1932

Abstract

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), once believed to be safe for patients with renal disease, have been strongly associated with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), a severe systemic fibrosing disorder that predominantly afflicts individuals with advanced renal dysfunction. We provide a historical perspective on the appearance and disappearance of NSF, including its initial recognition as a discrete clinical entity, its association with GBCA exposure, and the data supporting a causative relationship between GBCA exposure and NSF. On the basis of this body of evidence, we propose that the name gadolinium-induced fibrosis (GIF) more accurately reflects the totality of knowledge regarding this disease. Use of high-risk GBCAs, such as formulated gadodiamide, should be avoided in patients with renal disease. Restriction of GBCA use in this population has almost completely eradicated new cases of this debilitating condition. Emerging antifibrotic therapies may be useful for patients who suffer from GIF.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-med-063014-124936
2016-01-14
2024-07-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/med/67/1/annurev-med-063014-124936.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-med-063014-124936&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Carr DH, Brown J, Bydder GM. 1.  et al. 1984. Gadolinium-DTPA as a contrast agent in MRI: initial clinical experience in 20 patients. Am. J. Roentgenol. 143:215–24 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein EJ, Kay J. 2.  2011. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a fibrosing disorder induced by gadolinium exposure. Int. J. Adv. Rheumatol. 9:4123–33 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cowper SE, Robin HS, Steinberg SM. 3.  et al. 2000. Scleromyxoedema-like cutaneous diseases in renal-dialysis patients. Lancet 356:1000–1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cowper SE, Su LD, Bhawan J. 4.  et al. 2001. Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy. Am. J. Dermatopathol. 23:383–93 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ting WW, Stone MS, Madison KC, Kurtz K. 5.  2003. Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy with systemic involvement. Arch. Dermatol. 139:903–6 [Google Scholar]
  6. Jimenez SA, Artlett CM, Sandorfi N. 6.  et al. 2004. Dialysis-associated systemic fibrosis (nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy): study of inflammatory cells and transforming growth factor beta1 expression in affected skin. Arthritis Rheum. 50:2660–66 [Google Scholar]
  7. Moschella SL, Kay J, Mackool BT, Liu V. 7.  2004. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises. Case 35–2004. A 68-year-old man with end-stage renal disease and thickening of the skin. N. Engl. J. Med. 351:2219–27 [Google Scholar]
  8. Todd DJ, Kagan A, Chibnik LB, Kay J. 8.  2007. Cutaneous changes of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: predictor of early mortality and association with gadolinium exposure. Arthritis Rheum. 56:3433–41 [Google Scholar]
  9. Grobner T. 9.  2006. Gadolinium—a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis?. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 21:1104–8 [Google Scholar]
  10. Collidge TA, Thomson PC, Mark PB. 10.  et al. 2007. Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: retrospective study of a renal replacement therapy cohort. Radiology 245:168–75 [Google Scholar]
  11. Marckmann P, Skov L, Rossen K. 11.  et al. 2007. Case-control study of gadodiamide-related nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 22:3174–78 [Google Scholar]
  12. 12. US Food and Drug Administration 2007. FDA requests boxed warning for contrast agents used to improve MRI images News release. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/2007/ucm108919.htm [Google Scholar]
  13. High WA, Ayers RA, Chandler J. 13.  et al. 2007. Gadolinium is detectable within the tissue of patients with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 56:21–26 [Google Scholar]
  14. Abraham JL, Thakral C, Skov L. 14.  et al. 2008. Dermal inorganic gadolinium concentrations: evidence for in vivo transmetallation and long-term persistence in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Br. J. Dermatol. 158:273–80 [Google Scholar]
  15. Wermuth PJ, Del Galdo F, Jimenez SA. 15.  2009. Induction of the expression of profibrotic cytokines and growth factors in normal human peripheral blood monocytes by gadolinium contrast agents. Arthritis Rheum. 60:1508–18 [Google Scholar]
  16. Sieber MA, Lengsfeld P, Frenzel T. 16.  et al. 2008. Preclinical investigation to compare different gadolinium-based contrast agents regarding their propensity to release gadolinium in vivo and to trigger nephrogenic systemic fibrosis-like lesions. Eur. Radiol. 18:2164–73 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jain SM, Canova E, Hoy M. 17.  et al. 2004. Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy in pediatric patients. Pediatr. Nephrol. 19:467–70 [Google Scholar]
  18. Prince MR, Zhang H, Morris M. 18.  et al. 2008. Incidence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis at two large medical centers. Radiology 248:807–16 [Google Scholar]
  19. Sadowski EA, Bennett LK, Chan MR. 19.  et al. 2007. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. Radiology 243:148–57 [Google Scholar]
  20. 20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2007. Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy associated with exposure to gadolinium-containing contrast agents—St. Louis, Missouri, 2002–2006. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 56:137–41 [Google Scholar]
  21. Cassis TB, Jackson JM, Sonnier GB, Callen JP. 21.  2006. Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy in a patient with acute renal failure never requiring dialysis. Int. J. Dermatol. 45:56–59 [Google Scholar]
  22. Girardi M, Kay J, Elston DM. 22.  et al. 2011. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: clinicopathological definition and workup recommendations. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 65:1095–106.e7 [Google Scholar]
  23. Perez-Rodriguez J, Lai S, Ehst BD. 23.  et al. 2009. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: incidence, associations, and effect of risk factor assessment—report of 33 cases. Radiology 250:371–77 [Google Scholar]
  24. Barker-Griffith A, Goldberg J, Abraham JL. 24.  2011. Ocular pathologic features and gadolinium deposition in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Arch. Ophthalmol. 129:661–63 [Google Scholar]
  25. Swaminathan S, High WA, Ranville J. 25.  et al. 2008. Cardiac and vascular metal deposition with high mortality in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Kidney Int. 73:1413–18 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kucher C, Steere J, Elenitsas R. 26.  et al. 2006. Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy/nephrogenic systemic fibrosis with diaphragmatic involvement in a patient with respiratory failure. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 54:S31–S34 [Google Scholar]
  27. Broome DR. 27.  2008. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis associated with gadolinium based contrast agents: a summary of the medical literature reporting. Eur. J. Radiol. 66:230–34 [Google Scholar]
  28. Evenepoel P, Zeegers M, Segaert S. 28.  et al. 2004. Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy: a novel, disabling disorder in patients with renal failure. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 19:469–73 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hershko K, Hull C, Ettefagh L. 29.  et al. 2004. A variant of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy with osteoclast-like giant cells: a syndrome of dysregulated matrix remodeling?. J. Cutan. Pathol. 31:262–65 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kartono F, Basile A, Roshdieh B. 30.  et al. 2011. Findings of osseous sclerotic bodies: a unique sequence of cutaneous bone formation in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. J. Cutan. Pathol. 38:286–89 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kucher C, Xu X, Pasha T, Elenitsas R. 31.  2005. Histopathologic comparison of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and scleromyxedema. J. Cutan. Pathol. 32:484–90 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kay J. 32.  2008. What causes nephrogenic systemic fibrosis?. Dial. Transplant. 37:395–98 [Google Scholar]
  33. Behra-Miellet J, Gressier B, Brunet C. 33.  et al. 1996. Free gadolinium and gadodiamide, a gadolinium chelate used in magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of their in vitro effects on human neutrophil viability. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 18:437–42 [Google Scholar]
  34. Spencer A, Wilson S, Harpur E. 34.  1998. Gadolinium chloride toxicity in the mouse. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 17:633–37 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lansman JB. 35.  1990. Blockade of current through single calcium channels by trivalent lanthanide cations. Effect of ionic radius on the rates of ion entry and exit. J. Gen. Physiol. 95:679–96 [Google Scholar]
  36. Boyd AS, Zic JA, Abraham JL. 36.  2007. Gadolinium deposition in nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 56:27–30 [Google Scholar]
  37. Idee JM, Port M, Robic C. 37.  et al. 2009. Role of thermodynamic and kinetic parameters in gadolinium chelate stability. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 30:1249–58 [Google Scholar]
  38. Idee JM, Port M, Dencausse A. 38.  et al. 2009. Involvement of gadolinium chelates in the mechanism of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: an update. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 47:855–69 [Google Scholar]
  39. Van Wagoner M, O'Toole M, Worah D. 39.  et al. 1991. A phase I clinical trial with gadodiamide injection, a nonionic magnetic resonance imaging enhancement agent. Investig. Radiol. 26:980–86 [Google Scholar]
  40. Joffe P, Thomsen HS, Meusel M. 40.  1998. Pharmacokinetics of gadodiamide injection in patients with severe renal insufficiency and patients undergoing hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Acad. Radiol. 5:491–502 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schuhmann-Giampieri G, Krestin G. 41.  1991. Pharmacokinetics of Gd-DTPA in patients with chronic renal failure. Investig. Radiol. 26:975–79 [Google Scholar]
  42. Gibby WA, Gibby KA. 42.  2004. Comparison of Gd DTPA-BMA (Omniscan) versus Gd HP-DO3A (ProHance) retention in human bone tissue by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. Investig. Radiol. 39:138–42 [Google Scholar]
  43. Frenzel T, Lengsfeld P, Schirmer H. 43.  et al. 2008. Stability of gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents in human serum at 37 degrees C. Investig. Radiol. 43:817–28 [Google Scholar]
  44. Bernstein EJ, Isakova T, Sullivan ME. 44.  et al. 2014. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is associated with hypophosphataemia: a case-control study. Rheumatology 53:1613–17 [Google Scholar]
  45. Idee JM, Fretellier N, Robic C, Corot C. 45.  2014. The role of gadolinium chelates in the mechanism of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a critical update. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 44:895–913 [Google Scholar]
  46. Arsenault TM, King BF, Marsh JW Jr. 46.  et al. 1996. Systemic gadolinium toxicity in patients with renal insufficiency and renal failure: retrospective analysis of an initial experience. Mayo Clin. Proc. 71:1150–54 [Google Scholar]
  47. Prince MR. 47.  1994. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 191:155–64 [Google Scholar]
  48. 48. US Food and Drug Administration 2009. Joint Meeting of the Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs and Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/CardiovascularandRenalDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM197768.pdf [Google Scholar]
  49. Maloo M, Abt P, Kashyap R. 49.  et al. 2006. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis among liver transplant recipients: a single institution experience and topic update. Am. J. Transplant. 6:2212–17 [Google Scholar]
  50. Dharnidharka VR, Wesson SK, Fennell RS. 50.  2006. Gadolinium and nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy in pediatric patients. Pediatr. Nephrol. 22:1395 [Google Scholar]
  51. Fazeli A, Lio PA, Liu V. 51.  2004. Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy: Are ACE inhibitors the missing link?. Arch. Dermatol. 140:1401 [Google Scholar]
  52. Kallen AJ, Jhung MA, Cheng S. 52.  et al. 2008. Gadolinium-containing magnetic resonance imaging contrast and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a case-control study. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 51:966–75 [Google Scholar]
  53. Lauenstein TC, Salman K, Morreira R. 53.  et al. 2007. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: center case review. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 26:1198–203 [Google Scholar]
  54. Marckmann P, Skov L, Rossen K. 54.  et al. 2006. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: suspected causative role of gadodiamide used for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 17:2359–62 [Google Scholar]
  55. Rydahl C, Thomsen HS, Marckmann P. 55.  2008. High prevalence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in chronic renal failure patients exposed to gadodiamide, a gadolinium-containing magnetic resonance contrast agent. Investig. Radiol. 43:141–44 [Google Scholar]
  56. Wertman R, Altun E, Martin DR. 56.  et al. 2008. Risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: evaluation of gadolinium chelate contrast agents at four American universities. Radiology 248:799–806 [Google Scholar]
  57. Altun E, Martin DR, Wertman R. 57.  et al. 2009. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: change in incidence following a switch in gadolinium agents and adoption of a gadolinium policy—report from two U.S. universities. Radiology 253:689–96 [Google Scholar]
  58. 58. European Medicines Agency 2010. Assessment report for gadolinium-containing contrast agents. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Referrals_document/gadolinium_31/WC500099538.pdf [Google Scholar]
  59. 59. US Food and Drug Administration 2010. FDA drug safety communication: new warnings for using gadolinium-based contrast agents in patients with kidney dysfunction. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm223966.htm [Google Scholar]
  60. Abujudeh HH, Rolls H, Kaewlai R. 60.  et al. 2009. Retrospective assessment of prevalence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) after implementation of a new guideline for the use of gadobenate dimeglumine as a sole contrast agent for magnetic resonance examination in renally impaired patients. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 30:1335–40 [Google Scholar]
  61. Broome DR, Girguis MS, Baron PW. 61.  et al. 2007. Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: why radiologists should be concerned. Am. J. Roentgenol. 188:586–92 [Google Scholar]
  62. Martin DR, Krishnamoorthy SK, Kalb B. 62.  et al. 2010. Decreased incidence of NSF in patients on dialysis after changing gadolinium contrast-enhanced MRI protocols. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 31:440–46 [Google Scholar]
  63. Wahba IM, Simpson EL, White K. 63.  2007. Gadolinium is not the only trigger for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: insights from two cases and review of the recent literature. Am. J. Transplant. 7:2425–32 [Google Scholar]
  64. Abraham JL, Thakral C. 64.  2008. Tissue distribution and kinetics of gadolinium and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Eur. J. Radiol. 66:200–7 [Google Scholar]
  65. George SJ, Webb SM, Abraham JL, Cramer SP. 65.  2010. Synchrotron X-ray analyses demonstrate phosphate-bound gadolinium in skin in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Br. J. Dermatol. 163:1077–81 [Google Scholar]
  66. Cacheris WP, Quay SC, Rocklage SM. 66.  1990. The relationship between thermodynamics and the toxicity of gadolinium complexes. Magn. Reson. Imaging 8:467–81 [Google Scholar]
  67. Franano FN, Edwards WB, Welch MJ. 67.  et al. 1995. Biodistribution and metabolism of targeted and nontargeted protein-chelate-gadolinium complexes: evidence for gadolinium dissociation in vitro and in vivo. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13:201–14 [Google Scholar]
  68. Idee JM, Port M, Raynal I. 68.  et al. 2006. Clinical and biological consequences of transmetallation induced by contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 20:563–76 [Google Scholar]
  69. Swaminathan S, Horn TD, Pellowski D. 69.  et al. 2007. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, gadolinium, and iron mobilization. N. Engl. J. Med. 357:720–22 [Google Scholar]
  70. Del Galdo F, Wermuth PJ, Addya S. 70.  et al. 2010. NFkappaB activation and stimulation of chemokine production in normal human macrophages by the gadolinium-based magnetic resonance contrast agent Omniscan: possible role in the pathogenesis of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 69:2024–33 [Google Scholar]
  71. Bhagavathula N, DaSilva M, Aslam MN. 71.  et al. 2009. Regulation of collagen turnover in human skin fibroblasts exposed to a gadolinium-based contrast agent. Investig. Radiol. 44:433–39 [Google Scholar]
  72. Edward M, Quinn JA, Mukherjee S. 72.  et al. 2008. Gadodiamide contrast agent ‘activates’ fibroblasts: a possible cause of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. J. Pathol. 214:584–93 [Google Scholar]
  73. Bhagavathula N, Dame MK, DaSilva M. 73.  et al. 2010. Fibroblast response to gadolinium: role for platelet-derived growth factor receptor. Investig. Radiol. 45:769–77 [Google Scholar]
  74. Varani J, DaSilva M, Warner RL. 74.  et al. 2009. Effects of gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents on human skin in organ culture and human skin fibroblasts. Investig. Radiol. 44:74–81 [Google Scholar]
  75. Wermuth PJ, Jimenez SA. 75.  2012. Gadolinium compounds signaling through TLR4 and TLR7 in normal human macrophages: establishment of a proinflammatory phenotype and implications for the pathogenesis of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. J. Immunol. 189:318–27 [Google Scholar]
  76. Schmidt-Lauber C, Bossaller L, Abujudeh HH. 76.  et al. 2015. Gadolinium-based compounds induce NLRP3-dependent IL-1beta production and peritoneal inflammation. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 742062–69 [Google Scholar]
  77. Harpur ES, Worah D, Hals PA. 77.  et al. 1993. Preclinical safety assessment and pharmacokinetics of gadodiamide injection, a new magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent. Investig. Radiol. 28:Suppl. 1S28–43 [Google Scholar]
  78. Do C, Barnes JL, Tan C, Wagner B. 78.  2014. Type of MRI contrast, tissue gadolinium, and fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 307:F844–55 [Google Scholar]
  79. Sato T, Ito K, Tamada T. 79.  et al. 2013. Tissue gadolinium deposition in renally impaired rats exposed to different gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents: evaluation with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Magn. Reson. Imaging 31:1412–17 [Google Scholar]
  80. Hill AB. 80.  1965. The environment and disease: association or causation?. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 58:295–300 [Google Scholar]
  81. Agarwal R, Brunelli SM, Williams K. 81.  et al. 2009. Gadolinium-based contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 24:856–63 [Google Scholar]
  82. Bernstein EJ, Schmidt-Lauber C, Kay J. 82.  2012. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a systemic fibrosing disease resulting from gadolinium exposure. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 26:489–503 [Google Scholar]
  83. Kay J, Czirjak L. 83.  2010. Gadolinium and systemic fibrosis: guilt by association. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 69:1895–97 [Google Scholar]
  84. Kurtkoti J, Snow T, Hiremagalur B. 84.  2008. Gadolinium and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: association or causation. Nephrology 13:235–41 [Google Scholar]
  85. Deng A, Martin DB, Spillane A. 85.  et al. 2010. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis with a spectrum of clinical and histopathological presentation: a disorder of aberrant dermal remodeling. J. Cutan. Pathol. 37:204–10 [Google Scholar]
  86. Abujudeh HH, Kaewlai R, Kagan A. 86.  et al. 2009. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after gadopentetate dimeglumine exposure: case series of 36 patients. Radiology 253:81–89 [Google Scholar]
  87. Amet S, Launay-Vacher V, Clement O. 87.  et al. 2014. Incidence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients undergoing dialysis after contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium-based contrast agents: the Prospective Fibrose Nephrogénique Systémique study. Investig. Radiol. 49:109–15 [Google Scholar]
  88. Kendrick-Jones JC, Voss DM, De Zoysa JR. 88.  2011. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, in patients with end-stage kidney disease on dialysis, in the greater Auckland region, from 2000–2006. Nephrology 16:243–48 [Google Scholar]
  89. Reilly RF. 89.  2008. Risk for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis with gadoteridol (ProHance) in patients who are on long-term hemodialysis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 3:747–51 [Google Scholar]
  90. Wang Y, Alkasab TK, Narin O. 90.  et al. 2011. Incidence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after adoption of restrictive gadolinium-based contrast agent guidelines. Radiology 260:105–11 [Google Scholar]
  91. Martinez-Tello FJ, Navas-Palacios JJ, Ricoy JR. 91.  et al. 1982. Pathology of a new toxic syndrome caused by ingestion of adulterated oil in Spain. Virchows Arch. A Pathol. Anat. Histol. 397:261–85 [Google Scholar]
  92. 92. Centers for Disease Control 1989. Eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome and L-tryptophan-containing products—New Mexico, Minnesota, Oregon, and New York, 1989. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 38:785–88 [Google Scholar]
  93. McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF. 93.  et al. 2015. Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced mr imaging. Radiology 275:772–82 [Google Scholar]
  94. 94. American College of Radiology 2015. Manual of contrast media, Version 10.1 http://www.acr.org/quality-safety/resources/contrast-manual [Google Scholar]
  95. Kadiyala D, Roer DA, Perazella MA. 95.  2009. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis associated with gadoversetamide exposure: treatment with sodium thiosulfate. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 53:133–37 [Google Scholar]
  96. Yerram P, Saab G, Karuparthi PR, Hayden MR, Khanna R. 96.  2007. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a mysterious disease in patients with renal failure—role of gadolinium-based contrast media in causation and the beneficial effect of intravenous sodium thiosulfate. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2:258–63 [Google Scholar]
  97. Gilliet M, Cozzio A, Burg G, Nestle FO. 97.  2005. Successful treatment of three cases of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy with extracorporeal photopheresis. Br. J. Dermatol. 152:531–36 [Google Scholar]
  98. Lauchli S, Zortea-Caflisch C, Nestle FO, Burg G, Kempf W. 98.  2004. Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy treated with extracorporeal photopheresis. Dermatology 208:278–80 [Google Scholar]
  99. Mathur K, Morris S, Deighan C, Green R, Douglas KW. 99.  2008. Extracorporeal photopheresis improves nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy/nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: three case reports and review of literature. J. Clin. Apheresis 23:144–50 [Google Scholar]
  100. Richmond H, Zwerner J, Kim Y, Fiorentino D. 100.  2007. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: relationship to gadolinium and response to photopheresis. Arch. Dermatol 143:1025–30 [Google Scholar]
  101. Wahba IM, White K, Meyer M, Simpson EL. 101.  2007. The case for ultraviolet light therapy in nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy—report of two cases and review of the literature. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 22:631–36 [Google Scholar]
  102. Distler JH, Jungel A, Huber LC. 102.  et al. 2007. Imatinib mesylate reduces production of extracellular matrix and prevents development of experimental dermal fibrosis. Arthritis Rheum. 56:311–22 [Google Scholar]
  103. Kay J, High WA. 103.  2008. Imatinib mesylate treatment of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Arthritis Rheum. 58:2543–48 [Google Scholar]
  104. Chandran S, Petersen J, Jacobs C. 104.  et al. 2009. Imatinib in the treatment of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 53:129–32 [Google Scholar]
  105. Elmholdt TR, Buus NH, Ramsing M, Olesen AB. 105.  2013. Antifibrotic effect after low-dose imatinib mesylate treatment in patients with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: an open-label non-randomized, uncontrolled clinical trial. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 27:779–84 [Google Scholar]
  106. Hope TA, Leboit PE, High WA. 106.  et al. 2013. Evaluation of imatinib mesylate as a possible treatment for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in a rat model. Magn. Reson. Imaging 31:139–44 [Google Scholar]
  107. Minato H, Taki R, Miyachi Y, Utani A. 107.  2009. Symmetrical pigmented sclerosis enclosed by pruritic erythema: a new variant of morphoea?. Br. J. Dermatol. 161:703–6 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-med-063014-124936
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-med-063014-124936
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error