1932

Abstract

Stablecoins have the potential to drastically increase competition and innovation in financial services by reducing our reliance on traditional intermediaries. But they also introduce new challenges, as regulators rely on intermediaries to ensure financial stability, market integrity, and consumer protection. Because they operate at the interface between traditional banking and cryptocurrencies, stablecoins also represent an ideal setting for understanding the key trade-offs cryptocurrencies involve, and insights from robust stablecoin design and regulation are highly relevant for related innovations in decentralized finance (DeFi), nonfungible tokens, and Web3 protocols. In this review, we describe the following: key stablecoin design choices, from reserve composition to stability mechanism; legal claim against the issuer; noninterference with macroeconomic stability; and interoperability with public sector payment rails and central bank digital currencies. Last, we cover the key benefits of stablecoins in the context of real-time, low-cost programmable payments, financial inclusion, and DeFi.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-111621-101151
2022-11-01
2024-04-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/financial/14/1/annurev-financial-111621-101151.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-111621-101151&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adrian T, Mancini-Griffoli T. 2019. The rise of digital money. Int. Monet. Fund FinTech Notes, July 15. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fintech-notes/Issues/2019/07/12/The-Rise-of-Digital-Money-47097
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Auer R, Cornelli G, Frost J. 2020. Rise of the central bank digital currencies: drivers, approaches and technologies Work. Pap. 880 Bank Int. Settl. Basel, Switz:.
  3. Banerjee A, Duflo E, Glennerster R, Kinman C. 2015. The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 7:122–53
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bank of England 2020. Central bank digital currency: opportunities, challenges and design Discuss. Pap., March 12 Bank of England London:
  5. Bank of Israel 2018. Report of the team to examine the issue of central bank digital currencies Tech. Rep. Bank of Israel Jerusalem:
  6. Banque de France 2020. Central bank digital currency Tech. Rep. Banque de France Paris:
  7. Barnett C, Dowling M. 2020. the wildcat era of stablecoins, commercial banks have new rails to ride. CoinDesk, June 16. https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2020/06/16/in-the-wildcat-era-of-stablecoins-commercial-banks-have-new-rails-to-ride/
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Barontini C, Holden H. 2019. Proceeding with caution—a survey on central bank digital currency Work. Pap. 101 Bank Int. Settl. Basel, Switz:.
  9. Baydakova A. 2019. Millions in crypto is crossing the Russia-China border daily. There, tether is king. CoinDesk, July 30. https://www.coindesk.com/business/2019/07/30/millions-in-crypto-is-crossing-the-russia-china-border-daily-there-tether-is-king/
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Benigno P, Schilling LM, Uhlig H. 2019. Cryptocurrencies, currency competition, and the impossible trinity NBER Work Pap. 26214
  11. Boar C, Holden H, Wadsworth A. 2020. Impending arrival—a sequel to the survey on central bank digital currency Work. Pap. 107 Bank Int. Settl. Basel, Switz:.
  12. Bordo MD, Levin AT. 2017. Central bank digital currency and the future of monetary policy NBER Work Pap. 23711
  13. Brunnermeier MK, James H, Landau JP. 2019. The digitalization of money NBER Work. Pap. 26300
  14. Catalini C, de Gortari A. 2021. On the economic design of stablecoins SSRN Work Pap. 3899499
  15. Catalini C, Gans JS. 2019. Initial coin offerings and the value of crypto tokens NBER Work Pap. 24418
  16. Catalini C, Gans JS. 2020. Some simple economics of the blockchain. Commun. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 63:780–90
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Catalini C, Li WD, de Gortari A, Lilley A. 2021. From stablecoins to CBDCs: the public benefits of a public-private partnership. SSRN Work Pap. 3986192
  18. Catalini C, Lilley A. 2021. Why is the United States lagging behind in payments? SSRN Work Pap. 3893937
  19. Catalini C, Massari J. 2021. Stablecoins and the future of money. Harvard Bus. Rev., Aug. 10. https://hbr.org/2021/08/stablecoins-and-the-future-of-money
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Catalini C, Shah N. 2021. Setting standards for stablecoin reserves. SSRN Work Pap. 3970885
  21. Cecchetti S, Schienholtz K. 2019. Libra: a dramatic call to regulatory action. VoxEU.org, Aug. 28. https://voxeu.org/article/libra-dramatic-call-regulatory-action
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Chainalysis 2020. The 2020 geography of cryptocurrency report Tech. Rep. Sept., Chainalysis New York:
  23. Chalkias K, Lewi K, Mohassel P, Nikolaenko V. 2020. Distributed auditing proofs of liabilities. Presented at the 3rd ZKProof Workshop https://research.facebook.com/file/593824151622372/Distributed-Auditing-Proofs-of-Liabilities.pdf
  24. Comm. Paym. Market Infrastruct 2018. Central bank digital currencies Rep. Bank Int. Settl. Basel, Switz:.
  25. Duffie D 2020. Interoperable payment systems and the role of central bank digital currencies. SSRN Work Pap. 3604665
  26. Fengler W. 2012. How Kenya became a world leader for mobile money. World Bank Blogs, Africa Can End Poverty, July 16. https://blogs.worldbank.org/africacan/how-kenya-became-a-world-leader-for-mobile-money
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Financ. Stab. Board 2020. Regulation, supervision and oversight of “global stablecoin” arrangements Tech. Rep. Financ. Stab. Board Basel, Switz:.
  28. G7 Work. Group Stablecoins 2019. Investigating the impact of global stablecoins Comm. Paym. Market Infra-struct. Pap. 187 Bank Int. Settl. Basel, Switz:.
  29. Goldstein J. 2020. Money: The True Story of a Made-Up Thing New York: Hachette Books
  30. Gorton GB, Zhang J. 2021. Taming wildcat stablecoins SSRN Work Pap. 3888752
  31. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jack W, Ray A, Suri T. 2013. Transaction networks: evidence from mobile money in Kenya. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:3356–61
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jack W, Suri T. 2011. Mobile money: the economics of M-PESA NBER Work Pap. 16721
  34. John K, O'Hara M, Saleh F. 2022. Bitcoin and beyond. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ. 14:95–115
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kast F, Meier S, Pomeranz D. 2018. Saving more in groups: field experimental evidence from Chile. J. Dev. Econ. 133:275–94
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kuo E, Iles B, Rincon-Cruz M. 2019. Ampleforth: a new synthetic commodity White Pap. Ampleforth San Francisco: https://ampltools.com/Media/Ampleforth-whitepaper.pdf
  37. Long H, Singletary M. 2020. Glitches prevent $1,200 stimulus checks from reaching millions of Americans. Washington Post Apr. 16. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/04/16/coronavirus-cares-stimulus-check/
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lyons RK, Viswanath-Natraj G. 2020. What keeps stablecoins stable?. NBER Work Pap. 27136
  39. Nakamoto S. 2008. Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system Tech. Rep. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
  40. Narayanan A, Bonneau J, Felten E, Miller A, Goldfeder S. 2016. Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  41. Off. Monet. Financ. Inst. Forum 2019. Retail CBDCs: the next payments frontier. Rep. Off. Monet. Financ. Inst. Forum London:
  42. Parker SW, Todd PE. 2017. Conditional cash transfers: the case of Progresa/Oportunidades. J. Econ. Lit. 55:3866–915
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Prasad ES. 2021. The Future of Money: How the Digital Revolution Is Transforming Currencies and Finance Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press
  44. Pres. Work. Group Financ. Markets 2020. Statement on key regulatory and supervisory issues relevant to certain stablecoins Statement, Pres. Work. Group Financ. Markets, U.S. Dep. Treas. Washington, DC:
  45. Pres. Work. Group Financ. Markets 2021. Report on stablecoins Tech. Rep. Pres. Work. Group Financ. Markets, U.S. Dep. Treas. Washington, DC:
  46. Sams R. 2015. A note on cryptocurrency stabilisation: seigniorage shares. Work. Pap. Clearmatics London: https://blog.bitmex.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/A-Note-on-Cryptocurrency-Stabilisation-Seigniorage-Shares.pdf
  47. Scott SV, Van Reenen J, Zachariadis M. 2017. The long-term effect of digital innovation on bank performance: an empirical study of SWIFT adoption in financial services. Res. Policy 46:5984–1004
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Suri T. 2017. Mobile money. Annu. Rev. Econ. 9:497–520
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Suri T, Jack W. 2016. The long-run poverty and gender impacts of mobile money. Science 354:63171288–92
    [Google Scholar]
  50. von Luckner CG, Reinhart CM, Rogoff KS. 2021. Decrypting new age international capital flows NBER Work. Pap. 29337
  51. World Bank Group 2020. COVID-19 crisis through a migration lens Migr. Dev. Brief 32 World Bank Group Washington, DC:
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-111621-101151
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-111621-101151
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error