1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science
  4. Volume 67, 2017
  5. Article

Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science

Volume 67, 2017

A New Paradigm for Hadronic Parity Nonconservation and Its Experimental Implications

Abstract

The primary experimental goal of studies of hadronic parity nonconservation (PNC) has long been the isolation of the isovector weak nucleon–nucleon interaction, expected to be dominated by long-range pion exchange and enhanced by the neutral current. In meson-exchange descriptions, this interaction, together with an isoscalar interaction generated by and exchange, dominates most observables. Both amplitudes have been used to compare and check the consistency of experiments, yet no evidence for isovector hadronic PNC has been found. We argue that the emphasis on isovector hadronic PNC was misplaced. The large- expansion provides an alternative and theoretically better-motivated simplification of effective field theories (EFTs) of hadronic PNC, separating the five low-energy constants (LECs) into two of leading order (LO) and three of next-to-next-to-leading order (NLO). We show that this large- LEC hierarchy accurately describes all existing data on hadronic PNC and discuss opportunities to further test the predicted large- LEC hierarchy. This formalism—combined with future experiments—could lead to rapid progress in the next 5 years. We discuss the impact of anticipated new results and describe future experiments that can yield more precise values of the LO LECs and help to isolate the NLO 10% corrections.

Keyword(s): effective field theory, hadronic parity nonconservation, hadronic parity violation
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-041917-033231
2017-10-12
2024-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/nucl/67/1/annurev-nucl-041917-033231.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-041917-033231&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Fry J. 1.  et al. Hyperfine Interact 238:111 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kurth T. 2.  et al. Proc. Sci. LATTICE2015 329 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. Haxton W, Holstein B. 3.  Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71:185 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Phillips DR, Samart D, Schat C. 4.  Phys. Rev. Lett. 114:062301 2015. [Google Scholar]
  5. Schindler MR, Springer RP, Vanasse J. 5.  Phys. Rev. C 93:025502 2016. [Google Scholar]
  6. Donoghue JF, Golowich E, Holstein BR. 6.  Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol. 2:1 1992. [Google Scholar]
  7. Maiani L.7.  Riv. Nuovo Cim. 34:679 2011. [Google Scholar]
  8. Desplanques B, Donoghue JF, Holstein BR. 8.  Ann. Phys. 124:449 1980. [Google Scholar]
  9. Barnes C. 9.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 40:840 1978. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bizetti PG. 10.  et al. Lett. Nuovo Cim. 29:167 1980. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ahrens G. 11.  et al. Nucl. Phys. A 390:486–508 1982. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bini M, Fazzini T, Poggi G, Taccetti N. 12.  Phys. Rev. Lett. 55:795 1985. [Google Scholar]
  13. Page S. 13.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 35:1119 1987. [Google Scholar]
  14. Haxton W.14.  Phys. Rev. Lett. 46:698 1981. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bennett C, Lowrey MM, Krien K. 15.  Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 25:486 1980. [Google Scholar]
  16. Adelberger E. 16.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 27:2833–56 1983. [Google Scholar]
  17. Adelberger EG, Haxton WC. 17.  Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 35:501 1985. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gericke M. 18.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 83:015505 2011. [Google Scholar]
  19. Page SA. 19.  et al. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 110:195 2005. [Google Scholar]
  20. Caviagnac JF, Vignon B, Wilson R. 20.  Phys. Lett. B 67:149 1977. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhu S-L. 21.  et al. Nucl. Phys. A 748:435 2005. [Google Scholar]
  22. Girlanda L.22.  Phys. Rev. C 77:067001 2008. [Google Scholar]
  23. Phillips DR, Schindler MR, Springer RP. 23.  Nucl. Phys. A 822:1 2009. [Google Scholar]
  24. Danilov G.24.  Phys. Lett. 18:40 1965. [Google Scholar]
  25. Danilov G.25.  Phys. Lett. B 35:579 1971. [Google Scholar]
  26. Danilov G.26.  Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 14:443 1972. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee TD, Yang C-N. 27.  Phys. Rev. 104:254 1956. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wu CS. 28.  et al. Phys. Rev. 105:1413 1957. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tanner N.29.  Phys. Rev. 107:1203 1957. [Google Scholar]
  30. Haeberli W, Holstein BR. 30.  arXiv:nucl-th/ 9510062 1995.
  31. Ramsey-Musolf MJ, Page SA. 31.  Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56:1 2006. [Google Scholar]
  32. Krane K, Olsen C, Sites JR, Steyert W. 32.  Phys. Rev. Lett. 26:1579 1971. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yuan V. 33.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 44:2187 1991. [Google Scholar]
  34. Dubovik VM, Zenkin SV. 34.  Ann. Phys. 172:100 1986. [Google Scholar]
  35. Feldman GB, Crawford GA, Dubach J, Holstein BR. 35.  Phys. Rev. C 43:863 1991. [Google Scholar]
  36. Schindler M, Springer R. 36.  Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 72:1 2013. [Google Scholar]
  37. Desplanques B, Missimer JH. 37.  Nucl. Phys. A 300:286 1978. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wasem J.38.  Phys. Rev. C 85:022501 2012. [Google Scholar]
  39. Carlson J, Schiavilla R, Brown V, Gibson B. 39.  Phys. Rev. C 65:035502 2002. [Google Scholar]
  40. Eversheim P. 40.  et al. Phys. Lett. B 256:11 1991. [Google Scholar]
  41. Nagle D. 41.  et al. AIP Conf. Proc. 51:224 1979. [Google Scholar]
  42. Balzer R. 42.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 44:699 1980. [Google Scholar]
  43. Balzer R. 43.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 30:1409 1984. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kistryn S. 44.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58:1616 1987. [Google Scholar]
  45. Berdoz AR. 45.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 68:034004 2003. [Google Scholar]
  46. Berdoz AR. 46.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87:272301 2001. [Google Scholar]
  47. Lang J. 47.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 54:170 1985. [Google Scholar]
  48. Henneck R. 48.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48:725 1982. [Google Scholar]
  49. Elsener K. 49.  et al. Nucl. Phys. A 461:579 1987. [Google Scholar]
  50. Elsener K. 50.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52:1476 1984. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wood C. 51.  et al. Science 275:1759 1997. [Google Scholar]
  52. Snover KA. 52.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 41:145 1978. [Google Scholar]
  53. Earle ED. 53.  et al. Nucl. Phys. A 396:221C 1983. [Google Scholar]
  54. Snow W. 54.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 83:022501 2011. [Google Scholar]
  55. Knyaz'kov VA. 55.  et al. Nucl. Phys. A 417:209 1984. [Google Scholar]
  56. Avenier M. 56.  et al. Phys. Lett. B 137:125 1984. [Google Scholar]
  57. Desplanques B.57.  Nucl. Phys. A 335:147 1980. [Google Scholar]
  58. Liu CP.58.  Phys. Rev. C 75:065501 2007. [Google Scholar]
  59. de Vries J. 59.  et al. Phys. Lett. B 747:299 2015. [Google Scholar]
  60. McKellar B.60.  Phys. Lett. B 26:107 1967. [Google Scholar]
  61. Fischbach E.61.  Phys. Rev. 170:1398 1968. [Google Scholar]
  62. Tadić D.62.  Phys. Rev. 174:1694 1968. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kummer W, Schweda M. 63.  Acta Phys. Aust. 28:303 1968. [Google Scholar]
  64. Fischbach E, Tadić D. 64.  Phys. Rep. 6:123 1973. [Google Scholar]
  65. Box MA, McKellar BHJ, Pick P, Lassey KR. 65.  J. Phys. G 1:493 1975. [Google Scholar]
  66. Patrignani C. 66.  et al. (Part. Data Group) Chin. Phys. C 40:100001 2016. [Google Scholar]
  67. Donoghue JF, Golowich E, Holstein B. 67.  Phys. Rep. 131:319 1986. [Google Scholar]
  68. Barton G.68.  Nuovo Cim 19:512 1961. [Google Scholar]
  69. Glashow SL, Iliopoulos J, Maiani L. 69.  Phys. Rev. D 2:1285 1970. [Google Scholar]
  70. Kaplan DB, Savage MJ. 70.  Nucl. Phys. A 556:653 1993. [Google Scholar]
  71. Kaiser N, Meißner U-G. 71.  Nucl. Phys. A 489:671 1988. [Google Scholar]
  72. Meißner UG, Weigel H. 72.  Phys. Lett. B 447:1 1999. [Google Scholar]
  73. Freeman W, Toussaint D. 73.  (MILC Collab.) Phys. Rev. D 88:054503 2013. [Google Scholar]
  74. Ohki H. 74.  et al. (JLQCD Collab.) Phys. Rev. D 87:034509 2013. [Google Scholar]
  75. Junnarkar P, Walker-Loud A. 75.  Phys. Rev. D 87:114510 2013. [Google Scholar]
  76. Gong M. 76.  et al.(XQCD Collab.) Phys. Rev. D 88:014503 2013. [Google Scholar]
  77. Dai J, Savage MJ, Liu J, Springer RP. 77.  Phys. Lett. B 271:403 1991. [Google Scholar]
  78. Buchalla G, Buras AJ, Lautenbacher ME. 78.  Rev. Mod. Phys. 68:1125 1996. [Google Scholar]
  79. Boyle PA. 79.  et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110:152001 2013. [Google Scholar]
  80. Buras AJ, Gerard J-M, Bardeen WA. 80.  Eur. Phys. J. C 74:2871 2014. [Google Scholar]
  81. Maiani L, Testa M. 81.  Phys. Lett. B 245:585 1990. [Google Scholar]
  82. Huang K, Yang CN. 82.  Phys. Rev. 105:767 1957. [Google Scholar]
  83. Lee TD, Huang K, Yang CN. 83.  Phys. Rev. 106:1135 1957. [Google Scholar]
  84. Wu TT.84.  Phys. Rev. 115:1390 1959. [Google Scholar]
  85. Lüscher M.85.  Commun. Math. Phys. 105:153 1986. [Google Scholar]
  86. Lüscher M.86.  Nucl. Phys. B 354:531 1991. [Google Scholar]
  87. Berkowitz E. 87.  et al. Phys. Lett. B 765:285 2017. [Google Scholar]
  88. Tiburzi B.88.  Phys. Rev. D 86:097501 2012. [Google Scholar]
  89. Kaplan DB, Savage MJ, Wise MB. 89.  Phys. Lett. B 424:390 1998. [Google Scholar]
  90. Epelbaum E, Gloeckle W, Meißner U-G. 90.  Nucl. Phys. A 637:107 1998. [Google Scholar]
  91. Epelbaum E, Gloeckle W, Meißner U-G. 91.  Nucl. Phys. A 671:295 2000. [Google Scholar]
  92. van Kolck U.92.  Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 43:337 1999. [Google Scholar]
  93. Beane SR, Bedaque PF, Savage MJ, van Kolck U. 93.  Nucl. Phys. A 700:377 2002. [Google Scholar]
  94. Epelbaum E, Hammer H-W, Meißner U-G. 94.  Rev. Mod. Phys. 81:1773 2009. [Google Scholar]
  95. Beane SR, Savage MJ. 95.  Nucl. Phys. B 636:291 2002. [Google Scholar]
  96. Marcucci LE, Nollett KM, Schiavilla R, Wiringa RB. 96.  Nucl. Phys. A 777:111 2006. [Google Scholar]
  97. Viviani M. 97.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 82:044001 2010. [Google Scholar]
  98. Desplanques B, Benayoun JJ. 98.  Nucl. Phys. A 458:689 1986. [Google Scholar]
  99. Lobashov VM. 99.  et al. Nucl. Phys. A 197:241 1972. [Google Scholar]
  100. Snow WM. 100.  et al. Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. 40:1660002 2016.); Vanasse J, Schindler MR Phys. Rev. C 90:044001 2014. [Google Scholar]
  101. Avishai Y, Grange P. 101.  J. Phys. G 10:L263 1984. [Google Scholar]
  102. Heckel B.102.  Proceedings of the Workshop on the Investigation of Fundamental Interactions with Cold Neutrons GL Greene 90 Washington, DC: Natl. Bur. Stand 1986. [Google Scholar]
  103. Adelberger E. 103.  Proceedings of the Symposium/Workshop on Parity Violation in Hadronic Systems SA Page, WD Ramsay, WTH Van Oers 50 Vancouver, Can: TRIUMF 1987. [Google Scholar]
  104. Schiavilla R, Carlson J, Paris MW. 104.  Phys. Rev. C 70:044007 2004. [Google Scholar]
  105. Griesshammer HW, Schindler MR, Springer RP. 105.  Eur. Phys. J. A 48:7 2012. [Google Scholar]
  106. Schiavilla R. 106.  et al. Phys. Rev. C 78:014002 2008. Schiavilla R, et al. Erratum Phys. Rev. C 83:029902 (2011); Vanasse J Phys. Rev. C 86:014001 2012. Vanasse J Phys. Rev. C 88:044001 2013. [Google Scholar]
  107. Dmitriev VF, Flambaum VV, Sushkov OP, Telitsin VB. 107.  Phys. Lett. B 125:1 1983. [Google Scholar]
  108. Desplanques B, Benayoun JJ, Gignoux C. 108.  Nucl. Phys. A 324:221 1979. [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-041917-033231
Loading
A New Paradigm for Hadronic Parity Nonconservation and Its Experimental Implications
Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 67, 69 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-041917-033231
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-041917-033231
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-041917-033231
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error