1932

Abstract

This article surveys the theory on zombie lending incentives and the consequences of zombie lending for the real economy. It also offers a historical perspective by reviewing the growing empirical evidence on zombie lending along three dimensions: () the role of undercapitalized banks, () effects on zombie firms, and () spillovers and distortions for non-zombie firms. We then provide an overview of how zombie lending can be attenuated. Finally, we use a sample of US publicly listed firms to compare various measures proposed in the literature to classify firms as “zombies.” We identify definitions of zombie firms that are adequate to investigate economic inefficiency in the form of real sector competitive distortions of zombie lending. We find that only definitions based on interest rate subsidies are able to detect these spillovers and thereby provide evidence in support of credit misallocation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-111620-114424
2022-11-01
2024-04-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/financial/14/1/annurev-financial-111620-114424.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-111620-114424&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Acharya VV, Borchert L, Jager M, Steffen S. 2021. Kicking the can down the road: government interventions in the European banking sector. Rev. Financ. Stud. 34:94090–131
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Acharya VV, Crosignani M, Eisert T, Eufinger C. 2020. Zombie credit and (dis-)inflation: evidence from Europe NBER Work. Pap. 27158
  3. Acharya VV, Eisert T, Eufinger C, Hirsch C. 2019. Whatever it takes: the real effects of unconventional monetary policy. Rev. Financ. Stud. 32:93366–411
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Acharya VV, Lenzu S, Wang O. 2021. Zombie lending and policy traps NBER Work. Pap. 29606
  5. Acharya VV, Steffen S. 2015. The “greatest” carry trade ever? Understanding Eurozone bank risks. J. Financ. Econ. 115:2215–36
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Adalet McGowan M, Andrews D, Millot V 2018. The walking dead? Zombie firms and productivity performance in OECD countries. Econ. Policy 33:685–736
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Altman EI, Dai R, Wang W. 2022. Global zombies SSRN Work. Pap. 3970332
  8. Angelini P, Passalacqua A, Lotti F, Soggia G 2020. The real effects of bank supervision: evidence from on-site bank inspections SSRN Work. Pap. 3705558
  9. Asriyan V, Laeven L, Martin A, Van der Ghote A, Vanasco V. 2021. Falling interest rates and credit misallocation: lessons from general equilibrium. Work. Pap. Univ. Pompeu Fabra Barcelona: https://crei.cat/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ALMVV_2021_GELessons.pdf
  10. Banerjee R, Hofmann B. 2020. Corporate zombies: anatomy and life cycle. Work. Pap. 882 Bank Int. Settl. Basel, Switz:.
  11. Becker B, Ivashina V. 2021. Corporate insolvency rules and zombie lending. Presented at the European Central Bank Forum on Central Banking Sintra, Portugal: Sept. 28
  12. Becker B, Milbourn T. 2011. How did increased competition affect credit ratings?. J. Financ. Econ. 101:3493–514
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Berg T, Reisinger M, Streitz D. 2021. Spillover effects in empirical corporate finance. J. Financ. Econ. 142:1109–27
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bhattacharya S, Nyborg KJ. 2013. Bank bailout menus. Rev. Corp. Finance Stud. 2:129–61
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Blattner L, Farinha L, Rebelo F. 2022. When losses turn into loans: the cost of weak banks. Am. Econ. Rev. Forthcoming
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bonfim D, Cerqueiro G, Degryse H, Ongena S. 2022. On-site inspecting zombie lending. Manag. Sci. In press. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4452
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bruche M, Llobet GL. 2014. Preventing zombie lending. Rev. Financ. Stud. 27:3923–56
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Caballero RJ, Hishi T, Kashyap AK. 2008. Zombie lending and depressed restructuring in Japan. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:51943–77
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Charoenwong B, Miao M, Ruan T. 2021. Non-performing loan disposals without resolution SSRN Work. Pap. 3662344
  20. Chopra Y, Subramanian K, Tantri PL. 2021. Bank cleanups, capitalization, and lending: evidence from India. Rev. Financ. Stud. 34:94132–76
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Crosignani M, Faria-e-Castro M, Fonseca L. 2020. The (unintended?) consequences of the largest liquidity injection ever. J. Monet. Econ. 112:27–47
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Favara G, Minoiu C, Perez-Orive A. 2021. U.S. zombie firms: How many and how consequential? Board Gov. Fed. Reserve Washington, DC: FEDS Notes, July 30
  23. G30 Work. Group Corp. Sect. Revital 2020. Reviving and restructuring the corporate sector post-Covid: designing public policy interventions. Rep. Group of Thirty (G30) Washington, DC:
  24. Gande A, Puri M, Saunders A, Walter I. 1997. Bank underwriting of debt securities: modern evidence. Rev. Financ. Stud. 10:41175–202
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Giannetti M, Simonov A. 2013. On the real effects of bank bailouts: micro evidence from Japan. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 5:1135–67
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gopinath G, Kalemli-Ozcan S, Karabarbounis L, Villegas-Sanchez C. 2017. Capital allocation and productivity in South Europe. Q. J. Econ. 132:41915–67
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Greenlaw D, Kashyap A, Schoenholtz K, Shin HY. 2012. Stressed out: macroprudential principles for stress testing. Res. Pap. 12-08, Booth School Bus. Univ. Chicago:
  28. Hoshi T 2000. Why is the Japanese economy unable to get out of a liquidity trap?. Zero Interest Rate and the Japanese Economy, ed. M Fukao, H Yoshikawa 233–66 Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shimbunsha
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hsieh C, Klenow PJ. 2009. Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Q. J. Econ. 124:41403–48
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hu Y, Varas F. 2021. A theory of Zombie lending. J. Finance 76:41813–67
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Jordà Ò, Kornejew M, Schularick M, Taylor AM. 2020. Zombies at large? Corporate debt overhang and the macro-economy Staff Rep. 951 Fed. Reserve Bank New York, New York:
  32. Kane EJ. 1989. The S&L insurance mess: How did it happen? Res. Pap. Urban Inst. Washington, DC:
  33. Kulkarni N, Ritadhi SK, Vij S, Waldock K. 2021. Unearthing zombies SSRN Work. Pap. 3495660
  34. Li B, Ponticelli J. 2022. Going bankrupt in China. Rev. Finance 26:3449–86
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Midrigan V, Xu DX. 2014. Finance and misallocation: evidence from plant-level data. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:2422–58
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Peek V, Rosengren ES. 2005. Perverse incentives and the misallocation of credit in Japan. Am. Econ. Rev. 95:41144–66
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schaede U. 2005. The ‘middle-risk gap’ and financial system reform: small-firm financing in Japan. Monet. Econ. Stud. 23:1149–76
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Schivardi F, Sette E, Tabellini G. 2020. Identifying the real effects of zombie lending. Rev. Corp. Finance Stud. 9:569–92
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Schivardi F, Sette E, Tabellini G. 2022. Credit misallocation during the European financial crisis. Econ. J. 132:641391–423
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Schmidt C, Schneider Y, Steffen S, Streitz D. 2021. Capital misallocation and innovation SSRN Work. Pap. 3489801
  41. Smith D. 2003. Loans to Japanese borrowers. J. Jpn. Int. Econ. 17:3283–304
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Storz M, Koetter M, Setzer R, Westphal A. 2017. Do we want these two to tango? On zombie firms and stressed banks in Europe SSRN Work. Pap. 3052072
  43. Tracey B. 2021. The real effects of zombie lending in Europe. Staff Work. Pap. 783 Bank Engl. London:
  44. White LJ. 1991. The S&L Debacle: Public Policy Lessons for Bank and Thrift Regulation Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-111620-114424
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-111620-114424
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error