1932

Abstract

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) accounts for ∼50% of mortality after myocardial infarction (MI). Most SCDs result from ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and the tachycardias that precipitate cardiac arrest result from multiple mechanisms. As a result, it is highly unlikely that any single test will identify all patients at risk for SCD. Current guidelines for use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) to prevent SCD are based primarily on measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Although reduced LVEF is associated with increased total cardiac mortality after MI, the focus of current guidelines on LVEF omits ∼50% of patients who die suddenly. In addition, there is no evidence of a mechanistic link between reduced LVEF and arrhythmias. Thus, LVEF is neither sensitive nor specific as a tool for post-MI risk stratification. Newer tests to screen for predisposition to ventricular arrhythmias and SCD examine abnormalities of ventricular repolarization, autonomic nervous system function, and electrical heterogeneity. These tests, as well as older methods such as programmed stimulation, the signal-averaged electrocardiogram, and spontaneous ventricular ectopy, do not perform well in patients with LVEF ≤30%. Recent observational studies suggest, however, that these tests may have greater utility in patients with LVEF >30%. Because SCD results from multiple mechanisms, it is likely that combinations of risk factors will prove more precise for risk stratification. Prospective trials that evaluate the performance of risk stratification schema to determine ICD use are necessary for cost-effective reduction of the incidence of SCD after MI.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-med-041316-090046
2018-01-29
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/med/69/1/annurev-med-041316-090046.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-med-041316-090046&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Botkin NF, Spencer FA, Goldberg RJ. 1.  et al. 2006. Changing trends in the long-term prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective. Am. Heart J. 151:199–205 [Google Scholar]
  2. Yeh RW, Sidney S, Chandra M. 2.  et al. 2010. Population trends in the incidence and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 362:2155–65 [Google Scholar]
  3. Capewell S, Murphy NF, MacIntyre K. 3.  et al. 2006. Short-term and long-term outcomes in 133,429 emergency patients admitted with angina or myocardial infarction in Scotland, 1990–2000: population-based cohort study. Heart 92:1563–70 [Google Scholar]
  4. Zheng Z-J, Croft JB, Giles WH, Mensah GA. 4.  2001. Sudden cardiac death in the United States, 1989 to 1998. Circulation 104:2158–63 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cairns JA, Connolly SJ, Roberts R, Gent M. 5.  1997. Randomised trial of outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with frequent or repetitive ventricular premature depolarisations: CAMIAT. Canadian Amiodarone Myocardial Infarction Arrhythmia Trial Investigators. Lancet 349:675–82 [Google Scholar]
  6. Huikuri HV, Tapanainen JM, Lindgren K. 6.  et al. 2003. Prediction of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction in the beta-blocking era. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 42:652–58 [Google Scholar]
  7. Myerburg RJ, Fenster J, Velez M. 7.  et al. 2002. Impact of community-wide police car deployment of automated external defibrillators on survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 106:1058–64 [Google Scholar]
  8. Exner DV, Kavanagh KM, Slawnych MP. 8.  et al. 2007. Noninvasive risk assessment early after a myocardial infarction: the REFINE study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 50:2275–84 [Google Scholar]
  9. Buxton A, Hafley G, Lee K. 9.  et al. 2002. Relation of ejection fraction and inducible ventricular tachycardia to mode of death in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 106:2466–72 [Google Scholar]
  10. Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS. 10.  et al. 1996. Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. N. Engl. J. Med. 335:1933–40 [Google Scholar]
  11. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ. 11.  et al. 2002. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N. Engl. J. Med. 346:877–83 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB. 12.  et al. 2005. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 352:225–37 [Google Scholar]
  13. Moss AJ, Benhorin J. 13.  1990. Prognosis and management after a first myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 322:743–53 [Google Scholar]
  14. Solomon SD, Zelenkofske S, McMurray JJ. 14.  et al. 2005. Sudden cardiac death in patients with myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or both. N. Engl. J. Med. 352:2581–88 [Google Scholar]
  15. Pouleur AC, Barkoudah E, Uno H. 15.  et al. 2010. Pathogenesis of sudden unexpected death in a clinical trial of patients with myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or both. Circulation 122:597–602 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gorgels APM, Gijsbers C, de Vreede-Swagemakers J. 16.  et al. 2003. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-the relevance of heart failure. The Maastricht Circulatory Arrest Registry. Eur. Heart J. 24:1204–9 [Google Scholar]
  17. Davies MJ, Thomas A. 17.  1984. Thrombosis and acute coronary-artery lesions in sudden cardiac ischemic death. N. Engl. J. Med. 310:1137–40 [Google Scholar]
  18. Myerburg RJ, Interian A Jr., Simmons J, Castellanos A. 18.  2004. Sudden cardiac death. Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside DP Zipes, J Jalife 720–31 Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 4th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  19. Farb A, Burke AP, Tang AL. 19.  et al. 1996. Coronary plaque erosion without rupture into a lipid core: a frequent cause of coronary thrombosis in sudden coronary death. Circulation 93:1354–63 [Google Scholar]
  20. Josephson M, Horowitz L, Spielman S, Greenspan A. 20.  1980. Electrophysiologic and hemodynamic studies in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. Am. J. Cardiol. 46:948–55 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ruskin J, DiMarco J, Garan H. 21.  1980. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: electrophysiologic observations and selection of long-term antiarrhythmic therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 303:607–13 [Google Scholar]
  22. Pogwizd SM. 22.  1995. Nonreentrant mechanisms underlying spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias in a model of nonischemic heart failure in rabbits. Circulation 92:1034–48 [Google Scholar]
  23. Wolk R. 23.  2000. Arrhythmogenic mechanisms in left ventricular hypertrophy. Europace 2:216–23 [Google Scholar]
  24. Tracy C, Winkler J, Brittain E. 24.  et al. 1987. Determinants of ventricular arrhythmias in mildly symptomatic patients with coronary artery disease and influence of inducible left ventricular dysfunction on arrhythmia frequency. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 9:483–88 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mahmarian JJ. 25.  2007. Computed tomography coronary angiography as an anatomic basis for risk stratification: deja vu or something new?. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 50:1171–73 [Google Scholar]
  26. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB. 26.  et al. 2007. Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 50:1161–70 [Google Scholar]
  27. Holmes D, Davis K, Gersh BJ. 27.  et al. 1989. Risk factor profiles of patients with sudden cardiac death and death from other cardiac causes: a report from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 13:524–30 [Google Scholar]
  28. Bigger JTJ. 28.  1997. Prophylactic use of implanted cardiac defibrillators in patients at high risk for ventricular arrhythmias after coronary-artery bypass graft surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 337:1569–75 [Google Scholar]
  29. Goldenberg I, Moss AJ, McNitt S. 29.  et al. 2006. Time dependence of defibrillator benefit after coronary revascularization in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT)-II. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 47:1811–17 [Google Scholar]
  30. Elhendy A, Chapman S, Porter TR, Windle J. 30.  2005. Association of myocardial ischemia with mortality and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in patients with coronary artery disease at risk of arrhythmic death. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 46:1721–26 [Google Scholar]
  31. Uretsky BF, Thygesen K, Armstrong PW. 31.  et al. 2000. Acute coronary findings at autopsy in heart failure patients with sudden death: results from the assessment of treatment with lisinopril and survival (ATLAS) trial. Circulation 102:611–16 [Google Scholar]
  32. Denes P, Gillis AM, Pawitan Y. 32.  et al. 1991. Prevalence, characteristics and significance of ventricular premature complexes and ventricular tachycardia detected by 24-hour continuous electrocardiographic recording in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. CAST Investigators. Am. J. Cardiol. 68:887–96 [Google Scholar]
  33. Bigger JT, Fleiss JL, Kleiger R. 33.  et al. 1984. The relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality in the 2 years after myocardial infarction. Circulation 69:250–58 [Google Scholar]
  34. Maggioni AP, Zuanetti G, Franzosi MG. 34.  et al. 1993. Prevalence and prognostic significance of ventricular arrhythmias after acute myocardial infarction in the fibrinolytic era. GISSI-2 results. Circulation 87:312–22 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hohnloser SH, Klingenheben T, Zabel M. 35.  et al. 1999. Prevalence, characteristics and prognostic value during long-term follow-up of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 33:1895–902 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hofsten D, Wachtell K, Lund B. 36.  et al. DANAMI-2 Investigators 2007. Prevalence and prognostic implications of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia after revascularization with either fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty. Eur. Heart J. 28:407–14 [Google Scholar]
  37. Freedman RA, Alderman EL, Sheffield LT. 37.  et al. 1987. Bundle branch block in patients with chronic coronary artery disease: angiographic correlates and prognostic significance. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 10:73–80 [Google Scholar]
  38. Zimetbaum PJ, Buxton AE, Batsford W. 38.  et al. 2004. Electrocardiographic predictors of arrhythmic death and total mortality in the Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial. Circulation 110:766–69 [Google Scholar]
  39. Buxton AE, Sweeney MO, Wathen MS. 39.  et al. 2005. QRS duration does not predict occurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 46:310–16 [Google Scholar]
  40. Siscovick DS, Raghunathan TE, Rautaharju P. 40.  et al. 1996. Clinically silent electrocardiographic abnormalities and risk of primary cardiac arrest among hypertensive patients. Circulation 94:1329–33 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schwartz PJ, Wolf S. 41.  1978. QT interval prolongation as predictor of sudden death in patients with myocardial infarction. Circulation 57:1074–77 [Google Scholar]
  42. Peters RW, Byington RP, Barker AH, Yusuf S. 42.  1990. Prognostic value of prolonged ventricular repolarization following myocardial infarction: the BHAT experience. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 43:167–72 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kusmirek SL, Gold MR. 43.  2007. Sudden cardiac death: the role of risk stratification. Am. Heart J. 153:S25–S33 [Google Scholar]
  44. Malik M, Batchvarov VN. 44.  2000. Measurement, interpretation and clinical potential of QT dispersion. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 36:1749–66 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sanz G, Castañer A, Betriu A. 45.  et al. 1982. Determinants of prognosis in survivors of myocardial infarction: a prospective clinical angiographic study. N. Engl. J. Med. 306:1065–70 [Google Scholar]
  46. 46. The Multicenter Postinfarction Research Group. 1983. Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J. Med. 309:331–36 [Google Scholar]
  47. Halkin A, Stone GW, Dixon S. 47.  et al. 2005. Impact and determinants of left ventricular function in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 96:325–31 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sjöblom J, Muhrbeck J, Witt N. 48.  et al. 2014. Evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction: implications for implantable defibrillator eligibility. Circulation 130:743–48 [Google Scholar]
  49. Rouleau J, Talajic M, Sussex B. 49.  et al. 1996. Myocardial infarction patients in the 1990s—their risk factors, stratification and survival in Canada: the Canadian Assessment of Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 27:1119–27 [Google Scholar]
  50. Yap YG, Duong T, Bland JM. 50.  et al. 2007. Optimising the dichotomy limit for left ventricular ejection fraction in selecting patients for defibrillator therapy after myocardial infarction. Heart 93:832–36 [Google Scholar]
  51. Copie X, Hnatkova K, Staunton A. 51.  et al. 1996. Predictive power of increased heart rate versus depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and heart rate variability for risk stratification after myocardial infarction. Results of a two-year follow-up study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 27:270–76 [Google Scholar]
  52. Mukharji J, Rude RE, Poole WK. 52.  et al. 1984. Risk factors for sudden death after acute myocardial infarction: two-year follow-up. Am. J. Cardiol. 54:31–36 [Google Scholar]
  53. Farrell TG, Bashir Y, Cripps T. 53.  et al. 1991. Risk stratification for arrhythmic events in postinfarction patients based on heart rate variability, ambulatory electrocardiographic variables and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 18:687–97 [Google Scholar]
  54. Richards DA, Byth K, Ross DL, Uther JB. 54.  1991. What is the best predictor of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and sudden death after myocardial infarction?. Circulation 83:756–63 [Google Scholar]
  55. Bauer A, Guzik P, Barthel P. 55.  et al. 2005. Reduced prognostic power of ventricular late potentials in post-infarction patients of the reperfusion era. Eur. Heart J. 26:755–61 [Google Scholar]
  56. Bauer A, Barthel P, Schneider R. 56.  et al. 2009. Improved stratification of autonomic regulation for risk prediction in post-infarction patients with preserved left ventricular function (ISAR-Risk). Eur. Heart J. 30:576–83 [Google Scholar]
  57. Makikallio TH, Barthel P, Schneider R. 57.  et al. 2005. Prediction of sudden cardiac death after acute myocardial infarction: role of Holter monitoring in the modern treatment era. Eur. Heart J. 26:762–69 [Google Scholar]
  58. Bourke JP, Richards DA, Ross DL. 61.  et al. 1991. Routine programmed electrical stimulation in survivors of acute myocardial infarction for prediction of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias during follow-up: results, optimal stimulation protocol and cost-effective screening. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 18:780–88 [Google Scholar]
  59. Exner DV, Kavanagh KM, Slawnych MP. 76.  et al. 2007. Noninvasive risk assessment early after a myocardial infarction: the REFINE study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 50:2275–84 [Google Scholar]
  60. Bello D, Fieno DS, Kim RJ. 58.  et al. 2005. Infarct morphology identifies patients with substrate for sustained ventricular tachycardia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 45:1104–8 [Google Scholar]
  61. Levine YC, Matos J, Rosenberg MA. 59.  et al. 2016. Left ventricular sphericity independently predicts appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Heart Rhythm 13:490–97 [Google Scholar]
  62. Bourke J, Richards D, Ross D. 60.  et al. 1995. Does the induction of ventricular flutter or fibrillation at electrophysiologic testing after myocardial infarction have any prognostic significance?. Am. J. Cardiol. 75:431–35 [Google Scholar]
  63. Marchlinski F, Buxton A, Waxman H, Josephson M. 62.  1983. Identifying patients at risk of sudden death after myocardial infarction: value of the response to programmed stimulation, degree of ventricular ectopic activity and severity of left ventricular dysfunction. Am. J. Cardiol. 52:1190–96 [Google Scholar]
  64. Nogami A, Aonuma K, Takahashi A. 63.  et al. 1991. Usefulness of early versus late programmed ventricular stimulation in acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 68:13–20 [Google Scholar]
  65. Richards D, Cody D, Denniss A. 64.  et al. 1983. Ventricular electrical instability: a predictor of death after myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 51:75–80 [Google Scholar]
  66. Roy D, Marchand E, Theroux P. 65.  et al. 1985. Programmed ventricular stimulation in survivors of an acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 72:487–94 [Google Scholar]
  67. Bailey JJ, Berson AS, Handelsman H, Hodges M. 66.  2001. Utility of current risk stratification tests for predicting major arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 38:1902–11 [Google Scholar]
  68. Buxton A, Marchlinski F, Waxman H. 67.  et al. 1984. Prognostic factors in nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Am. J. Cardiol. 53:1275–79 [Google Scholar]
  69. Buxton AE, Marchlinski FE, Flores BT. 68.  et al. 1987. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease: role of electrophysiologic study. Circulation 75:1178–85 [Google Scholar]
  70. Buxton AE, Lee KL, DiCarlo L. 69.  et al. 2000. Electrophysiologic testing to identify patients with coronary artery disease who are at risk for sudden death. N. Engl. J. Med. 342:1937–45 [Google Scholar]
  71. De Ferrari GM, Rordorf R, Frattini F. 70.  et al. 2007. Predictive value of programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: implications for the selection of candidates for an implantable defibrillator. Europace 9:1151–57 [Google Scholar]
  72. Daubert JP, Zareba W, Hall WJ. 71.  et al. 2006. Predictive value of ventricular arrhythmia inducibility for subsequent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 47:98–107 [Google Scholar]
  73. Costantini O, Hohnloser SH, Kirk MM. 72.  et al. 2009. The ABCD (Alternans Before Cardioverter Defibrillator) Trial: strategies using T-wave alternans to improve efficiency of sudden cardiac death prevention. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 53:471–79 [Google Scholar]
  74. Zaman S, Narayan A, Thiagalingam A. 73.  et al. 2014. Long-term arrhythmia-free survival in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and no inducible ventricular tachycardia post myocardial infarction. Circulation 129:8848–54 [Google Scholar]
  75. Kuchar DL, Thorburn CW, Sammel NL. 74.  1987. Prediction of serious arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction: signal-averaged electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring and radionuclide ventriculography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 9:531–38 [Google Scholar]
  76. La Rovere MT, Pinna GD, Hohnloser SH. 75.  et al. 2001. Baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability in the identification of patients at risk for life-threatening arrhythmias: implications for clinical trials. Circulation 103:2072–77 [Google Scholar]
  77. Goldenberg I, Vyas AK, Hall WJ. 77.  et al. 2007. Risk stratification for primary implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 51:288–96 [Google Scholar]
  78. Setoguchi S, Glynn RJ, Avorn J. 78.  et al. 2008. Improvements in long-term mortality after myocardial infarction and increased use of cardiovascular drugs after discharge: a 10-year trend analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 51:1247–54 [Google Scholar]
  79. Buxton AE, Lee KL, Hafley GE. 79.  et al. 2007. Limitations of ejection fraction for prediction of sudden death risk in patients with coronary artery disease. Lessons from the MUSTT study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 50:1150–57 [Google Scholar]
  80. Goldenberg I, Vyas AK, Hall WJ. 80.  et al. 2008. Risk stratification for primary implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 51:288–96 [Google Scholar]
  81. Levy WC, Mozaffarian D, Linker DT. 81.  et al. 2006. The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure. Circulation 113:1424–33 [Google Scholar]
  82. Levy WC, Lee KL, Hellkamp AS. 82.  et al. 2009. Maximizing survival benefit with primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in a heart failure population. Circulation 120:835–42 [Google Scholar]
  83. Shadman R, Poole JE, Dardas TF. 83.  et al. 2015. A novel method to predict the proportional risk of sudden cardiac death in heart failure: derivation of the Seattle Proportional Risk Model. Heart Rhythm 12:2069–77 [Google Scholar]
  84. Breithardt G, Cain ME, El-Sherif N. 84.  et al. 1991. Standards for analysis of ventricular late potentials using high-resolution or signal-averaged electrocardiography: a statement by a task force committee of the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 17:999–1006 [Google Scholar]
  85. El-Sherif N, Denes P, Katz R. 85.  et al. 1995. Definition of the best prediction criteria of the time domain signal-averaged electrocardiogram for serious arrhythmic events in the postinfarction period. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 25:908–14 [Google Scholar]
  86. Steinberg JS, Hochman JS, Morgan CD. 86.  et al. 1994. Effects of thrombolytic therapy administered 6 to 24 hours after myocardial infarction on the signal-averaged ECG. Results of a multicenter randomized trial. LATE ancillary study investigators. Late Assessment of Thrombolytic Efficacy. Circulation 90:746–52 [Google Scholar]
  87. Gomes J, Cain M, Buxton A. 87.  et al. 2001. Prediction of long-term outcomes by signal-averaged electrocardiography in patients with unsustained ventricular tachycardia, coronary artery disease, and left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 104:436–41 [Google Scholar]
  88. de Chillou C, Sadoul N, Bizeau O. 88.  et al. 1997. Prognostic value of thrombolysis, coronary artery patency, signal-averaged electrocardiography, left ventricular ejection fraction, and Holter electrocardiographic monitoring for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias after a first acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 80:852–58 [Google Scholar]
  89. Nearing BD, Verrier RL. 89.  2002. Modified moving average analysis of T-wave alternans to predict ventricular fibrillation with high accuracy. J. Appl. Physiol. 92:541–49 [Google Scholar]
  90. Weiss JN, Karma A, Shiferaw Y. 90.  et al. 2006. From pulsus to pulseless: the saga of cardiac alternans. Circ. Res. 98:1244–53 [Google Scholar]
  91. Walker ML, Rosenbaum DS. 91.  2003. Repolarization alternans: implications for the mechanism and prevention of sudden cardiac death. Cardiovasc. Res. 57:599–614 [Google Scholar]
  92. Gehi AK, Stein RH, Metz LD, Gomes JA. 92.  2005. Microvolt T-wave alternans for the risk stratification of ventricular tachyarrhythmic events: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 46:75–82 [Google Scholar]
  93. Gold MR, Ip JH, Costantini O. 93.  et al. 2008. Role of microvolt T-wave alternans in assessment of arrhythmia vulnerability among patients with heart failure and systolic dysfunction: primary results from the T-wave alternans sudden cardiac death in heart failure trial substudy. Circulation 118:202022–28 [Google Scholar]
  94. Chow T, Kereiakes DJ, Onufer J. 94.  et al. 2008. Does microvolt T-wave alternans testing predict ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and prophylactic defibrillators?. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 52:1607–15 [Google Scholar]
  95. Ikeda T, Yoshino H, Sugi K. 95.  et al. 2006. Predictive value of microvolt T-wave alternans for sudden cardiac death in patients with preserved cardiac function after acute myocardial infarction: results of a collaborative cohort study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 48:2268–74 [Google Scholar]
  96. Al-Khatib SM, Sanders GD, Bigger JT. 96.  et al. 2007. Preventing tomorrow's sudden cardiac death today: part I: current data on risk stratification for sudden cardiac death. Am. Heart J. 153:941–50 [Google Scholar]
  97. Lahiri MK, Kannankeril PJ, Goldberger JJ. 97.  2008. Assessment of autonomic function in cardiovascular disease: physiological basis and prognostic implications. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 51:1725–33 [Google Scholar]
  98. Schmidt G, Malik M, Barthel P. 98.  et al. 1999. Heart-rate turbulence after ventricular premature beats as a predictor of mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 353:1390–96 [Google Scholar]
  99. Farrell TG, Paul V, Cripps TR. 99.  et al. 1991. Baroreflex sensitivity and electrophysiological correlates in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 83:945–52 [Google Scholar]
  100. De Ferrari GM Sanzo A, Bertoletti A. 100.  et al. 2007. Baroreflex sensitivity predicts long-term cardiovascular mortality after myocardial infarction even in patients with preserved left ventricular function. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 50:2285–90 [Google Scholar]
  101. Malhotra S, Canty JM Jr. 101.  2016. Life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias: current role of imaging in diagnosis and risk assessment. J. Nuclear Cardiol. 23:1322–34 [Google Scholar]
  102. Jacobson AF, Senior R, Cerqueira MD. 102.  et al. 2010. Myocardial iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine imaging and cardiac events in heart failure. Results of the prospective ADMIRE-HF (AdreView Myocardial Imaging for Risk Evaluation in Heart Failure) study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 55:2212–21 [Google Scholar]
  103. Fallavollita JA, Heavey BM, Luisi AJ Jr.. 103.  et al. 2014. Regional myocardial sympathetic denervation predicts the risk of sudden cardiac arrest in ischemic cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 63:141–49 [Google Scholar]
  104. Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA. 104.  et al. 2008. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 51:e1–62 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-med-041316-090046
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-med-041316-090046
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error