Genomic medicine is a relatively new concept that involves using individual patients' genomic results in their clinical care. Genetic technology has advanced swiftly over the past decade, and most providers have been left behind without an understanding of this complex field. To realize its full potential, genomic medicine must be both understood and accepted by the greater medical community. The current state of professional medical education in genomics and genomic medicine is reviewed, including ongoing plans to expand educational efforts for medical students, clinical geneticists, and nongeneticist physicians.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. 1. Accredit. Counc. Grad. Med. Educ 2013. ACGME program requirements for graduate medical education in medical genetics. Accredit. Counc. Grad. Med. Educ., Chicago. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/130_medical_genetics_07012014.pdf
  2. 2. Accredit. Counc. Grad. Med. Educ., Am. Board Med. Genet 2013. The medical genetics milestone project. Accredit. Counc. Grad. Med. Educ., Chicago. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/MedicalGeneticsMilestones.pdf
  3. 3. Am. Coll. Med. Genet. Genomics 2013. Mission statement. http://www.acmg.net/ACMG/About_ACMG/Mission_Statement.aspx
  4. 4. Am. Coll. Med. Genet. Genomics 2013. Using databases to interpret cytogenomic arrays: an educational CME activity. http://www.acmg.net/ACMG/Education/Cytogenomic_Array/ACMG/Education/Cytogenomic_Array/Cytogenomic_Array.aspx
  5. 5. Am. Soc. Hum. Genet 2013. About the ASHG. http://www.ashg.org/pages/about_overview.shtml
  6. 6. Assoc. Am. Med. Coll 2004. Contemporary issues in medicine: genetics education. Rep. VI, Med. Sch. Object. Proj., Assoc. Am. Med. Coll., Chicago. http://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/Contemporary%20Issues%20in%20Med%20Genetics%20Education%20Report%20VI.pdf
  7. 7. Assoc. Profr. Hum. Med. Genet. Genet. Competencies Work. Group 2013. Medical school core curriculum in genetics 2013. Assoc. Profr. Hum. Med. Genet., Bethesda, MD. http://aphmg.org/pdf/Med%20Competencies.pdf
  8. Evans JP, Khoury MJ. 8.  2013. The arrival of genomic medicine to the clinic is only the beginning of the journey. Genet. Med. 15:268–69 [Google Scholar]
  9. Feero WG, Green ED. 9.  2011. Genomics education for health care professionals in the 21st century. JAMA 306:989–90 [Google Scholar]
  10. 10. Genet. Prim. Care Inst 2013. Dive into the gene pool: integrating genetics and genomics into your pediatric primary care practice. http://www.geneticsinprimarycare.org/Provider%20Education/Pages/Dive-into-the-Gene-Pool.aspx
  11. 11. Int. HapMap Consort 2003. The International HapMap Project. Nature 426:789–96 [Google Scholar]
  12. Korf BR. 12.  2011. Genetics and genomics education: the next generation. Genet. Med. 13:201–2 [Google Scholar]
  13. Korf BR, Irons M, Watson MS. 13.  2011. Competencies for the physician medical geneticist in the 21st century. Genet. Med. 13:911–12 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, Nussbaum C, Zody MC. 14.  et al. 2001. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409:860–921 [Google Scholar]
  15. Manolio TA. 15.  2010. Genomewide association studies and assessment of the risk of disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 363:166–76 [Google Scholar]
  16. Manolio TA, Rex LC, Ozenberger B, Roden DM, Williams MS. 16.  et al. 2013. Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: The future is here. Genet. Med. 15:258–67 [Google Scholar]
  17. Marshall E. 17.  2011. Waiting for the revolution. Science 331:526–29 [Google Scholar]
  18. Murray M. 18.  2013. American College of Physicians Presented at Natl. Hum. Genome Res. Inst. Genomic Med. Cent. Meet. IV: Physician Educ. Genomics, Jan. 29, Dallas, TX. http://www.genome.gov/Multimedia/Slides/GM4/GM4_09_Murray.pdf
  19. 19. Natl. Coalit. Health Prof. Educ. Genet 2013. About NCHPEG. http://www.nchpeg.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=83&Itemid=57
  20. 20. Natl. Hum. Genome Res. Inst 2013. Inter-Society Coordinating Committee for Practitioner Education in Genomics (ISCC-PEG): proposed charge, goals, activities and metrics. http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/ResearchFunding/DGM/ISCC_Description.pdf
  21. 21. Natl. Inst. Health 2013. NIH funds new grants exploring use of genome sequencing in patient care. News Release, July 13. http://www.nih.gov/news/health/jul2013/nhgri-23.htm
  22. Plon SE, Cooper HP, Parks B, Dhar SU, Kelly PA. 22.  et al. 2011. Genetic testing and cancer risk management recommendations by physicians for at-risk relatives. Genet. Med. 13:148–54 [Google Scholar]
  23. Salari K, Karzewski K, Hudgins L, Ormond K. 23.  2013. Evidence that personal genome testing enhances student learning in a course on genomics and personalized medicine. PLoS ONE 8:e68853 [Google Scholar]
  24. Salari K, Pizzo PA, Prober CG. 24.  2011. To genotype or not to genotype? Addressing the debate through the development of a genomics and personalized medicine curriculum. Acad. Med. 86:925–27 [Google Scholar]
  25. Scheuner MT, Sieverding P, Shekelle PG. 25.  2008. Delivery of genomic medicine for common chronic adult diseases: a systematic review. JAMA 299:1320–34 [Google Scholar]
  26. Scott SS. 26.  2011. Personalizing medicine with clinical pharmacogenetics. Genet. Med. 13:987–95 [Google Scholar]
  27. Sharp RR, Goldlust ME, Eng C. 27.  2011. Addressing gaps in physician education using personal genomic testing. Genet. Med. 13:750–51 [Google Scholar]
  28. Thurston VC, Wales PA, Bell MA, Torbeck L, Brokaw JJ. 28.  2007. The current status of medical genetics instruction in U.S. and Canadian medical schools. Acad. Med. 82:441–45 [Google Scholar]
  29. 29. US Gov. Account. Off 2010. Direct-to-consumer genetic tests: Misleading test results are further complicated by deceptive marketing and other questionable practices. Rep. GAO-10-847T, US Gov. Account. Off., Washington, DC. http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-847T
  30. Walt DR, Kuhlik A, Epstein SK, Demmer LA, Knight M. 30.  et al. 2011. Lessons learned from the introduction of personalized genotyping into a medical school curriculum. Genet. Med. 13:63–66 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error