Intracellular Fluid Mechanics: Coupling Cytoplasmic Flow with Active Cytoskeletal Gel

Literature Cited

1. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Morgan D, Raff M. et al. 2014. Molecular Biology of the Cell New York: Garland Sci, 6th ed.. [Google Scholar]
2. Allen GM, Mogilner A, Theriot JA. 2013. Electrophoresis of cellular membrane components creates the directional cue guiding keratocyte galvanotaxis. Curr. Biol. 23:7560–68 [Google Scholar]
3. Allen RD, Allen NS. 1978. Cytoplasmic streaming in amoeboid movement. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 7:1469–95 [Google Scholar]
4. Alt W, Dembo M. 1999. Cytoplasm dynamics and cell motion: two-phase flow models. Math. Biosci. 156:1207–28 [Google Scholar]
5. Atilgan E, Wirtz D, Sun SX. 2006. Mechanics and dynamics of actin-driven thin membrane protrusions. Biophys. J. 90:165–76 [Google Scholar]
6. Atzberger PJ, Kramer PR, Peskin CS. 2007. A stochastic immersed boundary method for fluid-structure dynamics at microscopic length scales. J. Comput. Phys. 224:21255–92 [Google Scholar]
7. Barnhart E, Lee KC, Allen GM, Theriot JA, Mogilner A. 2015. Balance between cell–substrate adhesion and myosin contraction determines the frequency of motility initiation in fish keratocytes. PNAS 112:165045–50 [Google Scholar]
8. Bausch AR, Kroy K. 2006. A bottom-up approach to cell mechanics. Nat. Phys. 2:4231–38 [Google Scholar]
9. Bausch AR, Ziemann F, Boulbitch AA, Jacobson K, Sackmann E. 1998. Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry. Biophys. J. 75:42038–49 [Google Scholar]
10. Bergert M, Chandradoss SD, Desai RA, Paluch E. 2012. Cell mechanics control rapid transitions between blebs and lamellipodia during migration. PNAS 109:3614434–39 [Google Scholar]
11. Biot MA. 1941. General theory of three‐dimensional consolidation. J. Appl. Phys. 12:2155–64 [Google Scholar]
12. Bloom M, Evans E, Mouritsen OG. 1991. Physical properties of the fluid lipid-bilayer component of cell membranes: a perspective. Q. Rev. Biophys. 24:3293–397 [Google Scholar]
13. Bottino DC, Fauci LJ. 1998. A computational model of ameboid deformation and locomotion. Eur. Biophys. J. 27:5532–39 [Google Scholar]
14. Bretscher MS, Aguado-Velasco C. 1998. Membrane traffic during cell locomotion. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10:4537–41 [Google Scholar]
15. Brugués J, Nuzzo V, Mazur E, Needleman DJ. 2012. Nucleation and transport organize microtubules in metaphase spindles. Cell 149:3554–64 [Google Scholar]
16. Callan-Jones AC, Jülicher F. 2011. Hydrodynamics of active permeating gels. New J. Phys. 13:9093027 [Google Scholar]
17. Carlier MF, Romet-Lemonne G, Jegou A. 2014. Actin filament dynamics using microfluidics. Methods Enzymol 540:3–17 [Google Scholar]
18. Carlsson AE. 2011. Mechanisms of cell propulsion by active stresses. New J. Phys. 13:7073009 [Google Scholar]
19. Chan CE, Odde DJ. 2008. Traction dynamics of filopodia on compliant substrates. Science 322:59081687–91 [Google Scholar]
20. Charras GT, Coughlin M, Mitchison TJ, Mahadevan L. 2008. Life and times of a cellular bleb. Biophys. J. 94:51836–53 [Google Scholar]
21. Charras GT, Mitchison TJ, Mahadevan L. 2009. Animal cell hydraulics. J. Cell Sci. 122:183233–41 [Google Scholar]
22. Charras GT, Yarrow JC, Horton MA, Mahadevan L, Mitchison TJ. 2005. Non-equilibration of hydrostatic pressure in blebbing cells. Nature 435:7040365–69 [Google Scholar]
23. Cogan NG, Guy RD. 2010. Multiphase flow models of biogels from crawling cells to bacterial biofilms. HFSP J 4:111–25 [Google Scholar]
24. Dai J, Sheetz MP. 1999. Membrane tether formation from blebbing cells. Biophys. J. 77:63363–70 [Google Scholar]
25. Dembo M. 1989. Mechanics and control of the cytoskeleton in Amoeba proteus. Biophys. J. 55:61053–80 [Google Scholar]
26. Dembo M, Harlow F. 1986. Cell motion, contractile networks, and the physics of interpenetrating reactive flow. Biophys. J. 50:1109–21 [Google Scholar]
27. Diz-Muñoz A, Romanczuk P, Yu W, Bergert M, Ivanovitch K. et al. 2016. Steering cell migration by alternating blebs and actin-rich protrusions. BMC Biol 14:174 [Google Scholar]
28. Drew DA, Segel LA. 1971. Averaged equations for two‐phase flows. Stud. Appl. Math. 50:3205–31 [Google Scholar]
29. Eloy C, Lauga E. 2012. Kinematics of the most efficient cilium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109:3038101 [Google Scholar]
30. Fabry B, Maksym GN, Butler JP, Glogauer M, Navajas D, Fredberg JJ. 2001. Scaling the microrheology of living cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87:14148102 [Google Scholar]
31. Fogelson B, Mogilner A. 2014. Computational estimates of membrane flow and tension gradient in motile cells. PLOS ONE 9:1e84524 [Google Scholar]
32. Gabella C, Bertseva E, Bottier C, Piacentini N, Bornert A. et al. 2014. Contact angle at the leading edge controls cell protrusion rate. Curr. Biol. 24:101126–32 [Google Scholar]
33. Gauthier NC, Masters TA, Sheetz MP. 2012. Mechanical feedback between membrane tension and dynamics. Trends Cell Biol 22:10527–35 [Google Scholar]
34. Giomi L, DeSimone A. 2014. Spontaneous division and motility in active nematic droplets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112:14147802 [Google Scholar]
35. Goldstein RE. 2016. Fluid dynamics at the scale of the cell. J. Fluid Mech. 807:1–39 [Google Scholar]
36. Goldstein RE, van de Meent JW. 2015. A physical perspective on cytoplasmic streaming. Interface Focus 5:420150030 [Google Scholar]
37. Gracheva ME, Othmer HG. 2004. A continuum model of motility in ameboid cells. Bull. Math. Biol. 66:1167–93 [Google Scholar]
38. Gross SP, Welte MA, Block SM, Wieschaus EF. 2000. Dynein-mediated cargo transport in vivo: A switch controls travel distance. J. Cell Biol. 148:5945–56 [Google Scholar]
39. Guy RD, Nakagaki T, Wright GB. 2011. Flow-induced channel formation in the cytoplasm of motile cells. Phys. Rev. E 84:1016310 [Google Scholar]
40. He X, Dembo M. 1997. On the mechanics of the first cleavage division of the sea urchin egg. Exp. Cell Res. 233:2252–73 [Google Scholar]
41. Hecht I, Rappel WJ, Levine H. 2009. Determining the scale of the Bicoid morphogen gradient. PNAS 106:61710–15 [Google Scholar]
42. Herant M, Dembo M. 2010. Form and function in cell motility: from fibroblasts to keratocytes. Biophys. J. 98:81408–17 [Google Scholar]
43. Herant M, Marganski WA, Dembo M. 2003. The mechanics of neutrophils: synthetic modeling of three experiments. Biophys. J. 84:53389–413 [Google Scholar]
44. Holmes WR, Edelstein-Keshet L. 2012. A comparison of computational models for eukaryotic cell shape and motility. PLOS Comput. Biol. 8:12e1002793 [Google Scholar]
45. Hu J, Verkman AS. 2006. Increased migration and metastatic potential of tumor cells expressing aquaporin water channels. FASEB J 20:111892–94 [Google Scholar]
46. Iglesias PA, Devreotes PN. 2012. Biased excitable networks: how cells direct motion in response to gradients. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24:2245–53 [Google Scholar]
47. Iskratsch T, Wolfenson H, Sheetz MP. 2014. Appreciating force and shape—the rise of mechanotransduction in cell biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15:12825–33 [Google Scholar]
48. Jaeger M, Carin M, Medale M, Tryggvason G. 1999. The osmotic migration of cells in a solute gradient. Biophys. J. 77:31257–67 [Google Scholar]
49. Janmey PA, Slochower DR, Wang YH, Wen Q, Cēbers A. 2014. Polyelectrolyte properties of filamentous biopolymers and their consequences in biological fluids. Soft Matter 10:101439–49 [Google Scholar]
50. Joanny JF, Prost J. 2009. Active gels as a description of the actin‐myosin cytoskeleton. HFSP J 3:294–104 [Google Scholar]
51. Kamm RD. 2002. Cellular fluid mechanics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34:1211–32 [Google Scholar]
52. Keener JP, Sircar S, Fogelson AL. 2011. Kinetics of swelling gels. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 71:3854–75 [Google Scholar]
53. Keren K, Yam PT, Kinkhabwala A, Mogilner A, Theriot JA. 2009. Intracellular fluid flow in rapidly moving cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 11:101219–24 [Google Scholar]
54. Khismatullin DB, Truskey GA. 2012. Leukocyte rolling on P-selectin: a three-dimensional numerical study of the effect of cytoplasmic viscosity. Biophys. J. 102:81757–66 [Google Scholar]
55. Kimpton LS, Whiteley JP, Waters SL, King JR, Oliver JM. 2013. Multiple travelling-wave solutions in a minimal model for cell motility. Math. Med. Biol. 30:3241–72 [Google Scholar]
56. Kimpton LS, Whiteley JP, Waters SL, Oliver JM. 2015. On a poroviscoelastic model for cell crawling. J. Math. Biol. 70:1–2133–71 [Google Scholar]
57. Kole TP, Tseng Y, Jiang I, Katz JL, Wirtz D. 2005. Intracellular mechanics of migrating fibroblasts. Mol. Biol. Cell 16:1328–38 [Google Scholar]
58. Kozlov MM, Mogilner A. 2007. Model of polarization and bistability of cell fragments. Biophys. J. 93:113811–19 [Google Scholar]
59. Kruse K, Joanny JF, Jülicher F, Prost J. 2006. Contractility and retrograde flow in lamellipodium motion. Phys. Biol. 3:2130 [Google Scholar]
60. Kruse K, Joanny JF, Jülicher F, Prost J, Sekimoto K. 2004. Asters, vortices, and rotating spirals in active gels of polar filaments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92:7078101 [Google Scholar]
61. Kruse K, Joanny JF, Jülicher F, Prost J, Sekimoto K. 2005. Generic theory of active polar gels: a paradigm for cytoskeletal dynamics. Eur. Phys. J. E 16:15–16 [Google Scholar]
62. Kuusela E, Alt W. 2009. Continuum model of cell adhesion and migration. J. Math. Biol. 58:1–2135–61 [Google Scholar]
63. Larripa K, Mogilner A. 2006. Transport of a 1D viscoelastic actin–myosin strip of gel as a model of a crawling cell. Physica A 372:1113–23 [Google Scholar]
64. Lee P, Wolgemuth CW. 2011. Crawling cells can close wounds without purse strings or signaling. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7:3e1002007 [Google Scholar]
65. Lewis OL, Guy RD, Allard JF. 2014. Actin-myosin spatial patterns from a simplified isotropic viscoelastic model. Biophys. J. 107:4863–70 [Google Scholar]
66. Lewis OL, Zhang S, Guy RD, del Álamo JC. 2015. Coordination of contractility, adhesion and flow in migrating Physarum amoebae. J. R. Soc. Interface 12:10620141359 [Google Scholar]
67. Li Y, Mori Y, Sun SX. 2015. Flow-driven cell migration under external electric fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115:26268101 [Google Scholar]
68. Lieber AD, Schweitzer Y, Kozlov MM, Keren K. 2015. Front-to-rear membrane tension gradient in rapidly moving cells. Biophys. J. 108:71599–603 [Google Scholar]
69. Lim FY, Chiam KH, Mahadevan L. 2012. The size, shape, and dynamics of cellular blebs. Europhys. Lett. 100:228004 [Google Scholar]
70. Lim FY, Koon YL, Chiam KH. 2013. A computational model of amoeboid cell migration. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 16:101085–95 [Google Scholar]
71. Liu AS, Wang H, Copeland CR, Chen CS, Shenoy VB, Reich DH. 2016. Matrix viscoplasticity and its shielding by active mechanics in microtissue models: experiments and mathematical modeling. Sci. Rep. 6:33919 [Google Scholar]
72. Loitto VM, Forslund T, Sundqvist T, Magnusson KE, Gustafsson M. 2002. Neutrophil leukocyte motility requires directed water influx. J. Leukoc. Biol. 71:2212–22 [Google Scholar]
73. Luby-Phelps K. 1999. Cytoarchitecture and physical properties of cytoplasm: volume, viscosity, diffusion, intracellular surface area. Int. Rev. Cytol. 192:189–221 [Google Scholar]
74. Luby-Phelps K. 2013. The physical chemistry of cytoplasm and its influence on cell function: an update. Mol. Biol. Cell 24:172593–96 [Google Scholar]
75. MacKintosh FC, Schmidt CF. 2010. Active cellular materials. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 22:129–35 [Google Scholar]
76. Marée AF, Jilkine A, Dawes A, Grieneisen VA, Edelstein-Keshet L. 2006. Polarization and movement of keratocytes: a multiscale modelling approach. Bull. Math. Biol. 68:51169–211 [Google Scholar]
77. Marquez JP, Genin GM, Zahalak GI, Elson EL. 2005. The relationship between cell and tissue strain in three-dimensional bio-artificial tissues. Biophys. J. 88:2778–89 [Google Scholar]
78. Mitchison TJ, Charras GT, Mahadevan L. 2008. Implications of a poroelastic cytoplasm for the dynamics of animal cell shape. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 19:3215–23 [Google Scholar]
79. Moeendarbary E, Valon L, Fritzsche M, Harris AR, Moulding DA. et al. 2013. The cytoplasm of living cells behaves as a poroelastic material. Nat. Mater. 12:3253–61 [Google Scholar]
80. Monteith CE, Brunner ME, Djagaeva I, Bielecki AM, Deutsch JM, Saxton WM. 2016. A mechanism for cytoplasmic streaming: kinesin-driven alignment of microtubules and fast fluid flows. Biophys. J. 110:92053–65 [Google Scholar]
81. Nishimura SI, Sasai M. 2007. Modulation of the reaction rate of regulating protein induces large morphological and motional change of amoebic cell. J. Theor. Biol. 245:2230–37 [Google Scholar]
82. Oakes PW, Banerjee S, Marchetti MC, Gardel ML. 2014. Geometry regulates traction stresses in adherent cells. Biophys. J. 107:4825–33 [Google Scholar]
83. Oliver JM, King JR, McKinlay KJ, Brown PD, Grant DM. et al. 2005. Thin-film theories for two-phase reactive flow models of active cell motion. Math. Med. Biol. 22:153–59 [Google Scholar]
84. Oster GF, Perelson AS. 1987. The physics of cell motility. J. Cell Sci. 1987:Suppl. 835–54 [Google Scholar]
85. Paluch EK, Raz E. 2013. The role and regulation of blebs in cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 25:5582–90 [Google Scholar]
86. Peskin CS, McQueen DM. 1995. A general method for the computer simulation of biological systems interacting with fluids. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 49:265–76 [Google Scholar]
87. Petrie RJ, Koo H, Yamada KM. 2014. Generation of compartmentalized pressure by a nuclear piston governs cell motility in a 3D matrix. Science 345:62001062–65 [Google Scholar]
88. Phillips R, Kondev J, Theriot J, Garcia HG. 2013. Physical Biology of the Cell New York: Garland Sci, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
89. Pollack GH. 2001. Cells, Gels and the Engines of Life: A New, Unifying Approach to Cell Function Seattle: Ebner [Google Scholar]
90. Prass M, Jacobson K, Mogilner A, Radmacher M. 2006. Direct measurement of the lamellipodial protrusive force in a migrating cell. J. Cell Biol. 174:6767–72 [Google Scholar]
91. Quinlan ME. 2016. Cytoplasmic streaming in the Drosophila oocyte. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 32:173–95 [Google Scholar]
92. Recho P, Putelat T, Truskinovsky L. 2013. Contraction-driven cell motility. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111:10108102 [Google Scholar]
93. Robinson DN, Spudich JA. 2004. Mechanics and regulation of cytokinesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16:2182–88 [Google Scholar]
94. Rosenbluth MJ, Crow A, Shaevitz JW, Fletcher DA. 2008. Slow stress propagation in adherent cells. Biophys. J. 95:126052–59 [Google Scholar]
95. Rotsch C, Jacobson K, Radmacher M. 1999. Dimensional and mechanical dynamics of active and stable edges in motile fibroblasts investigated by using atomic force microscopy. PNAS 96:3921–26 [Google Scholar]
96. Rubinstein B, Fournier MF, Jacobson K, Verkhovsky AB, Mogilner A. 2009. Actin-myosin viscoelastic flow in the keratocyte lamellipod. Biophys. J. 97:71853–63 [Google Scholar]
97. Rubinstein B, Jacobson K, Mogilner A. 2005. Multiscale two-dimensional modeling of a motile simple-shaped cell. Multiscale Model. Simul. 3:2413–39 [Google Scholar]
98. Sabass B, Gardel ML, Waterman CM, Schwarz US. 2008. High resolution traction force microscopy based on experimental and computational advances. Biophys. J. 94:1207–20 [Google Scholar]
99. Schwarz US. 2015. Physical constraints for pathogen movement. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 46:82–90 [Google Scholar]
100. Schweitzer Y, Lieber AD, Keren K, Kozlov MM. 2014. Theoretical analysis of membrane tension in moving cells. Biophys. J. 106:184–92 [Google Scholar]
101. Shao D, Rappel WJ, Levine H. 2010. Computational model for cell morphodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105:10108104 [Google Scholar]
102. Sheetz MP, Sable JE, Döbereiner HG. 2006. Continuous membrane-cytoskeleton adhesion requires continuous accommodation to lipid and cytoskeleton dynamics. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 35:417–34 [Google Scholar]
103. Shinar T, Mana M, Piano F, Shelley MJ. 2011. A model of cytoplasmically driven microtubule-based motion in the single-celled Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. PNAS 108:2610508–13 [Google Scholar]
104. Shivashankar GV. 2011. Mechanosignaling to the cell nucleus and gene regulation. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 40:361–78 [Google Scholar]
105. Sigurdsson JK, Atzberger PJ. 2016. Hydrodynamic coupling of particle inclusions embedded in curved lipid bilayer membranes. Soft Matter 12:326685–707 [Google Scholar]
106. Stroka KM, Jiang H, Chen SH, Tong Z, Wirtz D. et al. 2014. Water permeation drives tumor cell migration in confined microenvironments. Cell 157:3611–23 [Google Scholar]
107. Strychalski W, Copos CA, Lewis OL, Guy RD. 2015. A poroelastic immersed boundary method with applications to cell biology. J. Comput. Phys. 282:77–97 [Google Scholar]
108. Strychalski W, Guy RD. 2012. A computational model of bleb formation. Math. Med. Biol. 30:2115–30 [Google Scholar]
109. Strychalski W, Guy RD. 2016. Intracellular pressure dynamics in blebbing cells. Biophys. J. 110:51168–79 [Google Scholar]
110. Tanaka T, Fillmore DJ. 1979. Kinetics of swelling of gels. J. Chem. Phys. 70:31214–18 [Google Scholar]
111. Tao J, Li Y, Vig DK, Sun SX. 2017. Cell mechanics: a dialogue. Rep. Prog. Phys. 80:3036601 [Google Scholar]
112. Terasaki M, Shemesh T, Kasthuri N, Klemm RW, Schalek R. et al. 2013. Stacked endoplasmic reticulum sheets are connected by helicoidal membrane motifs. Cell 154:2285–96 [Google Scholar]
113. Tinevez JY, Schulze U, Salbreux G, Roensch J, Joanny JF, Paluch E. 2009. Role of cortical tension in bleb growth. PNAS 106:4418581–86 [Google Scholar]
114. Tjhung E, Tiribocchi A, Marenduzzo D, Cates ME. 2015. A minimal physical model captures the shapes of crawling cells. Nat. Commun. 6:5420 [Google Scholar]
115. Tozluoğlu M, Tournier AL, Jenkins RP, Hooper S, Bates PA, Sahai E. 2013. Matrix geometry determines optimal cancer cell migration strategy and modulates response to interventions. Nat. Cell Biol. 15:7751–62 [Google Scholar]
116. Trong PK, Doerflinger H, Dunkel J, St. Johnston D, Goldstein RE. 2015. Cortical microtubule nucleation can organise the cytoskeleton of Drosophila oocytes to define the anteroposterior axis. eLife 4:e06088 [Google Scholar]
117. Vanderlei B, Feng JJ, Edelstein-Keshet L. 2011. A computational model of cell polarization and motility coupling mechanics and biochemistry. Multiscale Model. Simul. 9:41420–43 [Google Scholar]
118. Weirich KL, Banerjee S, Dasbiswas K, Witten TA, Vaikuntanathan S, Gardel ML. 2017. Liquid behavior of cross-linked actin bundles. PNAS 114:92131–36 [Google Scholar]
119. Wolgemuth CW, Stajic J, Mogilner A. 2011. Redundant mechanisms for stable cell locomotion revealed by minimal models. Biophys. J. 101:3545–53 [Google Scholar]
120. Wolke U, Jezuit EA, Priess JR. 2007. Actin-dependent cytoplasmic streaming in C. elegans oogenesis. Development 134:122227–36 [Google Scholar]
121. Wollman R, Civelekoglu‐Scholey G, Scholey JM, Mogilner A. 2008. Reverse engineering of force integration during mitosis in the Drosophila embryo. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4:1195 [Google Scholar]
122. Woodhouse FG, Goldstein RE. 2012. Shear-driven circulation patterns in lipid membrane vesicles. J. Fluid Mech. 705:165–75 [Google Scholar]
123. Woolley TE, Gaffney EA, Oliver JM, Baker RE, Waters SL, Goriely A. 2014. Cellular blebs: pressure-driven, axisymmetric, membrane protrusions. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 13:2463–76 [Google Scholar]
124. Xie J, Hu GH. 2016. Hydrodynamic modeling of Bicoid morphogen gradient formation in Drosophila embryo. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 15:61765–73 [Google Scholar]
125. Yi K, Unruh JR, Deng M, Slaughter BD, Rubinstein B, Li R. 2011. Dynamic maintenance of asymmetric meiotic spindle position through Arp2/3-complex-driven cytoplasmic streaming in mouse oocytes. Nat. Cell Biol. 13:101252–58 [Google Scholar]
126. Young J, Mitran S. 2010. A numerical model of cellular blebbing: a volume-conserving, fluid–structure interaction model of the entire cell. J. Biomech. 43:2210–20 [Google Scholar]
127. Zajac M, Dacanay B, Mohler WA, Wolgemuth CW. 2008. Depolymerization-driven flow in nematode spermatozoa relates crawling speed to size and shape. Biophys. J. 94:103810–23 [Google Scholar]
128. Zhao J, Wang Q. 2016. A 3D multi-phase hydrodynamic model for cytokinesis of eukaryotic cells. Commun. Comput. Phys. 19:03663–81 [Google Scholar]
129. Zheng F, Basciano C, Li J, Kuznetsov AV. 2007. Fluid dynamics of cell cytokinesis—numerical analysis of intracellular flow during cell division. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 34:11–7 [Google Scholar]
130. Zhu CH, Skalak RI. 1988. A continuum model of protrusion of pseudopod in leukocytes. Biophys. J. 54:61115–37 [Google Scholar]
131. Zhu J, Mogilner A. 2016. Comparison of cell migration mechanical strategies in three-dimensional matrices: a computational study. Interface Focus 6:520160040 [Google Scholar]
132. Zicha D, Dobbie IM, Holt MR, Monypenny J, Soong DY. et al. 2003. Rapid actin transport during cell protrusion. Science 300:5616142–45 [Google Scholar]
133. Ziebert F, Aranson IS. 2013. Effects of adhesion dynamics and substrate compliance on the shape and motility of crawling cells. PLOS ONE 8:5e64511 [Google Scholar]
134. Ziebert F, Swaminathan S, Aranson IS. 2011. Model for self-polarization and motility of keratocyte fragments. J. R. Soc. Interface 9:701084–92 [Google Scholar]
135. Zumdieck A, Voituriez R, Prost J, Joanny JF. 2008. Spontaneous flow of active polar gels in undulated channels. Faraday Discuss 139:369–75 [Google Scholar]