1932

Abstract

As the cost of education rises and student debt reaches new highs, more research has focused on financing the acquisition of human capital. Most research has had a positive focus, examining the effect of debt on student choices and outcomes. However, because education financing involves many public policy choices, normative questions have become more prominent. We discuss the trade-offs involved in these choices and propose simple models to help shape these questions. We first develop an overlapping generations framework of student debt to examine the macroeconomic impact of shifting from a parent-funded to a student debt–based financing system. We then consider a framework that includes the supply-side response to different funding regimes; that is, how do enrollment and tuition decisions of schools respond to changes in education financing?

We show that shifting from parent-based funding to a student loan program can lower aggregate savings, although welfare still improves if education has a higher return than physical capital investment. A public student loan program also tends to promote enrollment at the cost of higher tuition at for-profit schools and deteriorating loan performance, paid for by taxpayers. Alternative contract designs, with school participation in the lending program, tend to ameliorate these issues.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-121415-033040
2016-10-23
2024-10-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/financial/8/1/annurev-financial-121415-033040.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-121415-033040&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abbott B, Gallipoli G, Meghir C, Violante G. 2013. Education policy and intergenerational transfers in equilibrium Discuss. Pap. 1887, Cowles Found. Res. Econ., Yale Univ. [Google Scholar]
  2. Agarwal S, Amromin G, Chomsisengphet S, Ben-David I, Evanoff DD. 2011. The role of securitization in mortgage renegotiation. J. Financ. Econ. 102:3559–78 [Google Scholar]
  3. Agarwal S, Amromin G, Chomsisengphet S, Piskorski T, Seru A, Yao V. 2016. Mortgage refinancing, consumer spending, and competition: evidence from the Home Affordable Refinancing Program. J. Polit. Econ. In press [Google Scholar]
  4. Akers B, Chingos MM. 2014. Student loan safety nets: estimating the costs and benefits of income-based repayment Brown Cent. Educ. Policy, Brookings Inst., Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  5. Altig D, Davis SJ. 1993. Borrowing constraints and two-sided altruism with an application to Social Security. J. Econ. Dyn. Control. 17:467–94 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ambrose BW, Cordell L, Ma S. 2015. The impact of student loan debt on small business formation Work. Pap. 15-26, Fed. Reserve Bank Phila., Philadelphia [Google Scholar]
  7. Amromin G, Eberly J, Mondragon J. 2016. Substitution between parents' home equity and students' borrowing: evidence from the housing boom and bust Work. Pap., Northwest. Univ. [Google Scholar]
  8. Athreya K, Eberly J. 2013. The supply of college-educated workers: the roles of college premia, college costs, and risk Work. Pap. 13–02, Fed. Reserve Bank Richmond, Richmond, VA. https://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/working_papers/2013/wp_13-02r [Google Scholar]
  9. Avery C, Turner S. 2012. Student loans: Do college students borrow too much—or not enough?. J. Econ. Perspect. 26:1165–92 [Google Scholar]
  10. Barrow L, Malamud O. 2015. Is college a worthwhile investment?. Annu. Rev. Econ. 7:519–55 [Google Scholar]
  11. Belley P, Lochner L. 2007. The changing role of family income and ability in determining educational achievement. J. Hum. Cap. 1:137–89 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bennett WJ. 1987. Our greedy colleges. New York Times Feb. 18, p. A27 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bleemer Z, Brown M, Lee D, van der Klaauw W. 2014. Debt, jobs, or housing: What's keeping millennials at home? Staff Rep. 700, Fed. Reserve Bank N.Y., New York [Google Scholar]
  14. Brooks JR. 2016. Income-driven repayment and the public financing of higher education. Georget. Law J. 104:229–289 [Google Scholar]
  15. Brown M, Caldwell S. 2013. Young student loan borrowers retreat from housing and auto markets. Liberty Street Economics Blog April 17 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown M, Scholz JK, Seshadri A. 2012. A new test of borrowing constraints for education. Rev. Econ. Stud. 79:2511–38 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cameron SV, Taber CR. 2004. Borrowing constraints and the returns to schooling. J. Polit. Econ. 112:132–82 [Google Scholar]
  18. Carneiro P, Heckman JJ. 2002. The evidence on credit constraints in post-secondary schooling. Econ. J. 112:482705–34 [Google Scholar]
  19. CBO (Congr. Budg. Off.) 2010. Costs and Policy Options for Federal Student Loan Programs Washington, DC: CBO [Google Scholar]
  20. Cellini SR, Goldin C. 2014. Does federal student aid raise tuition? New evidence on for-profit colleges. Am. Econ. J. 6:4174–206 [Google Scholar]
  21. CFPB (Consum. Financ. Prot. Bur.) 2012. Private Student Loans Washington, DC: CFPB http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201207_cfpb_Reports_Private-Student-Loans.pdf [Google Scholar]
  22. Chatterjee S, Ionescu F. 2012. Insuring student loans against the financial risk of failing to complete college. Quant. Econ. 3:3393–420 [Google Scholar]
  23. Deming DJ, Goldin C, Katz LF. 2012. The for-profit postsecondary school sector: nimble critters or agile predators?. J. Econ. Perspect. 26:1139–64 [Google Scholar]
  24. Department of Education 2012. Student Loans Overview: Budget Request 2013 Washington, DC: US Department of Education https://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/budget13/justifications/r-loansoverview.pdf [Google Scholar]
  25. Drazen A. 1978. Government debt, human capital, and bequests in a life-cycle model. J. Polit. Econ. 86:3505–16 [Google Scholar]
  26. Dynarski S. 2003. Does aid matter? Measuring the effect of student aid on college attendance and completion. Am. Econ. Rev. 93:1279–88 [Google Scholar]
  27. Dynarski S. 2016. The dividing line between haves and have-nots in homeownership: education, not student debt Evidence Speaks Rep., Brookings Inst., Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  28. Dynarski S, Kreisman D. 2013. Loans for educational opportunity: making borrowing work for today's students Hamilton Proj. Discuss. Pap. 2013–05, Brookings Inst., Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  29. Eberly J, Krishnamurthy A. 2014. Efficient credit policies in a housing debt crisis. Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. Fall73–125 [Google Scholar]
  30. Eckwert B, Zilcha I. 2012. Private investment in higher education: comparing alternative funding schemes. Economica 79:31376–96 [Google Scholar]
  31. Elango S, Garcia JL, Heckman JJ, Hojman A. 2015. Early childhood education NBER Work. Pap. 21766, Cambridge, MA [Google Scholar]
  32. Epple D, Romano R, Sieg H. 2006. Admission, tuition, and financial aid policies in the market for higher education. Econometrica 74:4885–928 [Google Scholar]
  33. FRBNY (Fed. Reserve Bank N.Y.) 2015. Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit, Q3 2015. New York: FRBNY https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/interactives/householdcredit/data/pdf/HHDC_2015Q3.pdf [Google Scholar]
  34. Fu C. 2014. Equilibrium tuition, applications, admissions and enrollment in the college market. J. Polit. Econ. 122:2225–81 [Google Scholar]
  35. Geanakoplos J, Mitchell O, Zeldes S. 1999. Social Security money's worth. Prospects for Social Security Reform OS Mitchell, RJ Myers, H Young 79–151 Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press [Google Scholar]
  36. Gicheva D, Thompson JP. 2015. The effects of student loans on long-term household financial stability. Student Loans and the Dynamics of Debt Brad Hershbein, KM Hollenbeck 287–316 Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Inst. Employ. Res. [Google Scholar]
  37. Guryan J, Thompson M. 2014. Report on the proposed gainful employment regulation Rep., Charles River Assoc., Boston [Google Scholar]
  38. Hanushek EA, Leung CKY, Yilmaz K. 2014. Borrowing constraints, college aid, and intergenerational mobility. J. Hum. Cap. 8:11–41 [Google Scholar]
  39. Harris M, Raviv A. 1991. The theory of capital structure. J. Finance 46:1297–355 [Google Scholar]
  40. Heckman JJ, Lochner L. 2000. Rethinking education and training policy: understanding the sources of skill formation in a modern economy. Securing the Future: Investing in Children from Birth to College S Danziger, J Waldfogel 47–83 New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ionescu F. 2009. The Federal Student Loan Program: quantitative implications for college enrollment and default rates. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 12:1205–31 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ionescu F. 2011. Risky human capital and alternative bankruptcy regimes for student loans. J. Hum. Cap. 5:2153–206 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kimball M. 1987. Making sense of two-sided altruism. J. Monet. Econ. 20:301–26 [Google Scholar]
  44. Layard R, Psacharapoulos G. 1974. The screening hypothesis and the returns to education. J. Polit. Econ. 82:5985–98 [Google Scholar]
  45. Levitin AJ, Twomey T. 2011. Mortgage servicing. Yale J. Regul. 28:1–90 [Google Scholar]
  46. Lochner L, Monge-Naranjo A. 2011. The nature of credit constraints and human capital. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:62487–529 [Google Scholar]
  47. Lochner L, Monge-Naranjo A. 2014. Student loans and repayment: theory, evidence and policy Work. Pap., Univ. West. Ont. [Google Scholar]
  48. Looney A, Yannelis C. 2015. A crisis in student loans? How changes in the characteristics of borrowers and in the institutions they attended contributed to rising loan defaults. Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. Fall:1–89 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lucas D. 2016. Credit policy as fiscal policy. Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. Spring [Google Scholar]
  50. Lucas D, Moore D. 2010. Guaranteed versus direct lending: the case of student loans. Measuring and Managing Federal Financial Risk D Lucas 163–205 Chicago: Univ. Chic. Press [Google Scholar]
  51. Lucca DO, Nadauld T, Shen K. 2015. Credit supply and the rise in college tuition: evidence from the expansion in federal student aid programs Work. Pap., Fed. Reserve Bank N.Y., New York [Google Scholar]
  52. Mezza A, Ringo DR, Sherlund SM, Sommer K. 2016. On the effect of student loans on access to homeownership Work. Pap., Finance Econ. Discuss. Ser. 2016-010, Fed. Reserve Board, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  53. NCES (Nat. Cent. Educ. Stat.) 2013. Digest of Education Statistics: 2013 Washington, DC: NCES [Google Scholar]
  54. OECD (Org. Econ. Coop. Dev.) 2014. Education at a Glance 2014: OECD Indicators Paris: OECD http://www.oecd.org/edu/Education-at-a-Glance-2014.pdf [Google Scholar]
  55. Piskorski T, Seru A, Vig V. 2010. Securitization and distressed loan renegotiation: evidence from the subprime mortgage crisis. J. Financ. Econ. 97:3369–97 [Google Scholar]
  56. Rothstein J, Rouse CE. 2011. Constrained after college: student loans and early-career occupational choices. J. Public Econ. 95:149–63 [Google Scholar]
  57. Saul S. 2015. For-profit college system expected to pay millions. New York Times Nov 15 [Google Scholar]
  58. Stinebrickner T, Stinebrickner R. 2008. The effect of credit constraints on the college drop-out decision: a direct approach using a new panel study. Am. Econ. Rev. 98:52163–84 [Google Scholar]
  59. Townsend RM. 1979. Optimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state verification. J. Econ. Theory 21:2265–93 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-121415-033040
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-financial-121415-033040
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error