financ. Econ. 143:569–92
     [Google Scholar]
  16. CFTC (Commod. Futures Trading Comm.) 2014. In the matter of Lloyds Banking Group plc and Lloyds Bank plc. CFTC Washington, DC: July 28, accessed Oct. 18, 2022. https://www.cftc.gov/ucm/groups/public/@lrenforcementactions/documents/legalpleading/enflloydsorderdf072814.pdf
  17. CFTC (Commod. Futures Trading Comm.) 2018. CFTC orders Société Générale S.A. to pay $475 million penalty to resolve charges of manipulation, attempted manipulation, and false reporting of LIBOR and Euribor. Press Release 7736-18, June 4. https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/7736-18
  18. Chen J. 2021. LIBOR's poker. J. Financ. Markets 55:1–28
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Chua C, Suardi S, Change Y. 2017. A re-examination of LIBOR rigging: a time-varying cointegration perspective. Quant. Finance 17:91367–86
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Cone A. 2016. European Commission fines JP Morgan Chase, HSBC, Credit Agricole $520 million for collusion. UPI.com Dec. 7. https://www.upi.com/Businessews/2016/12/07/European-Commission-fines-JP-Morgan-Chase-HSBC-Credit-Agricole-520M-for-collusion/9811481115794/
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cooperman H, Duffie D, Luck S, Wang Z, Yang Y 2022. Bank funding risk, reference rates, and credit supply. Work. Pap. Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA:
  22. Coulter B, Shapiro J, Zimmerman P. 2013. A mechanism for LIBOR PhD Thesis Univ. Oxford Oxford, UK:
  23. Coulter B, Shapiro J, Zimmerman P. 2018. A mechanism for LIBOR. Rev. Finance 22:2491–520
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Dealbook 2016. Tracking the LIBOR scandal. The New York Times March 23. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/04/23/business/dealbook/db-libor-timeline.html
    [Google Scholar]
  25. de la Merced MJ, Protess B. 2012. New York Fed knew of false Barclays reports on rates. New York Times July 13. https://archive.nytimes.com/dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/07/13/barclays-informed-new-york-fed-of-problems-with-libor-in-2007/
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Department of Justice 2012a. Appendix A, statement of facts (Barclays). Department of Justice Washington, DC: June 26, accessed Oct. 18, 2022. https://www.justice.gov/iso/opa/resources/9312012710173426365941.pdf
  27. Department of Justice 2012b. Appendix A, statement of facts (UBS). Department of Justice Washington, DC: Dec. 18, accessed Oct. 18, 2022. https://www.justice.gov/iso/opa/resources/6942012121911725320624.pdf
  28. Department of Justice 2018. Société Générale S.A. agrees to pay $860 million in criminal penalties for bribing Gaddafi-Era Libyan officials and manipulating LIBOR rate. Department of Justice Washington, DC: June 4, accessed Oct. 18, 2022. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/soci-t-g-n-rale-sa-agrees-pay-860-million-criminal-penalties-bribing-gaddafi-era-libyan
  29. Duffie D, Dworczak P. 2021. Robust benchmark design. J. Financ. Econ. 142:775–802
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Duffie D, Dworczak P, Zhu H. 2017. Benchmarks in search markets. J. Finance 72:51983–2044
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Duffie D, Skeie D, Vickery J. 2013. A sampling-window approach to transactions-based LIBOR fixing Staff Rep. 596 Fed. Reserve Bank New York
  32. Duffie D, Stein J. 2015. Reforming LIBOR and other financial market benchmarks. J. Econ. Perspect. 29:2191–212
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Eisl A, Jankowitsch R, Subrahmanyam M. 2017. The manipulation potential of Libor and Euribor. Eur. Financ. Manag. 23:4604–47
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Evans M, O'Neill P, Rime D, Saakvitne J. 2018. Fixing the fix? Assessing the effectiveness of the 4pm Fix benchmark. FCA Occas. Pap., Financ. Conduct Auth. London:
  35. finews.com 2020. Swiss watchdog fines banks on Euribor. finews.com Oct. 27. https://www.finews.com/news/english-news/43485-antitrust-euribor-credit-agricole-hsbc-france-rates
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Fletcher G. 2016. Benchmark regulation. Iowa Law Rev. 102:1929–82
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Forrester JP, Miller MJN 2022. A deeper dive into the US Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act. Mayer Brown April 4
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Fouquau J, Spieser P. 2015. Statistical evidence about LIBOR manipulation: a “Sherlock Holmes” investigation. J. Bank. Finance 50:632–43
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Frei C, Mitra J. 2021. Optimal closing benchmarks. Finance Res. Lett. 40:1–8
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Friedman M. 1971. The Euro-Dollar market: some first principles. Fed. Res. Bank St. Louis Rev. July:16–24
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Frunza M. 2013. Market manipulation and moral hazard: Can the LIBOR be fixed? Work. Pap. Schwarzthal Tech London:
  42. FSB (Financ. Stab. Board) 2014. Reforming major interest rate benchmarks. Rep. FSB Basel, Switz.: July 22. https://www.fsb.org/2014/07/r40722/
  43. Gandhi P, Golez B, Jackwerth J, Plazzi A. 2022. Financial market misconduct and public enforcement: the case of LIBOR manipulation. Manag. Sci. 65:115268–89
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Geissbühler G, Ollivier N. 2021. Discontinuation of LIBOR: Have the replacement rates passed the Covid test?. Bus. Law Int. 22:15–19
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Goyder B. 2022. Regional banks lead charge into term SOFR. Risk.net April 11. https://www.risk.net/derivatives/7946276/regional-banks-lead-charge-into-term-sofr
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Gyntelberg J, Wooldridge P. 2008. Interbank rate fixings during the recent turmoil. BIS Q. Rev. March:59–72
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Hernando-Veciana Á, Trög M. 2019. Cheap talk and strategic rounding in LIBOR submissions. Rev. Financ. Stud. 33:62585–621
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Hintze J. 2021. Banks' transition away from Libor just became easier. ABA Banking Journal June 3. https://bankingjournal.aba.com/2021/06/banks-transition-away-from-libor-just-became-easier/
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Hördahl P, King M. 2008. Developments in repo markets during the financial turmoil. BIS Q. Rev. December:37–53
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Hou D, Skeie D. 2014. LIBOR: origins, economics, crisis, scandal, and reform. Staff Rep. 667 Fed. Reserve Bank New York
  51. House of Commons 2012. Fixing LIBOR: some preliminary findings. Second report of session 2012–2013. House of Commons, Treasury Committee London:
  52. IOSCO (Int. Organ. Secur. Comm.) 2013. Principles for financial benchmarks: final report FR07/13, IOSCO, July. https://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD415.pdf
  53. IOSCO (Int. Organ. Secur. Comm.) 2016. Second review of the implementation of IOSCO's principles for financial benchmarks by administrators of Euribor, LIBOR and TIBOR. FR01/2016 IOSCO February. https://www.fsb.org/2016/05/second-review-of-the-implementation-of-ioscos-principles-for-financial-benchmarks-by-administrators-of-euribor-libor-and-tibor/
  54. Jarrow R, Li S. 2021. Index design: hedging and manipulation. Work. Pap. SC Johnson Coll. Bus., Cornell Univ. Ithaca, NY:
  55. Jarvis S. 2022. Deutsche, NatWest eye deals worth $34M in Swiss LIBOR case. Law360 June 30. https://www.law360.co.uk/capitalmarkets/articles/1507557/deutsche-natwest-eye-deals-worth-34m-in-swisslibor-case
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Jermann U. 2019. Is SOFR better than LIBOR? Work. Pap. Univ. Pa. Philadelphia:
  57. Jermann U. 2021. Interest received by banks during the financial crisis: LIBOR versus hypothetical SOFR loans NBER Work. Pap. 29614
  58. Jones C. 2021. LIBOR's US replacements: no one rate to rule them all. FT Alphaville June 3
    [Google Scholar]
  59. King T, Lewis K. 2020. Credit risk, liquidity, and lies. Int. J. Cent. Bank. 16:5219–67
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Kirti D. 2022. What are reference rates for?. J. Bank. Finance 144:106635
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Klinger S, Syrstad O. 2021. Life after LIBOR. J. Financ. Econ. 141:783–801
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Kreicher L, McCauley R, Wooldridge P. 2014. Benchmark tipping in the global bond market. Work. Pap. 466 Bank Int. Settl. Basel, Switz.:
  63. Kuo D, Skeie D, Vickery J. 2018. A comparison of LIBOR to other measures of bank borrowing costs. Work. Pap. Univ. Calif. Los Angeles:
  64. Liu X, Bai Y. 2022. Term risk-free rates: methodologies, challenges, and the future. J. Deriv. 29:330–45
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Market Participants Group 2014. Market Participants Group on reforming interest rate benchmarks: final report. Market Participants Group March: https://www.fsb.org/2014/07/r40722b/
  66. Marshall R, Lindenauer D, Leonard J, Trohan J, Smithy M et al. 2019. Letter to Randal Quarles Jelena McWilliams, and Joseph Otting September 23. https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/newsevents/events/markets/2020/credit-sensitivity-letters.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  67. McBride J. 2016. Understanding the LIBOR scandal. Council on Foreign Relations Oct. 12. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/understanding-libor-scandal
    [Google Scholar]
  68. McCauley R. 2001. Benchmark tipping in the money and bond markets. BIS Q. Rev. March:39–45
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Mollenkamp C. 2008a. Bankers cast doubt on key rate amid crisis. The Wall Street Journal April 16. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB120831164167818299
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Mollenkamp C. 2008b. Libor surges after scrutiny does, too. The Wall Street Journal April 18. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB120846842484224287
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Mollenkamp C, Whitehouse M. 2008. Study casts doubt on key rate. The Wall Street Journal May 29. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB121200703762027135
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Monticini A, Thornton D. 2013. The effect of underreporting on LIBOR rates. J. Macroecon. 37:345–48
     [Google Scholar]
  73. O'Malley C. 2015. Bonds Without Borders: A History of the Eurobond Market. West Sussex UK: John Wiley and Sons
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Pierson B. 2017. Citi, Deutsche Bank, HSBC agree to pay $132 million to settle Libor claims. Reuters Oct. 12. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-libor-settlement-idUSKBN1CH36N
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Pirrone A. 2018. On the Representativeness of the LBMA Silver Price. Res. Note, Financ. Conduct Auth. London: October. https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/research/research-note-on-the-representativeness-of-the-lbma-silver-auction.pdf
  76. Poskitt R, Dassanayake W. 2015. Modelling the lowballing of the LIBOR fixing. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 42:270–77
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Priem R, Van Rie W. 2020. The EURIBOR and EONIA reform: achieving regulatory compliance while protecting financial stability. Work. Pap. Financ. Serv. Markets Auth. Brussels:
  78. Schrimpf A, Sushko V. 2019. Beyond LIBOR: a primer on the new reference rates. BIS Q. Rev. March:29–52
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Smith R. 2020. Credit problem: SOFR faces uphill struggle in loan market. Risk.net June 16. https://www.risk.net/risk-management/7561711/credit-problem-sofr-faces-uphill-struggle-in-loan-market
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Snider C, Youle T. 2012. The fix is in: detecting portfolio driven manipulation of the LIBOR. Work. Pap. Univ. Calif. Los Angeles:
  81. Stempel J. 2017. Deutsche Bank to pay $220 million in U.S. LIBOR probe. Reuters Oct. 25. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-deutschebank-settlement-idUSKBN1CU2G4
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Stempel J. 2018. Deutsche Bank to pay $240 million to end Libor rigging lawsuit in U.S. Reuters Febr. 27. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1GB32H
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Stigum M. 1990. The Money Market. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin. , 3rd ed..
  84. Trefis Team 2016. Swiss Competition Commission fines 7 banks CHF 99 million for rigging rates. Trefis.com Dec. 22. https://www.trefis.com/stock/ubs/articles/392363/swiss-competition-commissionfines- 7-banks-chf-99-million-for-rigging-rates-more-to-follow/2016-12-22
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Tuckman B, Serrat A. 2022. Fixed Income Securities: Tools for Today's Markets Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons
  86. Vaughan L, Finch G. 2017. The Fix: How Bankers Lied, Cheated, and Colluded to Rig the World's Most Important Number. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons
  87. Wheatley M. 2012. The Wheatley review of LIBOR: final report. HM Treasury London: September. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachmentata/file/191762/ wheatleyeviewiborinalreport80912.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Williams-Grut O. 2016. Citi was fined $425 million for rate manipulation—here are the secret trader transcripts. BusinessInsider.com May 26
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Youle A. 2014. How much did manipulation distort the LIBOR? Work. Pap. Univ. Minn.
  90. Ysusi C, Pirrone A, Suntheim F. 2018. The impact of bringing additional benchmarks into the regulatory and supervisory regime. Eval. Pap. 18/2 Financ. Conduct Auth. London:
  91. Zhang A. 2022. Competition and manipulation in derivative contract markets. J. Financ. Econ. 144:396–413
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-015054
Loading
Short-Term Rate Benchmarks: The Post-LIBOR Regime
Annual Review of Financial Economics 15, 473 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-015054
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-015054
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-110921-015054
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error